PREFACE

Give credit where credit is due.

However, for the DepEd Northern Samar Division, a Reward and
Recognition Manual necessitates the process of giving due credits in
order to capture the why and wherefore of its raison d’être.
Adherent to the Civil Service Commission PRIME-HRM (Program to
Institutionalize Meritocracy and Excellence in Human Resource
Management), the Schools Governance Operations Division Human
Resource Development Section (SGOD HRDS) takes the initiative to
leverage the program implementation by ensuring quality and excel-
lent practice of assessing, assisting, and awarding a DepEd person-
nel who is exemplary, commendable, and outstanding. Hence, this
Division-Based Reward and Recognition Manual.

Composed of teachers, school heads and division personnel as writ-

er-developers, this RRM underwent the rigors of planning and work-
shop from its development, enhancement, field-testing, validation
and finalization.
Pursuant to DepEd Order 9, s. 2002 as reinforced by DepEd Order
78, s. 2007 entitled Strengthening the Program on Awards and In-
centives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) of the Department of Edu-
cation, and guided by specific categories, criteria, scoring, and need-
ed means of verifications (MOVs), this Manual shall serve as an easy
reference in ensuring that the most outstanding DepEd Northern
Samar Division Personnel is duly recognized and awarded.
This innovation is a harvest of excellence.

-Lex and Red-

HRD Specialists

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

Preface ……………………………………………………………… i
Table of Contents…………………………………………………. ii
Rationale …………………………………………………………… iii
Message of the Schools Division Superintendent ………… v
Division-Based Guidelines on the Selection of the
Outstanding DepEd Northern Samar Personnel ……… 1
Composition of the PRAISE Committees ………………....... 1
Procedures for Nominating, Evaluating and Identifying
Outstanding Teacher, Kindergarten Teacher, SPED
Teacher, Multi-Grade Teacher, Master Teacher,
Department Head (Secondary) and Guidance
Counselor ……………………………………………………… 2
Procedures for Nominating, Evaluating and Identifying
Outstanding Teacher in-Charge (TIC) Head Teacher,
Principal and Principal in-Charge (PIC)…………………. 3
Procedures for Nominating, Evaluating and Identifying
Outstanding CID, SGOD & OSDS Personnel………….. 3
Basic Qualifications …………………………………………….. 3
List of Requirements ……………………………………………. 3
Definition of Terms ……………………………………………... 4
Evaluation Guidelines and Score Sheets……………………. 7
Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
Teacher, Kindergarten Teacher, SpEd Teacher
Multi-grade Teacher ………………………………………… 7
Score Sheet for Outstanding Teacher, Kindergarten
Teacher, SpEd Teacher & Multi-grade Teacher...……. 11
Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
Master Teacher ……………………………………………… 14
LUPAD Score Sheet for Outstanding Master Teacher ……………. 16
(Lyrics: Sylvia D. Villanueva Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
Musical Arrangement: Antonio P. Dugan Jr.) Guidance Counselor (full-fledged or designate)………. 18
Score Sheet for Outstanding Guidance Counselor
Kun diin man may eskwelahan, (full-fledged or designate)………………………….………. 20
Kita an tag-undong san pag-
Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
aradman, ug suna sini nga Kun nano man an agian Principal (Elementary and Secondary, full-fledged),
kalibungan. Bukid, bungto, sa dagat man, Teacher in-Charge, Head Teacher, Department Head,
Kabataan at pagsirbihan. Head Teacher-Designate, PIC (with School) ………….. 22
An tuna nga at natawhan, naugop Score Sheet for Outstanding Principal (Elementary
and Secondary, Teacher in-Charge, Elementary School
san mga kabataan. Repeat Chorus Head/Head Teacher…………………………….……. 24
Katirok kita, burublig kita, pagkab- Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
ot san aton mga tinguha At paglaom mga kabataan, Public Schools District Supervisor,
Sarayo kita, lupad kita, sugad san Magturutdo sa serbisyo nagtutuman Principal in-Charge (without School)……………………. 27
Score Sheet for Outstanding Public Schools District
nasirit nga agila DepEd Norte aton pasalamatan, Supervisor, Principal in-Charge (without school)…….. 29
Ngan an Dyos aton pasidunggan Evaluation Guide for the Selection of Outstanding
Chorus District ALS Coordinator and Mobile Teacher ………… 31
Lupad kita mga Nortehanon Score Sheet for Outstanding District ALS
Coordinator and Mobile Teacher …………………………. 34
Abota an panganuron Repeat Chorus 2x Evaluation Guide for the selection of Outstanding
Ungod nga pag-uswag SGOD, CID and OSDS Personnel…………………………. 36
Aton hingyapon Bulig, uswag, lupad…. Nortehanon! Score Sheet for the Selection of Outstanding
Kadasig kita mga Nortehanon. SGOD, CID, and OSDS Personnel…………………………….. 39
Other General Provisions……………………………………….. 40
Acknowledgment …………………………………………………… 41
42 ii
RATIONALE
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

“Motivation is the art of getting people do what you want them to do

because they want to do it.” – Dwight E. Eisenhower

A gratifying work community comprised of motivated employees

engenders productivity and excellence. This is but the primordial and
optimum reason that this document has come into fruition.
The Civil Service Commission, through Memorandum Circular
No. 1, s. 2011, institutionalized the Program on Awards and Incen-
tives for Service Excellence (PRAISE). This program promotes every
department or agency to establish its own employee suggestions and
incentives awards system. The established system shall be designed
to encourage creativity, innovativeness, efficiency, integrity and
productivity in the public service by recognizing and rewarding offi- Writers/Developers: Rey F. Bulawan. Noe M. Hermosilla. Atty
cials and employees for their suggestions, inventions, superior ac- Risty A. Adrayan. Atty. Cesar Norman Calamay. Elna D. Enano.
complishments and other personal efforts which contribute to the Emily M. Adrayan. Lucila R. Balondo. Sylvia Villanueva. Nelida
efficiency, economy or other improvement in government operations, Lobos. Julito E. Lagrimas. Sonia Esteria. Michelle D. Caguimbal.
or for other extra-ordinary acts or services in the public interest. Roberto T. Orias Jr. Cesario Maglente (+). Deah A. Gamao. Joce-
lyn Acebuche. Merlita B. Fajardo. Maida Broto. Rodel C. Lutao.
In consonance with the aforementioned resolution, the Depart- Pablo Eufracio. Esther Dela Cruz. Carlos Balanquit. Racquel G.
ment of Education through its Department Order No. 9, s. 2002 es- Perfas. Gigi Cabullo. Leonor Bido. Silvano Pinca. Roberto
tablished its own PRAISE system which aims to encourage, recog- Galono. Ma. Helena V. Alumbres. Roselyn Galdones. Omar O.
nize, and reward employees for innovative ideas, discoveries, innova- Ty. Nedy D. Tingzon. Emma Merino. Lenore Salor. Diana Flor
tions, heroic deeds, exemplary behavior and extraordinary acts or Divina Eco. Edelma O. Blasquillo. Rosalyn A. Sosing. Nimfa
services. Furthermore, DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015 set forth the Sanico. Rico Baladad. Laarni Corcondia Mantilla. Michelle M.
guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Results- Probadora. Villa Jean Avila. Mary Ann Tacmo. Glenn Patrick D.
Based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department Catucod. Edilma Cabacang. Evelyn Virtudes. Maria Alma Cela-
of Education. The guidelines stipulate the specific mechanisms, crite- jes. Rosalie Matic. Hubert Ebuenga. McDeo Borromeo. Peter R.
ria and processes for the performance target setting, monitoring and Bobiles. Eufemio D. Adarayan Jr. Michael Jay Morales. Elmer B.
evaluation and development planning for schools and employees cov- Gamba. Mark Jil C. Abayon. Medardo D. Baylon III. Jajomar B.
ering all officials and employees. Ostan.

Proponents: Felix J. Ladeño and Redem D. Tingzon

iii 41
8. OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS These are the legal bases which prompted the people behind
8.1 Program and Project implementers duly recognized, this cumbersome task to work on the creation of contextualized
acknowledged, and awarded by DepEd Regional Office and guidelines on the Reward and Recognition System for the Division of
Central Office shall automatically be included in the Northern Samar. With the aim to elevate public sector HR to a level of
Pasidungog within one (1) year when the award was given excellence through a process of assessment, assistance and recogni-
and shall be recognized as Outstanding Program and Project tion, the Human Resource Management and Development personnel
Implementer. exhaust all means to be strategic HR implementers.

8.2. The Official Results of the Division Selection Process shall In order to realize this ambition, DepEd N. Samar through the
be posted at the Schools Division Office’s bulletin board. School Governance and Operations Division (SGOD) Human Re-
source Development Section (HRDS) took the initiative to institution-
8.3 In case of protest, the aggrieved party may file his/her pro-
alize the Reward and Recognition System, which will pave the way to
test within five (5) calendar days after the official result has
realizing its dream to become PRIME HR in the Department of Educa-
been posted in conspicuous places by the School/District/
tion.
Division PRAISE Committee.
This reward and recognition system for employees is of para-
mount importance for it offers a myriad of benefits and positive ef-
fects not only to the employees but to the department or agency as a
whole. This will further enable the employees to reflect and recognize
that their work is valued and appreciated. It will boost their sense of
ownership and belonging in the workplace, improve morale, enhance
loyalty, help build supportive work environment, increase employee
motivation and improve employee retention.

Ultimately, it shall contribute to the attainment of the depart-

ment’s vision and mission and consequently attain a quality and lib-
erating education.

40 iv
MESSAGE FROM THE SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT 7.6.d. Score sheet for the selection of Outstanding SGOD, CID and
OSDS Personnel
Excellence? Let it be defined by one’s competence and character.
Criteria Scoring Allotted Means of Verification
The finalized Reward and Recognition Guidelines encrypted in this
Manual aims to recognize those who have sought the narrow path, paid the System Score (MOVs) To be required
price, and delivered the goods. The requirements set herein are for those who from the candidate /
are not fainthearted, ordinary, nor mediocre. Those who shall meet the de- nominee
mands of this tenuous yet weighty document are only those who have proven
themselves to have set exceptional goals, worked hard, and gone beyond expec-
tations. All these are imbued in the whole being-mind, body and soul-of those I. Performance Rating 50 Approved IPCRF
who can be distinctively called compentent. II. Outstanding Em- 5 Certificate of Recogni-
ployee Award tion/Appreciation
I admire the men and women of DepEd Northern Samar who have
plowed the ground, watered the soil and planted the seeds so that we will have III. Research & Devel- 5 Indorsement Research
a harvest of extraordinary fruits. This manual is one of the many. When used opment Paper
with diligence and prudence, this will invite more members of our DepEd family IV. Innovations 5 Action plan, Project
to aim higher knowing that their labor will be paid off. Each recognition shall
serve as a validation that what they do in their respective assignments is indeed proposal
rewarding. V. Publication/ Author- 5 Book/ Paper/ Docu-
ship ment Published or
But let us not be content of a man’s tangible produce. Let us raise the Authored
bar higher by digging into his character-the intention of the heart, integrity and VI. Resource Speaker- 5 Certificate of Recogni-
attitude. For what shall profit a man who has collected all trophies but has al- ship/Learning Facilita- tion/ Appreciation
lowed his heart to rot in darkness? No, not with DepEd. We shall help our men tor
and women seek higher meaning of their existence. This can only be done when VII. Training 5 Certificate of Participa-
each is able to do the right things with the right intention, at the right time, and
for the right purpose. But how do you integrate this criterion in such a stiff and tion
objective manual as this? Maybe, a new challenge to the Human Resource De- VIII. Education 10 TOR
velopment Section specialists and to all those who have poured their philoso-
IX. Potential 5 Behavioral events in-
phies, ideals and ingenuities into this innovative pursuit.
terview
As I formally pen my name towards the institutionalization of this Re- X. Psychosocial Attrib- 5 Character Reference,
ward and Recognition Manual, my sincerest appreciation and highest salute go utes Background investiga-
to all who have braved the journey just so our personnel, both teaching and
tion
non-teaching will be prodded to dream more, do more, and reach more for the
children. For at the end of the day, the victory belongs to these little ones who TOTAL 100
shall one day lead this land.

Congratulations! _____________________________ _____________________________

signature over printed name signature over printed name
“Run in such a way as to get the prize. Everyone who competes in the PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
games goes into strict training. They do it get a crown that will not last; but we
do it to get a crown that will last forever.” – I Corinthiians 9: 24-25 _____________________________ _____________________________
signature over printed name signature over printed name
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member

BERNARDO A. ADINA, CESO VI _____________________________

Schools Division Superintendent signature over printed name
PRAISE Committee Chair

v 39
IX Potential 1.1 Communication skills 5 Behavioral
DIVISION-BASED GUIDELINES ON THE SELECTION OF THE
1.2 Ability to present ideas events inter-
1.3 Alertness view
OUTSTANDING DEPED NORTHERN SAMAR PERSONNEL
1.4 Judgment
1.5 Leadership Ability
1. COMPOSITION OF THE PRAISE COMMITTEES
X Psycho- 1.1 Human Relations 5 Character
social 1.2 Decisiveness reference, School Level District Level Division Level
Attrib- 1.3 Stress Tolerance Background
utes investigation
Small Schools
TOTAL POINTS 100
Chairman – School Head Chairman - District Chairman - SDS
Members Head Co-Chair - ASDS
1. Master Teacher or Members Members
Head Teacher or Most 1. Most senior elemen- 1. CID Chief
Senior Teacher (in tary principal in 2. SGOD Chief
terms of position) terms of position 3. HRMO/HRD
2. GPTA President or his/ 2. Most senior second- Specialist
her representative ary school principal 4. Educ. Program
in terms of position Supervisor
3. A school head elect 5. Division Feder
Large Schools ed by all the school ated PTA Presi
heads in the district dent or his/her
to be a member of representative
Chairman – School Head
the Committee
Members
4. President of the
1. Master Teacher
District Federated
2. Head Teacher or Grade
PTA or his/her rep-
Chairman
resentative
3. President of Teachers
Association
4. PTA President or his/
her representative

38 1
2. PROCEDURE FOR NOMINATING, EVALUATING AND IDENTIFY- V Publica- • National Level (5) 5 Book/ Pa-
tion/ • Regional Level (4) per/ Docu-
ING OUTSTANDING TEACHER, KINDERGARTEN TEACHER,
Authorship ment Pub-
SPED TEACHER, MULTI-GRADE TEACHER, MASTER TEACH- • Division Level (3)
lished or
ER, DEPARTMENT HEAD (Secondary) and GUIDANCE COUNSE Authored
LOR VI Resource Speakership in train- Certificate of
5
Speaker- ings/ seminars at: Recogni-
2.1 The School PRAISE committee shall conduct a selection procedure ship/ • National Level (5) tion/ Appre-
at the school level. The prescribed evaluation template shall be used in Learning • Regional Level (4) ciation
evaluating the document of the candidates. Facilitator
• Division Level (3)
2.2 The candidate with the highest score shall be nominated to the
district level. A nomination form shall be duly accomplished and all the VII Education • Doctoral Degree (5) 10 TOR
other requirements, as reflected in the list, shall be submitted by the • CAR for Doctoral De-
School PRAISE Committee Chairperson to the District PRAISE Com- gree (4)
mittee. Attached to the nomination is a documentation (pictorials, • Master’s Degree (3)
ACR, etc.) of the actual conduct of the school selection procedure.
• CAR for Master’s De-
gree (2)
2.3 The District PRAISE Committee shall validate and evaluate the
VIII Training 1.1 Participant in DepEd 5 Certificate of
forwarded documents using the same evaluation template. The district
accredited trainings con- Recogni-
nominee with the highest score shall be nominated to the Division
ducted at: Corre- tion/
PRAISE Committee as the district nominee. The District PRAISE Com-
• International Level (1) sponding Appreciation
mittee is likewise required to submit to the Division PRAISE Committee
• National Level (0.75) points
a documentation (pictorials, ACR, etc.) of the actual conduct of the
shall be
district selection procedure. • Regional Level (0.5)
given per
• Division Level (0.25) training
2.4 The Division PRAISE Committee shall review the documents of the but shall
district nominees vis-à-vis their score sheets. Only the TOP FIVE Dis- not exceed
trict Nominees shall be called for the division interview. The district 5 points
nominee with the highest final score after the Division Interview shall
be named as the Division Awardee. 1.4 Chair/Co-Chair in Corre-
technical planning in sponding
2.5 In case of a tie at any level, the Division PRAISE Committee shall any training, orientation points
examine the IPCRFs of the nominees. The nominee with the highest or workshop conducted shall be
IPCRF numerical rating gets the nomination/award. In case all nomi- at: given per
nees display the same IPCRF numerical rating, all nominees shall be • International Level (1) chairman-
recognized. • National Level (0.75) ship/ co-
• Regional Level (0.5) chairman-
2.6 Any member of the PRAISE Committee who is related to a candi- ship but
• Division Level (0.25)
date/nominee up to fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity shall shall not
inhibit himself/herself from evaluating the documents and interview- exceed 5
ing a particular candidate/nominee. points

2 37
7.6.c. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding SGOD, CID 3. PROCEDURE FOR NOMINATING, EVALUATING AND IDENTIFY-
ING OUTSTANDING TEACHER IN-CHARGE, HEAD TEACHER,
and OSDS Personnel
PRINCIPAL and PRINCIPAL IN-CHARGE
Par Criteria Scoring System Allotted Means of Verifi-
3.1 The District PRAISE committee shall conduct a selection procedure
t Score cation (MOVs)
at the district level. The prescribed evaluation template shall be used
To be required in evaluating the documents of the candidates. The candidate with the
from the candi- highest score shall be nominated to the division level. A nomination
form, duly accomplished and all the other requirements, as reflected in
date / nominee the list, shall be submitted by the District PRAISE Committee Chair-
I. Performance Formula: 50 Approved IPCRF person to the Division PRAISE Committee.
rating of at with correspond-
least VS for TWS / 5 x 100 x 0.5 ing MOVs 3.2 The Division PRAISE Committee shall review and validate the doc-
the last uments of the district nominees vis-à-vis their score sheets. After
three (3) rat- which, each nominee shall be interviewed. The district nominee with
ing periods the highest score shall be named as the division awardee.
Example:
3.3 In case of a tie at any level, the PRAISE Committee shall examine
The nominee with an the IPCRFs of the nominees. The nominee with the highest IPCRF nu-
IPCRF of Total merical rating gets the nomination/award. In case all nominees display
Weighted Score the same IPCRF numerical rating, all nominees shall be recognized.
(TWS) of 4.60 shall
get 46 3.4 Any member of the PRAISE Committee who is related to a candi-
date/nominee up to third degree of consanguinity and affinity shall
4.60 / 5 x 100 x 0.5 inhibit himself/herself from evaluating the documents and interview-
= 55.2 ing a particular candidate/nominee.
II. Outstanding • National Award (5) 5 Certificate of Rat-
Employee • Regional Award (4) ing COR 4. BASIC QUALIFICATIONS
Award • Division/LGU
Award (3) 4.1 Minimum relative experience of one (1) complete school year

4.2 With a performance numerical rating of at least 4.5

III Research & Conducted within 5 Endorsement,
Development the last three (3) Research paper 4.3 No pending criminal or administrative case
years:
4.4 No record of misbehavior in the school, district,
(Note: for
division grievance committee, within the year
Group Re- • National Level (5)
search, di- • Regional Level (4) 5. LIST OF REQUIREMENTS
vide the
• Division Level (3)
points to The Nomination Folder shall contain the following items:
number of
proponents) 5.1 Completely filled out nomination form
IV Innovations Approved at the: 5 Action plan, Pro-
ject Proposal 5.2 Nominee’s updated CS Form 212 Revised 2017
• National Level (5)
• Regional Level (4) 5.3 Certification from the Chairperson that the nomination has
• Division Level (3) undergone deliberation by the Committee
5.4 Letter from the district head indorsing the nomination to the
Schools Division Superintendent

36 3
5.5 Detailed information on dismissed/decided case/s of the nominee, 5. Resource 5 • Letter or Invitation
if any Speaker, Train- or Memorandum
ing Facilitator where the name of
5.6 Current Performance Rating the nominee appears
5.7 Updated service record duly certified by the Human Resource
• Certificate of Recog-
nition / Appreciation
Management Officer (HRMO)
6. Percentage of 10 • Enrolment (LIS
5.8 Means of verification (MOVs) for the I/OPCRF and outstanding BLP Learners Generated)
accomplishments promoted to A &
5.9 Certification of No Unliquidated Cash Advances E Elementary

6. DEFINITION OF TERMS
III. Interview 5
The following terms are operationally defined to facilitate understanding.
TOTAL 100
Academic Competition any academic or non-academic De-
pEd-mandated competitions where
the nominee receives an award as
_____________________________ _____________________________
champion coach
signature over printed name signature over printed name
Action Research a systematic inquiry conducted by
a nominee to diagnose a problem, PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
plan and implement remedial ac-
tion and monitor its effect
Author a writer of a DepEd-related offline
_____________________________ _____________________________
or online publication, a published
book, magazine or journal, or an signature over printed name signature over printed name
approved DepEd-related curricu- PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
lum, resource package, manual
Awards & Recognition pertains to the awards and recogni-
tions received by the nominee apart
from being a champion coach or _____________________________
trainer; could be from any recog- signature over printed name
nized award-giving body or entity PRAISE Committee Chair
Basic Research a full-blown document which ad-
dresses issues on a larger sense
relative to academic and education-
al practice
Coordinator service afforded as coordinator of a
DepEd program or project
Facilitator a trainer or resource person in a
DepEd-recognized seminar, work-
shop, or writeshop

35
4
7.6.b. Score sheet for the selection of Outstanding District Alterna Head Teacher – Designate holding a permanent position of Teacher I,
II, or III in a secondary school and is taking
tive System Coordinator (DALSC) and Mobile Teacher
the role of a full-fledged Department Head
Criteria Scoring System Allot- Means of Verification under the leadership of a full-fledged school
ted (MOVs) principal
Score To be required from Instructional Materials any novel teaching materials that enhance
the candidate / nomi- the quality of classroom instruction
nee
Intervention refers to guidance and counseling practice
as a program or an activity that aids the
emotional, social, intellectual and spiritual
I. Performance 50 Approved IPCRF with needs of learners
Rating its corresponding MOVs
Involvement in Civic Out- a civic outreach or extension program
II. Outstanding reach or Extension Pro- which creates an impact to the community
Accomplish- grams where the nominee spearheads, initiates or
ments / Ex- serves as a committee chair or member
emplary Per-
formances Learning Modules these are instructional aids which are craft-
ed and developed to address the least
1. Percentage of 10 • Rating Report Card learned competencies
A & E Passers • List of test takers Outstanding CID Personnel A CID personnel who holds a permanent
2. Innovation 5 position
• Concept Paper or
(Process Simplifi- Approved Proposal Outstanding Department holding a permanent position as Head
cation) ACR Head Teacher I, II, III, IV, V, or VI in a secondary
• Pictures school under the leadership of a full-fledged
school principal
• Program Report
(indicating improved Outstanding Guidance holding a special order as a full-fledged or
performance) Counselor designate guidance counselor.
3. Resource 10 • Program/Matrix Outstanding Head Teacher holding a permanent position as HT I, II or
Generation where the name of III in an elementary school and at the same
Advocacy Cam- the nominee appears time designated as school head of a partic-
paigns of ALS ular school
• Activity Completion
Programs and Report Outstanding Kindergarten a permanent teacher handling kindergarten
Projects. classes
• Pictures
• Copy of Deed of Do- Outstanding Master holding a permanent position as Master
nation Teacher Teacher I or II
• Certificate of Ac- Outstanding Multi-grade holding a permanent position handling two
ceptance Teacher or more grade levels in a class
• Pictures of donations Outstanding OSDS An OSDS personnel who holds a perma-
4. Outstanding 5 • Certificate of Recog- Personnel nent position
Recognition / nition holding a permanent position as Principal I,
Outstanding Principal
Awards Received
II, III or IV
Outstanding Principal in- holding an item with special order as prin-
charge cipal and designated as district in-charge

34 5
Outstanding SGOD An SGOD personnel who holds a 4. Outstand- 5 – National Level 5 Certificate of Recog-
Personnel permanent position ing Recogni- 4 – Regional Level nition
Outstanding Teacher holding a permanent position as tion / 3 – Division Level
Teacher I, II, or III. Awards Re- 2 – District Level
ceived
Outstanding SPED Teacher a permanent teacher holding a 5. Resource 5 – National Level 5 Certificate of Recog-
SPED-item position Speaker, 4 – Regional Level nition
Outstanding Teacher holding a permanent position as Training 3 – Division Level
Facilitator 2 – District Level
Teacher I, II, or III.
Outstanding Teacher in-charge holding a position of Teacher I, II,
III in an elementary school and is 6. Percent- 10 = 80% - 100% 10 Enrolment (LIS Gen-
designated with special order as in age of BLP 8 = 60% - 79% erated)
-charge of a particular school Learners 6 = 40% - 59%
Partnership / Linkages this refers to partnerships and/or promoted to 4 = 20% - 39%
linkages established by the nomi- A & E Ele- 2 = 19% and be-
mentary low
nee with the external stakeholders
III. Interview 5
that resulted in generating re-
sources or its peso equivalent TOTAL POINTS 100
Process Simplification Specific for ALS, it is the creation
or development of District innova-
tive intervention which eases the
difficulty of implementing the ALS
programs and projects, properly
backed up by a Concept Paper

Training Design a training proposal geared at ca-

pacitating teachers and/or em-
ployees; includes the rationale, key
understandings, learning objec-
tives, training matrix and budget
specifications
Training Manager a DepEd employee who assists in
the conduct of a DepEd-recognized
seminar or training

6 33
2. Innova- 5 – adapted by 5 Concept Paper or
7. EVALUATION GUIDELINES AND SCORE SHEETS
tion (Process other dis- Approved Proposal,
Simplifica- tricts within ACR, 7.1.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding Teacher, Kinder
tion) the division Pictures, garten Teacher, SpEd Teacher & Multi-grade Teacher
3 – implemented Program Report
by the (indicating improved
Part Criteria Scoring System Points Means of Verifica-
schools / performance)
Allotted tion (MOVs)
school heads
to be required from
within the
the candidate/
district han-
nominee
dled by the
nominee I. Perfor- Formula: 60 Approved IPCRF
mance Rat- TWS / 5 x 100 x with its correspond-
3. Network- 5 – Division Level 5 Certificate of Ap-
ing 0.6 ing MOVs
ing / Link- 4 – District Level pearance,
(with a
ages 3 – School Level Project Proposal duly
minimum Example:
2 – Community/ approved by the ALS
rating of The nominee has
3.a. Advoca- Barangay -EPS or SDS,
4.50) an IPCRF total
cy Cam- Level Advocacy Materials
weighted score
paigns of ACR
of 4.60. The
ALS Pro- 5 – 50,000 &
point that he/
grams and above Copy of Deed of Do-
she will get is
Projects. 4 – 40,000 – nation, Certificate of
55.2.
49,999 Acceptance, Pictures
3 – 10,000 – of donations
4.60 / 5 x 100 x
39,999
0.6 = 55.2
3.b. Re- 2 – below 10,000
source Gen-
eration (SEF excluded) II. Outstand- 10 – National 10 For Research:
ing Accom- 9 – Regional • Approved by the
plishments 8 – Division Division Re-
(Obtain the / Exempla- 7 – District search Coordi-
average ry Perfor- 6 – School nator (DRC) &
points for mances 5 – Classroom SDS
both indica- • Certification
tors) [Link] from the Head
n or Com- of concerned
pleted Office that the
Research research was
or In- presented, rec-
struction ognized & im-
al Materi- plemented
als or
Teaching
Strategies

32 7
Part Criteria Scoring System Points Means of Verifica-
7.6.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding District
Allotted tion (MOVs)
to be required from
Alternative Learning System Coordinator (DALSC) and Mobile
the candidate/ Teacher (MT)
nominee
Part Criteria Scoring System Allotted Means of Verifica-
For Teaching Strate-
Score tion (MOVs)
gies: To be required from
the candidate /
• Approved by the nominee
CID Chief
• Lesson Plan
I. Performance Formula: 50 Approved IPCRF with
• Certification Rating (with TWS / 5 x 100 x corresponding MOVs
from the Head a minimum 0.5
of concerned rating of
Office that the 4.50) Example:
The nominee with
teaching strate-
an IPCRF of Total
gies presented, Weighted Score
recognized & (TWS) of 4.60
implemented shall get 55.2.

4.60 / 5 x 100 x
0.5 = 55.2
For Instructional
II. Outstanding 10 = 80% - 100% 10 Certificate of Rating
Materials: Accomplish- 8 = 60% - 79% (COR)
ments / Ex- 6 = 40% - 59% List of test takers
• Description and emplary Per- 4 = 20% - 39% Report of Completers
Methodology of formance 2 = 19% and
innovation/s below
made 1. Percent-
age. of A & E
• Lesson Plan Passers
(enrolment
• Certification
vs. complet-
from the Head ers vs. tak-
of concerned ers vs. pass-
Office that the ers)
teaching strate-
gies are pre-
sented, recog-
nized & imple-
mented

8 31
Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification Part Criteria Scoring System Points Means of Verifica-
Points Score Allotted tion (MOVs)
5. Resource Speaker, 5 • Letter or Invitation to be required from
Training Facilitator or Memorandum the candidate/
where the name of nominee
the nominee ap- 2. As Coor- 5 – National 5 As Coordinator:
pears dinator/ 4 – Regional
Facilitator/ 3 – Division • Special Order
• Certificate of Recog-
Author 2 – District • Activity Com-
nition / Apprecia-
1 – School pletion Report
tion
6. Publication / Author- 5 • Copy of published / As Facilitator:
ship institutionalized
• Memorandum/
material where the
Training Matrix
name of the nomi-
nee appears • Certificate of
III. Interview 10 Recognition
As Author:
TOTAL 100
• Memoran-
dum / Special
Order
_____________________________ _____________________________
• Certificate of
signature over printed name signature over printed name
Recognition
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
• Copy of the
Write-up

_____________________________ _____________________________ 3. Champi- 5 – National 5 • Certificate of

signature over printed name signature over printed name on Coach 4 – Regional Recognition
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member (academic 3 – Division • Pictorials
and non- 2 – District
academic 1 – School
competi-
_____________________________ tions)
signature over printed name 4. Involve- Number of times 5 • Letter of invita-
ment in participated: tion from the
PRAISE Committee Chair
Civic Out- community
reach / 5 – 5 or more • Certification
Extension 4 – 4 issued by the
Programs 3 – 3 concerned or-
where the 2 – 2 ganization or
teacher is 1 – 1 LGU
a commit-
• Program
tee mem-
ber or • Pictorials
chairper-
son

30 9
Part Criteria Scoring System Points Means of Verifica- 7.5.b. Score sheet for the selection of Outstanding Public Schools
Allotted tion (MOVs)
District Supervisor/Principal in-Charge (without school)
to be required from
the candidate/
nominee
5. Awards 5—National 5 • Certificates of
and Recog- 4—Regional Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification
Recognition Points Score
nitions re- 3—Division
ceived 2—District • Pictorials I. Performance Rating 60 • Approved IPCRF
1—School with corresponding
MOVs
II. Outstanding Ac-
complishments /
Exemplary Perfor-
6. Partner- 5 – more than 5 • Financial Re- mances
ships / port 1. Basic or Action Re- 5
Php 3,000 • Copy of Action/
Linkages 4 – Php 2,251 – • Deed of Dona- search Basic Research ap-
3,000 tion proved by the DRC/
3 – Php 1,501 – • Certificate of SDS
2,250 Acceptance 2. Innovation (Process 5 • Concept Paper or
2 – Php 751 – Simplification) Approved Proposal
1,500 • Pictorials
ACR
1 – below Php
• Pictures
750
3. Community & Civic 5 • Program/Matrix
Involvement and Re- where the name of
source Generation the nominee ap-
III Interview 5 pears
• Activity Completion
Report
• Pictures
• Copy of Deed of
Donation
• Certificate of Ac-
TOTAL SCORE 100 ceptance
• Pictures of dona-
tions
4. Outstanding Recog- 5 Certificate of Recogni-
nition / Awards Re- tion
ceived

10 29
Part Criteria Scoring System Allotted Means of Verifica- 7.1.b. Score Sheet for evaluating candidates/nominees for Outstand-
Score tion (MOVs)
To be required from
ing Teacher, Kindergarten Teacher, SpEd Teacher and Multi-
the candidate / Grade Teacher
nominee
Name of Candidate/Nominee: ___________________________________________
3. Network- 5 – Chairman of 5 Program/Matrix Position: _______________________ School:_________________________________
ing / Linkag- community / where the name of District: ________________________ Signature of Nominee:_________________
es civic activity the nominee ap- Level of Evaluation: ( ) School ( ) District ( ) Division
3 – Membership pears, Activity Com-
Community of a commit- pletion Report, Pic- Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification
& Civic In- tee tures Points Score
volvement
I. Performance Rating 60 Approved IPCRF with
4. Outstand- 5 – National Level 5 Certificate of Recog- corresponding MOVs
ing Recogni- 4 – Regional Level nition II. Outstanding Ac-
tion / 3 – Division Level complishments /
Awards Re- 2 – District Level Exemplary Perfor-
ceived mances
5. Resource 5 – Regional Level 5 Letter or Invitation or 1. Innovation/ 10 For Research:
Speaker, 4 – Division Level Memorandum, Cer- Completed Re- • Approved by the
Training Fa- 3 – District Level tificate of Recogni- search/Instructional DRC & SDS
cilitator 2 – School Level tion / Appreciation Materials/Teaching • Certification
Strategies from the Head of
6. Publica- 5 – Regional Level 5 Copy of published / concerned Office
tion / Au- 4 – Division Level institutionalized ma- that the research
thorship 3 – District Level terial where the was presented,
2 – School Level name of the nominee recognized &
appears implemented
III. Interview 10
For Teaching Strate-
TOTAL POINTS 100 gies:

• Approved by the
CID Chief
• Lesson Plan
• Certification
from the Head of
concerned Office
that the teaching
strategies are
presented, recog-
nized & imple-
mented

28
11
Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification 7.5.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding Public
Points Score Schools District Supervisor/Principal in-Charge (without
For Instructional Materi- School)
als:

• Description and Part Criteria Scoring System Allotted Means of Verifica-

Methodology of in- Score tion (MOVs)
novations made To be required from
the candidate /
nominee
• Lesson Plan
I. Performance Formula: 60 Approved IPCRF with
• Certification from Rating (with TWS / 5 x 100 x corresponding MOVs
the Head of con- a minimum 0.6 and AAR
cerned Office that rating of
the teaching strate- 4.50) Example:
gies are presented, The nominee with
recognized & imple- an IPCRF of Total
mented Weighted Score
2. As Coordina- 5 As Coordinator: (TWS) of 4.60
tor / Facilitator/ shall get 55.2.
• Special Order
Author • Activity Completion 4.60 / 5 x 100 x
Report 0.6 = 55.2
As Facilitator: II. Outstanding 5 – adapted in 5 Copy of Basic or Ac-
• Memorandum/ Accomplish- other dis tion Research ap-
Training Matrix ments / Ex- tricts within proved by the DRC/
• Certificate of Recog- emplary Per- the division SDS
nition formance 3 – implemented
within the
As Author 1. Basic or district han-
• Memorandum / Action Re- dled by the
Special Order search nominee
• Certificate of Recog-
nition
2. Innova- 5 – adapted by 5 Concept Paper or
• Copy of the Write-
tion (Process other dis- Approved Proposal
up
Simplifica- tricts within ACR
3. Champion 5 • Certificate of Recog- tion) the division Pictures
Coach nition 3 – implemented
(academic • Pictorials by the
and non-
schools /
academic
school heads
competi-
within the
tions)
district han-
dled by the
nominee

12 27
6. Linkages / Network- 5 • Deed of Donation, Cer- 4. Involvement in Civic 5 • Letter of invitation
ing / Community Part- tificate of Acceptance, Outreach / Extension from the community
nership Pictorial, ACR of pro- Programs where the • Certification issued
jects donated teacher is a committee by the concerned
III. Interview 5 member or chairperson organization or LGU
TOTAL 100 • Program
• Pictorials
5. Awards and Recogni- 5 • Certificates
tions received • Pictorials
_____________________________ _____________________________ 6. Partnerships / Linkages • Financial Report
signature over printed name signature over printed name
• Deed of Donation
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
• Certificate of Ac-
ceptance
• Pictorials
_____________________________ _____________________________
signature over printed name III. Interview 5
signature over printed name
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
TOTAL 100

_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ signature over printed name signature over printed name
signature over printed name PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
PRAISE Committee Chair

_____________________________ _____________________________
signature over printed name signature over printed name
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member

_____________________________
signature over printed name
PRAISE Committee Chair

26
13
7.2.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding Master 7.4.b. Score sheet for the selection of Outstanding Principal (full-fledged),
Teacher Teacher In-Charge, Head Teacher, Department Head, Head Teacher
–Designate, PIC with School
Part Criteria Scoring System Weight Means of Verifica- Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification
tion (MOVs) Points Score
To be required from
the candidate / I. Performance Rating 60 Approved IPCRF with cor-
nominee responding MOVs, AAR
I. Performance Formula: 60 Approved IPCRF with II. Outstanding Ac-
Rating (with TWS / 5 x 100 x corresponding MOVs complishments /
a minimum 0.6 Exemplary Perfor-
rating of mances
4.50) Example: 1. Awards Received 5 • Original/Authenticated
The nominee with copies of Certificates of
an IPCRF of Total Awards /Recognition
Weighted Score 2. Research Develop 5 • Copy of Action/Basic
(TWS) of 4.60 ment/ Innovations Research approved by
shall get 55.2. the DRC/SDS
• Copy of innovation/
4.60 / 5 x 100 x
ACR of implementation
0.6 = 55.2
3. Publication/ 5 • Copy of published ma-
II. Outstanding 10 – developed 4 10 Actual IM or LM,
Authorship/Co- terial where the name
Accomplish- items or Lesson Plan used in
Authorship of the candidate /
ments / Ex- more the implementation
emplary Per- 8 – developed 3 of the IM / LM / TD, nominee
formance items Certification from 4. Resource Speaker/ 5 • Original/Authenticated
6 – developed 2 the Head of con- Facilitator/ Curricu copy of certificates
1. Develop- items cerned Office that lum Writer • ACR of trainings /
ment of In- 4 – developed 1 the teaching IM / seminars conducted (if
novative In- item LM was used OR organizer)
structional
Materials, Organizer/
Learning Chairmanship/
Modules, or Membership in a
Training De- working committee/
sign TWG in trainings/
2. Basic or 10 – National 10 Approved Basic or seminars/work
Action Re- 9 – Regional Action Research by shops/writeshops/
search 8 – Division DRC & SDS and symposia
7 – District Certification from the 5. School-based Man 10 • Copy of validated SBM
6 – School Head of concerned agement level of Practice (The
5 - Classroom Office that the re- SBM level of the school
search was present- handled by the nomi-
ed, recognized & im- nee within the rating
plemented period/school year)

14 25
3. Academic Compe- 5 – National Level 5 Certificate of
F. Linkages / Resources Generated 5 Deed of Dona- titions (as Champi- 4 – Regional Level Recognition,
Networking / 5 – 50,000-above tion, Certificate on Coach) 3 – Division Level Pictures
Community 4 – 40,000-49,000 of Acceptance, 2 – District Level
Partnership 3 – 30,000-39,000 Pictorial, ACR of 1 – School Level
2 – 20,000-29,000 projects donated
1 – 10,000-19,000 4. Coordinator / 10 – Regional Level 10 Certificate of Ap-
Writer / Training 8 – Division Level preciation /
III. Interview 5 Facilitator / Train- 6 – District Level Recognition,
ing Manager / Au- 4 – School Level Page of the book,
TOTAL SCORE 100 thor journal, article
where the name
of the nominee
appears

Interview 5

TOTAL POINTS 100%

24 15
C. Publica- 5 - National level 5 Copy of pub-
7.2.b. Score sheet for evaluating candidates/nominees for Out
tion/ Author- 4 – Regional level lished material
standing Master Teacher ship / co- 3 – Division level where the name
authorship 2— District of the candi-
date/nominee
Name of Candidate/Nominee: _________________________________________
appears
Position: _______________________ School:_______________________________
District: ________________________ Signature of Nominee:_______________ D. Resource 5 - National 5 Original/
Speaker/ 4 – Regional level Authenticated
Facilita- 3 – Division copy of certifi-
Level of Evaluation: ( ) School ( ) District ( ) Division tor/ Cur- 2 – District cates
riculum ACR of train-
Writer/ ings / semi-
Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification
nars conducted
Points Score OR (if organizer)

Organizer/
I. Performance 60 Approved IPCRF with its cor- Chairman-
Rating responding MOVs ship/
Member-
II. Outstanding ship in a
Accomplish- working
ments / Ex- commit-
emplary Per- tee/TWG
formances in train-
1. Development of 10 For Innovative Instructional ings/ sem-
Innovative In- Materials/Learning Modules/ inars/
structional Mate- Training Design: work-
rials, Learning shops/
• Actual IM, LM, or TD
Modules, Training write-
• Lesson Plan used in the shops/
Design) implementation of the symposia
IM / LM; ACR in the im-
plementation of TD E. School- 10 – Level 3 10 Copy of validat-
• Certification from the based 8 – Level 2 ed SBM level of
Head of concerned Office Manage- 6 – Level 1 Practice
that the teaching IM, LM, ment (The SBM level
or TD was utilized/ im- of the school
plemented handled by the
2. Basic or Action 10 • Approved Research paper nominee within
Research • Certification from the the rating peri-
Head of concerned Office od/school year)
that the research was
conducted

16 23
7.4.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding Principal (full Criteria Allotted Obtained Means of Verification
-fledged), Teacher In-Charge, Head Teacher, Department Points Score
Head, Head Teacher–Designate, PIC (with School) 3. Academic Com- 5 • Certificates of Recognition
petitions (as
• Pictures
Part Criteria Scoring Sys- Allotted Means of Verifi- Champion Coach)
tem Points cation (MOVs) 4. Coordinator / 10 • Special Order and Accom-
To be required Writer / Training plishment Report (for being
from the candi- Facilitator / a coordinator)
date / nominee Training Manag- • Page of the book, journal,
I Performance Formula: 60 Approved OPCRF er / Author article where the name of
Rating TWS / 5 x with correspond- the nominee appears (for
(with a mini- 100 x 0.6 ing MOVs, AAR being a writer)
mum rating of • Certificate of Appreciation/
4.50) Example: Recognition (for training
The nominee facilitation)
has an IPCRF • Memorandum & Training
total Matrix where name of the
weighted nominee appears (for Train-
score of 4.60. ing Management)
The point that
he/she will
get is 55.2.
III. Interview 5
4.60 / 5 x
100 x 0.6 = TOTAL 100
55.2
II Outstanding
Accomplish-
ments _____________________________ _____________________________
and Exempla- signature over printed name signature over printed name
ry Perfor- PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
mance

A. Awards 5 – National 5 Original/

received 4 – Region Authenticated _____________________________ _____________________________
3 – Division copies of Certifi- signature over printed name signature over printed name
2 – District cates of Awards / PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
Recognition

B. Research 5 – region 5 Copy of Action/

Develop- 4 – division Basic Research _____________________________
ment/ In- 3 – district approved by the
signature over printed name
novations 2 - imple DRC/SDS
mented/ Copy of innova- PRAISE Committee Chair
adopted tion/ACR of im-
in school plementation

22 17
4. Involvement in Civic 5 • Documentation / pic-
7.3.a. Evaluation guide for the selection of Outstanding Guidance
Outreach / Extension torials
Counselor (Full-fledged or Designate) Program(s) where s/he • Letter of Invitation
Part Criteria Scoring System Allotted Means of Verifica- is a Chairperson or a from the community
Score tion (MOVs) Committee Member
• Certification issued by
To be required the concerned organi-
from the candi- zation
date / nominee
• Program
I. Performance Formula: 60 Approved IPCRF
III. Interview 5
Rating (with a TWS / 5 x 100 with corresponding
minimum rat- x 0.6 MOVs TOTAL 100
ing of 4.50)
Example:
The nominee _____________________________ _____________________________
with an IPCRF signature over printed name signature over printed name
of Total PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
Weighted Score
(TWS) of 4.60
shall get 55.2.
_____________________________ _____________________________
4.60 / 5 x 100 x
signature over printed name signature over printed name
0.6 = 55.2
PRAISE Committee Member PRAISE Committee Member
II. Outstanding 10 – conducted 10 Copy/ies of Case
Accomplish- 5 or more Studies,
ments / Ex- 8 – conducted 4 Certification from
emplary Per- 6 – conducted 3 the School Head
_____________________________
formance 4 – conducted 2 that the case study
2 – conducted 1 was conducted signature over printed name
1. Conducted PRAISE Committee Chair
Case Study/
ies

2. Initiated 10 – initiated 5 10 Approved Proposal

Intervention interven - ACR
tions Pictures
8 – initiated 4 Certification from
6 – initiated 3 the School Head
4 – initiated 2 that the interven-
2 – initiated 1 tion was effected
3. Relevant 10 – conducted 10 Activity Completion
Fora / Orien- 5 fora or orien- Reports (ACRs)
tation con- tations in a S.Y. duly noted by the
ducted to par- 8 – conducted 4 School Head or
ents, students, 6 – conducted 3 District Head, At-
teachers, com- 4 – conducted 2 tendance Sheets,
munity 2 – Conducted Pictures
1

18 21
7.3.b. Score sheet for evaluating candidates/nominees for Outstanding Part Criteria Scoring Sys- Allotted Means of Verifica-
Guidance Counselor tem Score tion (MOVs)
To be required
Name of Candidate/Nominee: _________________________________________ from the candi-
Position: _______________________ School:_______________________________ date / nominee
District: ________________________ Signature of Nominee:_______________ 4. Involvement 5 Letter of Invitation
in Civic Out- from the
reach / Exten- community
Level of Evaluation: ( ) School ( ) District ( ) Division sion Program Certification issued
(s) where s/he by the concerned
is a Chairper- organization
son or a Com- Program
Criteria Allotted Ob- Means of Verification
mittee Mem- Documentation /
Points tained
ber pictorials
Score
III. Interview 5
I. Performance Rating 60 Approved IPCRF with TOTAL POINTS 100%
corresponding MOVs

II. Outstanding Accom-

plishments / Exem-
plary Performances
1. Case Study/ies 10 • Copy/ies of Case
Studies
• Certification from the
School Head that the
case study was con-
ducted
2. Initiated Interven- 10 • Approved Proposal
tion • ACR(s)
• Pictures
• Certification from the
School Head that the
intervention was ef-
fected
3. Relevant Fora / 10 • Activity Completion
Orientation con- Reports (ACRs) duly
ducted to parents, noted by the School
students, teachers, Head or District Head
community • Attendance Sheet
• Pictures
• Program

20 19