Technology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Read more from Iaea
Adapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Technology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment
Titles in the series (62)
Design Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResource Requirements for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeismic Design for Nuclear Installations: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of the Reactor Containment and Associated Systems for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Instrumentation and Control Systems for New and Existing Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComputer Security Aspects of Design for Instrumentation and Control Systems at Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign of Auxiliary Systems and Supporting Systems for Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProtection against Internal Hazards in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants: Specific Safety Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Energy Transition and Climate Change: Developments and Future Perspectives - Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadioactive Waste from Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOffshore Wind Energy Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMunicipal Solid Waste to Energy Conversion Processes: Economic, Technical, and Renewable Comparisons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLow-Carbon Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRenewable Energy Prospects for Central and South-Eastern Europe Energy Connectivity (CESEC) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal hydrogen trade to meet the 1.5°C climate goal: Part II – Technology review of hydrogen carriers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy Storage in Power Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHydrogen, Mister President: Energy War 2.0 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Wind Energy Generation: Modelling and Control Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInnovation Outlook: Renewable Methanol Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamentals and Applications of Lithium-ion Batteries in Electric Drive Vehicles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThermal Cycles of Heat Recovery Power Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThermal Energy Storage Standard Requirements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReaching Zero with Renewables: Biojet Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMembrane Gas Separation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOffshore Renewables: An Action Agenda for Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Chimney Power Plants: Numerical Investigations and Experimental Validation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFuels and Fuel-Additives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Electronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Way Home: Tales from a life without technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5OFF-GRID PROJECTS: Essential Guide to Enhance DIY Skills for Self-Reliance Preppers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Illustrated Tesla (Rediscovered Books): With linked Table of Contents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5OFF-GRID PROJECTS: A Comprehensive Beginner's Guide to Learn All about OffGrid Living from A-Z and Live a Life of Self-Sufficiency Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmergency Preparedness and Off-Grid Communication Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Illustrated Tesla Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Electricity Basics: Powering Your Home or Office with Solar Energy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Energy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5DIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Nuclear War Survival Skills Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOil: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fire on the Horizon: The Untold Story of the Gulf Oil Disaster Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOff Grid And Mobile Solar Power For Everyone: Your Smart Solar Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStation Blackout: Inside the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLet It Shine: The 6,000-Year Story of Solar Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamentals of Electronics 1: Electronic Components and Elementary Functions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSerious Microhydro: Water Power Solutions from the Experts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHome Generator Selection, Installation and Repair Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectric Power Transmission: Lecture Notes of Electric Power Transmission Course Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Power Your Home For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Technology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Technology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment - IAEA
TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP
FOR SMALL MODULAR
REACTOR DEPLOYMENT
IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES No. NR-T-1.18
TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP
FOR SMALL MODULAR
REACTOR DEPLOYMENT
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2021
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: [email protected]
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2021
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
August 2021
STI/PUB/1944
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Technology roadmap for small modular reactor deployment / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021. | Series: IAEA nuclear energy series, ISSN 1995–7807 ; no. NR-T-1.18 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 21-01425 | ISBN 978–92–0–110021–4 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–110121–1 (pdf) | ISBN 978–92–0–110221–8 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Nuclear reactors — Technological innovations. | Technology — Planning. | Nuclear power plants.
Classification: UDC 621.039.5 | STI/PUB/1944
FOREWORD
The IAEA’s statutory role is to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world
. Among other functions, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of atomic energy
. One way this is achieved is through a range of technical publications including the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises publications designed to further the use of nuclear technologies in support of sustainable development, to advance nuclear science and technology, catalyse innovation and build capacity to support the existing and expanded use of nuclear power and nuclear science applications. The publications include information covering all policy, technological and management aspects of the definition and implementation of activities involving the peaceful use of nuclear technology.
The IAEA safety standards establish fundamental principles, requirements and recommendations to ensure nuclear safety and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
When IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications address safety, it is ensured that the IAEA safety standards are referred to as the current boundary conditions for the application of nuclear technology.
Technology roadmaps have proven to be very useful management tools for identifying, evaluating and promoting the development of complex technological projects. More importantly, the development and use of a technology roadmap can accelerate development of the technology while avoiding unforeseen barriers to the product’s deployment. Technology roadmaps promote enhanced collaboration and knowledge sharing, and help to ensure that efforts (by technology developers, industry, users and regulatory bodies) are focused on a common objective. Additionally, for Member States, technology roadmaps can support science and technology policy decisions, investments across government and industry in terms of loan guarantees and incentives, industry led initiatives and human resource development.
This publication is intended to provide Member States with a set of generic roadmaps that can be used in the deployment of small modular reactors (SMRs). These roadmaps are based on the latest inputs from Member States currently pursuing this technology. The publication places emphasis on the activities of owners/operating organizations, who drive the demand and requirements for reactor designs; designers, who develop the technologies; and regulators, who establish and maintain the regulatory requirements that owners/operating organizations are obliged to meet. It also provides a methodology for developing a technology roadmap for reactors with longer development horizons, and provides information on emerging opportunities and challenges for this relatively new nuclear technology.
Before deploying nuclear power technology, Member States need relevant reference and guidance documents to develop the necessary infrastructure. Although the focus of this publication is on roadmaps, a discussion related to infrastructure is included with reference to the appropriate guidance documents. This publication assumes that Member States either have the needed infrastructure or are working to develop the infrastructure necessary to support a peaceful nuclear power programme. The technology roadmaps laid out in this publication were developed with the support of experts from several Member States in four meetings convened by the IAEA over the course of three years.
The IAEA wishes to acknowledge the assistance provided by the contributors and reviewers listed at the end of the publication, especially C.L. Painter (United States of America), who developed the initial draft on SMR technology roadmaps. The IAEA officers responsible for this publication were M.H. Subki, S. Monti and F. Reitsma of the Division of Nuclear Power.
EDITORIAL NOTE
This publication has been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader’s assistance. It does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative version of this publication is the hard copy issued at the same time and available as pdf on www.iaea.org/publications. To create this version for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including a the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
2. SMALL MODULAR REACTORS AND THE TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP
2.1. Current status of deployment
2.2. Modular design and construction: Terminology
2.3. Nuclear power infrastructure
2.4. Non-proliferation and safeguards
2.5. Technology roadmap as a concept
3. PROSPECTS, IMPEDIMENTS AND DEPLOYMENT INDICATORS
3.1. Prospects
3.2. Issues and impediments
3.3. Indicators of SMR deployment
4. STAKEHOLDERS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
4.1. Stakeholders
4.2. Regulatory frameworks
5. TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP FOR NEAR TERM DEPLOYABLE SMR TECHNOLOGY
5.1. Generic roadmap for the owner/operating organization
5.2. Generic roadmap for the designer/supplier
5.3. Generic approach for regulatory bodies
6. DEVELOPING REACTOR TECHNOLOGY WITH LONGER DEVELOPMENT TIMELINES
6.1. Relevant technical areas and support for R&D
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Annex: REVIEW OF SMR DESIGNS IN OPERATION OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [1] with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Goals 7, 9 and 13 are entitled Affordable and Clean Energy; Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; and Climate Action, respectively. In December 2015, during the 21st annual session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), held in Paris, 195 countries agreed on a historic and first-ever legally binding global climate agreement establishing an action plan to limit global warming to well below 2°C [2]. To achieve these goals, a worldwide change in the way energy is both produced and consumed is required. Moreover, a wide range of low carbon energy technologies will be needed to support this transition, including a variety of renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency measures, advanced vehicles, carbon capture and storage, and nuclear energy. The Paris Agreement offers an incentive for nuclear power development because every signatory has to update its Nationally Determined Contribution every five years.
According to the IAEA’s Power Reactor Information System (PRIS), as of July 2021 there were 443 nuclear power reactors in operation in 32 IAEA Member States, contributing 393 241 MW(e) total net installed capacity. Furthermore, 51 nuclear power reactors were under various stages of construction in 19 Member States which will in due course contribute 53 905 MW(e) total net installed capacity. These power reactors can trace their lineage back to small prototype or demonstration reactors. The earlier generation designs generally ranged from less than 100 MW(e) to as large as 300 MW(e), and a small number of these facilities continue to be safely operated today. These designs were part of many efforts around the world to experiment with different cooling technologies, fuel types and operating configurations. Although not designed at the time for modular fabrication or construction, these early plants shared many of the same considerations for modern day small modular reactor (SMR)¹ technologies in that vision and careful planning were needed to develop and successfully deploy them. Preferential technologies that emerged from these early commercial efforts are based on the following:
— The expected effort required to obtain technology maturity for use in commercial facilities;
— The ability to resolve technical uncertainties in a timely manner (e.g. material degradation challenges, chemistry);
— Political considerations such as nationalization of supply chains where possible, preferences for reactor brands, access to technology user groups to share and learn from operating experience.
Water cooled reactors (WCRs) were the dominant technology to emerge, although considerable efforts in other coolant technologies continued over the decades, recognizing that significant advantages could be gained in operating performance if outstanding technological issues could be resolved.
Over time, economies of scale, based on maximizing megawatts against operating and maintenance (O&M) costs, drove nuclear power reactor technology developers to produce ever larger designs, leading to designs today with power levels of up to 1700 MW(e). An interest in reducing plant O&M costs while improving safety performance led to the development of passive safety features that are adopted in today’s advanced evolutionary reactor designs (also known as Generation III and III+ reactors). However, these advanced reactor designs are now pushing the technological envelope and little can be done to make them more efficient.
The development of innovative reactor designs and technologies (also known as Generation IV reactors), to establish a step change in efficiency as well as in safety performance over existing water cooled technologies, continues. New fuels, reactor configurations and materials push thermal efficiency higher while reducing the number of systems necessary to run the plant safely.
However, the market for large capacity power plants is limited to countries with a grid capacity capable of accepting them. The grid demand of such a country should also be growing to the extent that plants of this capacity would be necessary (e.g. replacement of old plants or addition of new generation plants). At the same time, recognizing the need for political support for nuclear power, a utility and its stakeholders should select a technology that they know with certainty can be constructed and operated more cost effectively, safely and efficiently than existing plants.
Of the more than 50 new plants currently under construction in 19 countries, all are based on water cooled technologies, except two nuclear power reactors. One is in China, a high temperature gas cooled reactor, and one is in India, a sodium cooled fast reactor. Most of the power reactors under construction are in countries with well developed grids. However, after 2010, countries embarking on nuclear power programmes, including Bangladesh, Belarus, Turkey and United Arab Emirates, started construction projects for large nuclear power reactors with advanced technology. In addition to the issues of reliability and cost competitiveness, there is also the issue of political risk, with nuclear projects becoming topics of political and/or public controversy, and consequently lengthening licensing procedures, the risk of governments imposing nuclear phase out, etc.
Limitations of grid capacity² and slow growth in power demand are leading factors in exploring whether smaller, more incremental, nuclear power technologies can be used either instead of new large nuclear power plants, or to supplement existing installed capacity. In addition, with the growing use of intermittent renewable capacity such as solar, wind, small hydroelectric and tidal generation, there are advantages to introducing small baseload nuclear plants with enhanced load following capabilities to stabilize the supply to the grid. A large number of nuclear technology developers have recognized this gap in the market and are responding with smaller reactor facility concepts that promise to meet the long term needs of power utilities and their stakeholders. In some cases, developers are going a step further and are looking to address yet another market niche for smaller sources of reliable power supply in remote places, such as a mine where the only source of reliable power comes from local off-grid combustion generation (e.g. diesel sets).
The key to the success of these new technologies is the ability to demonstrate stronger economic efficiency, given that smaller reactors equate to a loss of economies of scale. This means that:
— Users will no longer accept delays in construction and commissioning, which lead to increased long term costs to be absorbed by a project. This is resulting in the use of more predictable manufacturing and construction approaches, such as modular engineering and construction, which come from the shipbuilding and aerospace industries.
— Users require modern technological measures to reduce O&M costs and to improve the overall plant capacity factor while at the same time demonstrating to their stakeholders an improvement in safety performance necessary to ensure public acceptance of a nuclear project.
These new reactor concepts are known in the marketplace as SMRs in an attempt to differentiate them from larger nuclear power plants. They are generally understood to be smaller than 300 MW(e) per reactor in output. However, despite being built and operated using different approaches, the IAEA considers these concepts to be smaller nuclear power plants that should still address the requirements specified in the IAEA safety standards and guides.
The market for smaller nuclear facilities has the potential to be an order of magnitude larger than for current full scale nuclear power plants, given that most small countries either have small grids or are developing mixed generation grids. However, much of the infrastructure essential for larger plants is still needed for these smaller types of facilities, albeit scaled commensurate with risk. These include the regulatory regime; operator capacity to oversee safe conduct of its activities; emergency planning; and security and safeguards.
The IAEA has pursued a number of initiatives to support the development and deployment of SMRs, recognizing their potential as options for enhancing energy supply security in countries expanding their nuclear programmes or embarking on such programmes. The driving forces in the development of such reactors are the following:
— Meeting the need for flexible power generation for a wider range of users and applications.
— Replacing existing ageing fossil fuel fired power plants or enhancing a grid which contains