STE-10 Research-4 Q1 LC1 MOD1
STE-10 Research-4 Q1 LC1 MOD1
i
Grade 10 STE- Research 4
Alternative Delivery Mode
Quarter 1 – Module 1: EVALUATING THE TITLE PAGE OF RESEARCH PAPER
First Edition, 2020
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in
any work of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the
government agency or office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for
exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office may, among other
things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
ii
10
iii
Most Essential Learning Competency
iv
EVALUATING THE TITLE PAGE
Introduction
Duration: 2 meetings
1
Pre-Test
2
For nos. 4 & 5, refer to the figure below.
October,1997
D
Ms Juanita M. Cruz
4. Evaluate the title page above. Which part is incorrectly done based from the
standards in evaluating a title page?
a. Title c. school
b. Name of researchers d. Date submitted/Name of adviser
How did you find the test? Were you able to answer the
questions correctly? Are you confused of some choices in the
questions? Well, as we proceed with this module, all your
questions or confusions will be answered.
3
Learning Activities
E licit/ Engage
Look at the two pictures below. Which do you think in these two pictures is the
correct title page of a scientific research paper? Why?
A B
What are the characteristics of a good title page of a scientific research paper?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
E xplore
To learn more about
evaluating a title page,
answer the four activities.
4
Activity 1- Recalling Time!!!
Table 1: Suggestions/Recommendations
Part of the Research Paper Suggestions/Recommendations
1. Title Page
2. Abstract
3. Table of Contents
4. Introduction
a. Background of Study
c. Hypothesis
6. Methodology
7. Results
8. Conclusions
9. Bibliography
10. Appendices
5
You’re done listing the suggestions/recommendations
given by the experts/advisers/peers to improve your
research paper. Though you listed all the
suggestions/recommendations to improve the paper,
however in the next activity, you will evaluate only the title
page of your research paper using the given suggestions/
recommendations and the standards (criteria/checklist) for
evaluating a title page. The other parts of the paper will be
evaluated in the next modules.
A. Self-Evaluation
6
B. Peer Evaluation
Directions: Choose a classmate whom you can exchange with the checklist. Send a
hard copy to your classmate and ask him/her to place a check mark on their
answer and write their suggestions in the last column.
7
Activity 3- Time to Revise!!
Directions: Based from the given suggestions/recommendations, you are now task
to revise the title page of your research paper. Attach a copy of a revised title page.
E xplain
Standards for Evaluating the Title page
Title page must include the following parts;
a. The research title, d. School
b. Full name of researchers, e. Date submitted
c. Submission statement f. Full name of research adviser
Research Title
School
Date submitted
8
● The usual length of a research title is 10 to 15 words.
● Use italics for words in a foreign language.
E laborate/ Extend
tend
In the previous activities you performed, you learned that a
title is a brief statement of the topic. It answers the
question, “What did you study?” It clearly identifies the
variables investigated.
Abstract
This study is an evaluation of the feasibility of extracting
gum from Taro (Colocassia esculenta) using solvent and
mechanical extraction and two method of drying, namely, solar
drying and oven-drying and the isolation of pectin as calcium
pectate from the petioles. Results were evaluated in terms of the
average percentage yield of gum and pectin. Tests for pH,
moisture and ash content, and solubility were likewise conducted.
Results show that the yield on sun-dried petioles is not
significantly different from the yield on oven-dried petioles.
Hence, it was shown that the sun-drying method is cheaper and
more beneficial in maximizing the yield of gum from Taro
petioles. It was also found out that pectin can be isolated as
calcium pectate from Taro petioles.
Guide Questions:
1. What is the subject matter of the study?
Recommended Title:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
9
Vocabulary List
10
Post-Test
E valuate
1. Which of the following statements are the standards (criteria) used in
evaluating the Title page of a research paper?
I. Brief but accurate & comprehensive
II. The contents are typed all in uppercases.
III. All contents of the title page are typed centred on the page
IV. The length of a research title does not exceed to 15 words
V. It includes the title, full name of researchers, School & Date submitted
11
For nos. 4 & 5, refer to the figure below.
October,1997 D
Ms Juanita M. Cruz
4. Evaluate the title page above. Which part is incorrectly done based from the
standards in evaluating a title page?
a. Title c. school
b. Name of researchers d. Date submitted/Name of adviser
5. Which of the following is the correct revision of the title page?
a. ALBERT ALLAN CAMACHO
RAINVILLE GONZALES
VIRGO RAMIL RUARO
CHRISTINE AGATHA UNTALAN
12
Answer Keys
Elicit/Engage:
1. A, because it is simple. The title page should be brief.
Explore
Answers may vary.
13
References
Caintic, Helen & Juanito Cruz. Scientific Research Manual . (2008).C & E
Publishing Inc.
14