Final Coverage QD
Final Coverage QD
Final Coverage QD
A. MAGNIFYING LENS
- Bank personnel and other people involved in currency examinations usually use and
ordinary hand-lens; the maximum diameter of which is four inches, and this appears big
with its wide frame it has a nagnifying power of two times the original only Magnifying
lenses of five times or more magnifying power, with built-in-lighting are more useful.
B. SHADOWGRAPH
- a pictorial image formed by casting a shadow, usually of the hands, upon a rightful
surface or screen.
H. INFRARED VIEWER
- primarily used to decipher writings in a charred document.
I. COMPARISON MICROSCOPE
- similar to that of the bullet comparison microscope
A. MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION
- Any examination or study which is made with the microscope in order to discover minute physical
details. Stereoscopic examination with low and high-power objectives is used to detect
retouching, patching and unnatural pen-lift in signature analysis. With proper angle and intensity
or illumination, it aids in the decipherment of erasures, some minute manipulations not perfectly
pictured to the unaided eye and the sequence of entries done by different writing instruments.
D. PHOTOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
- This type of examination is very essential in every document examination. Actual
observations are recorded in the photographs.
E. ULTRA-VIOLET EXAMINATION
- Ultraviolet radiation is invisible and occurs in the wave lengths just below the visible
blue-violet end of the spectrum (rainbow). These visible rays react on some substances
so that visible light is reflected, a phenomenon known as FLOURESCENCE. This type of
examination is done in a darkroom after the lamp has been warmed up in order to give
a maximum output of the ultra-violet light. Exposure to the ultra violet light should be to
the minimum duration in order to avoid fading of some writing ink and typewriter ribbon.
F. INFRARED EXAMINATION
- This examination of documents employs invisible radiation beyond the red portion of
the visible spectrum (rainbow) which is usually recorded on a specially sensitized
photographic emulsion.
A. ERASURES
One of the common inquiries in questioned document is whether or not an erasure
was actually made on a document. In cases like this, the following examinations are
made:
1. Physical inspection: using ultraviolet light, observation with light striking the surface at
a sharp angle, and observation under the microscope maybe considered.
2. Fuming with iodine may cause an almost negligible stain, but in most instances not the
slightest semblance of a stain remains.
B. INDENTED WRITING
Indented writing is a term usually applied to the partially visible depressions
appearing on a sheet of paper underneath the one on which the visible writing appears.
These depressions or indentation are due to the application of pressure on the writing
instrument and would appear as a carbon copy if a sheet of carbon paper had been
properly inserted. Indentation may also appear on a blank sheet of paper if such is used
as a backing sheet while typing out a message on a typewriter.
D. ADDING MACHINES
The construction of an adding machine differs greatly from the typewriter but the
methods and principles of identification are related.
Manufacturers use different types of numerals and from time to time change their
design. The spacing between columns is also not standardized for all machines. Those
factors form the basis of determining the make of the machine and for estimating the
period in which it was built. Another kind of approach is the ribbon impression, for the
ribbon is made and operates very similarly to the typewriter.
2. It is also advisable that right after the document becomes disputed, or questioned, it
is important to make not only the usual photo static copy (Xerox), but also a proper
photograph or photo-enlargement, done if possible, by the document expert or under the
supervision of the document expert.
3. When working in the preparation of case, it is often necessary for the lawyer or court
to handle repeatedly the disputed document. Should this be necessary, instead of
handling and working with the original document, the photograph should be used.
5. Pointing a document with any other instruments, such as sharp stick, can cause slight
damage which although it cannot be seen by the naked eye, can show definite marks
under the microscope or on the enlarged photograph.
6. No test should be made to alter the conditions of the document, for example, the old-
fashioned ink test, which was used to determine the age of the ink-writing.
7. Should any test be necessary, insist that it should be done in the presence of a chemist,
or in court, or in front of both parties involved the case.
B. DO's and DON'T's in the CARE, HANDLING AND PRESERVATION OF
DOCUMENTS
1. "DO'S"
a. Take disputed papers to Document Examiner's Laboratory at the First Opportunity.
b. If storage is necessary, keep in dry place away from excessive heat and strong light
c. Maintain in consequential document, unfolded and in transparent plastic envelope or
evidence preserver.
2. "DONT'S"
a. Do not underscore, make careless markings, fold, erase, impress rubber stamps,
sticker, write on, or otherwise alter any handwriting.
b. Do not smear with fingerprints powder or chemicals.
c. Do not carry handwriting document carelessly in wallet, notebook or brief case on
grounds of interviews.
d. Do not handle disputed papers excessively or carry them in pocket for a long time.
e. Do not mark disputed documents (either by consciously writing instruments or
dividers).
f. Do not mutilate or damage by repeated refolding, creasing, cutting, tearing or punching
for filing purposes.
g. Do not allow anyone except qualified specialist to make chemical or other tests do no
treat or dust for latent finger prints before consulting a document examiner.
2. Side Lighting. Try lighting from various angles. An extremely oblique angle will often
be found useful. If some particular light and viewing angle make the erasure visible,
duplicate setup for the camera.
3. Transmitted Light Look at the document with the light coming through it. Turn the
document over and repeat.
4. Magnification Examine the paper with a magnifier, such as a hand glass or a low-power
binocular microscope. Magnifications up to about 10x are most useful.
5. Polarized Light- light the document with polarized light, using a Kodak Pola-Light, for
example, Examine it through a Kodak Pola-Screen.
6. Filters. Look at the document through various filters-either separate filters or the
viewing filters in the Kodak Master Photoguide.
CHEMICAL METHODS
An erasure can be brought up with iodine fuming. Iodine fuming is a general procedure
which includes:
1. Reveals the presence and extent of an erasure.
2. Restores some of the writing, and
3. Delineates any area that had previously been wet.
2. Photomicrography
- the process of obtaining photographs of magnified images of small subject is
known as photomicrography. It has a wide application in many fields where the minutes
scrutiny of an object is necessary and a court exhibit of a magnified image is needed.
3. Ultra-Violet Photography
- in the radiant energy spectrum between the x-ray band and the visible light
band and adjoining the latter at its violet end is a band of rays known as ultraviolet.
Photographs made by using ultraviolet rays as the light source sometimes reveal physical
or chemical differences in subjects that are undetectable by any type of photography.
a. Straight Ultraviolet Photography - is a method of taking a picture in which
a camera is used to record the difference in a subject reflection, transmission or
absorption of ultraviolet rays in much the same manner as in light photography.
4. Infra-Red Photography
- define as taking a picture with infrared rays by means of a camera loaded with
film sensitive to infrared radiations. However, infrared pictures often, are produced
without a camera and they are also taken sometimes with films that are not sensitive to
infrared radiations.
5. In traced forgery cases the photographing of disputed signature with the model from
which it was traced if model is found, and the printing of photograph of forged signature
and model signature or separate transparent films, or oiled, paper and also photographing
those signatures under ruled squares slightly enlarged to show suspicious identity by this
method as well as by the use of the transparent films or print.
7. The size of photographs to be used, whether 8x12, or 11 x 14 and also whether they
are to be arranged in loose-leaf album form or separately in fortfolio.
8. The use of large bromide enlargements.
1. The writing in questioned can be accurately enlarged so that every quality and
characteristics of it can be clearly and properly interpreted whether the facts so shown
point to genuineness or to forgery.
3. Photographic duplicate, and especially enlargements, also enable court and jury to
understand and weight the technical testimony given by an expert regarding their finding.
4. Photographs can be cut apart as may be desirable and the various parts classified for
comparison.
5. Photographs are also useful in showing delicate discolorations due to chemical erasures
or other fraudulent changes otherwise might be overlook, denied or misinterpreted.
QUALIFICATIONS OF DOCUMENT
EXPERT
During initial discussions with a prospective client, it may be discovered that FDES has
been retained by another party involved in the dispute. Due to this conflict-of-interest situation,
the prospective client will have to locate another qualified expert to assist him/her. While the
statement, "all men are created equal" is widely accepted, no two forensic document examiners
possess identical professional qualifications. Every document examiner draws on a body of
knowledge he or she has acquired through formal education, specialized training, scientific
research and collaborating with other experts. The number of years’ experience, the types of
cases examined and testimony given as an expert witness also contribute to a person's
credentials. Those seeking assistance from a forensic document examiner should closely examine
the expert's training, qualifications and experience...especially as they apply to the specific
problem or matter at hand.
There are probably more unqualified people who claim to be "experts" in the Document
Examination profession than in any other forensic specialty. Far too often, these untrained or self-
taught individuals claim to have received their training by attending a few lectures or by reading
one or two books that may or may not be written by recognized authorities in the field. How then,
can the truly qualified expert be distinguished from the charlatan? The answer is by thoroughly
investigating the training, background and experience of everyone purported to be an expert.
Whenever you use non-expert opinion testimony, you must take care to
demonstrate that the lay witness has a sufficient basis to express the opinion. Moreover,
even if the opinion is rationally based, it will not usually be admitted if it is superfluous
or otherwise inappropriate. For example, a witness' opinion about the veracity of another
witness' testimony is not admissible.
Establishing sufficient basis is quite easy when it comes to the situation illustrated
above. As a general rule, the court will allow the owner of real property to express an
opinion as to the property's value because she has a vital relationship to it. She stands to
gain or lose the most from the court's valuation. Another way of putting it is that the
owner has quasi-expert status. The court presumes she is qualified to give a valuation
opinion based on the special knowledge arising out of ownership.
Beware, though, that when a lack of such knowledge can be demonstrated, and if
the opinion is hypothesized, the lay opinion will be rejected. Indeed, if you want to resist
a non-expert opinion, pursue any weak point in the opinion's basis.
The forensic questioned document examiner will testify before a judge. He may
be presented by the prosecution lawyer or by a private prosecuting lawyer the court may
allow.
His purpose is to be a assistance to the legal luminaries may they be for the
defense or for the prosecution in the administration of justice. He will also testify before
the court. This may be presented by the defense lawyer (Gonzales, 2008).
As soon as you find out that you will be testifying, you should begin preparing for the
witness chair. Regardless of your role, you should take the following steps.
1. First, discuss with the lawyer/attorney who will present you as a witness what is
expected, how your testimony is to be used and when you will be expected to testify.
3. Discuss your testimony with the lawyer and what line of questioning will be used to
develop the case, and have a general idea of how you will respond to the questions.
4. Consider what the defense counsel's approach will be and the area he will most likely
probe during cross-examination.
The forensic examiner has various responsibilities and duties during judicial proceedings.
1. In criminal cases, review the prosecution memorandum.
2. In criminal cases, review the charge filed which sets forth the specific allegations of the
criminal act.
3. Review the anticipated evidence available to prove and disprove the charge or
information in criminal cases, or support or deny the plaintiffs or respondents' position in
a civil case.
6. Determine the clearest manner to present the testimony in terms that the judge will
understand.
8. Supply the lawyer you are assisting a written statement of your qualifications as a
forensic examiner or a current resume.
9. Testify only on those matters that are presented by the lawyers to the court.
10. Take notes regarding the evidence that is presented and marked as exhibits and
prepare a list of documentary exhibits of both sides, whether in a criminal or a civil case.
11. Alert the lawyer regarding any evidence that has been overlooked. It is important that
all evidence necessary to support your testimony has been admitted.
The basic rule for the forensic examiner and investigator is to truthfully testify in
court. His or her demeanor should reflect professionalism Fostering cooperation with the
lawyers can be greatly beneficial Communication between your lawyers can enlighten you,
as well as those around you, on the case.
The forensic examiner should expect to work long hours during the trial. Most of
the job is done outside the courtroom, not in it. The forensic examiner should be very
familiar with the case. If not, he or she should study the case a week or so before the
trial begins.
THE ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND
PROPER COURTROOM BEHAVIOR
1. The expert witness before testifying in court must have his evidence and
testimony adequately prepared and should have at least one pre-trial conference with
the trial attorney.
2. The expert witness must have confidence in his opinion, which is based upon
his knowledge, experience and proper preparation Confidence is an intelligent faith based
on fact.
3. The expert witness must create a good impression of himself to the court. He
should come to court dressed simply in clean conservative street clothes in keeping with
the prevailing style.
4. Enter the courtroom with an aggressive and positive walk, giving the assurance
that you are prepared to beat whatever may confront you. It is the walk and posture of
most men that indicate their character.
5. Upon reaching the witness stand, turning to the court to be sworn in, he should
raise his hand without hesitation and let his voice ring out in a clear and forceful "I do."
Without hesitation, he takes the stand and sits down with ease in comfortable but erect
position.
6. The expert must have the ability to explain his technical subject in simple and
clear language, understandable by the trial judge. Make it easy for the judge to
understand what you are talking about. Use distinct and expressive sentence with a
simple, clear and logical presentation.
7. Present your opinion in a friendly spirit. Be natural and speak in a normal, down-
to-earth, and congenial manner. Be human. Sincerity is displayed by the expert in the
manner of his speech. It will be conveyed in the ring of his voice, his facial expressions,
and his bodily movements. The slightest indication by his tone of voice or by any gesture
that he is doubtful will destroy the confidence of the judge. You cannot hide in sincerity.
If the expert does not believe in his ideas or opinion whole-heartedly, he cannot make
others believe in him. A timid voice never carries conviction.