Case Study Final2.0
Case Study Final2.0
Case Study Final2.0
_____________________________________________
_________________________________
Leader:
Lluvioso, Angelyn L.
Members:
Callera, Lourenz
Ojeda, Vince
2021
i
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION
Defining Terms………………..………………..………………..………………......
Hypothesis ………………..………………..………………..………………………..
10
II. BODY
11
Presentation of Data………………..………………..………………..……………
11
Arguments ………………..………………..………………..……………………….
12
i
Evidences………………..………………..………………..………………………… 13
III. CONCLUSION
Recommendation………………..………………..………………..……………… 20
Concluding statement………………..………………..………………..………… 20
References………………..………………..………………..……………………… 23
ii
INTRODUCTION
History signifies us about the unified strength of people for what they’ve been
through and what story they might tell us about, also the awareness or consciousness it
would provide. It is also an instrument for the better understanding of things around us
We are connected, united and we reign from the past, providing us the path to
the brighter future ahead and shapes our lives, strengthens our faith, and if we want to
truly understand why something happened, only through the study of history can people
really see and grasp the reasons behind these changes, and only through history can
had experienced during their time specifically in the colonial period, where many had felt
hideous oppressions and inferiority to those who had the power or superior in the era of
As we go on through this study, we’ll be able to learn things about the Philippine
History and what happened before as we recall on the phenomena that might give us
the idea about our National Heroes’ experiences and gives us the authentic knowledge
for better discovery and identifications of events for certain time and place of the
phenomena.
The Philippine history has a lot to tell stories hidden beyond our knowledge and
compromise the gaps between the reality of the present, the past and the future to
better acknowledge the path that encompasses with the infinite changes of the world
1
within us and the world beyond our imagination. This study aims to understand the
history of the Philippines especially to the time of the cry of rebellion where as we go on
to the study, we will be identifying the events happened and the places where it
happened, thus will give us a hint to the cry of the rebellion and it’s additional
information to help us give the awareness to other people to appreciate the efforts that
the Filipino citizens had given their all to claim the victory of the land against the
This study aims to know where did the Cry of Rebellion Happen? “Different dates
and places of the cry”. This will give us the fact that must be answered in identifying the
truth behind the “Cry of Rebellion” and what other information we might learn as we go
The findings of this research specifically seek to answer the following questions
1. “Cry of Rebellion”
2. Did the katipuneros gained a success fight for freedom against colonialism of
2
Presentation of the Problem
the Problem contains “Some of the information that need to know about the Cry of
Rebellion” which consist of; What is the Cry of Rebellion all about? Where did the Cry of
Rebellion Happen? When did the Cry of Rebellion Happen? And Who led the Cry of
Rebellions? The result of this case study would be gotten from the internet. And lastly
did the Katipuneros gained a success fight for freedom against colonialism of the
Defining Terms
3
members.
speaking ethnic group native to Spain. Within Spain, there are several national
and regional ethnic identities that reflect the country. Spaniards are the persons
born in Spain.
government.
Hypothesis
This study will seek to identify the cases of the history where the cry of
rebellion took place and what were the concise actions, they had taken up to further
explain their said rebellion and what chances they get in succeeding against the
the lessons behind their rebellion that will serve as guide in identifying other cases
such as the death of the National Heroes of the Philippines and more, thus will help
us see through a wide range of moral acquisition towards a better and intrinsic nature
This study will result to give the facts and pieces of evidence that will certainly
provide us the knowledge about the cases of the cry of rebellion and will make a
general conclusion to the result of the rebellion against the Spaniards if they had
4
gained success and what actions that led to their executions or success in reclaiming
back the territory and the freedom against the invaders of the land.
In this chapter, we will be identifying other studies related to the topic that were
conducted and will give us a brief description about the said topic or the “cry of
rebellion” and the different dates of the phenomena that took our curiosity in touch af
According to the Nineteenth-century journalists who used the phrase "el grito de
rebelion" or "the Cry of Rebellion" to describe the momentous events sweeping the
Spanish colonies. In Mexico, it was the "Cry of Dolores" (September 16th, 1810), Brazil
the "City of Ypiraga" (September 7th, 1822), and in Cuba the "Cry of Matanza"
against the Spanish colonial government. Manuel Sastron, the Spanish Historian,
institutionalized the phrased for the Philippines in his 1897 book, La Insurreccion en
Filipinas. All these "Cries" were milestones in the several colonial-to-nationalist histories
of the world.
Originally, the term cry referred to the first clash between the Katipuneros and
the Civil Guards (Guardia Civil). The cry could also refer to the tearing up of community
inscriptions of "Viva la Independencia Filipina" can also be referred as term for the cry.
5
The controversies in differing accounts by participants and historians have
served to confuse the reader regarding the factual date and place of the event. An
officer of the Spanish guardia civil, Lt. Olegario Diaz, stated that the "Cry" took place in
Balintawak on August 25, 1896. Teodoro Kalaw in his 1925 book The Filipino
Revolution, wrote that the event took place during the last week of August 1896 at
Kangkong, Balintawak. Santiago Alvarez, the son of Mariano Alvarez, the leader of the
Magdiwang faction in Cavite, stated in 1927 that the "Cry" took place in Bahay Toro,
now in Quezon City on August 24, 1896. Pio Valenzuela, a close associate of Andrés
Bonifacio declared in 1948 that it happened in Pugad Lawin on August 23, 1896.
Gregorio Zaide stated in his books in 1954 that the "Cry" happened in Balintawak on
August 26, 1896. Fellow historian Teodoro Agoncillo reported in 1956 that it took place
in Pugad Lawin on August 23, 1896, echoing Pio Valenzuela's statement. Accounts by
Milagros Guerrero, Emmanuel Encarnacion and Ramon Villegas claim the event to
have taken place in Tandang Sora's barn in Gulod, Barangay Banlat, Quezon City. The
marking the location of the "Cry" in Pugad Lawin, Quezon City. The plaque bears the
Due of competing accounts and ambiguity of the place where this event took
place, the exact date and place of the Cry is in contention. From 1908 until 1963, the
official stance was that the cry occurred on August 26 in Balintawak. In 1963 the
August 23, 1896, Andrés Bonifacio and his comrades from the Katipunan society tore
6
their cédulas in the hills of Balintawak. This event is regarded as the starting signal of
If the expression has taken literally –the Cry as the shouting of nationalistic
slogans in mass assemblies –then there were scores of such Cries. Some writers refer
Katipunan members wrote on the cave walls, "Viva la indepencia Filipina!" long before
Agoncillo chose to emphasize Bonifacio's tearing of the cedula (tax receipt) before a
crowd of Katipuneros, who then broke out in cheers. However, Guardia Civil Manuel
Sityar never mentioned the cedula's tearing or inspection in his memoirs (1896-1898).
Still, he did note the pacto de Sangre (blood pact) mark on who he met in August 1896
Some writers consider the first military engagement with the enemy as the
defining moment of the Cry. To commemorate this martial event upon his return from
herald renewed fighting after the failed peace of the pact of Biak na Bato. It is not clear
why the 1911 monument has erected there. It could not have been to mark Apolonio
Samson's house in barrio Kangkong; Katipuneros observed that site on Kaingin Road,
between Balintawak and San Francisco del Monte Avenue. Neither could the 1911
monument have been erected to mark the site of the first armed encounter, which,
incidentally, the Katipuneros fought and won. A contemporary map of 1896 shows that
the August battle between the Katipunan rebels and the Spanish forces led by Lt. Ros
7
of the Civil Guards took place at sitio Banlat, North of Pasong Tamo Road, far from
reference point for a larger area. Second, while Katipunan may have been massing in
and, therefore, historians disagreed on the site and date of the Cry. But the issue did
not rest there. In 1970, the Historian Pedro A. Gagelonia pointed out: The controversy
among historians continues to the present day. The "Cry of Pugad Lawin" cannot be
evidence from the witness. The testimony of only one eyewitness (Dr. Pio Valenzuela)
is not enough to authenticate and verify a controversial issue in history. Historians and
their living participants, not politicians and their sycophants, should settle this
controversy.
The “First Cry of Revolution” became the movement of the Filipinos to fight back
on the tyrannical rule of the Spanish regime; it is also called as the “First Cry”, the
revolution of independence. In this scenario the Filipinos tore their cedulas (tax
receipt) and proclaimed the start to fight for independence-the main goal. The news of
the existence of Katipunan spread throughout Manila and so, Andres Bonifacio, the
Supreme leader of the Katipunan organized a meeting outside the city particular in
Balintawak to talk about their next movement for the revolution against Spaniards.
According to him, the start of the revolution will begin at the end of month of August.
Dr. Pio Valenzuela has been authorized the ‘’Cry of Pugad Lawin, who
happened to eyewitness the event. He was also an official of the Katipunan and a
8
friend of Andres Bonifacio. There were two versions presented by him. In his first
version, he said that the prime staging point of the Cry was in Balintawak on
Wednesday of August 26, 1896. He held this account when the happenings or events
are still vivid in his memory. On the other hand, later in his life and with a fading
memory, he wrote his Memoirs of the Revolution without consulting the written
documents of the Philippine revolution and claimed that the ‘’Cry’’ took place at Pugad
Katipunero from Cavite and a son of Mariano Alvarez. Santiago is a relative of Gregoria
de Jesus, who happened to be the wife of Andres Bonifacio. Unlike the author of the
event. As a result, this version of him is not given of equal value as compared with the
other versions for authors of other accounts are part of the historic event.
an interview with the Sunday Tribune magazine, Masangkay said that the First Cry
happened in Balintawak on August 26, 1896. In the first decade of American rule, it
was his account that was used by the government and civic officials to fix date and
place of the First Cry which was capped with the erection of the ‘’Monument to the
Bagong Buhayon August 26, 1957, Masangkay changed his narrative stating that the
revolution began on August 23, 1896, like the assertion of Dr. Pio Valenzuela. But
9
Masangkay’s date was later changed again when his granddaughter, Soledad
Buehler- Borromeo, cited sources, including the Masangkay papers, that the original
Another version was written by no other than the “Lakambini of the Katipunan”
and wife Andres Bonifacio, Gregoria de Jesus. She has been a participant of this
event and became the keeper of the secret documents of the Katipunan. After the
revolution in August 1896, she lived with her parents in Caloocan then fled to Manila
when she was told that the Spanish authorities wanted to arrest her. Eventually, she
joined her husband in the mountains and shared adversities with him. In her account,
more than 300 years of Spanish colonial rule, exposed the weakness of Spanish
U.S. Army.
School. This case study would benefit the school to have an existing study on
the research topic, they would be able to understand some of the information
about the Cry of Rebellion and use it as a guide to help the future researchers
10
Teacher. This study will help them give some important information to their
students, molding the minds and shaping the information we gathered. The
information gathered will be concrete evidence of where did the Cry of Rebellion
Students. This study is significant to the students to know where did the Cry of
Rebellion Happen, the “Different dates and Place of the Cry”, and to better
understand the situation of the past and look through a better future ahead of
them.
II. BODY
This study aims to identify the facts and the said dates of the phenomenal start
that was carved among the records of history of the Philippines and, to give us a better
understanding about what happened. Pieces of evidence that prove the primary sources
that led to confusion as to when the commencement of the raging battle cry of the
Filipino citizens or the legendary Katipuneros that set the dim fire of rebellion ablaze
There are other controversies that led to confusions about the dates and facts
about the rebellion which makes it harder for others to truly understand the phenomena.
This study is for us to give a better idea or information that will give a valid and
concrete information about the cry of rebellion and the dates about the phenomena,
thus will give interest to readers that will persuade them and give burst to their curiosity
11
in finding out the truth about the history of the Philippines and what conclusion they can
Presentation of Data
This study aims to understand the cry of rebellion in the Philippines, where did
the cry happens, when did the cry happens, who lead the cry and lastly did the
katipuneros succeed using arm revolution to fight our freedom against the Spaniards.
Using different data from the internet we gathered and collected to come up with a
specific answer. Using the eyewitness accounts or the primary sources of the different
studies, we compared their accounts to have an understanding on the exact date and
katipunan, Mabuhay ang Pilipinas” while tearing their cedulas. This study aims to
spread the truth using the right resource and evidence that will be presented.
By understanding the different perspective of the primary source, the reader will
realize that it is not easy to study history, it needs a lot of proofs and evidence to prove
history itself. It will make them realize too whether the story is fake or not. This study
aims to make the readers realized that before believing a story you must prove it first.
This study also aims to strengthen the discipline within ourselves when it comes to
history. We have to know the different information about the cry because somewhat in
the near future some of the historian will find sources and evidence on that particular
event and knowing the different facts of the cry, we connect those evidence to come up
12
Arguments
The purpose of this study is to understand the facts about the cry of rebellion.
Knowing the facts about this event will give us clarification to the misconception about
the phenomena. We must know that the facts use the right evidence and not by gossip.
Another purpose of this study is to know our identity as a Filipino. As a Filipino we must
understand the facts about what happen in our history specifically the cry of rebellion,
the initiative in fighting the independence of the Philippines during Spanish regime.
This study will help not just the students, the teachers but also the future
researchers to give them an upright and see through a wide range of understanding to
the study and make their own as an instrument for a bright and exquisite selves
Evidence
The first place of refuge of Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Jacinto, Procopio Bonifacio,
Teodoro Plata, Aguedo del Rosario, and myself was Balintawak, the first five arriving
there on August 19, and I, on August 20, 1896. The first place where some 500
members of the Katipunan met on August 22, 1896 was the house and yard of Apolonio
Samson at Kangkong. Aside from the persons mentioned above, among those who
Samson, and others. Here, views were only exchanged, and no resolution was debated
or adopted. It was at PugadLawin, in the house, store- house and yard of Juan Ramos,
son of Melchora Aquino, where over 1,000 members of the Katipunan met and carried
13
out considerable debate and discussion on August 29, 1896. Only one man protested
and fought against a war and that was Teodoro Plata. Besides the persons named
above, among those present at this meeting were Enrique Cipriano, Alfonso Pacheco,
Tomas Remigio, Sinforoso San Pedro, and others. After the tumultuous meeting many
of those present tore their cedula certificates and shouted “ Long live the Philippines!
We started our trek to Kangkong at about eleven that night. We walked through
the rain over dark expanses of muddy meadows and fields. Our clothes drenched and
our bodies numbed by the cold wind, we plodded wordlessly. It was nearly two in the
crowded into the house to rest and warm ourselves. We were so tired that, after
The Supremo began assigning guards at five o’ clock the following morning,
another at the backyard to the north of the house where we were gathered…No less
than three hundred men assembled at the bidding of the Supremo Andres Bonifacio.
Altogether, they carried assorted weapons, bolos, spears, daggers, a dozen small
revolvers and a rifle used by its owner, one Lieutenant Manuel, for hunting birds. The
Supremo Bonifacio was restless because of fear of a sudden attack by the enemy. He
was worried over the thought that any of the couriers carrying the letter sent by Emilio
Jacinto could have been intercepted; and in that eventuality, the enemy would surely
know their whereabouts and attack them on the sly. He decided that it was better to
14
move to a site called Bahay Toro At ten o’ clock that Sunday morning, 23 August
1896, we arrived at Bahay Toro. Our number had grown to more than 500 and the
Katipuneros. The generous hospitality of Cabesang Melchora was no less than that of
Apolonio Samson. Like him, she also opened her granary and he had plenty of rice
The following day, Monday, 24 August, more Katipuneros came and increased
our number to more than a thousand. The Supremo called a meeting at ten o ‘clock that
morning inside CabesangMelchora’s barn. Flanking him on both sides at the head of the
table were Dr. Pio Valenzuela, Emilio Jacinto, BriccioPantas, Enrique Pacheco, Ramon
and others. We were so crowded that some stood outside the barn.
the situation arise where the enemy was at a disadvantage. Thus, the uprising
could be started earlier than the agreed time of midnight 29 August 1896 should
a favorable opportunity arise at that date. Everyone should steel himself and be
After the adjournment of the meeting at twelve noon, there were tumultuous shouts of
15
‘’ Long live the Sons of the People!’’
On August 26, a big meeting was held in Balintawak, at the house of Apolonio
Samson, then the cabeza of that barrio of Caloocan. Among those who attended, I
remember, were Bonifacio, Emilio Jacinto, Aguedo del Rosario, Tomas Remigio,
Carreon. They were all leaders of the Katipunan and composed the board of directors
of the organization. Delegates from Bulacan, Cabanatuan, Cavite, and Morong (now
At about nine o’ clock in the morning of August 26, the meeting was opened
with Andres Bonifacio presiding and Emilio Jacinto acting as secretary. The purpose
was to discuss when the uprising was to take place. Teodoro Plata, Briccio Pantas,
and Pio Valenzuela were all opposed to starting the revolution too early. They
reasoned that the people would be in distress if the revolution were started without
adequate preparation. Plata was very forceful in his argument, stating that the
uprising could not very well be started without arms and food for the soldiers.
Valenzuela used Rizal’s argument about the rich not siding with the Katipunan
organization.
Andres Bonifacio, sensing that he would lose in the discussion then left the
session hall and talked to the people who were waiting outside for the result of the
meeting of the leaders. He told the people that the leaders were arguing against
starting the revolution early and appealed to them in a fiery speech in which he said: ‘’
You remember the fate of our countrymen who were shot in Bagumbayan. Should we
16
return now to the towns, the Spaniards will only shoot us. Our organization has been
discovered and we are all marked men. If we don’t start the uprising, the Spaniards
will get us anyway. What then, do you say? “Revolt,’’ the people shouted as one.
Bonifacio then asked the people to give a pledge that they were to revolt. He
said that the sign of slavery of the Filipinos were (sic) the cedula tax charged each
citizen. ‘’ If it is true that you are ready to revolt, ‘’ Bonifacio said, ‘’I want to see you
destroyed your cedulas. It will be the sign that all of us have declared our severance
from the Spaniards.’’ With tears in their eyes, the people, as one man, pulled out their
cedulas and tore them to pieces. It was the beginning of the formal declaration of the
When the people’s pledge was obtained by Bonifacio, he returned to the session hall
and informed the leaders of what took place outside. ‘’ The people want to revolt, and
they destroyed their cedulas, ‘’ Bonifacio said, ‘’ So now we have to start the uprising,
otherwise the people by hundreds will be shot.” There was no alternative. The board of
directors, in spite of the protest of Plata, Pantas, Valenzuela, voted for the revolution.
And when this was decided, the people outside shouted, “Long live the Philippine
Republic.”
“The activities of the Katipunan had reached nearly all corners of the Philippine
Archipelago, so that when its existence was discovered and some of the members
watched by the agents of the Spanish authorities, Andres Bonifacio and other
Katipuneros left the town after some days. It was then that the uprising began, with
17
the first cry for freedom on August 25, 1896. Meanwhile, I was with my parents.
Through my friends, I learned that Spanish were coming to arrest me. Immediately, I
fled town at eleven o’ clock at night, secretly going through the rice fields to La Lorna,
with the intention of returning to Manila. I was treated like an apparition, for, sad to
say, in every house where I tried to get a little rest, I was driven away as if people
therein were frightened for their own lives. Later, I found out that the occupants of the
houses which I had visited were seized and severely punished – and some even
exiled. One of them was an uncle of mine whom I had visited on that night to kiss his
Where Did the Cry of Rebellion Happen? - Momentous events swept the
of the time referred to the phrase “El Grito de Rebelion” or “Cry of Rebellion” tomark
the start of these revolutionary events, identifying the places where it happened.- In
the Philippines, the Cry of Rebellion happened in August 1896, northeast of Manila,
wherethey declared rebellion against the Spanish colonial government.- These events
are important markers in the history of colonies that struggled for theirindependence
the event when Bonifacio tore thecedula or tax receipt before the Katipuneros who
also did the same.- Some writers identified the first military event with the Spaniards
Balintawak” to inspire the renewedstruggle after the Pact of the Biak-na- Bato
failed.Different Dates and Places of the CryVarious accounts of the Cry give different
dates and places.1.A guardia civil, Lt. Olegario Diaz identified the Cry to have
18
happened in Balintawak onAugust 25, 1896.2.Teodoro Kalaw, a Filipino historian,
Magdiwangfaction in Cavite, put the Cry in Bahay Toro in Quezon City on August 24,
1896.4.Pio Valenzuela, known Katipunero and privy to many events concerning the
Katipunanstated that the Cry happened in Pugad Lawin on August 23, 1896.
This study emphasizes the different dates and places of the cry of rebellion, there
are also conflicts when it comes to the dates and time of the cry because of the different
information that the eyewitnesses or source had provided. But knowing them all is worth
acquiring because they are primary sources of the event, acquisition of those
knowledge is in fact valuable for it might be possible that in the near future evidence
from the past might be useful and will equipped us to what we will face ahead. Having
19
III. CONCLUSION
Recommendation
Philippines standard when it comes to the date and place of the cry of rebellion. As far
as this study concerns, they are the one who have a deep understanding about the cry
of rebellion it is because they have the accounts and evidence about that particular
event and such institution has the capability in having the best analysis of the event.
We the researchers of this study (Where did the Cry of Rebellion Happen?
“Different dates and Place of the Cry”) recommends conducting further studies on how
20
the Cry of Rebellion helpful for our new generation or in other term for this millennial
generation.
Concluding statement
This study was all about Where did the Cry of Rebellion Happen. Thus, the cry
of rebellion was on August 1896 and is one of the most important events in the
history of the Philippines. Where did the Filipinos declared rebellion against the
Spanish colonial authorities? The cry of rebellion happened in August 1896 at the
northeast of Manila and there were a lot of day on when it really happened, and the
present dates were between. August 23 to 26. Using the primary and secondary
sources it happened in the four places: Balintawak, Kangkong, Pugad Lawin, and
Bahay Toro while the dates differ in 23,24,25 and 26 th of August 1986. Base in
Wednesday,26th of August in Balintawak but he also said in his work “Memoirs of the
Masangkay “The Cry” happened at Balintawak on August 26, 1896, the meeting was
held at the house of Apolinio Samson in Balintawak. The cry of rebellion led by Emilio
Aguinaldo and the members of katipuneros led by Andres Bonifacio. This happening
become the foundation of the Filipinos to become one to fight against the Spanish
Government to fight for the freedom of the Filipinos. We can’t enjoy the freedom that
Mabuhay ang Pilipinas” while tearing their cedulas, eyewitness accounts and historian
21
has a different date on the cry but the majority of those information is echoing to Pio
Valenzuela’s statement, one of that is the historian Teodoro Agoncillo, who reported
that it took place in Pugad Lawin on August 23, 1896. Another that support this claim is
the interview published in the newspaper Bagong Buhayon August 26, 1957,
Masangkay changed his narrative stating that the revolution began on August 23, 1896.
Enough information that the Philippine government declared a shift on the date and
place of the cry to August 23 in Pugad Lawin, Quezon City. The tearing up of cedula
didn’t gained success in fighting the freedom against colonialism of the Spaniards. It is
just a remark that the revolutionary army of the Philippines are ready to fight against the
Spanish sovereignty. In fact, the one who defeated the Spaniards are the Americans,
the revolutionary army of the Philippines continue their fight for freedom against
the cedula in August 23,1896, which is a remark of the Cry of the Rebellion and led to
Philippines has placed a commemorative plaque marking the location of the "Cry" in
Pugad Lawin, Quezon City, The plaque bears the date August 23, 1896.
22
References
Rex Bookstore.
23
https://www.britannica.com/event/Philippine-American-War. Accessed 21
October 2021.
24