A Secure Base: Theoretical Context and Overview
A Secure Base: Theoretical Context and Overview
A Secure Base: Theoretical Context and Overview
A SECURE BASE
presence of attachment control system and its linkage to the working models of self and
attachment figures that are built in the mind during childhood are held to be central features of
personality functioning throughout life.
Object-relations therapists also believe that these early attachment patterns represent a
cornerstone of intimate relations in adult life. Individuals who grow up with a history of insecure
attachments often unconsciously choose intimate partners to repair their early deprivation, only
to reenact their earlier failed attachment experience.
A therapist’s stance
The therapeutic alliance appears as a secure base, an internal object as a working, or
representational model of an attachment figure, reconstruction as exploring memories of the past,
resistance as deep reluctance to disobey the past orders of parents not to tell or not to remember.
Therapist’s role is to be a companion for a client in his exploration of himself and his
experiences, rather than interpreting things to the client (“You know, you tell me”). The client is
encouraged to believe that, with support and occasional guidance, he can discover for himself
true nature of the models that underlie his thoughts, feelings, and actions, and that, by examining
3
the nature of his early experiences with his parents, or parental caregivers, he will understand
what has led him to build the models now active within him and be free to restructure them.
The human psyche is strongly inclined towards self-healing and therapist’s job is to
provide the conditions in which self-healing can best take place.
Concepts
Violence in the family (p.79)
Violence in the family can be understood as the distorted and exaggerated versions of
behavior that is potentially functional, especially attachment and care giving behavior.
When a relationship to a special loved person is endangered, we are not only anxious but are
usually angry as well. As responses to the risk of loss, anxiety and anger go hand in hand. The
specific relationships, threats to which may arouse anger are three main types: relationship with a
sexual partner, relationships with parents and relationships with children. Each type of
relationship is filled with strong emotion because a person’s whole emotional life – the
underlying tone of how he feels- is determined by the state of these long-term, committed
relationships.
a) those that parents wish their children not to know about; b) those in which parents have treated
children in ways that children find too unbearable to think about; c) those in which children have
done, or perhaps thought, things about which they feel unbearably guilty or ashamed.
Many of the children are aware of how their parents feel, and they proceed to conform to
their parents’ wishes by excluding from further processing such information as they already
have; and that, having done so, they cease consciously to be aware that they have ever observed
such scenes, form such impressions, or had such experiences (e.g. parent’s death). Many of the
children’s psychological problems seemed directly traceable to their having been exposed to
situations of these kinds. Their problems included chronic distrust of other people, inhibition of
their curiosity, distrust of their own senses and a tendency to find everything unreal. When
working with these children a therapeutic process will not be so much about restoring a memory
but giving a client permission to talk about something he had always is some ways known about.
References
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base. Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development.
Basic Books.