Discover millions of audiobooks, ebooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Thus Was Adonis Murdered: A Novel
Thus Was Adonis Murdered: A Novel
Thus Was Adonis Murdered: A Novel
Ebook286 pages4 hours

Thus Was Adonis Murdered: A Novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A young woman accused of murder while on holiday in Venice enlists a friend to come help her—but once they begin unraveling clues, there’s no telling what else will come to light.
 
“Sarah Caudwell is one of my very favorite mystery writers.”—A. J. Finn, New York Times bestselling author of The Woman in the Window


His was a body to die for . . .
 
Set to have a vacation away from her home life and the tax man, young barrister Julia Larwood takes a trip to Italy with her art-loving boyfriend. But when her personal copy of the current Finance Act is found a few meters away from a dead body, Julia finds herself caught up in a complex fight against the Inland Revenue. 
 
Fortunately, she’s able to call on her fellow colleagues who enlist the help of their friend Oxford professor Hilary Tamar. However, all is not what it seems. Could Julia’s boyfriend in fact be an employee of the establishment she has been trying to escape from? And how did her romantic luxurious holiday end in murder?

Don’t miss any of Sarah Caudwell’s riveting Hilary Tamar mysteries:
THUS WAS ADONIS MURDERED • THE SHORTEST WAY TO HADES • THE SIRENS SANG OF MURDER • THE SIBYL IN HER GRAVE
LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 4, 2023
ISBN9780593598740

Read more from Sarah Caudwell

Related to Thus Was Adonis Murdered

Related ebooks

Amateur Sleuths For You

View More

Reviews for Thus Was Adonis Murdered

Rating: 3.9245014316239315 out of 5 stars
4/5

351 ratings24 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Apr 10, 2025

    This is the first book in a mystery series, written in the 80s and 90s, that features an Oxford Don and a band of merry young barristers, who mostly solve crime from armchairs, via correspondence. Hilary Tamar, the first-person narrator, was deliberately written without any clues as to gender, since the author said she wished to create the sort of dry academic for whom gender is irrelevant. It's a good thing Hilary speaks in the first person, because in the third person it would very tough to avoid choosing he or she.

    As I said, Hilary is a dry academic. A legal academic. With a specialty in medieval law. In Britain. And Hilary has an ego. So the language is highly mannered. The young barristers also often speak as if they were arguing in court. (The reasons why Hilary is included in their band are rather vaguely explained, other than that Hilary had been a tutor to one of them at Oxford.) This stilted language schtick can be amusing at times, but it gets a bit old with an entire book written that way, though I can see where it might be more amusing to those with a legal background.

    Also, the mystery, and its solution, can't really be called "unfair" but the solution is VERY obscure.

    I read this because it was a gift, and it fit a challenge, but I won't be looking for others in the series. But it is well regarded by many, so if you are looking for something a bit offbeat, I wouldn't want to discourage you from giving it a try. Just not for me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Feb 22, 2025

    The mystery is an overly complex bit of nonsense, but the humor makes that worth ignoring.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Oct 28, 2024

    Amusing mystery, not completely epistolary, but mostly Julia's letters with interruptions, where Julia is a "highly intelligent and educated half-wit" [p. 224] who is accused of murder while she vacations in Venice.
    The story is told by Hilary Tamar, mentor, and friend to a group of lawyers in London. As the back of the book explains, "Caudwell told writer Martin Edwards in an interview for Mystery Scene, 'I knew from the onset Hilary must be an Oxford don---but of equivocal sex and even equivocal age."

    A quote from one of Julia's letters about her attempt, successful in her eyes, to be a tour guide:
    "My translation was therefore a trifle emancipated."
    This sentence follows:
    "The information I gave them may not, I admit, have been in every detail entirely accurate, for the guide book was in Italian: my knowledge of Italian architectural terms is sketchy, you might say nonexistent, as is also my knowledge of English architectural terms." [p. 106-107]
    I hope it isn't too much of a spoiler to add that the guide book she used was for a different city.

    I guessed whodunit, but I didn't guess who it was done to or when it was done.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Dec 19, 2023

    This book is essentially the platonic ideal of what I wish murder mysteries to be; in this I am continually disappointed.

    Julia Larwood, accidental murder suspect, learned space case, over-educated hot mess express, is such a treasure; though I am not a hypersexual lady barrister, rarely have I felt as validated by a female character. I, too, am worried for Desdemona.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Dec 9, 2022

    My librarian friend suggested this one to me - loaned me his personal copy. He said, smiling: "It's very VEDDY British!" And he was definitely not wrong. Set in a law practice with a cast of young barristers, narrated by their mentor, a law professor, it crackles with a certain brittle, arch, snappish dialog like something out of Wodehouse or Coward, couched in verbiage that truly deserves the epithet "sesquipedalian." Now, I wallow in 19th century literature and am not afraid of polysyllables, but this took even me some work to get used to. The characters are "bright young things," and don't seem especially likable, but after a while, you start to enjoy them - they are smart, loyal, funny, and brave. The plot involves one of their number (and she IS really annoying!) on an art tour in Venice, pursuing an impossibly "enchanting" young man, but ends up accused of his murder. It is convoluted, and unfortunately much of the story is told in the form of letters our art tourist writes to her colleagues back home, who provide some relief in their eye-rolling, snarky commentary on her letters and behavior. Once you settle into the idea that the entire style and tone of this book is a send-up of "Golden Age" 1930's sorts of mystery stories, it can be rather fun. And having been published in the 1980's, Caudwell has fun with smart, competent women (one in the eye for that old fart Rumpole); one or two quite charming men (and some damaged galoots), the slimier side of the art market, and picking apart some sexist tropes from the genre she is playing with.

    As it happens, I had just been perusing Martin Edwards's massive The Life of Crime: Detecting the History of Mysteries and their Creators compendium. One footnote mentioned Christopher Isherwood, who based his character Sally Bowles (most famously played in Cabaret by Liza Minelli) on a woman he knew called Jean Ross. Ross went on to raise a daughter, a brilliant legal scholar and barrister, named Sarah. She wrote detective novels under the name Sarah Caudwell. They may be an acquired taste, with a very definite style, but worth a shot if you think you might like that kind of thing.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Jun 8, 2020

    This is the first of Caudwell's four crime novels. They are famous in the annals of crime-fiction because we never discover whether her narrator and amateur sleuth, Oxford law professor Hilary Tamar, is a man or a woman. The professor solves crimes together with former student Michael and four of his junior barrister colleagues at Lincoln's Inn.

    In this first book, one of the young barristers, the notoriously accident-prone Julia, becomes a suspect in a murder inquiry during a holiday in Venice, and her friends are busy trying to clear her name, leading to a scenario that looks like a sort of cross between Donna Leon and John Mortimer (except that Leon's Venetian detective didn't appear on the scene until ten years after this). But the style is very much Caudwell's own, with most of the work done through witty dialogue between Tamar and the young lawyers that is rather in the tradition of P.G. Wodehouse and Evelyn Waugh, without ever reading like a direct pastiche. The non-dialogue parts of the text are mostly in the form of long, and also very funny, letters between the characters (we have to believe that letters posted in Venice would arrive in London the next day, rather implausible given the state of both British and Italian public services in the late 1970s!). Lots of jokes about chancery law and the art world, lots of LGBT plot interest, and a running gag that any unfamiliar American expressions, criminal slang, or other vulgarity must be "Cambridge idiom". I really don't know how I've gone forty years without finding out about these books!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jun 26, 2019

    Reminiscent of John Mortimer's Rumpole series, this very British mystery is both a comedy of manners and a good puzzle.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Apr 25, 2018

    Julia, a British attorney with Inland Revenue troubles, travels to Italy and becomes the leading suspect in a murder case involving another British citizen. Some of her British colleagues begin to puzzle over the case in Britain, eventually traveling to Venice. While the writing style is more sophisticated than most, the attorney and tax themes held little appeal to me. Letter-writing played a role in the plot. Literature lovers will enjoy the allusions to several great literary works.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jul 24, 2017

    Eccentric lawyer Julia travels to Venice for some frivolous fun with an attractive co-traveler but winds up being arrested for murder; back in London, professor Hilary Tamar and an assortment of Julia's quirky lawyer friends have to solve the case at a distance.

    This was a fun, quick, frivolous mystery that I'll likely not remember too well in a few months but that I enjoyed as a vacation book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    May 16, 2017

    Found all the sophisticated, ironic and often glib repartee rather tiresome -- so adolescent. The epistolary structure was kind of interesting.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Nov 3, 2014

    Fun but trivial mystery. Erudite and humorous, but not exactly in the same vein as an Innes novel. Of course, Innes started writing in the 30s and quit in the 80s, whereas Caudwell began in the 80s, so a lot of the differences may be attributable to the era.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jun 4, 2014

    Six-word review: Delightful series-starter introduces colorful characters.

    Extended review:

    Clever whodunit with an endearingly stuffy first-person narrator and a droll supporting cast in the best tradition of British cozy mysteries. I would be thrilled to discover a list of two dozen titles following this one in series, but alas, there are only three more. I expect to savor them.

    Young barrister Julia Larwood, well versed in law but charmingly inept in practical matters, is off on a holiday in Venice. In quest of a romantic fling in a picturesque Italian setting, she instead finds herself under suspicion of murder. Her colleagues back in London, together with an Oxford don with talents as an armchair sleuth, set about the urgent business of rescuing her on the strength of what they are able to discover, deduce, and contrive from a distance.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    May 17, 2014

    Thus Was Adonis Murdered is the first of four mysteries featuring a group of English barristers, including narrator Hilary Tamar. Tamar is a pompous academic who mentors the younger members of the group. In this novel, one of the barristers, Julia, gets caught up in a murder while on holiday in Venice. Her colleagues back home find it impossible to believe Julia had anything to do with the crime, and aim to prove this to the authorities. Which of course they do, because this is the sort of book where you know everything will work out all right in the end. Along the way there's a fair amount of irony and humor, making this more of a "fun read" than a gripping crime novel.

    Every series has its schtick, and in this case it revolves around Tamar. Is Hilary Tamar a man or a woman? It really doesn't matter, but one can't help wondering, and Sarah Caudwell leaves clues which keep the reader guessing. Tamar's credentials are a more relevant concern, and this is my only quibble with this series. Caudwell provides little background on Tamar and the team of barristers, simply dropping the reader into the story. They are all amateur detectives, conversant in law but not in criminal investigation. And their investigative efforts occur almost entirely from a London office, based on clues obtained from letters Julia wrote in the days leading up to the murder. Tamar is the sort of crime-solver who earns his stripes by being more intelligent than everyone else, ultimately declaring the solution which has been obvious to him (her?) all along. It requires some suspension of disbelief to think a murder could be solved more quickly via long distance without ever visiting the crime scene, than by the local authorities with all manner of evidence right in front of them.

    But then, this book is intended more as a romp than a page-turner, and on that level, it succeeds. With only four books in the series, these will be perfect light reads when the mood strikes.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Sep 22, 2013

    When one of a group of young London barristers is detained as a murder suspect while on holiday in Venice, the others, with the help of their mentor Professor Hilary Tamar, combine efforts to solve the crime and exonerate their friend. Julia, the suspect, has sent one of their number daily letters detailing the events of the Art Lovers tour of Venice and a description of her travel companions, giving her friends back home in London all the information they need to apply the rules of logic to solve the crime.

    Although the book is a little more risque than the typical cozy mystery, it has a similar humorous, light-hearted atmosphere. Readers who enjoy reading about the British legal and tax systems, art, and travel, all wrapped up in witty repartee will want to add this one to their reading lists.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5

    Mar 31, 2013

    Actually this was a DNF for me. I'm not sure why, I liked the premise and the characters mostly seemed okay. I think it might have been the language. it was very formal and very stilted my my inner ear. I also was easily confused when the reading of Julia's letters were happening. Someone would read a section, people listening would interrupt and comment and then back to the letters. Maybe it was that I didn't have enough long periods of time to read more than a few pages at a time. Either way, I finally gave up because it wasn't holding my attention.

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Apr 2, 2012

    The first mystery in Caudwell's series featuring amateur investigator Hilary Tamar and a cast of young London lawyers. When a young man is found dead in Julia Larwood's bed, her lawyer friends are the only ones who can uncover the truth of this murder. What I found most interesting about this book is that we are never really at the murder scene--only through a series of letters do we get the clues needed to solve the crime. I would give this book 3.5 out of 5.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5

    Jan 26, 2011

    Potentially a clever idea, though in the event I found this novel inordinately tedious.
    Reading this was like suffering a bout of otalgia,just without the fun.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5

    Jan 1, 2011

    Barrister Julia Larwood goes to Venice on an Art Lovers Holiday for one last romp before Inland Revenue catches up with her for back taxes. She meets a beautiful young man, who, unfortunately, is an employee of Inland Revenue. She manages to overlook this flaw, but when he is found murdered, she becomes the number one suspect. Being a bit of a klutz, her cohorts back at 62 New Square in London feel compelled to solve the mystery, which they do with the help of Hilary Tamar, their former teacher at Oxford. Told from the viewpoint of Hilary, via frequent coffee shop visits, office visits, and dinners, where letters from Julia are shared, we learn much more about each individual from the impressions of others than we do from any blatant descriptions. The mystery is mostly secondary to the wonderful character sketches.

    This is a delightfully fun book to read, and I can't wait to continue the series.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Sep 4, 2010

    Let me start by saying that I am not a big fan of mysteries, which probably counts for my giving this book a rating lower than did most other LT readers. I just don't care for formulaic plots. Caudwell's Hilary Tamer series had been recommended to me by a number of LT friends, so I decided to give the first one a try. Oxford don Hilary Tamar and a group of his/her former students, now solicitors, are stunned to learn that their colleague, the lovely and intelligent but charmingly spacey Julia, has been arrested for murder in Venice. Julia's vacation letters to Selena describe her fellow tour group members, helping to set the scene for the murder and prompting her colleagues towards unravelling the mystery.

    The witty, often barbed conversation of the young solicitors was delightful, and Julia's letters even moreso (I'm a sucker for epistolary novels). Caudwell also creates an amusing, if stereotypical, cast of characters. But I have to admit that about 2/3 of the way through, I started to get rather bored with it all, and I was happy to reach the conclusion and move on to something more to my liking. I have the other three novels in the series on my shelf, but it may be awhile before I get around to them (if ever; I may just gift them to my brother, who likes mysteries). Since I'm not a regular reader of this genre, I can't compare Thus Was Adonis Murdered to anything else. I certainly wouldn't want to steer any mystery fans away from Caudwell.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Jan 28, 2010

    Great fun -- a very English murder mystery involving the Chancery Bar, Venice, beautiful young men, and the chicanery so often associated with art. Well plotted and satisfyingly mysterious, but the real point here is the chat. I laughed out loud a lot.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Dec 1, 2009

    The second of her mysteries I've read - they feature Professor Hilary Tamar and four young and attractive barristers. This one takes place in Venice and London. These are mysteries where the plot itself is secondary to the characters. I find the characters and their banter entertaining. Highly enjoyable.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5

    Aug 23, 2009

    If "Friends and Sex in the City" had been on the telly in the 1980s, Sarah Caudwell's London group of bawdy and horny barristers could have been the cast. With grammatically excellent dialogue often demonstrating its P G Wodehouse/ Oscar Wilde antecedents, this book was fun to read just for the wit and language. A complex plot entwined within 1980's Venetian Art Tourism cum London's Lincoln Inn legal locales is enhanced by a set of very interesting if eccentric characters to complete the package.

    The author's, Sarah Cockburn in real life, life style strongly remind you of Katherine Hepburn with a real British accent and history. She wrote only 4 books and I am anticipating similar good read's with the other three. She is my second, 4 books only, author recently discovered. The other was Kate Ross, both discovered through Librarything communiques.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Feb 17, 2008

    Julia Larwood finds herself suspected of murdering a young man she just slept with in the afternoon. She is puzzled, to say the least as are her London colleges. As they work to solve the puzzle, she must wait in Venice.
    This was a good mystery. I was unable to come up with the solution, and it was fun getting there. What seemed to be witty dialog at the beginning though, seemed trite and contrived by the end. The characters ended up annoying rather than pleasing my ears. Although the relationships are kept vague, there is enough spelled out to know that these people seem very superficial.
    So, I would not read this again, though, if I found an inexpensive copy of another book by this author, I might try it. I will not be keeping this book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Nov 28, 2007

    Caudwell keeps up a tone of relentless silliness as she presents and solves a mystery from a distance, using letters and phone calls from the accused murderer to move her story along. The humor is mostly successful, and she does a nice job of progressively revealing relationships among the characters. An enjoyable read, but not one that makes me jump up and find more by this author.

Book preview

Thus Was Adonis Murdered - Sarah Caudwell

CHAPTER 1

Scholarship asks, thank God, no recompense but Truth. It is not for the sake of material reward that she (Scholarship) pursues her (Truth) through the undergrowth of Ignorance, shining on Obscurity the bright torch of Reason and clearing aside the tangled thorns of Error with the keen secateurs of Intellect. Nor is it for the sake of public glory and the applause of the multitude: the scholar is indifferent to vulgar acclaim. Nor is it even in the hope that those few intimate friends who have observed at first hand the labour of the chase will mark with a word or two of discerning congratulation its eventual achievement. Which is very fortunate, because they don’t.

If the events in which Julia Larwood became involved last September had not been subjected to the penetrating scrutiny of the trained scholar—that is to say, my own—well, I do not say it is certain that Julia would even now be languishing in a Venetian prison. The crime being thought to be one of passion, great lenience might have been shown; the Italian Government might have declared an amnesty; the Foreign Office might have done something. Very possibly. I do say, however, that it was only as a result of my own investigation that Julia’s innocence was conclusively established and that she returned to England without a stain on her character.

As an instance of what the methods of Scholarship may achieve, the affair seems not unworthy of some written record. And you may think, dear reader, that those who had been able—modesty forbids me to say, if others do not choose to, privileged—to observe for themselves the process of my reasoning would have competed in eagerness to undertake the task. How little, if you think so, do you know the Chancery Bar. Timothy Shepherd—additionally inspired by the reverence which ought to be felt for his former tutor—that is to say, myself—Timothy, you might imagine, would have been delighted by the opportunity. But no—Timothy has a case on the Companies Act coming up in the House of Lords; he is weeks behind with his paperwork; he cannot do it. Selena Jardine, who is fond of Julia and would have been distressed by her prolonged incarceration—no, Selena is engaged in a planning enquiry on behalf of certain objectors to a road-widening scheme; she is months behind with her paperwork; she cannot possibly do it. Michael Cantrip and Desmond Ragwort, of the same Chambers—Cantrip is instructed on behalf of a lady who claims by custom immemorial to be entitled to hang her washing across her neighbour’s garden; the neighbour has instructed Ragwort to oppose the claim; they confidently expect the matter to occupy their attention for the best part of term, and that of a High Court Judge for at least a fortnight: no, clearly they cannot do it.

I am obliged, therefore, with some reluctance, to do the thing myself. It means my own work must be laid aside: the day must be deferred to a yet more distant future which sees the publication of Causa in the Early Common Law by Hilary Tamar and the appearance in learned journals of such phrases as ‘Professor Tamar’s masterly exposition’, ‘Professor Tamar’s revolutionary analysis’ and so forth. But I am content to make the sacrifice—if I hesitate, it is for fear that some of my readers will suspect that my motive for publication is mere self-advertisement. The danger of incurring so contemptible an opinion has almost deterred me; but I cannot allow mere personal delicacy to deprive the public of a possibly useful and instructive chronicle. I shall set down what happened, as it happened: and if, in the cause of Truth, I am unable to minimize my own achievement, I hope that the wiser spirits—I refer, in particular, dear reader, to yourself—will not think the worse of me for it.


I had decided to spend September in London—my work on the concept of causa required me to study various original documents in the Public Record Office. And Oxford in September is not at all amusing.

I had at first been uncertain where I should stay. For the occasional night or two, I am sure of a welcome at Timothy’s flat in Middle Temple Lane. I feared, however, that my presence for a whole month might place an excessive strain on his hospitality. Fortune came to my aid: a former colleague of mine, now the owner of a house and two cats in Islington, had arranged to spend the month in the United States of America and had realized, at a late stage, the difficulty of taking the cats with him to that country—he wrote in piteous terms, begging me to come and care for them. Happy to be of assistance to a fellow scholar, I consented.

On my first day in London I made an early start. Reaching the Public Record Office not much after ten, I soon secured the papers needed for my research and settled in my place. I became, as is the way of the scholar, so deeply absorbed as to lose all consciousness of my surroundings or of the passage of time. When at last I came to myself, it was almost eleven and I was quite exhausted: I knew I could not prudently continue without refreshment.

If, at eleven o’clock on a weekday morning, you leave the Public Record Office, turn right down Chancery Lane and continue past the Silver Vaults to the nearest coffee house, you will generally find gathered there (professional obligations and their Clerk permitting) the junior members of 62 New Square. They are a decorative little group—it would be a difficult taste that was pleased by none of them. Between Ragwort and Cantrip there are certain points of resemblance: they are the same age; of similar height; both thin; both very pale. But it is for those whose pleasure lies in the conquest of virtue that Ragwort’s delicate profile and demure autumnal colouring have a most particular charm. Cantrip, in sharp contrast, has eyes and hair of a witchlike blackness, more pleasing to those whose preference is for a savour of iniquity. Selena—I can think of no especially striking feature by which you might distinguish Selena from any other pretty woman in her middle twenties, average in height and roundness of figure, with hair an inconstant shade of blonde; I mean, until she speaks: for her voice is unmistakable, smooth and persuasive, the envy of rival advocates. But until then—well, if you can imagine a Persian cat which has just completed a successful cross-examination, that will give you some idea of her. Timothy, my former pupil, being by some two or three years the senior in call to the Bar, is detained more often than not by the claims of his profession and was absent on the morning of which I write—there is little point, therefore, in my describing him.

They will be debating one of those diverse questions which interest the minds of the Chancery Bar—when to apply by summons rather than by motion, what to do about Ireland, or whose turn it is to pay for coffee.

‘Perfectly scandalous,’ Ragwort was saying as I entered the coffee house. The object of his disapproval might have been almost anything—Ragwort has such high principles. It turned out on this occasion to be the price of coffee. But he is a young man of graceful manners—on seeing me he ordered another cup, almost without hesitation.

I had feared, in the middle of the Long Vacation, to find Lincoln’s Inn deserted. I expressed my surprise and pleasure at finding them.

‘My dear Hilary,’ said Selena, ‘you surely know by now that in the period ironically called the Long Vacation, Henry allows us to be away from Chambers for no more than a fortnight. Cantrip and I have already taken our fortnights—Ragwort is saving his for the end of the month.’

Henry is the Clerk at 62 New Square. From references which will from time to time be made to him some of my readers, unfamiliar with the system, may infer that Selena and the rest are employed by Henry under a contract more or less equivalent to one of personal servitude. I should explain that this is not the case: they employ Henry. It is Henry’s function, in exchange for ten per cent of their earnings, to deal on their behalf with the outside world: to administer, manage and negotiate; to extol their merits, gloss over their failings, justify their fees and extenuate their delays; to flatter those clients whose patronage is most lucrative; to write reproachfully to those who delay payment for more than two years or so; to promise with equal conviction in the same morning that six separate sets of papers will be the first to receive attention. By the outside world, I mean, of course, solicitors: nothing could be more improper than for a member of the English Bar to have dealings, without the intervention of a solicitor, with a member of the general public.

I asked if Timothy’s absence, at least, was attributable to pleasure. Selena and Ragwort shook their heads.

‘Got nobbled,’ said Cantrip.

‘Nobbled?’ I repeated, a little perplexed by the expression. Cantrip is a Cambridge man—it is not always easy to understand what he says. ‘Nobbled? By whom, Cantrip? Or, to adopt the Cambridge idiom, who by?’

‘Henry, of course,’ said Cantrip. ‘Spotted old Tim trying to make a break for it and sent out the guards to head him off. Had him hauled back to the stalag.’

‘Cantrip means,’ said Selena, ‘that as we were leaving for coffee Henry sent a message by the temporary typist that Timothy’s presence was required in Chambers. It appears that a rather distinguished firm of London solicitors needs the advice of Chancery Counsel on a matter of some urgency.’

‘That’s right,’ said Cantrip. ‘So while we’re swilling coffee, poor old Tim is listening to the demented ravings of the senior partner in Tiddley, Thingummy & Whatsit.’

‘So you see, Hilary,’ said Selena, ‘no one’s on holiday. Except Julia, of course. She should be in Venice by now.’

‘Julia?’ I said, much astonished. ‘You haven’t let Julia go off on her own to Venice, surely?’

‘Am I,’ asked Selena, ‘Julia’s keeper?’

‘Yes,’ I said, rather severely, for her attitude seemed to me to be irresponsible. She likes, I know, to pretend that Julia is a normal, grown-up woman, who can safely be sent round the corner to buy a loaf of bread; but, of course, it is quite absurd. Poor Julia’s inability to understand what is happening, or why, in the world about her, her incompetence to learn even the simplest of the practical skills required for survival—these must have made it evident, even in childhood, that she would never be able to cope unaided with the full responsibilities of adult life. She must have been, no doubt, a docile, good-natured child, with a certain facility for Latin verbs and intelligence tests—but what use is that to anyone? Seeking some suitable refuge, where her inadequacies would pass unnoticed, her relatives, very sensibly, sent her to Lincoln’s Inn. She is now a member of the small set of Revenue Chambers in 63 New Square. There she sits all day, advising quite happily on the construction of the Finance Acts, and doing no harm to anyone. But to let her go to Venice—I imagined her, wandering alone through those devious alleyways, looking—as, indeed, she does at the best of times—like one of the more dishevelled heroines of Greek tragedy; and I could not forbear to chide.

‘Furthermore,’ I added, ‘it is no use your implying, Selena, that your part in the enterprise was a merely negative one. If you tell me that Julia could have managed to purchase a travel ticket, find her passport, pack her suitcase and catch an aeroplane, all without the aid of some competent adult, I shall be obliged to disbelieve you.’

Selena admitted to having provided such assistance. She had accompanied Julia to a travel agent and had represented, on her behalf, the necessity of a holiday in Venice being arranged at five days’ notice. (I did not ask why Julia had made no earlier arrangements—to plan five days in advance is, for her, a remarkable achievement.) The travel agent had found a vacant place on something called an Art Lovers’ Holiday. Asked in what manner this differed from other holidays, the agent had explained that it included guided tours of various places of historical and artistic interest: additional tours were available on an optional basis.

‘This made,’ said Selena, ‘a great impression on Julia. If some of the tours are optional, the remainder, she reasons, must be compulsory. For most of the time, therefore, she will not be on her own, but travelling about the Veneto in a group of respectable Art Lovers under the supervision of a qualified guide. So you see, Hilary, that all this alarm and despondency is quite unjustified.’

‘You naturally prefer,’ I said, ‘to look on the bright side. So far as I am aware, however, the qualifications for a guide are not those of a nursemaid or a guardian of the mentally infirm. The poor fellow will take his eye off her for a moment and she will wander off. What then?’

‘She will ask the way back to her hotel.’

‘She will have forgotten the name of her hotel.’

‘We have made her write it down on a piece of paper.’

‘She will have lost the piece of paper. She will find herself alone in a strange city. She will not know where she is or what she ought to do.’

‘The same thing,’ said Selena, ‘happens in London at least once a fortnight.’

There was some truth in this. In her native city Julia is still unable to find her way with confidence from Holborn to Covent Garden. Even so—

‘Julia,’ said Ragwort firmly, ‘will not get lost in Venice. I have lent her my guide books, both to Venice itself and to those cities of the Veneto which she is likely to visit. I wasn’t always able to get the English version, so one or two of them are in Italian. Still, I don’t think it matters—the main thing is that they all have maps in them. Perfectly clear, simple maps. Julia will be able to see at a glance where she is, where she ought to be and how to get from one to the other.’

This was a kindness beyond mere courtesy. Visiting Venice in the previous spring Ragwort had formed a passionate attachment to the city and all connected with it—the guide books were as dear to him as the last mementoes of a love affair. To hand them over to Julia, particularly when one remembers her tendency to spill things—

‘I have told her,’ said Ragwort, ‘that she is to take great care of them and not to read them while drinking gin. Or coffee. Or while eating pizza with her fingers. And I have put brown paper covers on them to protect them on the outside. So it really should be all right.’

‘Of course it will be all right,’ said Selena. ‘And it doesn’t matter about some of them being in Italian. Julia speaks very good Italian.’

This opinion of Selena’s is erroneous but incorrigible. Selena herself declines to learn any foreign language. Julia, on the other hand, makes her way along the shores of the Mediterranean in the happy belief that everyone still speaks some version of Latin, with the endings of the nouns slurred and a slightly lilting accent: she achieves in this way a sufficient fluency to be regarded by Selena, when they travel together, as the one who speaks the language.

I raised another question which was perplexing me. ‘It all sounds,’ I said, ‘very expensive. How can Julia afford it? I thought that the Inland Revenue had reduced her to destitution.’

Julia’s unhappy relationship with the Inland Revenue was due to her omission, during four years of modestly successful practice at the Bar, to pay any income tax. The truth is, I think, that she did not, in her heart of hearts, really believe in income tax. It was a subject which she had studied for examinations and on which she had thereafter advised a number of clients: she naturally did not suppose, in these circumstances, that it had anything to do with real life.

The day had come on which the Revenue discovered her existence and reminded her of theirs. They had not initially asked her for money: they had first insisted, unreasonably but implacably, that she should submit accounts. They had shown by this that they were not motivated by a just and lawful desire to fill the public purse for the public benefit: their true purpose was to make Julia spend every evening for several months copying out the last four years’ entries in her Clerk’s Fee Book on an old typewriter that did not work properly. I myself am not entirely sure that the age and defectiveness of the typewriter were an essential feature of the Revenue’s planning. But Julia was: every time it stuck, her bitterness towards them deepened. The Revenue, on receiving the result of her labours, had uttered no word of gratitude or commendation. They had demanded a large sum of money. More than she had. More, according to her—though I think that she cannot be quite right about this—than she had ever had. More than she could ever hope to have.

In this extremity, she had appealed to her Clerk. Julia’s Clerk is called William, an older man than Henry, and perhaps more indulgent. It took a mere two hours of sycophantic pleading, freely laced with promises of perpetual industry, to secure his assistance. He sent out fee notes, as a matter of urgency, requesting immediate payment from those solicitors who were indebted to Julia for her services.

His efforts raised a sufficient sum to pay the Revenue, but left Julia with nothing to live on. Or at any rate with only so much as might support the bare necessities of life. I did not see how she could afford to go to Venice.

‘The unhappy events to which you refer,’ said Selena, ‘occurred some months ago. That is to say, in the financial year which ended on the fifth of April. On or about that date, the Revenue wrote to Julia, reminding her that they were now entitled to another year’s accounts.’

‘And Julia was jolly miffed,’ said Cantrip. ‘Because the way she saw it, she’d done her bit as far as accounts were concerned.’

‘But she consoled herself,’ said Selena, ‘with the reflection that it was only one year’s accounts and couldn’t be as bad as last time. So she went back to her typewriter and in less than three months prepared her accounts for the previous year.’

‘But since,’ said Ragwort, ‘her income for the previous year included the rather substantial sum raised by William to pay her previous liabilities to the Revenue—’

‘She now owes them even more than she did last year. And she’s really rather despondent about it. Because it seems to her that every effort she makes to reduce her liability will in fact simply serve to increase it. And it is difficult to point to any fallacy in her reasoning.’ Selena gazed sadly into her coffee cup.

‘It is still not clear to me,’ I said, ‘why she now feels able to afford a holiday.’

‘It is true,’ said Selena, ‘that if she takes a holiday, she can’t afford to pay the Revenue. But if she doesn’t take a holiday she still can’t afford to pay the Revenue. On the sheep and lamb principle, she has decided to go to Venice. I think it’s very sensible. She will return to London spiritually refreshed and able to cope with life.’

‘Spiritually?’ said Ragwort. ‘My dear Selena, we all know exactly what Julia is hoping to find in Venice, and there is, I regret to say, nothing spiritual about it.’ Ragwort’s rather beautiful mouth closed in a severe straight line, as if denying utterance to more explicit improprieties.

‘After a bit of the other,’ said Cantrip. It is a Cambridge expression, signifying, as I understand it, the pursuit of erotic satisfaction.

‘Julia has been working very hard all summer,’ said Selena, ‘and has had few opportunities for pleasure. No one, I hope, would grudge her a little innocent diversion. My only fear is that she may be over-precipitate. I have reminded her that young men like to think one is interested in them as people: if one discloses too early the true nature of one’s interest, they are apt to be offended and get all hoity-toity. But we must hope someone takes her fancy in the first day or two, or she may feel she hasn’t got time for the subtle approach.’

‘How long does she have?’ I asked.

‘Ten days. But effectively only eight, because two are spent travelling. She gets back to London on Saturday week.’

After a moment’s reflection, Selena thought it prudent to qualify her last statement with the words ‘Deo volente.’ The phrase was intended, no doubt, to allow for some lesser catastrophe than Julia’s arrest on a charge of murder.

CHAPTER 2

Despite her professed confidence that Julia would come to no harm, Selena’s conversation betrayed, in the days that followed, an unusually anxious acquaintance with those columns of The Times which carried the news from Italy. It was full, suddenly, of casual references to student unrest in Bologna; the problems of the Tuscan peach farmers; and the doctrinal innovations of the Vatican and the Italian Communist Party. Happily, it appeared that neither crime nor accident, civil commotion nor natural disaster had impinged on any person answering to Julia’s description.

In addition to this negative intelligence, she expected letters. She had impressed on Julia her duty to write daily, for the edification and amusement of those left in Lincoln’s Inn.

‘You made it clear, I hope,’ said Ragwort, ‘that the letters should be suitable to be read in mixed company and the activities described of unquestionable decorum?’

‘Not precisely,’ said Selena. ‘I said that what we hoped for was a picaresque series of attempted seductions. I told her we would not insist, however, on their uniform success. I said that on the contrary we might think it inartistic.’

Ragwort sighed.

I had thought Selena optimistic to expect that any letters sent from Venice would reach London before

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1