Advantages & Disadvantages of Delegated Legislation (Regulation)
Advantages & Disadvantages of Delegated Legislation (Regulation)
Advantages & Disadvantages of Delegated Legislation (Regulation)
Advantages 1) Relieve the workload of parliament - Since it is expensive, cumbersome and time consuming to operate parliamentary process, therefore, the delegated authorities which reside by experts are more appropriate to make law to meet the needs of the community. - Parliaments are more concern on social issue and rule of law. Whereas the delegated authorities is more appropriate to make law to address the technical and administrative details 2) Technical expertise - The parliament is not a forum which make laws on technical and administrative details. - Delegated authorities with skills, experiences, and current knowledge are more able to make laws addressing the technical details. 3) De-centralised decision making - The local councils are more suited to consult with their constituents to devise the laws to meet local needs - Regulation made locally are more able to be respected and accepted by community. - Parliament makes legislation to cover the broad principle whereas the local council makes regulation to address local details. 4) Emergencies - Since a bill must passes through 3 readings in parliament, therefore it is hardly for the parliament to make legislation to deal with emergencies such as SARS. - Therefore, it is more appopriate for delegated authorities to make regulation to deal with it. 5) Administrative convenience - The matters of the government require constant review and updating, and the parliament is not an appropriate forum to do this as it is expensive, time consuming and cumbersome to operate. 6) Political purpose - Without passing through 3 reading stages of parliament, a regulation can be made. - Therefore it is used to evade the scutiny of parliament, which known as "back-door".
1)Undemocratic making law - Since the delegated authorities are not elected by the people, therefore they are not accountable to the regulation made by them. - Hence, it abrogating the democratic responsibility of a government 2) Complexity of the law - Some of the regulations are made were too complex and did not meet the need of the community as well as causing alot of unneccesarry problems to the businessmen. 3) Accessibility and a lack of community awareness - Since the regulations made always according the changes of circumstances, therefore it is hardly for everyone to adapt to the changes of regulations - And, people unwittingly, therefore, often break the law.
that the Privy Council and most of such bodies are simply a means through which the government in the form of the committee of ministers can introduce legislation without disputes and reactions. It is generally acceptable that the ordinary members of Parliament cannot fully understand what is being enacted; partly because of the highly specific and technical phrasing of these Acts and partly because regulations appear outside the context of their enabling legislation. Furthermore, the lack of scrutiny by the ordinary member of Parliament is increased by magnitude of delegated legislation which some times becomes law only because no one was informed about their existence, so to vote against them. Lastly, since the very form of delegated legislation makes it extremely difficult for ordinary members to monitor it effectively, it is impossible for a reasonable man not to question the accountability and erosion of the Parliament. Certain people notably government ministers and the civil servants who work under them have more power that might be thought constitutionally correct. To conclude, it is understandable that delegated legislation is needed at some extent. Still, delegated legislation tends to be used to avoid political cost. It shouldnt be disregarded that in a democratic society, the view of the people who disagree must be heard and taken into account.