Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Presented By: - Nimika - Prachi - Prerna - Santosh - Shilpa - Yogendra
Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Presented By: - Nimika - Prachi - Prerna - Santosh - Shilpa - Yogendra
Consumer Protection Act, 1986: Presented By: - Nimika - Prachi - Prerna - Santosh - Shilpa - Yogendra
1986
PRESENTED BY:-
•NIMIKA
•PRACHI
•PRERNA
•SANTOSH
•SHILPA
•YOGENDRA
THE PRE-1986 POSITION
Consumer education;
It includes any user of such goods other than the person who actualy
buys goods and such use is made with the approval of the purchaser.
It includes any beneficiary of such service other than the one who
actually hires or avails of the service for consideration and such services
are availed with the approval of such person.
INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION V.
V.P.SHANTHA, (1995), CPJ 1
Services rendered by a medical practitioner for a fee
is ‘service’ within the Act
Even if the employer, Insurance Company pays for
it, still it would be service
Where in a Govt. or non-govt. hospital/NH some pay
and others do not, all would be treated as
‘consumer’ (including those who do not pay)
A token payment for registration is not enough to
bring the hospital/NH in to the definition of ‘service’
In general, the rights of consumers in India can be listed as
under:-ACT1986
Defects
Deficiencies
Unfair Trade Practices
Adulteration Deficiency of services
Spurious goods Non-fulfillment of
Use of guarantee/warrantee
deceptive/incorrect Misleading
rates advertisement
Supply related Hidden prices
problems components
Variation in the Price discrimination
contents of the packet Poor after sales
Defective goods services
Buddhist Mission Dental College & Hospital V. Bhupesh
Khurana & Others (Date of Judgment 13.2.2009 by
Supreme Court)
Fault In the
Imperfection Quality
Shortcoming Quantity
Potency
Purity Or
Standards
Fault
In the
Imperfection
Quality
Shortcoming Or Standard and
Inadequacy
Manner of
performance
Inadequate awareness
Burden on law and order machinery - additional
load
Delays in the judicial system
Deficiency in existing laws
Punishment not enough
Loopholes - bonafide belief by re-seller
No Nodal agency to exclusively deal with the Issue.
No Single window for investigation/enforcement
Recommendations
Make the forums more consumer friendly
Regular product testing
Free legal counseling
Conduct workshops in schools, colleges, village
panchayats and in offices
Encourage consumer clubs
Research on issues on consumer concern
Publish regular articles on current scenarios to keep
the consumer updated with malicious practices
Levy heavy charges on those found guilty under the
consumer protection act.
CONTD…
Strict norms for advertisements and their promises
Regular check on authenticity of the claims made in the
advertisements
The brand ambassadors should be equally held liable if the
brand they promote fails to keep up with its claims.
Rolling back of distributed banned goods
Compensation for product side effects
Routine inspection of plant, storage, manufacturing, logistics
and distribution and upload of data for public usage
MIS information upload for public usage
Real sales info, bad product report, quality check results
about product uploaded for public usage
THANK YOU