-
What is the International Court of Justice? The Role and Activities of the ICJ
United Nations - The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the world’s highest international court.
It has a dual role: to settle in accordance with international law the legal disputes submitted to it by UN Member States, and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized international organs and agencies of the UN system.
This short film (available in over 50 languages) presents its main features.
Use of this file is free for non-profit and educational/editorial purposes. The ICJ encourages its use, reproduction and distribution for the same purposes. Sale or commercial use strictly prohibited.
Learn more: http://www.icj-cij.org/en
published: 24 Oct 2017
-
Virtual visit of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
This virtual tour of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) leads the viewers through the rooms of the Peace Palace used by the judges in carrying out their judicial functions.
FAQ
------
What is the International Court of Justice?
The Court is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established by the United Nations Charter, which was signed in 1945 in San Francisco (United States), and began work in 1946 in the Peace Palace, The Hague (Netherlands).
The Court, which is composed of 15 judges, has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes between States submitted to it by them and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal matters referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.
The Court...
published: 26 Apr 2021
-
World court orders Russia to immediately halt invasion of Ukraine | ICJ | Russia-Ukraine Conflict
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military action in Ukraine, saying it is profoundly concerned by Moscow’s use of force.
#ICJ #Russia #Ukraine
About Channel:
WION -The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and res...
published: 17 Mar 2022
-
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
The Russian legal team responds to Ukrainian arguments presented on 6 June, in a case brought by Ukraine against Russia at the UN's top court alleging that Russia breached treaties on terrorist financing and racial discrimination in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. The case was filed in 2017, before Russia's invasion last year triggered a full-scale war in Ukraine.
Russia Ukraine War | Russia Ukraine News | Russia Ukraine Crisis | Russian Invasion | Ukraine War | ICJ | Vladimir Putin | Zelensky | World News | International News | Firstpost
#russiaukrainewar #russiaukrainelive #russiaukrainecrisis #russianinvasion #icj #internationalcourtofjustice #vladimirputin #worldnews #internationalnews #firstpost
First...
published: 08 Jun 2023
-
'Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine' - International Court of Justice
Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine, the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Wednesday (16 Mar), in The Hague.
By a vote of 13 to two, with Vice-President Kirill Gevorgian of Russia and Judge Xue Hanqin of China dissenting, the ICJ ruled that Russia “shall immediately suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February.”
The court’s ruling – the first such verdict handed down by the world court since the Russian invasion began – is in response to a suit filed by Ukraine on 27 February, accusing Russia of manipulating the concept of genocide to justify its military aggression.
Although the ICJ's verdicts are binding, news reports questioned whether Moscow would abide by the ruling, and the court has no direct means of enforcing them.
...
published: 17 Mar 2022
-
Ukraine vs Russian Federation - Allegations of Genocide | International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The public hearing on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) was concluded today.
Oral arguments were presented by Ukraine. The Russian Federation did not participate in the hearing. In a letter sent on Saturday 5 March 2022, the Russian Federation informed the Court that it “ha[d] decided not to participate in the oral proceedings due to open on 7 March 2022”.
During the hearing, the seat of the Court, the delegation of Ukraine was led by Anton Korynevych, Permanent Representative of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, as Agent.
At the end of the hearing, Co-Agent of ...
published: 07 Mar 2022
-
International criminal court issues arrest warrant for Russian president Vladimir Putin
An arrest warrant has been issued by the International criminal court (ICC) for Russian president Vladimir Putin, as well as Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Russia's presidential commissioner for children's rights.
Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub
The ICC has stated that it has sufficient evidence to suggest that Putin is criminally liable for the 'war crime of illegal deportation of population (children)' and 'unlawful transfer of population (children)' from Ukraine's occupied regions to Russia. The ICC has also found evidence to suggest that Lvova-Belova bears individual responsibility for the same crimes.
The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► https://bit.ly/3uhA7zg
Sign up ...
published: 17 Mar 2023
-
International Criminal Court issues arrest warrant for Russian President Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for his alleged involvement in the unlawful deportation of children from Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine. Founder and Chairman of Renew Democracy Initiative Garry Kasparov shares his reaction.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: https://www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: https://www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth ...
published: 17 Mar 2023
-
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivers its Order in the case of Iran v. USA
The ICJ delivers its Order in the case Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America (provisional measures) .
-------
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) unanimously ruled today (03 Oct) that the United States “shall remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments” to the free exportation of humanitarian needs to Iran arising from its withdrawal from the nuclear deal.
Iran had filed a lawsuit late August claiming that the US was in violation the 1955 “Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights” between the two countries over sanctions it imposed against Iran. The US imposed the sanctions after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 between Iran, the US, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany.
The Court f...
published: 03 Oct 2018
-
ICC issues arrest warrant for Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of war crimes such as unlawful deportation of children and unlawful transfer of people from the territory of Ukraine to Russia. CNN senior international correspondents Ivan Watson and David McKenzie report from Ukraine.
#CNN #News
published: 17 Mar 2023
18:49
What is the International Court of Justice? The Role and Activities of the ICJ
United Nations - The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the world’s highest international court.
It...
United Nations - The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the world’s highest international court.
It has a dual role: to settle in accordance with international law the legal disputes submitted to it by UN Member States, and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized international organs and agencies of the UN system.
This short film (available in over 50 languages) presents its main features.
Use of this file is free for non-profit and educational/editorial purposes. The ICJ encourages its use, reproduction and distribution for the same purposes. Sale or commercial use strictly prohibited.
Learn more: http://www.icj-cij.org/en
https://wn.com/What_Is_The_International_Court_Of_Justice_The_Role_And_Activities_Of_The_Icj
United Nations - The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and the world’s highest international court.
It has a dual role: to settle in accordance with international law the legal disputes submitted to it by UN Member States, and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized international organs and agencies of the UN system.
This short film (available in over 50 languages) presents its main features.
Use of this file is free for non-profit and educational/editorial purposes. The ICJ encourages its use, reproduction and distribution for the same purposes. Sale or commercial use strictly prohibited.
Learn more: http://www.icj-cij.org/en
- published: 24 Oct 2017
- views: 509548
8:59
Virtual visit of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
This virtual tour of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) leads the viewers through the rooms of the Peace Palace used by the judges in carrying out their j...
This virtual tour of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) leads the viewers through the rooms of the Peace Palace used by the judges in carrying out their judicial functions.
FAQ
------
What is the International Court of Justice?
The Court is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established by the United Nations Charter, which was signed in 1945 in San Francisco (United States), and began work in 1946 in the Peace Palace, The Hague (Netherlands).
The Court, which is composed of 15 judges, has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes between States submitted to it by them and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal matters referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.
The Court’s official languages are English and French.
Who may submit cases to the Court?
Only States are eligible to appear before the Court in contentious cases.
The Court has no jurisdiction to deal with applications from individuals, non-governmental organizations, corporations or any other private entity. It cannot provide them with legal advice or help them in their dealings with national authorities.
However, a State may take up the case of one of its nationals and invoke against another State the wrongs which its national claims to have suffered at the hands of the latter; the dispute then becomes one between States.
What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
This task is the preserve of national courts, the ad hoc criminal tribunals established by the United Nations (such as the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT), mandated to take over residual functions from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)) or in co-operation with it (such as the Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon), and also of the International Criminal Court, set up under the Rome Statute.
https://wn.com/Virtual_Visit_Of_The_International_Court_Of_Justice_(Icj)
This virtual tour of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) leads the viewers through the rooms of the Peace Palace used by the judges in carrying out their judicial functions.
FAQ
------
What is the International Court of Justice?
The Court is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established by the United Nations Charter, which was signed in 1945 in San Francisco (United States), and began work in 1946 in the Peace Palace, The Hague (Netherlands).
The Court, which is composed of 15 judges, has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes between States submitted to it by them and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal matters referred to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.
The Court’s official languages are English and French.
Who may submit cases to the Court?
Only States are eligible to appear before the Court in contentious cases.
The Court has no jurisdiction to deal with applications from individuals, non-governmental organizations, corporations or any other private entity. It cannot provide them with legal advice or help them in their dealings with national authorities.
However, a State may take up the case of one of its nationals and invoke against another State the wrongs which its national claims to have suffered at the hands of the latter; the dispute then becomes one between States.
What differentiates the International Court of Justice from the International Criminal Court and the ad hoc international criminal tribunals?
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
This task is the preserve of national courts, the ad hoc criminal tribunals established by the United Nations (such as the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT), mandated to take over residual functions from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)) or in co-operation with it (such as the Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon), and also of the International Criminal Court, set up under the Rome Statute.
- published: 26 Apr 2021
- views: 110890
6:41
World court orders Russia to immediately halt invasion of Ukraine | ICJ | Russia-Ukraine Conflict
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military action in Ukraine, saying it is profoundly concerned by Moscow’s...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military action in Ukraine, saying it is profoundly concerned by Moscow’s use of force.
#ICJ #Russia #Ukraine
About Channel:
WION -The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs as well as personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at https://goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: http://www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WIONews
Follow us on Google News for latest updates
Zee News:- https://bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Bussiness:- https://bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- https://bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: https://bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps : https://bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps
https://wn.com/World_Court_Orders_Russia_To_Immediately_Halt_Invasion_Of_Ukraine_|_Icj_|_Russia_Ukraine_Conflict
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military action in Ukraine, saying it is profoundly concerned by Moscow’s use of force.
#ICJ #Russia #Ukraine
About Channel:
WION -The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs as well as personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at https://goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: http://www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WIONews
Follow us on Google News for latest updates
Zee News:- https://bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Bussiness:- https://bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- https://bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: https://bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps : https://bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps
- published: 17 Mar 2022
- views: 97186
1:38:10
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
The Russian legal team responds to Ukrainian arguments presented on 6 June,...
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
The Russian legal team responds to Ukrainian arguments presented on 6 June, in a case brought by Ukraine against Russia at the UN's top court alleging that Russia breached treaties on terrorist financing and racial discrimination in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. The case was filed in 2017, before Russia's invasion last year triggered a full-scale war in Ukraine.
Russia Ukraine War | Russia Ukraine News | Russia Ukraine Crisis | Russian Invasion | Ukraine War | ICJ | Vladimir Putin | Zelensky | World News | International News | Firstpost
#russiaukrainewar #russiaukrainelive #russiaukrainecrisis #russianinvasion #icj #internationalcourtofjustice #vladimirputin #worldnews #internationalnews #firstpost
Firstpost is an Indian news and media website. Get all the incisive opinions, in-depth analyses and other visual stories that matter to you and the world right here on this channel.
Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
https://www.youtube.com/@Firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/firstpost/
Follow Firstpost on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/firstpostin/
Follow Firstpost on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/firstpost
https://wn.com/International_Court_Of_Justice_Hearing_Live_Russia_Responds_To_Ukrainian_Arguments
International Court of Justice Hearing LIVE: Russia Responds To Ukrainian Arguments
The Russian legal team responds to Ukrainian arguments presented on 6 June, in a case brought by Ukraine against Russia at the UN's top court alleging that Russia breached treaties on terrorist financing and racial discrimination in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. The case was filed in 2017, before Russia's invasion last year triggered a full-scale war in Ukraine.
Russia Ukraine War | Russia Ukraine News | Russia Ukraine Crisis | Russian Invasion | Ukraine War | ICJ | Vladimir Putin | Zelensky | World News | International News | Firstpost
#russiaukrainewar #russiaukrainelive #russiaukrainecrisis #russianinvasion #icj #internationalcourtofjustice #vladimirputin #worldnews #internationalnews #firstpost
Firstpost is an Indian news and media website. Get all the incisive opinions, in-depth analyses and other visual stories that matter to you and the world right here on this channel.
Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
https://www.youtube.com/@Firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/firstpost/
Follow Firstpost on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/firstpostin/
Follow Firstpost on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/firstpost
- published: 08 Jun 2023
- views: 7244
38:20
'Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine' - International Court of Justice
Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine, the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Wednesday (16 Mar), in The Hague.
By a vot...
Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine, the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Wednesday (16 Mar), in The Hague.
By a vote of 13 to two, with Vice-President Kirill Gevorgian of Russia and Judge Xue Hanqin of China dissenting, the ICJ ruled that Russia “shall immediately suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February.”
The court’s ruling – the first such verdict handed down by the world court since the Russian invasion began – is in response to a suit filed by Ukraine on 27 February, accusing Russia of manipulating the concept of genocide to justify its military aggression.
Although the ICJ's verdicts are binding, news reports questioned whether Moscow would abide by the ruling, and the court has no direct means of enforcing them.
The Court began by recalling that, on 26 February Ukraine filed an application against Russia concerning a dispute on the interpretation, application and fulfilment of the Genocide Convention.
Ukraine contended that having falsely claimed acts of genocide against the people of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts, Russia declared and implemented what it called a special military operation to prevent and punish the purported acts.
The ICJ asked Russia to immediately suspend its attacks and cease all military operations as they were based on Moscow’s stated purpose of preventing or punishing Ukraine for committing genocide.
The Court also noted that Russia had decided not to participate in oral proceedings and later, presented a document setting out its position that in this case, the Court lacks jurisdiction and requested it to refrain from indicating provisional measures and to remove the case from its list.
In delivering the verdict, President Joan E. Donoghue of the United States outlined that the necessary conditions were met to give the ICJ the authority to indicate provisional measures, namely that the rights asserted by Ukraine are plausible; genocide was not committed; and the condition of urgency was met in that acts causing irreparable prejudice can occur at any moment.
The ICJ President said any military operation, in particular one on the scale carried out by the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine, inevitably causes loss of life, mental and bodily harm, and damage to property and to the environment.
Judge Donoghue said the civilian population affected by the present conflict is extremely vulnerable, adding that Russia’s aggression has resulted in numerous civilian deaths and injuries and significant material damage, including the destruction of buildings and infrastructure.
Attacks are ongoing and are creating increasingly difficult living conditions for the civilian population, and many people have no access to the most basic necessities, she explained.
The judges were unanimous in their order that both parties refrain from any action that might “aggravate or extend the dispute…or make it more difficult to resolve.”
More information: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/182
Photo Credit: UN Photo/Frank van Beek
https://wn.com/'Russia_Must_Immediately_Suspend_Military_Operations_In_Ukraine'_International_Court_Of_Justice
Russia must immediately suspend military operations in Ukraine, the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on Wednesday (16 Mar), in The Hague.
By a vote of 13 to two, with Vice-President Kirill Gevorgian of Russia and Judge Xue Hanqin of China dissenting, the ICJ ruled that Russia “shall immediately suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February.”
The court’s ruling – the first such verdict handed down by the world court since the Russian invasion began – is in response to a suit filed by Ukraine on 27 February, accusing Russia of manipulating the concept of genocide to justify its military aggression.
Although the ICJ's verdicts are binding, news reports questioned whether Moscow would abide by the ruling, and the court has no direct means of enforcing them.
The Court began by recalling that, on 26 February Ukraine filed an application against Russia concerning a dispute on the interpretation, application and fulfilment of the Genocide Convention.
Ukraine contended that having falsely claimed acts of genocide against the people of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts, Russia declared and implemented what it called a special military operation to prevent and punish the purported acts.
The ICJ asked Russia to immediately suspend its attacks and cease all military operations as they were based on Moscow’s stated purpose of preventing or punishing Ukraine for committing genocide.
The Court also noted that Russia had decided not to participate in oral proceedings and later, presented a document setting out its position that in this case, the Court lacks jurisdiction and requested it to refrain from indicating provisional measures and to remove the case from its list.
In delivering the verdict, President Joan E. Donoghue of the United States outlined that the necessary conditions were met to give the ICJ the authority to indicate provisional measures, namely that the rights asserted by Ukraine are plausible; genocide was not committed; and the condition of urgency was met in that acts causing irreparable prejudice can occur at any moment.
The ICJ President said any military operation, in particular one on the scale carried out by the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine, inevitably causes loss of life, mental and bodily harm, and damage to property and to the environment.
Judge Donoghue said the civilian population affected by the present conflict is extremely vulnerable, adding that Russia’s aggression has resulted in numerous civilian deaths and injuries and significant material damage, including the destruction of buildings and infrastructure.
Attacks are ongoing and are creating increasingly difficult living conditions for the civilian population, and many people have no access to the most basic necessities, she explained.
The judges were unanimous in their order that both parties refrain from any action that might “aggravate or extend the dispute…or make it more difficult to resolve.”
More information: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/182
Photo Credit: UN Photo/Frank van Beek
- published: 17 Mar 2022
- views: 100299
3:18:18
Ukraine vs Russian Federation - Allegations of Genocide | International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The public hearing on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Conve...
The public hearing on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) was concluded today.
Oral arguments were presented by Ukraine. The Russian Federation did not participate in the hearing. In a letter sent on Saturday 5 March 2022, the Russian Federation informed the Court that it “ha[d] decided not to participate in the oral proceedings due to open on 7 March 2022”.
During the hearing, the seat of the Court, the delegation of Ukraine was led by Anton Korynevych, Permanent Representative of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, as Agent.
At the end of the hearing, Co-Agent of Ukraine Oksana Zolotaryova presented the following submissions to the Court on behalf of Ukraine.
She said, “In these extraordinary circumstances, Ukraine request the Court’s Order the following provisional measures: a. The Russian Federation shall immediately suspend the military operations commenced on 24 February 2022 that have as their stated purpose and objective the prevention and punishment of a claimed genocide in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine. b. The Russian Federation shall immediately ensure that any military or irregular armed units which may be directed or supported by it, as well as any organizations and persons which may be subject to its control, direction or influence, take no steps in furtherance of the military operations which have as their stated purpose and objective preventing or punishing Ukraine for committing genocide. c. The Russian Federation shall refrain from any action and shall provide assurances that no action is taken that may aggravate or extend the dispute that is the subject of this Application, or render this dispute more difficult to resolve. d. The Russian Federation shall provide a report to the Court on measures taken to implement the Court’s Order on Provisional Measures one week after such order and then on a regular basis to be fixed by the Court.”
The Co-Agent also said, “Ukraine is being supported by the civilized world. We are grateful to each and every act and effort to support Ukraine. But we need more help. We need more help from our allies. We need more help from every institution in the world. That includes this Court. On behalf of the Government of Ukraine, and on behalf of the people of Ukraine, I thank you for your attention in this matter of national life or death. I respectfully urge the Court to issue your order with utmost urgency. We are in your hands. Thank you.”
The Court’s decision on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine will be delivered at a public sitting, the date of which will be announced in due course.
-----
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the UN, holds public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures presented by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) on 7 and 8 March 2022 at the Peace in The Hague, the seat of the Court. Session held under the presidency of Judge Joan E. Donoghue, President of the Court.
La Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ), organe judiciaire principal de l’Organisation des Nations Unies, tient, les 7 et 8 mars 2022, des audiences publiques sur la demande en indication de mesures conservatoires présentée par l’Ukraine en l’affaire relative à des Allégations de génocide au titre de la convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide (Ukraine c. Fédération de Russie) au Palais de la Paix, à La Haye, où la Cour a son siège. Séance tenue sous la présidence de Mme la juge Joan E. Donoghue, présidente de la Cour.
Screenshot Credit: UN Photo/Frank van Beek
Original and French: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1s/k1s308hjlg
https://wn.com/Ukraine_Vs_Russian_Federation_Allegations_Of_Genocide_|_International_Court_Of_Justice_(Icj)
The public hearing on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) was concluded today.
Oral arguments were presented by Ukraine. The Russian Federation did not participate in the hearing. In a letter sent on Saturday 5 March 2022, the Russian Federation informed the Court that it “ha[d] decided not to participate in the oral proceedings due to open on 7 March 2022”.
During the hearing, the seat of the Court, the delegation of Ukraine was led by Anton Korynevych, Permanent Representative of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, as Agent.
At the end of the hearing, Co-Agent of Ukraine Oksana Zolotaryova presented the following submissions to the Court on behalf of Ukraine.
She said, “In these extraordinary circumstances, Ukraine request the Court’s Order the following provisional measures: a. The Russian Federation shall immediately suspend the military operations commenced on 24 February 2022 that have as their stated purpose and objective the prevention and punishment of a claimed genocide in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine. b. The Russian Federation shall immediately ensure that any military or irregular armed units which may be directed or supported by it, as well as any organizations and persons which may be subject to its control, direction or influence, take no steps in furtherance of the military operations which have as their stated purpose and objective preventing or punishing Ukraine for committing genocide. c. The Russian Federation shall refrain from any action and shall provide assurances that no action is taken that may aggravate or extend the dispute that is the subject of this Application, or render this dispute more difficult to resolve. d. The Russian Federation shall provide a report to the Court on measures taken to implement the Court’s Order on Provisional Measures one week after such order and then on a regular basis to be fixed by the Court.”
The Co-Agent also said, “Ukraine is being supported by the civilized world. We are grateful to each and every act and effort to support Ukraine. But we need more help. We need more help from our allies. We need more help from every institution in the world. That includes this Court. On behalf of the Government of Ukraine, and on behalf of the people of Ukraine, I thank you for your attention in this matter of national life or death. I respectfully urge the Court to issue your order with utmost urgency. We are in your hands. Thank you.”
The Court’s decision on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Ukraine will be delivered at a public sitting, the date of which will be announced in due course.
-----
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the UN, holds public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures presented by Ukraine in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) on 7 and 8 March 2022 at the Peace in The Hague, the seat of the Court. Session held under the presidency of Judge Joan E. Donoghue, President of the Court.
La Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ), organe judiciaire principal de l’Organisation des Nations Unies, tient, les 7 et 8 mars 2022, des audiences publiques sur la demande en indication de mesures conservatoires présentée par l’Ukraine en l’affaire relative à des Allégations de génocide au titre de la convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide (Ukraine c. Fédération de Russie) au Palais de la Paix, à La Haye, où la Cour a son siège. Séance tenue sous la présidence de Mme la juge Joan E. Donoghue, présidente de la Cour.
Screenshot Credit: UN Photo/Frank van Beek
Original and French: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1s/k1s308hjlg
- published: 07 Mar 2022
- views: 336288
1:20
International criminal court issues arrest warrant for Russian president Vladimir Putin
An arrest warrant has been issued by the International criminal court (ICC) for Russian president Vladimir Putin, as well as Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Rus...
An arrest warrant has been issued by the International criminal court (ICC) for Russian president Vladimir Putin, as well as Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Russia's presidential commissioner for children's rights.
Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub
The ICC has stated that it has sufficient evidence to suggest that Putin is criminally liable for the 'war crime of illegal deportation of population (children)' and 'unlawful transfer of population (children)' from Ukraine's occupied regions to Russia. The ICC has also found evidence to suggest that Lvova-Belova bears individual responsibility for the same crimes.
The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► https://bit.ly/3uhA7zg
Sign up to the Guardian's free new daily newsletter, First Edition ► http://theguardian.com/first-edition
Website ► https://www.theguardian.com
Facebook ►https://www.facebook.com/theguardian
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/guardian
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/guardian
The Guardian on YouTube:
The Guardian ► https://bit.ly/guardiannewssubs
Guardian Australia ► https://bit.ly/guardianaussubs
Guardian Football ► https://bit.ly/gdnfootballsubs
Guardian Sport ► https://bit.ly/gdnsportsubs
Guardian Live ► https://bit.ly/guardianlivesubs
#Ukraine #Russia #Putin #VladimirPutin #ICC #News
https://wn.com/International_Criminal_Court_Issues_Arrest_Warrant_For_Russian_President_Vladimir_Putin
An arrest warrant has been issued by the International criminal court (ICC) for Russian president Vladimir Putin, as well as Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Russia's presidential commissioner for children's rights.
Subscribe to Guardian News on YouTube ► http://bit.ly/guardianwiressub
The ICC has stated that it has sufficient evidence to suggest that Putin is criminally liable for the 'war crime of illegal deportation of population (children)' and 'unlawful transfer of population (children)' from Ukraine's occupied regions to Russia. The ICC has also found evidence to suggest that Lvova-Belova bears individual responsibility for the same crimes.
The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► https://bit.ly/3uhA7zg
Sign up to the Guardian's free new daily newsletter, First Edition ► http://theguardian.com/first-edition
Website ► https://www.theguardian.com
Facebook ►https://www.facebook.com/theguardian
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/guardian
Instagram ► https://instagram.com/guardian
The Guardian on YouTube:
The Guardian ► https://bit.ly/guardiannewssubs
Guardian Australia ► https://bit.ly/guardianaussubs
Guardian Football ► https://bit.ly/gdnfootballsubs
Guardian Sport ► https://bit.ly/gdnsportsubs
Guardian Live ► https://bit.ly/guardianlivesubs
#Ukraine #Russia #Putin #VladimirPutin #ICC #News
- published: 17 Mar 2023
- views: 111492
4:22
International Criminal Court issues arrest warrant for Russian President Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for his alleged involvement in the unlawful deportation of ch...
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for his alleged involvement in the unlawful deportation of children from Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine. Founder and Chairman of Renew Democracy Initiative Garry Kasparov shares his reaction.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: https://www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: https://www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
BREAKING: International Criminal Court issues arrest warrant for Russian President Putin
#Putin #Russia #Ukraine
https://wn.com/International_Criminal_Court_Issues_Arrest_Warrant_For_Russian_President_Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for his alleged involvement in the unlawful deportation of children from Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine. Founder and Chairman of Renew Democracy Initiative Garry Kasparov shares his reaction.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: https://www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: https://www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
BREAKING: International Criminal Court issues arrest warrant for Russian President Putin
#Putin #Russia #Ukraine
- published: 17 Mar 2023
- views: 273360
50:13
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivers its Order in the case of Iran v. USA
The ICJ delivers its Order in the case Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America (provisional measures) .
-------
The International Court of Justice ...
The ICJ delivers its Order in the case Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America (provisional measures) .
-------
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) unanimously ruled today (03 Oct) that the United States “shall remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments” to the free exportation of humanitarian needs to Iran arising from its withdrawal from the nuclear deal.
Iran had filed a lawsuit late August claiming that the US was in violation the 1955 “Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights” between the two countries over sanctions it imposed against Iran. The US imposed the sanctions after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 between Iran, the US, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany.
The Court found that some of the measures complained by Iran could relate to the essential security interests of the US and as such might affect at least some of the rights invoked by Iran under the 1955 Treaty. However, these did not include measures relating to the importation and purchase of goods required for humanitarian needs and the safety of civil aviation.
The Court ruled that the US “shall remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments arising from the measures announced on 8 May 2018 to the free exportation to the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran of: medicines and medical devices; foodstuffs and agricultural commodities; and spare parts, equipment and associated services (including warranty, maintenance, repair services and inspections) necessary for the safety of civil aviation.” It added that the US shall ensure that licences and necessary authorizations are granted, and that payments and other transfers of funds are not subject to any restriction in so far as they relate to these goods and services.
The ICJ said both parties shall refrain from any action which might aggravate or extend the dispute before the Court or make it more difficult to resolve.
-------
THE HAGUE, 3 October 2018. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, today delivered its Order on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Iran in the case concerning Alleged Violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). The Court begins by recalling that, on 16 July 2018, Iran instituted proceedings against the United States with regard to alleged violations of the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights concluded between the two States in 1955. The same day, Iran also submitted a Request for the indication of provisional measures, seeking to preserve its rights under the 1955 Treaty pending the Court’s final decision in the case.
The Court then sets out the factual background to the case. It notes in this regard that, on 8 May 2018, the President of the United States issued a National Security Presidential Memorandum announcing the end of the participation of the United States in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — an agreement on the nuclear programme of Iran reached on 14 July 2015 by Iran, the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, plus Germany and the European Union — and directing the reimposition on Iran of “sanctions lifted or waived in connection with the JCPOA”. In the Memorandum, the President observed, inter alia, that Iran had publicly declared that it would deny the International Atomic Energy Agency access to military sites, and that, in 2016, Iran had twice violated the JCPOA’s heavy-water stockpile limits. It was announced that “sanctions” would be reimposed in two steps. Upon expiry of a first wind-down period of 90 days, ending on 6 August 2018, the United States would reimpose a certain number of “sanctions” concerning, in particular, financial transactions, trade in metals, the importation of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuffs, and the export of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts. Following a second wind-down period of 180 days, ending on 4 November 2018, the United States would reimpose additional “sanctions”.
Learn More: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/175
https://wn.com/The_International_Court_Of_Justice_(Icj)_Delivers_Its_Order_In_The_Case_Of_Iran_V._USA
The ICJ delivers its Order in the case Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America (provisional measures) .
-------
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) unanimously ruled today (03 Oct) that the United States “shall remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments” to the free exportation of humanitarian needs to Iran arising from its withdrawal from the nuclear deal.
Iran had filed a lawsuit late August claiming that the US was in violation the 1955 “Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights” between the two countries over sanctions it imposed against Iran. The US imposed the sanctions after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 between Iran, the US, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany.
The Court found that some of the measures complained by Iran could relate to the essential security interests of the US and as such might affect at least some of the rights invoked by Iran under the 1955 Treaty. However, these did not include measures relating to the importation and purchase of goods required for humanitarian needs and the safety of civil aviation.
The Court ruled that the US “shall remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments arising from the measures announced on 8 May 2018 to the free exportation to the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran of: medicines and medical devices; foodstuffs and agricultural commodities; and spare parts, equipment and associated services (including warranty, maintenance, repair services and inspections) necessary for the safety of civil aviation.” It added that the US shall ensure that licences and necessary authorizations are granted, and that payments and other transfers of funds are not subject to any restriction in so far as they relate to these goods and services.
The ICJ said both parties shall refrain from any action which might aggravate or extend the dispute before the Court or make it more difficult to resolve.
-------
THE HAGUE, 3 October 2018. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, today delivered its Order on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Iran in the case concerning Alleged Violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). The Court begins by recalling that, on 16 July 2018, Iran instituted proceedings against the United States with regard to alleged violations of the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights concluded between the two States in 1955. The same day, Iran also submitted a Request for the indication of provisional measures, seeking to preserve its rights under the 1955 Treaty pending the Court’s final decision in the case.
The Court then sets out the factual background to the case. It notes in this regard that, on 8 May 2018, the President of the United States issued a National Security Presidential Memorandum announcing the end of the participation of the United States in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — an agreement on the nuclear programme of Iran reached on 14 July 2015 by Iran, the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, plus Germany and the European Union — and directing the reimposition on Iran of “sanctions lifted or waived in connection with the JCPOA”. In the Memorandum, the President observed, inter alia, that Iran had publicly declared that it would deny the International Atomic Energy Agency access to military sites, and that, in 2016, Iran had twice violated the JCPOA’s heavy-water stockpile limits. It was announced that “sanctions” would be reimposed in two steps. Upon expiry of a first wind-down period of 90 days, ending on 6 August 2018, the United States would reimpose a certain number of “sanctions” concerning, in particular, financial transactions, trade in metals, the importation of Iranian-origin carpets and foodstuffs, and the export of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts. Following a second wind-down period of 180 days, ending on 4 November 2018, the United States would reimpose additional “sanctions”.
Learn More: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/175
- published: 03 Oct 2018
- views: 1706332
7:38
ICC issues arrest warrant for Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of war crimes such as unlawful deportation of ch...
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of war crimes such as unlawful deportation of children and unlawful transfer of people from the territory of Ukraine to Russia. CNN senior international correspondents Ivan Watson and David McKenzie report from Ukraine.
#CNN #News
https://wn.com/Icc_Issues_Arrest_Warrant_For_Putin
The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of war crimes such as unlawful deportation of children and unlawful transfer of people from the territory of Ukraine to Russia. CNN senior international correspondents Ivan Watson and David McKenzie report from Ukraine.
#CNN #News
- published: 17 Mar 2023
- views: 2134828