- published: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 386989
-
remove the playlistMedical Ultrasound
-
remove the playlistUnited States V. White
- remove the playlistMedical Ultrasound
- remove the playlistUnited States V. White
- Medical ultrasound
- United States v. White
- Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
- Breedlove v. Suttles
- United States v. Ross
- Watson v. Jones
Medical ultrasound
Medical ultrasound (also known as diagnostic sonography or ultrasonography) is a diagnostic imaging technique based on the application of ultrasound. It is used to see internal body structures such as tendons, muscles, joints, vessels and internal organs. Its aim is often to find a source of a disease or to exclude any pathology. The practice of examining pregnant women using ultrasound is called obstetric ultrasound, and is widely used.
Ultrasound is sound waves with frequencies which are higher than those audible to humans (>20,000Hz). Ultrasonic images also known as sonograms are made by sending pulses of ultrasound into tissue using a probe. The sound echoes off the tissue; with different tissues reflecting varying degrees of sound. These echoes are recorded and displayed as an image to the operator.
Many different types of images can be formed using sonographic instruments. The most well-known type is a B-mode image, which displays the acoustic impedance of a two-dimensional cross-section of tissue. Other types of image can display blood flow, motion of tissue over time, the location of blood, the presence of specific molecules, the stiffness of tissue, or the anatomy of a three-dimensional region.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Medical_ultrasound
United States v. White
United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a warrant.
Facts and Procedural History
Criminal defendant White was convicted of narcotics charges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The conviction was based on evidence obtained from recorded conversations in 1965 and 1966 between the defendant White and a government informant wearing a concealed radio transmitter. White appealed the conviction, claiming the conversations were recorded without his permission, that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy (see Katz), and the conversations were recorded without a warrant, violating his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Thus, White argued that the recorded conversations should not have been admitted as evidence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 405 F.2d 838, reversed the district court and remanded, and certiorari was granted.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/United_States_v._White
Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
Blanton v. North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989), was a decision issued by the United States Supreme Court clarifying the limitations of the Right to Trial by Jury.
Background
Melvin R. Blanton was charged with Driving under the influence of alcohol. His petition for a jury trial was denied and he was instead given a bench trial. Blanton appealed, arguing that his sixth amendment right to trial by jury had been violated.
Decision of the Court
The US Supreme Court ruled that Blanton did not have the right to a jury trial because the crime he was charged with was "petty". The court went on to elaborate: "offenses for which the maximum period of incarceration is six months, or less, are presumptively petty...a defendant can overcome this, and become entitled to a jury trial,..by showing that additional penalties [such as monetary fines]...are...so severe [as to indicate] that the legislature clearly determined that the offense is a serious one."
See also
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Blanton_v._City_of_North_Las_Vegas
Breedlove v. Suttles
Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937), is a United States Supreme Court decision which upheld the constitutionality of requiring the payment of a poll tax in order to vote in state elections.
Background
At the relevant time, Georgia imposed a poll tax of $1.00 per year, levied generally on all inhabitants. The statute exempted from the tax all persons under 21 or over 60 years of age, and all females who do not register for voting. Under the state constitution, the tax must be paid by the person liable, together with arrears, before he can be registered for voting.
Nolan Breedlove, a white male, 28 years of age, declined to pay the tax, and was not allowed to register to vote. He filed a lawsuit challenging the Georgia law under the Fourteenth (both the Equal Protection Clause and the Privileges and Immunities Clause) and the Nineteenth Amendments. T. Earl Suttles was named defendant in the case in his official capacity as tax collector of Fulton County, Georgia.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Breedlove_v._Suttles
United States v. Ross
United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well. The appeals court had previously ruled that opening and searching the closed portable containers without a warrant was a violation of the Fourth Amendment, even though the warrantless vehicle search was permissible due to existing precedent.
Background
On November 27, 1978, Washington, D.C. police detectives received a tip from a reliable source describing a man known as "Bandit" who was selling illegal narcotics stored in the trunk of his car. The informant gave the location of the car and a description of both car and driver. The detectives discovered the parked car, and called for a computer check on the car, which confirmed that the car's owner matched the description and used the alias "Bandit". Shortly thereafter they observed the car being driven by a man matching the description. They stopped the car and ordered the driver out. After noticing a bullet on the front seat, they searched the glove compartment and discovered a pistol, at which point they arrested the driver, identified as Albert Ross. A detective then opened the trunk and discovered a closed brown paper bag. He opened the bag and found numerous bags containing white powder, which were later identified as heroin. During a later search, they also found and opened a zippered red leather pouch, which contained $3,200 in cash. No warrant was obtained for these searches.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/United_States_v._Ross
Watson v. Jones
Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S. 679 (1872), is a United States Supreme Court case. The case was based upon a dispute regarding the Third or Walnut Street Presbyterian Church in Louisville, Kentucky. The Court held that in adjudications of church property disputes, 1) courts cannot rule on the truth or falsity of a religious teaching, 2) where a previous authority structure existed before the dispute, courts should defer to the decision of that structure, and 3) in the absence of such an internal authority structure, courts should defer to the wishes of a majority of the congregation. Because the Walnut Street Presbyterian Church had a clear internal authority structure, the court granted control of the property to that group, even though it was only supported by a minority of the congregation.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Watson_v._Jones
Podcasts:
-
Ultrasound medical imaging | Mechanical waves and sound | Physics | Khan Academy
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by David SantoPietro. Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/standing-waves/v/standing-waves-in-tubes-part-1?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics Missed the previous lesson? https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/sound-topic/v/why-do-sounds-get-softer?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics Physics on Khan Academy: Physics is the study of the basic principles that govern the physical world around us. We'll start by looking at motion itself. Then, we'll learn about forces, momentum, energy, and other concepts in lots of different physical situations. To get the most out of physics, you'll need ...
published: 01 Jul 2014 -
How diagnostic ultrasound systems work (Canon Official)
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound systems . Canon's special video site "Canon Video Square" https://global.canon/en/v-square --- Subscribe to the official Canon Imaging Plaza YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/canonimagingplaza Official Canon website http://global.canon/ --- #CanonOfficial #CorporateIntroduction #Medical #Healthcare
published: 25 Dec 2020 -
What is Medical Ultrasound?
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe the common types of Ultrasound you might encounter.
published: 09 Sep 2014 -
How I do it: Ultrasound of the Abdomen
published: 06 Sep 2018 -
Point of Care Ultrasound - Functions and Settings of the Ultrasound Machine - AMBOSS Video
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultrasound machine. Most ultrasound consoles have a similar layout, with some variation between manufacturers. Ultrasound machines are typically equipped with factory presets for certain applications (e.g., preset for abdominal examination), which are a good starting point for visualizing the target tissue. Manual adjustment of the knobs and settings on the ultrasound console can further refine the ultrasound image. Table of Contents: 00:00 - Intro 00:58 - Setting up the B-mode image 01:20 - Gain 02:05 - Depth 02:32 - Focus 02:52 - Documentation functions 02:54 - Freeze function 03:35 - Performing measurements 04:05 - Other ultrasound modes 04:19 - Color Doppler mode 05:17 - M-mode Many thanks to Dr. Danie...
published: 14 Sep 2021 -
The Principles of Ultrasound Imaging
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultrasound for obstetrics and gynaecology, this film explains the safety aspects of ultrasound and basic physics around acoustics and the transducer technology of ultrasound systems. To watch or download this film for free, visit: https://www.medicalaidfilms.org/film/the-principles-of-ultrasound-imaging/ --------------------- MEDICAL AID FILMS: We've produced 400+ films in over 30 languages for health worker training and community education. Check out our work: www.medicalaidfilms.org/watch-2
published: 13 Feb 2019 -
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari #babyvideoshort #firstultrasound #ultrasound #weekspregnant
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
published: 30 Nov 2023 -
How to see with sound - Jacques S. Abramowicz
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for SONAR and non-invasive medical procedures. -- In a dark cave, bats can’t see much. But even with their eyes shut, they can navigate rocky topography at incredible speeds. This is because bats aren't just guided by their eyes, but rather, by their ears. It may seem impossible to see with sound, but bats, naval officers, and doctors do it all the time. How is that possible? Jacques S. Abramowicz digs into the unique properties of ultrasound. Lesson by Jacques S. Abramowicz, directed by Sofia Pashaei. Support Our Non-Profit Mission ---------------------------------------------- Support us on Patreon: http://bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon Check out our merch: http://bit.ly/TEDEDShop -----------------------------...
published: 01 Apr 2021 -
This Is How We Use An Ultrasound Machine For Breast Cancer Screening
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another incredible technology that allows us to detect abnormalities in the breast. Watch our ultrasound technologist explain how we perform a breast ultrasound. CONTACT US --------------------- 📍 Bedford Breast Center 436 N. Bedford Dr, Suite 105 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 📱 310.278.8590 🌐 https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/ SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW ------------------------------------ 🎀 YT: https://www.youtube.com/c/BedfordBreastCenterBeverlyHills 🎀 IG: https://www.instagram.com/bedfordbreastcenter 🎀 FB: https://www.facebook.com/bedfordbreastcenter 🎀 TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@bedfordbc LEARN MORE ---------------------- From Prevention to Detection to Treatment, Bedford Breast Center is LA'...
published: 21 Sep 2022 -
Diagnostic Medical Sonography General - Career Video
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/Vascular graduate.
published: 16 Jul 2020
developed with YouTube
5:35
Ultrasound medical imaging | Mechanical waves and sound | Physics | Khan Academy
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:35
- Uploaded Date: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 386989
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by David SantoPietro.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/s...
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by David SantoPietro.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/standing-waves/v/standing-waves-in-tubes-part-1?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Missed the previous lesson? https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/sound-topic/v/why-do-sounds-get-softer?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Physics on Khan Academy: Physics is the study of the basic principles that govern the physical world around us. We'll start by looking at motion itself. Then, we'll learn about forces, momentum, energy, and other concepts in lots of different physical situations. To get the most out of physics, you'll need a solid understanding of algebra and a basic understanding of trigonometry.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Physics channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0oGarQW2lE5PxhGoQAKV7Q?sub_confirmation=1
Subscribe to Khan Academy: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=khanacademy
https://wn.com/Ultrasound_Medical_Imaging_|_Mechanical_Waves_And_Sound_|_Physics_|_Khan_Academy
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by David SantoPietro.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/standing-waves/v/standing-waves-in-tubes-part-1?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Missed the previous lesson? https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/sound-topic/v/why-do-sounds-get-softer?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Physics on Khan Academy: Physics is the study of the basic principles that govern the physical world around us. We'll start by looking at motion itself. Then, we'll learn about forces, momentum, energy, and other concepts in lots of different physical situations. To get the most out of physics, you'll need a solid understanding of algebra and a basic understanding of trigonometry.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Physics channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0oGarQW2lE5PxhGoQAKV7Q?sub_confirmation=1
Subscribe to Khan Academy: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=khanacademy
3:31
How diagnostic ultrasound systems work (Canon Official)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:31
- Uploaded Date: 25 Dec 2020
- views: 111996
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound systems .
Canon's special video site "Canon Video Square"
https://global....
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound systems .
Canon's special video site "Canon Video Square"
https://global.canon/en/v-square
---
Subscribe to the official Canon Imaging Plaza YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/canonimagingplaza
Official Canon website
http://global.canon/
---
#CanonOfficial #CorporateIntroduction #Medical #Healthcare
https://wn.com/How_Diagnostic_Ultrasound_Systems_Work_(Canon_Official)
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound systems .
Canon's special video site "Canon Video Square"
https://global.canon/en/v-square
---
Subscribe to the official Canon Imaging Plaza YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/canonimagingplaza
Official Canon website
http://global.canon/
---
#CanonOfficial #CorporateIntroduction #Medical #Healthcare
- published: 25 Dec 2020
- views: 111996
1:37
What is Medical Ultrasound?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:37
- Uploaded Date: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 33055
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe the common types of Ultrasound you might encounter.
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe the common types of Ultrasound you might encounter.
https://wn.com/What_Is_Medical_Ultrasound
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe the common types of Ultrasound you might encounter.
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 33055
19:17
How I do it: Ultrasound of the Abdomen
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 19:17
- Uploaded Date: 06 Sep 2018
- views: 2394603
- published: 06 Sep 2018
- views: 2394603
6:09
Point of Care Ultrasound - Functions and Settings of the Ultrasound Machine - AMBOSS Video
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:09
- Uploaded Date: 14 Sep 2021
- views: 138098
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultrasound machine.
Most ultrasound consoles have a similar layout, with some...
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultrasound machine.
Most ultrasound consoles have a similar layout, with some variation between manufacturers. Ultrasound machines are typically equipped with factory presets for certain applications (e.g., preset for abdominal examination), which are a good starting point for visualizing the target tissue. Manual adjustment of the knobs and settings on the ultrasound console can further refine the ultrasound image.
Table of Contents:
00:00 - Intro
00:58 - Setting up the B-mode image
01:20 - Gain
02:05 - Depth
02:32 - Focus
02:52 - Documentation functions
02:54 - Freeze function
03:35 - Performing measurements
04:05 - Other ultrasound modes
04:19 - Color Doppler mode
05:17 - M-mode
Many thanks to
Dr. Daniel Merkel
Owner of the medical ultrasound media library https://sono.gallery
(Ultrasound expert, DEGUM stage III)
Florian Recker
OB/GYN resident, University Hospital Bonn
(Expert advice)
Toshiba Medical Systems, Berlin
(Provision of ultrasound unit, Aplio 400)
Make sure to check out our AMBOSS ultrasonography tutorial series and our article on POCUS:
https://go.amboss.com/pocus
Subscribe to the AMBOSS YouTube Channel for the latest clinical examination videos, medical student interviews, study tips and tricks, and live webinars!
Free 5-day trial: https://go.amboss.com/04g
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amboss_med/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AMBOSS.Med/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ambossmed
#AMBOSSMed, #MedicalSchool, #POCUS, #Ultrasound
https://wn.com/Point_Of_Care_Ultrasound_Functions_And_Settings_Of_The_Ultrasound_Machine_Amboss_Video
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultrasound machine.
Most ultrasound consoles have a similar layout, with some variation between manufacturers. Ultrasound machines are typically equipped with factory presets for certain applications (e.g., preset for abdominal examination), which are a good starting point for visualizing the target tissue. Manual adjustment of the knobs and settings on the ultrasound console can further refine the ultrasound image.
Table of Contents:
00:00 - Intro
00:58 - Setting up the B-mode image
01:20 - Gain
02:05 - Depth
02:32 - Focus
02:52 - Documentation functions
02:54 - Freeze function
03:35 - Performing measurements
04:05 - Other ultrasound modes
04:19 - Color Doppler mode
05:17 - M-mode
Many thanks to
Dr. Daniel Merkel
Owner of the medical ultrasound media library https://sono.gallery
(Ultrasound expert, DEGUM stage III)
Florian Recker
OB/GYN resident, University Hospital Bonn
(Expert advice)
Toshiba Medical Systems, Berlin
(Provision of ultrasound unit, Aplio 400)
Make sure to check out our AMBOSS ultrasonography tutorial series and our article on POCUS:
https://go.amboss.com/pocus
Subscribe to the AMBOSS YouTube Channel for the latest clinical examination videos, medical student interviews, study tips and tricks, and live webinars!
Free 5-day trial: https://go.amboss.com/04g
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amboss_med/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AMBOSS.Med/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ambossmed
#AMBOSSMed, #MedicalSchool, #POCUS, #Ultrasound
- published: 14 Sep 2021
- views: 138098
10:56
The Principles of Ultrasound Imaging
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 10:56
- Uploaded Date: 13 Feb 2019
- views: 1084853
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultrasound for obstetrics and gynaecology, this film explains the safety a...
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultrasound for obstetrics and gynaecology, this film explains the safety aspects of ultrasound and basic physics around acoustics and the transducer technology of ultrasound systems.
To watch or download this film for free, visit:
https://www.medicalaidfilms.org/film/the-principles-of-ultrasound-imaging/
---------------------
MEDICAL AID FILMS: We've produced 400+ films in over 30 languages for health worker training and community education.
Check out our work: www.medicalaidfilms.org/watch-2
https://wn.com/The_Principles_Of_Ultrasound_Imaging
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultrasound for obstetrics and gynaecology, this film explains the safety aspects of ultrasound and basic physics around acoustics and the transducer technology of ultrasound systems.
To watch or download this film for free, visit:
https://www.medicalaidfilms.org/film/the-principles-of-ultrasound-imaging/
---------------------
MEDICAL AID FILMS: We've produced 400+ films in over 30 languages for health worker training and community education.
Check out our work: www.medicalaidfilms.org/watch-2
- published: 13 Feb 2019
- views: 1084853
0:57
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari #babyvideoshort #firstultrasound #ultrasound #weekspregnant
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:57
- Uploaded Date: 30 Nov 2023
- views: 1005
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
https://wn.com/3_Oylik_Xomila_Xarakatlari_Babyvideoshort_Firstultrasound_Ultrasound_Weekspregnant
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
- published: 30 Nov 2023
- views: 1005
5:16
How to see with sound - Jacques S. Abramowicz
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:16
- Uploaded Date: 01 Apr 2021
- views: 383558
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for SONAR and non-invasive medical procedures.
--
In a dark cave, bats c...
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for SONAR and non-invasive medical procedures.
--
In a dark cave, bats can’t see much. But even with their eyes shut, they can navigate rocky topography at incredible speeds. This is because bats aren't just guided by their eyes, but rather, by their ears. It may seem impossible to see with sound, but bats, naval officers, and doctors do it all the time. How is that possible? Jacques S. Abramowicz digs into the unique properties of ultrasound.
Lesson by Jacques S. Abramowicz, directed by Sofia Pashaei.
Support Our Non-Profit Mission
----------------------------------------------
Support us on Patreon: http://bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon
Check out our merch: http://bit.ly/TEDEDShop
----------------------------------------------
Connect With Us
----------------------------------------------
Sign up for our newsletter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdNewsletter
Follow us on Facebook: http://bit.ly/TEDEdFacebook
Find us on Twitter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdTwitter
Peep us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/TEDEdInstagram
----------------------------------------------
Keep Learning
----------------------------------------------
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz
Dig deeper with additional resources: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz#digdeeper
Animator's website: https://www.sofiapashaei.com/
----------------------------------------------
Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Jose Henrique Leopoldo e Silva, Elnathan Joshua Bangayan, Jayant Sahewal, Mandeep Singh, Abhijit Kiran Valluri, Morgan Williams, Kris Siverhus, Devin Harris, Joy Love Om, Pavel Zalevskiy, Marc Bilodeau, Karen Goepen-Wee, Filip Dabrowski, Barbara Smalley, Megan Douglas, Chris, Tim Leistikow, Renhe Ji, Ka-Hei Law, Leora Allen, Mark Morris, Misaki Sato, EdoKun, Boytsov Ilya, SookKwan Loong, Bev Millar, Lex Azevedo, Noa Shore, Kyle Nguyen, Michael Aquilina, MJ Tan Mingjie, Dawn Jordan, Prasanth Mathialagan, Samuel Doerle, David Rosario, Siamak H, Manav parmar, David Lucsanyi, Anthony Kudolo, Ryohky Araya, Eduardo Briceño, Christophe Dessalles, Heather Slater, Yuh Saito, Fabian Amels, Sandra Tersluisen, Zhexi Shan, Bárbara Nazaré, Josh Engel and Andrea Feliz.
https://wn.com/How_To_See_With_Sound_Jacques_S._Abramowicz
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for SONAR and non-invasive medical procedures.
--
In a dark cave, bats can’t see much. But even with their eyes shut, they can navigate rocky topography at incredible speeds. This is because bats aren't just guided by their eyes, but rather, by their ears. It may seem impossible to see with sound, but bats, naval officers, and doctors do it all the time. How is that possible? Jacques S. Abramowicz digs into the unique properties of ultrasound.
Lesson by Jacques S. Abramowicz, directed by Sofia Pashaei.
Support Our Non-Profit Mission
----------------------------------------------
Support us on Patreon: http://bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon
Check out our merch: http://bit.ly/TEDEDShop
----------------------------------------------
Connect With Us
----------------------------------------------
Sign up for our newsletter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdNewsletter
Follow us on Facebook: http://bit.ly/TEDEdFacebook
Find us on Twitter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdTwitter
Peep us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/TEDEdInstagram
----------------------------------------------
Keep Learning
----------------------------------------------
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz
Dig deeper with additional resources: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz#digdeeper
Animator's website: https://www.sofiapashaei.com/
----------------------------------------------
Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Jose Henrique Leopoldo e Silva, Elnathan Joshua Bangayan, Jayant Sahewal, Mandeep Singh, Abhijit Kiran Valluri, Morgan Williams, Kris Siverhus, Devin Harris, Joy Love Om, Pavel Zalevskiy, Marc Bilodeau, Karen Goepen-Wee, Filip Dabrowski, Barbara Smalley, Megan Douglas, Chris, Tim Leistikow, Renhe Ji, Ka-Hei Law, Leora Allen, Mark Morris, Misaki Sato, EdoKun, Boytsov Ilya, SookKwan Loong, Bev Millar, Lex Azevedo, Noa Shore, Kyle Nguyen, Michael Aquilina, MJ Tan Mingjie, Dawn Jordan, Prasanth Mathialagan, Samuel Doerle, David Rosario, Siamak H, Manav parmar, David Lucsanyi, Anthony Kudolo, Ryohky Araya, Eduardo Briceño, Christophe Dessalles, Heather Slater, Yuh Saito, Fabian Amels, Sandra Tersluisen, Zhexi Shan, Bárbara Nazaré, Josh Engel and Andrea Feliz.
- published: 01 Apr 2021
- views: 383558
0:32
This Is How We Use An Ultrasound Machine For Breast Cancer Screening
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:32
- Uploaded Date: 21 Sep 2022
- views: 202345
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another incredible technology that allows us to detect abnormalities in the breas...
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another incredible technology that allows us to detect abnormalities in the breast.
Watch our ultrasound technologist explain how we perform a breast ultrasound.
CONTACT US
---------------------
📍 Bedford Breast Center
436 N. Bedford Dr, Suite 105
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
📱 310.278.8590
🌐 https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/
SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW
------------------------------------
🎀 YT: https://www.youtube.com/c/BedfordBreastCenterBeverlyHills
🎀 IG: https://www.instagram.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 FB: https://www.facebook.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@bedfordbc
LEARN MORE
----------------------
From Prevention to Detection to Treatment, Bedford Breast Center is LA's leading breast care clinic providing services such as mammography, breast ultrasounds, genetic testing, biopsies, mastectomy, lumpectomy, non-surgical lump removal, and breast reconstruction. Founded by women for women, the practice is led by the surgical team of Dr. Lisa Cassileth, Dr. Heather Richardson, Dr. Leslie Memsic, and Dr. Kelly Killeen.
https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/breast-ultrasound/
#ultrasound #ultrasoundtech #ultrasoundtechnologist #breastcancer #cancerscreening #mammogram #mammography #breastcancerprevention #womenshealth #bedfordbreastcenter
https://wn.com/This_Is_How_We_Use_An_Ultrasound_Machine_For_Breast_Cancer_Screening
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another incredible technology that allows us to detect abnormalities in the breast.
Watch our ultrasound technologist explain how we perform a breast ultrasound.
CONTACT US
---------------------
📍 Bedford Breast Center
436 N. Bedford Dr, Suite 105
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
📱 310.278.8590
🌐 https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/
SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW
------------------------------------
🎀 YT: https://www.youtube.com/c/BedfordBreastCenterBeverlyHills
🎀 IG: https://www.instagram.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 FB: https://www.facebook.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@bedfordbc
LEARN MORE
----------------------
From Prevention to Detection to Treatment, Bedford Breast Center is LA's leading breast care clinic providing services such as mammography, breast ultrasounds, genetic testing, biopsies, mastectomy, lumpectomy, non-surgical lump removal, and breast reconstruction. Founded by women for women, the practice is led by the surgical team of Dr. Lisa Cassileth, Dr. Heather Richardson, Dr. Leslie Memsic, and Dr. Kelly Killeen.
https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/breast-ultrasound/
#ultrasound #ultrasoundtech #ultrasoundtechnologist #breastcancer #cancerscreening #mammogram #mammography #breastcancerprevention #womenshealth #bedfordbreastcenter
- published: 21 Sep 2022
- views: 202345
3:19
Diagnostic Medical Sonography General - Career Video
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:19
- Uploaded Date: 16 Jul 2020
- views: 72746
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/Vascular graduate.
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/Vascular graduate.
https://wn.com/Diagnostic_Medical_Sonography_General_Career_Video
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/Vascular graduate.
- published: 16 Jul 2020
- views: 72746
-
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview United States v. White | 401 U.S. 745 (1971) Imagine you have what you think is a confidential conversation with a friend or acquaintance, but you later learn that the other person was a police informant wearing a wire. Does the informant’s use of the device require a search warrant? The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the 1971 case of United States versus White. On several occasions, Harvey Jackson purchased illegal drugs from James White. Unknown to White, Jackson was a police informant wearing a device that permitted federal agents to listen to their conversations about the drug transactions from a remote locatio...
published: 21 Oct 2020 -
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issue is whether evidence obtained through electronic surveillance of conversations between White and a government informant violates the Fourth Amendment. The Court of Appeals allowed the use of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance without a warrant. The Supreme Court disagreed with this decision and had to determine if the electronic surveillance violated White's Fourth Amendment rights. United States v. White (1971) Supreme Court of the United States 401 U.S. 745, 28 L. Ed. 2d 453, 91 S. Ct. 1122, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 132, SCDB 1970-076 Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-121436041 --- Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a...
published: 27 May 2023 -
United States v White (1971)
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
published: 04 Mar 2021 -
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in sexual activity with a 13-year-old at a party on an Indian Reservation. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the jury was not properly instructed and that the government did not prove he knew the victim's age. The court also considered evidentiary rulings, including the admissibility of a photograph and a police officer's testimony about the minor's appearance and age. United States v. White Calf (2011) United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 634 F.3d 453 Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-calf-129517068 --- Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just t...
published: 16 Aug 2023 -
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview State v. White | 114 S.W.3d 469 (2003) The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel. But can a defendant choose any attorney, even if that attorney is a prosecutor? In State versus White, the Tennessee Supreme Court explores the interplay between a defendant’s right to counsel and an attorney’s ethical responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest. After a grand jury in Shelby County, Tennessee indicted Jeremy White for multiple felonies, he hired attorney Mark McDaniel to defend him. During that same time, McDaniel was also practicing as a part-time assistant district attorney with authorit...
published: 06 Jun 2022 -
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview State v. White | 251 P.3d 820 (2011) An affirmative defense defeats or reduces an otherwise legitimate criminal charge. State versus White compares and contrasts two specific affirmative defenses that reduce murder to manslaughter. Brenda and Jon White had a rocky marriage. Brenda felt anxious and angry during the marriage because she suspected that John was addicted to pornography and having an affair. The couple eventually divorced. Jon subsequently refused to pay child support and cancelled Brenda’s health insurance. As a result, Brenda struggled financially and worked longer hours. She tried to alleviate her financial i...
published: 02 Mar 2023 -
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also convicted of heroin possession with intent to distribute. They challenged their conspiracy convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. They were convicted based on the work of two DEA agents who worked with a confidential informant. The informant bought heroin from Williams and concluded that Williams was selling for Claudell. The informant later bought small quantities of heroin from Phillip and discussed becoming a dealer for him. Phillip was later convicted of heroin possession based on Leeper's testimony that he purchased the drugs from Phillip. The court ruled that the chain of custody for the heroin was sufficient. United States v. White (1978) United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
published: 09 Jun 2023 -
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his website and was convicted of soliciting violence against the juror. However, the district court later granted his motion for acquittal or a new trial, but the appellate court reversed the decision. During the retrial, the government presented evidence of White's advocacy for violence against individuals he deemed "anti-racist" or "enemies" of white supremacy. The court provided instructions to the jury that speech is protected unless it incites an imminent lawless act. White's challenge to the district court's decision to use an anonymous jury was rejected. United States v. White (2012) United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 698 F.3d 1005 Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/...
published: 16 Aug 2023 -
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview Alabama v. White | 496 U.S. 325 (1990) Imagine someone anonymously calls the police department and claims that you’ve got illegal drugs in your car. Does the Fourth Amendment allow an officer to pull your car over and ask you whether you’ve got drugs, based on the anonymous tip? The United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in Alabama versus White. An anonymous caller told an officer with the Montgomery Police Department that an undescribed woman named Vanessa White was a drug dealer who would be engaging in a drug transaction later that day. The caller said White would drive away from a particular apartment complex...
published: 13 Nov 2020 -
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror on his website and made threatening statements towards various individuals and groups, including Jewish people and anti-racist activists. The government accused the defendant of soliciting violence and inciting harm through his online posts. The case involves potential violations of laws related to intimidation, harassment, hate speech, and incitement to violence. The most relevant facts to the court's analysis are the nature and content of the defendant's posts, including whether they constitute protected speech or solicitation of violence. The court must also consider whether the defendant's statements present a threat to public safety and violate applicable laws. United States v. White (2011) Uni...
published: 16 Aug 2023
developed with YouTube
1:25
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:25
- Uploaded Date: 21 Oct 2020
- views: 2317
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-ove...
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
United States v. White | 401 U.S. 745 (1971)
Imagine you have what you think is a confidential conversation with a friend or acquaintance, but you later learn that the other person was a police informant wearing a wire. Does the informant’s use of the device require a search warrant? The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the 1971 case of United States versus White.
On several occasions, Harvey Jackson purchased illegal drugs from James White. Unknown to White, Jackson was a police informant wearing a device that permitted federal agents to listen to their conversations about the drug transactions from a remote location. The agents didn’t obtain a search warrant before conducting the electronic eavesdropping. A federal grand jury later charged White with felony drug charges. White pleaded not guilty and had a jury trial. The district court overruled White’s objection that the agents’ electronic eavesdropping constituted an unconstitutional warrantless search and allowed the agents to testify about what they heard White say to Harvey. The jury convicted White, and he was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
White appealed to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which reversed his conviction after concluding that the agents violated the Fourth Amendment by listening to White’s conversations with Harvey.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_Case_Brief_Summary_|_Law_Case_Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
United States v. White | 401 U.S. 745 (1971)
Imagine you have what you think is a confidential conversation with a friend or acquaintance, but you later learn that the other person was a police informant wearing a wire. Does the informant’s use of the device require a search warrant? The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the 1971 case of United States versus White.
On several occasions, Harvey Jackson purchased illegal drugs from James White. Unknown to White, Jackson was a police informant wearing a device that permitted federal agents to listen to their conversations about the drug transactions from a remote location. The agents didn’t obtain a search warrant before conducting the electronic eavesdropping. A federal grand jury later charged White with felony drug charges. White pleaded not guilty and had a jury trial. The district court overruled White’s objection that the agents’ electronic eavesdropping constituted an unconstitutional warrantless search and allowed the agents to testify about what they heard White say to Harvey. The jury convicted White, and he was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
White appealed to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which reversed his conviction after concluding that the agents violated the Fourth Amendment by listening to White’s conversations with Harvey.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
- published: 21 Oct 2020
- views: 2317
1:34
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:34
- Uploaded Date: 27 May 2023
- views: 80
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issue is whether evidence obtained through electronic surveillance of conv...
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issue is whether evidence obtained through electronic surveillance of conversations between White and a government informant violates the Fourth Amendment. The Court of Appeals allowed the use of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance without a warrant. The Supreme Court disagreed with this decision and had to determine if the electronic surveillance violated White's Fourth Amendment rights.
United States v. White (1971)
Supreme Court of the United States
401 U.S. 745, 28 L. Ed. 2d 453, 91 S. Ct. 1122, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 132, SCDB 1970-076
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-121436041
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_(1971)_Overview_|_Lsdata_Case_Brief_Video_Summary
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issue is whether evidence obtained through electronic surveillance of conversations between White and a government informant violates the Fourth Amendment. The Court of Appeals allowed the use of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance without a warrant. The Supreme Court disagreed with this decision and had to determine if the electronic surveillance violated White's Fourth Amendment rights.
United States v. White (1971)
Supreme Court of the United States
401 U.S. 745, 28 L. Ed. 2d 453, 91 S. Ct. 1122, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 132, SCDB 1970-076
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-121436041
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
- published: 27 May 2023
- views: 80
1:30
United States v White (1971)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:30
- Uploaded Date: 04 Mar 2021
- views: 332
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
https://wn.com/United_States_V_White_(1971)
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
- published: 04 Mar 2021
- views: 332
2:44
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:44
- Uploaded Date: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 27
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in sexual activity with a 13-year-old at a party on an Indian Reservation....
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in sexual activity with a 13-year-old at a party on an Indian Reservation. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the jury was not properly instructed and that the government did not prove he knew the victim's age. The court also considered evidentiary rulings, including the admissibility of a photograph and a police officer's testimony about the minor's appearance and age.
United States v. White Calf (2011)
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
634 F.3d 453
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-calf-129517068
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_Calf_(2011)_Overview_|_Lsdata_Case_Brief_Video_Summary
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in sexual activity with a 13-year-old at a party on an Indian Reservation. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the jury was not properly instructed and that the government did not prove he knew the victim's age. The court also considered evidentiary rulings, including the admissibility of a photograph and a police officer's testimony about the minor's appearance and age.
United States v. White Calf (2011)
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
634 F.3d 453
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-calf-129517068
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 27
1:22
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:22
- Uploaded Date: 06 Jun 2022
- views: 204
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-brief...
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 114 S.W.3d 469 (2003)
The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel. But can a defendant choose any attorney, even if that attorney is a prosecutor? In State versus White, the Tennessee Supreme Court explores the interplay between a defendant’s right to counsel and an attorney’s ethical responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest.
After a grand jury in Shelby County, Tennessee indicted Jeremy White for multiple felonies, he hired attorney Mark McDaniel to defend him. During that same time, McDaniel was also practicing as a part-time assistant district attorney with authority to prosecute crimes in Shelby County. Before White’s case went to trial, the state of Tennessee moved to disqualify McDaniel from representing White.
The trial court disqualified McDaniel based on a perceived conflict of interest. The trial court also barred White from waiving the conflict without the state’s consent. White appealed to the criminal appeals court, which affirmed the trial court judgment but found an actual conflict of interest rather than a perceived one. White then appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
The Quimbee App features over 20,000 case briefs keyed to over 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
https://wn.com/State_V._White_Case_Brief_Summary_|_Law_Case_Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 114 S.W.3d 469 (2003)
The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel. But can a defendant choose any attorney, even if that attorney is a prosecutor? In State versus White, the Tennessee Supreme Court explores the interplay between a defendant’s right to counsel and an attorney’s ethical responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest.
After a grand jury in Shelby County, Tennessee indicted Jeremy White for multiple felonies, he hired attorney Mark McDaniel to defend him. During that same time, McDaniel was also practicing as a part-time assistant district attorney with authority to prosecute crimes in Shelby County. Before White’s case went to trial, the state of Tennessee moved to disqualify McDaniel from representing White.
The trial court disqualified McDaniel based on a perceived conflict of interest. The trial court also barred White from waiving the conflict without the state’s consent. White appealed to the criminal appeals court, which affirmed the trial court judgment but found an actual conflict of interest rather than a perceived one. White then appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
The Quimbee App features over 20,000 case briefs keyed to over 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
- published: 06 Jun 2022
- views: 204
2:17
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:17
- Uploaded Date: 02 Mar 2023
- views: 79
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-ove...
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 251 P.3d 820 (2011)
An affirmative defense defeats or reduces an otherwise legitimate criminal charge. State versus White compares and contrasts two specific affirmative defenses that reduce murder to manslaughter.
Brenda and Jon White had a rocky marriage. Brenda felt anxious and angry during the marriage because she suspected that John was addicted to pornography and having an affair. The couple eventually divorced. Jon subsequently refused to pay child support and cancelled Brenda’s health insurance. As a result, Brenda struggled financially and worked longer hours. She tried to alleviate her financial issues by refinancing the Whites’ marital home. But she needed Jon’s cooperation and signature. So, she went to Jon’s office to discuss the refinancing. They argued because Jon was reluctant to cooperate. Brenda became frustrated and drove away. She returned four hours later and saw Jon talking on a cell phone that he had denied owning during their marriage. Brenda chased Jon with her car, but he escaped into the office building. She then drove into the building and struck Jon twice. The State of Utah charged her with attempted murder. Before trial, Brenda moved for the judge to provide a jury instruction on the extreme-emotional-distress defense. She argued that when she saw Jon’s cell phone, the stress and emotion accumulated throughout their relationship overcame her and made her lose control.
The trial court denied Brenda’s motion, and she filed an interlocutory appeal. The court of appeals held that the extreme-emotional-distress defense requires a loss of self-control resulting from a highly provocative and contemporaneous triggering event. It concluded that seeing Jon’s cell phone wasn’t sufficiently provocative and Brenda’s other prior stressors didn’t occur contemporaneously to her loss of control. Thus, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and Brenda appealed to the Utah Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
The Quimbee App features over 36,300 case briefs keyed to 984 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
https://wn.com/State_V._White_(2011)_Case_Brief_Summary_|_Law_Case_Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 251 P.3d 820 (2011)
An affirmative defense defeats or reduces an otherwise legitimate criminal charge. State versus White compares and contrasts two specific affirmative defenses that reduce murder to manslaughter.
Brenda and Jon White had a rocky marriage. Brenda felt anxious and angry during the marriage because she suspected that John was addicted to pornography and having an affair. The couple eventually divorced. Jon subsequently refused to pay child support and cancelled Brenda’s health insurance. As a result, Brenda struggled financially and worked longer hours. She tried to alleviate her financial issues by refinancing the Whites’ marital home. But she needed Jon’s cooperation and signature. So, she went to Jon’s office to discuss the refinancing. They argued because Jon was reluctant to cooperate. Brenda became frustrated and drove away. She returned four hours later and saw Jon talking on a cell phone that he had denied owning during their marriage. Brenda chased Jon with her car, but he escaped into the office building. She then drove into the building and struck Jon twice. The State of Utah charged her with attempted murder. Before trial, Brenda moved for the judge to provide a jury instruction on the extreme-emotional-distress defense. She argued that when she saw Jon’s cell phone, the stress and emotion accumulated throughout their relationship overcame her and made her lose control.
The trial court denied Brenda’s motion, and she filed an interlocutory appeal. The court of appeals held that the extreme-emotional-distress defense requires a loss of self-control resulting from a highly provocative and contemporaneous triggering event. It concluded that seeing Jon’s cell phone wasn’t sufficiently provocative and Brenda’s other prior stressors didn’t occur contemporaneously to her loss of control. Thus, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and Brenda appealed to the Utah Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
The Quimbee App features over 36,300 case briefs keyed to 984 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
- published: 02 Mar 2023
- views: 79
1:57
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:57
- Uploaded Date: 09 Jun 2023
- views: 10
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also convicted of heroin possession with intent to distribute. They challe...
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also convicted of heroin possession with intent to distribute. They challenged their conspiracy convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. They were convicted based on the work of two DEA agents who worked with a confidential informant. The informant bought heroin from Williams and concluded that Williams was selling for Claudell. The informant later bought small quantities of heroin from Phillip and discussed becoming a dealer for him. Phillip was later convicted of heroin possession based on Leeper's testimony that he purchased the drugs from Phillip. The court ruled that the chain of custody for the heroin was sufficient.
United States v. White (1978)
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
569 F.2d 263
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-8820859
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_(1978)_Overview_|_Lsdata_Case_Brief_Video_Summary
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also convicted of heroin possession with intent to distribute. They challenged their conspiracy convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. They were convicted based on the work of two DEA agents who worked with a confidential informant. The informant bought heroin from Williams and concluded that Williams was selling for Claudell. The informant later bought small quantities of heroin from Phillip and discussed becoming a dealer for him. Phillip was later convicted of heroin possession based on Leeper's testimony that he purchased the drugs from Phillip. The court ruled that the chain of custody for the heroin was sufficient.
United States v. White (1978)
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
569 F.2d 263
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-8820859
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
- published: 09 Jun 2023
- views: 10
2:14
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:14
- Uploaded Date: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 5
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his website and was convicted of soliciting violence against the juror. However...
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his website and was convicted of soliciting violence against the juror. However, the district court later granted his motion for acquittal or a new trial, but the appellate court reversed the decision. During the retrial, the government presented evidence of White's advocacy for violence against individuals he deemed "anti-racist" or "enemies" of white supremacy. The court provided instructions to the jury that speech is protected unless it incites an imminent lawless act. White's challenge to the district court's decision to use an anonymous jury was rejected.
United States v. White (2012)
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
698 F.3d 1005
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-12903736
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_(2012)_Overview_|_Lsdata_Case_Brief_Video_Summary
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his website and was convicted of soliciting violence against the juror. However, the district court later granted his motion for acquittal or a new trial, but the appellate court reversed the decision. During the retrial, the government presented evidence of White's advocacy for violence against individuals he deemed "anti-racist" or "enemies" of white supremacy. The court provided instructions to the jury that speech is protected unless it incites an imminent lawless act. White's challenge to the district court's decision to use an anonymous jury was rejected.
United States v. White (2012)
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
698 F.3d 1005
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-12903736
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 5
1:58
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:58
- Uploaded Date: 13 Nov 2020
- views: 2557
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-ove...
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Alabama v. White | 496 U.S. 325 (1990)
Imagine someone anonymously calls the police department and claims that you’ve got illegal drugs in your car. Does the Fourth Amendment allow an officer to pull your car over and ask you whether you’ve got drugs, based on the anonymous tip? The United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in Alabama versus White.
An anonymous caller told an officer with the Montgomery Police Department that an undescribed woman named Vanessa White was a drug dealer who would be engaging in a drug transaction later that day. The caller said White would drive away from a particular apartment complex at a certain time, in a brown Plymouth station wagon with a broken taillight. She would travel to Dobey’s Motel, which was four miles from the apartment complex.
Officers conducted surveillance of the apartment complex and noticed a car fitting the description given by the caller. They saw a woman get in the car and drive away. The officers followed her until it was apparent that she was driving in the direction of the motel. Shortly before White would have arrived at the motel, a police car pulled her over. The officer informed White that he had stopped her based on suspicion that she had drugs in the car. The officer then obtained White’s consent to search her car for the drugs.
Officers found marijuana inside the car and cocaine inside White’s purse. White was charged in state court with drug possession. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress the drugs under the Fourth Amendment, White entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving her right to appeal. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed White’s conviction, concluding that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment. The Alabama Supreme Court denied review.
The state successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review White’s case.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
https://wn.com/Alabama_V._White_Case_Brief_Summary_|_Law_Case_Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Alabama v. White | 496 U.S. 325 (1990)
Imagine someone anonymously calls the police department and claims that you’ve got illegal drugs in your car. Does the Fourth Amendment allow an officer to pull your car over and ask you whether you’ve got drugs, based on the anonymous tip? The United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in Alabama versus White.
An anonymous caller told an officer with the Montgomery Police Department that an undescribed woman named Vanessa White was a drug dealer who would be engaging in a drug transaction later that day. The caller said White would drive away from a particular apartment complex at a certain time, in a brown Plymouth station wagon with a broken taillight. She would travel to Dobey’s Motel, which was four miles from the apartment complex.
Officers conducted surveillance of the apartment complex and noticed a car fitting the description given by the caller. They saw a woman get in the car and drive away. The officers followed her until it was apparent that she was driving in the direction of the motel. Shortly before White would have arrived at the motel, a police car pulled her over. The officer informed White that he had stopped her based on suspicion that she had drugs in the car. The officer then obtained White’s consent to search her car for the drugs.
Officers found marijuana inside the car and cocaine inside White’s purse. White was charged in state court with drug possession. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress the drugs under the Fourth Amendment, White entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving her right to appeal. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed White’s conviction, concluding that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment. The Alabama Supreme Court denied review.
The state successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review White’s case.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
- published: 13 Nov 2020
- views: 2557
2:14
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:14
- Uploaded Date: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 2
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror on his website and made threatening statements towards various individ...
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror on his website and made threatening statements towards various individuals and groups, including Jewish people and anti-racist activists. The government accused the defendant of soliciting violence and inciting harm through his online posts. The case involves potential violations of laws related to intimidation, harassment, hate speech, and incitement to violence.
The most relevant facts to the court's analysis are the nature and content of the defendant's posts, including whether they constitute protected speech or solicitation of violence. The court must also consider whether the defendant's statements present a threat to public safety and violate applicable laws.
United States v. White (2011)
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
779 F. Supp. 2d 775
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-132050542
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
https://wn.com/United_States_V._White_(2011)_Overview_|_Lsdata_Case_Brief_Video_Summary
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror on his website and made threatening statements towards various individuals and groups, including Jewish people and anti-racist activists. The government accused the defendant of soliciting violence and inciting harm through his online posts. The case involves potential violations of laws related to intimidation, harassment, hate speech, and incitement to violence.
The most relevant facts to the court's analysis are the nature and content of the defendant's posts, including whether they constitute protected speech or solicitation of violence. The court must also consider whether the defendant's statements present a threat to public safety and violate applicable laws.
United States v. White (2011)
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
779 F. Supp. 2d 775
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-132050542
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 2
5:35
Ultrasound medical imaging | Mechanical waves and sound | Physics | Khan Academy
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by Da...
published: 01 Jul 2014
Ultrasound medical imaging | Mechanical waves and sound | Physics | Khan Academy
Ultrasound medical imaging | Mechanical waves and sound | Physics | Khan Academy
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Jul 2014
- views: 386989
You can actually use sound to create images of the inside of the body. Wild! Created by David SantoPietro.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/standing-waves/v/standing-waves-in-tubes-part-1?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Missed the previous lesson? https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanical-waves-and-sound/sound-topic/v/why-do-sounds-get-softer?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=physics
Physics on Khan Academy: Physics is the study of the basic principles that govern the physical world around us. We'll start by looking at motion itself. Then, we'll learn about forces, momentum, energy, and other concepts in lots of different physical situations. To get the most out of physics, you'll need a solid understanding of algebra and a basic understanding of trigonometry.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Physics channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0oGarQW2lE5PxhGoQAKV7Q?sub_confirmation=1
Subscribe to Khan Academy: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=khanacademy
3:31
How diagnostic ultrasound systems work (Canon Official)
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound syst...
published: 25 Dec 2020
How diagnostic ultrasound systems work (Canon Official)
How diagnostic ultrasound systems work (Canon Official)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Dec 2020
- views: 111996
This video introduces the basic principles of the technology of diagnostic ultrasound systems .
Canon's special video site "Canon Video Square"
https://global.canon/en/v-square
---
Subscribe to the official Canon Imaging Plaza YouTube channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/canonimagingplaza
Official Canon website
http://global.canon/
---
#CanonOfficial #CorporateIntroduction #Medical #Healthcare
1:37
What is Medical Ultrasound?
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe t...
published: 09 Sep 2014
What is Medical Ultrasound?
What is Medical Ultrasound?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Sep 2014
- views: 33055
In Part 1 of the Ultrasound Series we present an overview of the technology and describe the common types of Ultrasound you might encounter.
19:17
How I do it: Ultrasound of the Abdomen
published: 06 Sep 2018
How I do it: Ultrasound of the Abdomen
How I do it: Ultrasound of the Abdomen
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Sep 2018
- views: 2394603
6:09
Point of Care Ultrasound - Functions and Settings of the Ultrasound Machine - AMBOSS Video
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultraso...
published: 14 Sep 2021
Point of Care Ultrasound - Functions and Settings of the Ultrasound Machine - AMBOSS Video
Point of Care Ultrasound - Functions and Settings of the Ultrasound Machine - AMBOSS Video
- Report rights infringement
- published: 14 Sep 2021
- views: 138098
This tutorial provides an overview of the most common functions and settings of an ultrasound machine.
Most ultrasound consoles have a similar layout, with some variation between manufacturers. Ultrasound machines are typically equipped with factory presets for certain applications (e.g., preset for abdominal examination), which are a good starting point for visualizing the target tissue. Manual adjustment of the knobs and settings on the ultrasound console can further refine the ultrasound image.
Table of Contents:
00:00 - Intro
00:58 - Setting up the B-mode image
01:20 - Gain
02:05 - Depth
02:32 - Focus
02:52 - Documentation functions
02:54 - Freeze function
03:35 - Performing measurements
04:05 - Other ultrasound modes
04:19 - Color Doppler mode
05:17 - M-mode
Many thanks to
Dr. Daniel Merkel
Owner of the medical ultrasound media library https://sono.gallery
(Ultrasound expert, DEGUM stage III)
Florian Recker
OB/GYN resident, University Hospital Bonn
(Expert advice)
Toshiba Medical Systems, Berlin
(Provision of ultrasound unit, Aplio 400)
Make sure to check out our AMBOSS ultrasonography tutorial series and our article on POCUS:
https://go.amboss.com/pocus
Subscribe to the AMBOSS YouTube Channel for the latest clinical examination videos, medical student interviews, study tips and tricks, and live webinars!
Free 5-day trial: https://go.amboss.com/04g
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amboss_med/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AMBOSS.Med/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ambossmed
#AMBOSSMed, #MedicalSchool, #POCUS, #Ultrasound
10:56
The Principles of Ultrasound Imaging
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultr...
published: 13 Feb 2019
The Principles of Ultrasound Imaging
The Principles of Ultrasound Imaging
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Feb 2019
- views: 1084853
Made in partnership with ISUOG, the leading international society of professionals in ultrasound for obstetrics and gynaecology, this film explains the safety aspects of ultrasound and basic physics around acoustics and the transducer technology of ultrasound systems.
To watch or download this film for free, visit:
https://www.medicalaidfilms.org/film/the-principles-of-ultrasound-imaging/
---------------------
MEDICAL AID FILMS: We've produced 400+ films in over 30 languages for health worker training and community education.
Check out our work: www.medicalaidfilms.org/watch-2
0:57
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari #babyvideoshort #firstultrasound #ultrasound #weekspregnant
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
published: 30 Nov 2023
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari #babyvideoshort #firstultrasound #ultrasound #weekspregnant
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari #babyvideoshort #firstultrasound #ultrasound #weekspregnant
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Nov 2023
- views: 1005
3 oylik xomila xarakatlari va dopler skrining tekshiruvi
5:16
How to see with sound - Jacques S. Abramowicz
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for ...
published: 01 Apr 2021
How to see with sound - Jacques S. Abramowicz
How to see with sound - Jacques S. Abramowicz
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Apr 2021
- views: 383558
Discover how scientists and doctors used bats' ultrasound capabilities as inspiration for SONAR and non-invasive medical procedures.
--
In a dark cave, bats can’t see much. But even with their eyes shut, they can navigate rocky topography at incredible speeds. This is because bats aren't just guided by their eyes, but rather, by their ears. It may seem impossible to see with sound, but bats, naval officers, and doctors do it all the time. How is that possible? Jacques S. Abramowicz digs into the unique properties of ultrasound.
Lesson by Jacques S. Abramowicz, directed by Sofia Pashaei.
Support Our Non-Profit Mission
----------------------------------------------
Support us on Patreon: http://bit.ly/TEDEdPatreon
Check out our merch: http://bit.ly/TEDEDShop
----------------------------------------------
Connect With Us
----------------------------------------------
Sign up for our newsletter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdNewsletter
Follow us on Facebook: http://bit.ly/TEDEdFacebook
Find us on Twitter: http://bit.ly/TEDEdTwitter
Peep us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/TEDEdInstagram
----------------------------------------------
Keep Learning
----------------------------------------------
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz
Dig deeper with additional resources: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-does-ultrasound-work-jacques-s-abramowicz#digdeeper
Animator's website: https://www.sofiapashaei.com/
----------------------------------------------
Thank you so much to our patrons for your support! Without you this video would not be possible! Jose Henrique Leopoldo e Silva, Elnathan Joshua Bangayan, Jayant Sahewal, Mandeep Singh, Abhijit Kiran Valluri, Morgan Williams, Kris Siverhus, Devin Harris, Joy Love Om, Pavel Zalevskiy, Marc Bilodeau, Karen Goepen-Wee, Filip Dabrowski, Barbara Smalley, Megan Douglas, Chris, Tim Leistikow, Renhe Ji, Ka-Hei Law, Leora Allen, Mark Morris, Misaki Sato, EdoKun, Boytsov Ilya, SookKwan Loong, Bev Millar, Lex Azevedo, Noa Shore, Kyle Nguyen, Michael Aquilina, MJ Tan Mingjie, Dawn Jordan, Prasanth Mathialagan, Samuel Doerle, David Rosario, Siamak H, Manav parmar, David Lucsanyi, Anthony Kudolo, Ryohky Araya, Eduardo Briceño, Christophe Dessalles, Heather Slater, Yuh Saito, Fabian Amels, Sandra Tersluisen, Zhexi Shan, Bárbara Nazaré, Josh Engel and Andrea Feliz.
0:32
This Is How We Use An Ultrasound Machine For Breast Cancer Screening
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another inc...
published: 21 Sep 2022
This Is How We Use An Ultrasound Machine For Breast Cancer Screening
This Is How We Use An Ultrasound Machine For Breast Cancer Screening
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Sep 2022
- views: 202345
We often discussing mammography for breast cancer screening, but ultrasound is another incredible technology that allows us to detect abnormalities in the breast.
Watch our ultrasound technologist explain how we perform a breast ultrasound.
CONTACT US
---------------------
📍 Bedford Breast Center
436 N. Bedford Dr, Suite 105
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
📱 310.278.8590
🌐 https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/
SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW
------------------------------------
🎀 YT: https://www.youtube.com/c/BedfordBreastCenterBeverlyHills
🎀 IG: https://www.instagram.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 FB: https://www.facebook.com/bedfordbreastcenter
🎀 TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@bedfordbc
LEARN MORE
----------------------
From Prevention to Detection to Treatment, Bedford Breast Center is LA's leading breast care clinic providing services such as mammography, breast ultrasounds, genetic testing, biopsies, mastectomy, lumpectomy, non-surgical lump removal, and breast reconstruction. Founded by women for women, the practice is led by the surgical team of Dr. Lisa Cassileth, Dr. Heather Richardson, Dr. Leslie Memsic, and Dr. Kelly Killeen.
https://www.bedfordbreastcenter.com/breast-ultrasound/
#ultrasound #ultrasoundtech #ultrasoundtechnologist #breastcancer #cancerscreening #mammogram #mammography #breastcancerprevention #womenshealth #bedfordbreastcenter
3:19
Diagnostic Medical Sonography General - Career Video
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/...
published: 16 Jul 2020
Diagnostic Medical Sonography General - Career Video
Diagnostic Medical Sonography General - Career Video
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Jul 2020
- views: 72746
Megan, a University of Iowa DMS program alum, talks about what it is like to be a General/Vascular graduate.
Medical ultrasound
Medical ultrasound (also known as diagnostic sonography or ultrasonography) is a diagnostic imaging technique based on the application of ultrasound. It is used to see internal body structures such as tendons, muscles, joints, vessels and internal organs. Its aim is often to find a source of a disease or to exclude any pathology. The practice of examining pregnant women using ultrasound is called obstetric ultrasound, and is widely used.
Ultrasound is sound waves with frequencies which are higher than those audible to humans (>20,000Hz). Ultrasonic images also known as sonograms are made by sending pulses of ultrasound into tissue using a probe. The sound echoes off the tissue; with different tissues reflecting varying degrees of sound. These echoes are recorded and displayed as an image to the operator.
Many different types of images can be formed using sonographic instruments. The most well-known type is a B-mode image, which displays the acoustic impedance of a two-dimensional cross-section of tissue. Other types of image can display blood flow, motion of tissue over time, the location of blood, the presence of specific molecules, the stiffness of tissue, or the anatomy of a three-dimensional region.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Medical_ultrasound
1:25
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and coun...
published: 21 Oct 2020
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Oct 2020
- views: 2317
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
United States v. White | 401 U.S. 745 (1971)
Imagine you have what you think is a confidential conversation with a friend or acquaintance, but you later learn that the other person was a police informant wearing a wire. Does the informant’s use of the device require a search warrant? The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the 1971 case of United States versus White.
On several occasions, Harvey Jackson purchased illegal drugs from James White. Unknown to White, Jackson was a police informant wearing a device that permitted federal agents to listen to their conversations about the drug transactions from a remote location. The agents didn’t obtain a search warrant before conducting the electronic eavesdropping. A federal grand jury later charged White with felony drug charges. White pleaded not guilty and had a jury trial. The district court overruled White’s objection that the agents’ electronic eavesdropping constituted an unconstitutional warrantless search and allowed the agents to testify about what they heard White say to Harvey. The jury convicted White, and he was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
White appealed to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which reversed his conviction after concluding that the agents violated the Fourth Amendment by listening to White’s conversations with Harvey.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
1:34
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issu...
published: 27 May 2023
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 27 May 2023
- views: 80
A man named James A. White was sentenced to prison for illegal drug transactions. The issue is whether evidence obtained through electronic surveillance of conversations between White and a government informant violates the Fourth Amendment. The Court of Appeals allowed the use of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance without a warrant. The Supreme Court disagreed with this decision and had to determine if the electronic surveillance violated White's Fourth Amendment rights.
United States v. White (1971)
Supreme Court of the United States
401 U.S. 745, 28 L. Ed. 2d 453, 91 S. Ct. 1122, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 132, SCDB 1970-076
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-121436041
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
1:30
United States v White (1971)
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
published: 04 Mar 2021
United States v White (1971)
United States v White (1971)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Mar 2021
- views: 332
Landmark Supreme Court Case Series - Case #678
2:44
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in s...
published: 16 Aug 2023
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 27
A man named Roman White Calf was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor when he engaged in sexual activity with a 13-year-old at a party on an Indian Reservation. He appealed his conviction, arguing that the jury was not properly instructed and that the government did not prove he knew the victim's age. The court also considered evidentiary rulings, including the admissibility of a photograph and a police officer's testimony about the minor's appearance and age.
United States v. White Calf (2011)
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
634 F.3d 453
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-calf-129517068
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
1:22
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and coun...
published: 06 Jun 2022
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Jun 2022
- views: 204
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 114 S.W.3d 469 (2003)
The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to counsel. But can a defendant choose any attorney, even if that attorney is a prosecutor? In State versus White, the Tennessee Supreme Court explores the interplay between a defendant’s right to counsel and an attorney’s ethical responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest.
After a grand jury in Shelby County, Tennessee indicted Jeremy White for multiple felonies, he hired attorney Mark McDaniel to defend him. During that same time, McDaniel was also practicing as a part-time assistant district attorney with authority to prosecute crimes in Shelby County. Before White’s case went to trial, the state of Tennessee moved to disqualify McDaniel from representing White.
The trial court disqualified McDaniel based on a perceived conflict of interest. The trial court also barred White from waiving the conflict without the state’s consent. White appealed to the criminal appeals court, which affirmed the trial court judgment but found an actual conflict of interest rather than a perceived one. White then appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
The Quimbee App features over 20,000 case briefs keyed to over 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-114-s-w-3d-469-2003
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
2:17
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and coun...
published: 02 Mar 2023
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Report rights infringement
- published: 02 Mar 2023
- views: 79
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 36,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 984 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
State v. White | 251 P.3d 820 (2011)
An affirmative defense defeats or reduces an otherwise legitimate criminal charge. State versus White compares and contrasts two specific affirmative defenses that reduce murder to manslaughter.
Brenda and Jon White had a rocky marriage. Brenda felt anxious and angry during the marriage because she suspected that John was addicted to pornography and having an affair. The couple eventually divorced. Jon subsequently refused to pay child support and cancelled Brenda’s health insurance. As a result, Brenda struggled financially and worked longer hours. She tried to alleviate her financial issues by refinancing the Whites’ marital home. But she needed Jon’s cooperation and signature. So, she went to Jon’s office to discuss the refinancing. They argued because Jon was reluctant to cooperate. Brenda became frustrated and drove away. She returned four hours later and saw Jon talking on a cell phone that he had denied owning during their marriage. Brenda chased Jon with her car, but he escaped into the office building. She then drove into the building and struck Jon twice. The State of Utah charged her with attempted murder. Before trial, Brenda moved for the judge to provide a jury instruction on the extreme-emotional-distress defense. She argued that when she saw Jon’s cell phone, the stress and emotion accumulated throughout their relationship overcame her and made her lose control.
The trial court denied Brenda’s motion, and she filed an interlocutory appeal. The court of appeals held that the extreme-emotional-distress defense requires a loss of self-control resulting from a highly provocative and contemporaneous triggering event. It concluded that seeing Jon’s cell phone wasn’t sufficiently provocative and Brenda’s other prior stressors didn’t occur contemporaneously to her loss of control. Thus, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment, and Brenda appealed to the Utah Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
The Quimbee App features over 36,300 case briefs keyed to 984 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/state-v-white-251-p-3d-820-2011
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
1:57
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also...
published: 09 Jun 2023
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Jun 2023
- views: 10
The Whites were convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin. Phillip was also convicted of heroin possession with intent to distribute. They challenged their conspiracy convictions on grounds of insufficient evidence. They were convicted based on the work of two DEA agents who worked with a confidential informant. The informant bought heroin from Williams and concluded that Williams was selling for Claudell. The informant later bought small quantities of heroin from Phillip and discussed becoming a dealer for him. Phillip was later convicted of heroin possession based on Leeper's testimony that he purchased the drugs from Phillip. The court ruled that the chain of custody for the heroin was sufficient.
United States v. White (1978)
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
569 F.2d 263
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-8820859
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
2:14
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his websi...
published: 16 Aug 2023
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 5
William White, a white supremacist, posted personal information about a juror on his website and was convicted of soliciting violence against the juror. However, the district court later granted his motion for acquittal or a new trial, but the appellate court reversed the decision. During the retrial, the government presented evidence of White's advocacy for violence against individuals he deemed "anti-racist" or "enemies" of white supremacy. The court provided instructions to the jury that speech is protected unless it incites an imminent lawless act. White's challenge to the district court's decision to use an anonymous jury was rejected.
United States v. White (2012)
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
698 F.3d 1005
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-12903736
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
1:58
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and coun...
published: 13 Nov 2020
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Nov 2020
- views: 2557
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Alabama v. White | 496 U.S. 325 (1990)
Imagine someone anonymously calls the police department and claims that you’ve got illegal drugs in your car. Does the Fourth Amendment allow an officer to pull your car over and ask you whether you’ve got drugs, based on the anonymous tip? The United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in Alabama versus White.
An anonymous caller told an officer with the Montgomery Police Department that an undescribed woman named Vanessa White was a drug dealer who would be engaging in a drug transaction later that day. The caller said White would drive away from a particular apartment complex at a certain time, in a brown Plymouth station wagon with a broken taillight. She would travel to Dobey’s Motel, which was four miles from the apartment complex.
Officers conducted surveillance of the apartment complex and noticed a car fitting the description given by the caller. They saw a woman get in the car and drive away. The officers followed her until it was apparent that she was driving in the direction of the motel. Shortly before White would have arrived at the motel, a police car pulled her over. The officer informed White that he had stopped her based on suspicion that she had drugs in the car. The officer then obtained White’s consent to search her car for the drugs.
Officers found marijuana inside the car and cocaine inside White’s purse. White was charged in state court with drug possession. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress the drugs under the Fourth Amendment, White entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving her right to appeal. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed White’s conviction, concluding that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment. The Alabama Supreme Court denied review.
The state successfully petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review White’s case.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/alabama-v-white
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
2:14
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror ...
published: 16 Aug 2023
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 2
The defendant is a white supremacist leader who posted personal information about a juror on his website and made threatening statements towards various individuals and groups, including Jewish people and anti-racist activists. The government accused the defendant of soliciting violence and inciting harm through his online posts. The case involves potential violations of laws related to intimidation, harassment, hate speech, and incitement to violence.
The most relevant facts to the court's analysis are the nature and content of the defendant's posts, including whether they constitute protected speech or solicitation of violence. The court must also consider whether the defendant's statements present a threat to public safety and violate applicable laws.
United States v. White (2011)
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
779 F. Supp. 2d 775
Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/united-states-v-white-132050542
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
United States v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Ca...
United States v. White (1971) Overview | LSData Ca...
United States v White (1971)...
United States v. White Calf (2011) Overview | LSDa...
State v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Expla...
State v. White (2011) Case Brief Summary | Law Cas...
United States v. White (1978) Overview | LSData Ca...
United States v. White (2012) Overview | LSData Ca...
Alabama v. White Case Brief Summary | Law Case Exp...
United States v. White (2011) Overview | LSData Ca...
Latest News for: spark (u.s. organization)
Edit
Republican candidate for Missouri House speaker draws scrutiny over $6M earmark
... took a job with the organization in charge of the project, the National Law Enforcement Foundation.
Edit
Report forecasts Beijing as top Spring Festival tourism destination
Spring Festival was inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on Dec.
Edit
Dennis Porter: “Up to 20 ‘Strategic Bitcoin Reserve’ bills will be introduced at the state level”
Edit
Canadian monopoly capital rallies to Conservative Party as Trudeau calls it quits
Edit
UNHCR a ‘Silent Spectator’ to Pakistani Police’s Inhumane Treatment of Afghan Refugees: Former MP
She urged the organization to defend the rights of vulnerable Afghans, especially women and children ... This crackdown has sparked strong reactions from human rights organizations, which have condemned the mistreatment and forced deportations ... .
Edit
What Happened to Jeff Baena? Aubrey Plaza’s Husband & Filmmaker Passes Away
Photo Credit. Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images/Getty Images Entertainment ... WARNING ... Russell ... His death has sparked discussions about mental health awareness, prompting organizations to highlight support lines for individuals facing similar challenges ... .
Edit
Everyone has a plan to fight antisemitism. Few have studied what actually works.
Edit
The Lower East Side anti-Jewish riot that changed the way Jews do politics
In 1902, an anti-Jewish riot at a ...
Edit
Musk flexing his political muscle on global stage
He called for the release of Tommy Robinson, the onetime leader of the English Defense League who for years has organized anti-Islam protests around Britain ... as a suspected extremist organization.
Edit
In Kerala, a battle is brewing over sacred threads & bare chests
The debate has sparked tensions among community organizations and ...
Edit
Elon Musk goes global with his playbook for political influence
He called for the release of Tommy Robinson, the onetime leader of the English Defense League who for years has organized anti-Islam protests around Britain ... as a suspected extremist organization.
Edit
Fans left stunned as conjoined twins Abby and Brittany Hensel reveal how their bodies are ...
The twins, 34, were born with dicephalic parapagus, where two heads are attached to a single body, with each twin having her own brain, heart, and other organs ... Conjoined twins Abby and Brittany Hensel spark pregnancy speculation.
Edit
China virus outbreak? Public urged to stop sharing unverified reports
... the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding the alleged outbreak, which has sparked concern following a surge of alarming social media posts.
- 1
- 2
- Next page »