-
Why We Need Scientific Communities | Mike Brownnutt | TEDxLingnanUniversitySalon
Mike he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
Dr. Mike Brownnutt obtained his first master’s degree (MSc in physics) and his PhD (in experimental quantum mechanics) from Imperial College London, then moved to Innsbruck, Austria, to develop scalable architectures for quantum computers. He completed his second master’s degree (MA in theology from the University of Chester) considering how “faith” is understood in discussions about Christianity and science. He is now Associate Director of the Faith and Science Collaborative Research Forum, based at HKU.
Brownnutt’s work consistently places him at the boundaries between disciplines. From this odd vantage, he shares perspectives on how scientists see thems...
published: 07 Apr 2017
-
Partnering with the Scientific Community
This video shows how BioLegend partners with the scientific community, addressing needs for quality products and services, providing technical support, and developing future reagents and technologies.
published: 27 May 2020
-
The Scientific Community (what do scientists do?)
What do real scientists actually do? This is a very brief (and simplified) summary of the scientific process.
Thanks for watching,
Lewis
_____________________________________
MY PHYSICS WEBSITES
Find even more videos organised by exam board and topic at:
GCSE Physics Online
► https://www.gcsephysicsonline.com
A Level Physics Online
► https://www.alevelphysicsonline.com
MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Your support in watching this video has been invaluable! To contribute towards the free videos on YouTube, make a small donation at:
► https://www.paypal.me/physicsonline
FOLLOW ME
► https://www.youtube.com/physicsonline?sub_confirmation=1
► https://www.instagram.com/physicsonline/
► https://www.facebook.com/gcseandalevelphysicsonline
#sc...
published: 12 Dec 2017
-
How can the scientific community proactively prevent sloppy science?
The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the most public displays of ‘sloppy science’. First known as 'slodderwetenschap' in Dutch, sloppy science occurs when shortcuts are overlooked in favour of reaching and proliferating preferred results. Professor Michael Lissack, from the College of Design and Innovation at Tongji University in China, and Brenden Meagher, Boston University, have identified how good research design and rigorous interrogation can ensure sound, not sloppy, science.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Article
────────────────────────────
https://researchoutreach.org/articles/sloppy-science-shortcuts-covid-19/
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Additional Information
────────────────────────────
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621001064?via%3Dihub
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Research Ou...
published: 16 Aug 2023
-
The Scientific Community Image Forum - Anne Carpenter and Kevin Eliceiri
https://www.ibiology.org/techniques/scientific-community-image-forum
The Scientific Community Image Forum is an online resource that helps scientists answer their bioimage analysis questions. In this talk, Dr. Anne Carpenter and Dr. Kevin Eliceiri encourage scientists to use the Scientific Community Image Forum when they have image analysis difficulties, and to familiarize themselves with the different tools that they can use to answer their questions.
Speaker Biographies:
Anne Carpenter is an Institute Scientist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Carpenter completed her bachelor’s degree in biological sciences, and a doctoral degree in cell biology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She continued her scientific training as a postdoctoral fellow at the MIT/Whitehe...
published: 20 Aug 2019
-
How the Scientific Community Can Improve Research Methods and Reporting - Shai Silberberg, PhD
Shai Silberberg explains reasons why some research can’t be replicated and how the scientific community can improve research methods and reporting. Silberberg spoke at an Experimental Biology 2015 symposium sponsored by the American Physiological Society’s Science Policy Committee. The session explored challenges to scientific rigor and identified issues that affect the reliability of research results. For more information and to view all the slides and hear all the presentations from the symposium in their entirety, visit the Science Policy pages of the APS website at www.the-aps.org/reproducibility.
published: 10 Sep 2015
-
Broad Institute: A Collaborative Scientific Community
The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard was launched in 2004 to empower this generation of creative scientists to transform medicine. The Broad Institute seeks to describe all the molecular components of life and their connections; discover the molecular basis of major human diseases; develop effective new approaches to diagnostics and therapeutics; and disseminate discoveries, tools, methods and data openly to the entire scientific community.Copyright Broad Institute, 2015. All rights reserved.
published: 04 Dec 2015
-
How the coronavirus is changing scientific research
When the coronavirus crisis became a worldwide pandemic, thousands of scientists pivoted their research efforts to help stop the spread of the virus. Ed Yong, a staff writer covering science for The Atlantic, joins CBSN to discuss how the pandemic has changed the scientific community and what mRNA technology means for future disease outbreaks.
published: 21 Dec 2020
-
How do we lead the way for the scientific community?
How do we lead the way for the scientific community? Well, that’s where The Royal Society of Chemistry editorial board members come in. They offer their expertise to ensure high-quality science across both our journals and our books, working as ambassadors, researchers, and key opinion leaders.
To learn more about their valuable contributions to the chemical sciences, visit https://rsc.li/OurEditors.
published: 14 Mar 2022
-
Scientific community influenced by ‘political wokeness’ on COVID
Most of the mainstream media and parts of the scientific community compromised their principles in order to dismiss any discussion that COVID-19 could have originated from a lab, according to former China advisor to the US State Department, Miles Yu.
In February 2020, eminent medical journal The Lancet published a letter signed by 27 leading scientists which said COVID-19 originated from animals and argued that anyone claiming it was from a lab was guilty of spreading “misinformation”.
Subsequently, more and more scientists, including some from the World Health Organisation, have said it is possible that the disease originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaking with Sky News host Sharri Markson as part of her exclusive documentary, ‘What Really Happened in Wuhan’, Mr Yu said...
published: 29 Sep 2021
15:28
Why We Need Scientific Communities | Mike Brownnutt | TEDxLingnanUniversitySalon
Mike he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
Dr. Mike Brownnutt obtained...
Mike he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
Dr. Mike Brownnutt obtained his first master’s degree (MSc in physics) and his PhD (in experimental quantum mechanics) from Imperial College London, then moved to Innsbruck, Austria, to develop scalable architectures for quantum computers. He completed his second master’s degree (MA in theology from the University of Chester) considering how “faith” is understood in discussions about Christianity and science. He is now Associate Director of the Faith and Science Collaborative Research Forum, based at HKU.
Brownnutt’s work consistently places him at the boundaries between disciplines. From this odd vantage, he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at http://ted.com/tedx
https://wn.com/Why_We_Need_Scientific_Communities_|_Mike_Brownnutt_|_Tedxlingnanuniversitysalon
Mike he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
Dr. Mike Brownnutt obtained his first master’s degree (MSc in physics) and his PhD (in experimental quantum mechanics) from Imperial College London, then moved to Innsbruck, Austria, to develop scalable architectures for quantum computers. He completed his second master’s degree (MA in theology from the University of Chester) considering how “faith” is understood in discussions about Christianity and science. He is now Associate Director of the Faith and Science Collaborative Research Forum, based at HKU.
Brownnutt’s work consistently places him at the boundaries between disciplines. From this odd vantage, he shares perspectives on how scientists see themselves, how they understand their own work, and how you should understand it.
This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at http://ted.com/tedx
- published: 07 Apr 2017
- views: 954
4:00
Partnering with the Scientific Community
This video shows how BioLegend partners with the scientific community, addressing needs for quality products and services, providing technical support, and deve...
This video shows how BioLegend partners with the scientific community, addressing needs for quality products and services, providing technical support, and developing future reagents and technologies.
https://wn.com/Partnering_With_The_Scientific_Community
This video shows how BioLegend partners with the scientific community, addressing needs for quality products and services, providing technical support, and developing future reagents and technologies.
- published: 27 May 2020
- views: 838
3:39
The Scientific Community (what do scientists do?)
What do real scientists actually do? This is a very brief (and simplified) summary of the scientific process.
Thanks for watching,
Lewis
___________________...
What do real scientists actually do? This is a very brief (and simplified) summary of the scientific process.
Thanks for watching,
Lewis
_____________________________________
MY PHYSICS WEBSITES
Find even more videos organised by exam board and topic at:
GCSE Physics Online
► https://www.gcsephysicsonline.com
A Level Physics Online
► https://www.alevelphysicsonline.com
MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Your support in watching this video has been invaluable! To contribute towards the free videos on YouTube, make a small donation at:
► https://www.paypal.me/physicsonline
FOLLOW ME
► https://www.youtube.com/physicsonline?sub_confirmation=1
► https://www.instagram.com/physicsonline/
► https://www.facebook.com/gcseandalevelphysicsonline
#science #alevelphysics #physicsonline
https://wn.com/The_Scientific_Community_(What_Do_Scientists_Do_)
What do real scientists actually do? This is a very brief (and simplified) summary of the scientific process.
Thanks for watching,
Lewis
_____________________________________
MY PHYSICS WEBSITES
Find even more videos organised by exam board and topic at:
GCSE Physics Online
► https://www.gcsephysicsonline.com
A Level Physics Online
► https://www.alevelphysicsonline.com
MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Your support in watching this video has been invaluable! To contribute towards the free videos on YouTube, make a small donation at:
► https://www.paypal.me/physicsonline
FOLLOW ME
► https://www.youtube.com/physicsonline?sub_confirmation=1
► https://www.instagram.com/physicsonline/
► https://www.facebook.com/gcseandalevelphysicsonline
#science #alevelphysics #physicsonline
- published: 12 Dec 2017
- views: 9786
1:23
How can the scientific community proactively prevent sloppy science?
The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the most public displays of ‘sloppy science’. First known as 'slodderwetenschap' in Dutch, sloppy science occurs when shortcuts...
The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the most public displays of ‘sloppy science’. First known as 'slodderwetenschap' in Dutch, sloppy science occurs when shortcuts are overlooked in favour of reaching and proliferating preferred results. Professor Michael Lissack, from the College of Design and Innovation at Tongji University in China, and Brenden Meagher, Boston University, have identified how good research design and rigorous interrogation can ensure sound, not sloppy, science.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Article
────────────────────────────
https://researchoutreach.org/articles/sloppy-science-shortcuts-covid-19/
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Additional Information
────────────────────────────
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621001064?via%3Dihub
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Research Outreach
────────────────────────────
https://researchoutreach.org/
https://twitter.com/@ResOutreach
https://www.facebook.com/researchoutreach
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
#science
#covid19
#understanding
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
https://wn.com/How_Can_The_Scientific_Community_Proactively_Prevent_Sloppy_Science
The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the most public displays of ‘sloppy science’. First known as 'slodderwetenschap' in Dutch, sloppy science occurs when shortcuts are overlooked in favour of reaching and proliferating preferred results. Professor Michael Lissack, from the College of Design and Innovation at Tongji University in China, and Brenden Meagher, Boston University, have identified how good research design and rigorous interrogation can ensure sound, not sloppy, science.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Article
────────────────────────────
https://researchoutreach.org/articles/sloppy-science-shortcuts-covid-19/
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Additional Information
────────────────────────────
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621001064?via%3Dihub
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Research Outreach
────────────────────────────
https://researchoutreach.org/
https://twitter.com/@ResOutreach
https://www.facebook.com/researchoutreach
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
#science
#covid19
#understanding
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- published: 16 Aug 2023
- views: 491
2:43
The Scientific Community Image Forum - Anne Carpenter and Kevin Eliceiri
https://www.ibiology.org/techniques/scientific-community-image-forum
The Scientific Community Image Forum is an online resource that helps scientists answer th...
https://www.ibiology.org/techniques/scientific-community-image-forum
The Scientific Community Image Forum is an online resource that helps scientists answer their bioimage analysis questions. In this talk, Dr. Anne Carpenter and Dr. Kevin Eliceiri encourage scientists to use the Scientific Community Image Forum when they have image analysis difficulties, and to familiarize themselves with the different tools that they can use to answer their questions.
Speaker Biographies:
Anne Carpenter is an Institute Scientist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Carpenter completed her bachelor’s degree in biological sciences, and a doctoral degree in cell biology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She continued her scientific training as a postdoctoral fellow at the MIT/Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in the laboratory of Dr. David Sabatini and was co-mentored by Dr. Polina Golland of MIT’s Computer Science/Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. In 2017, Carpenter started her laboratory at the Broad Institute where she combines her background in cell biology, microscopy, and computational biology to develop methods extracting quantitative information from biological images.
Dr. Kevin Eliceiri is an Associate Professor of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering and director of the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation (LOCI) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Eliceiri completed his bachelor’s and doctoral degree in Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. In 2008, he founded LOCI and started his research group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His current research focuses on the development of novel optical imaging methods for investigating the role of the cellular microenvironment in disease, and the development of software for multidimensional image analysis.
https://wn.com/The_Scientific_Community_Image_Forum_Anne_Carpenter_And_Kevin_Eliceiri
https://www.ibiology.org/techniques/scientific-community-image-forum
The Scientific Community Image Forum is an online resource that helps scientists answer their bioimage analysis questions. In this talk, Dr. Anne Carpenter and Dr. Kevin Eliceiri encourage scientists to use the Scientific Community Image Forum when they have image analysis difficulties, and to familiarize themselves with the different tools that they can use to answer their questions.
Speaker Biographies:
Anne Carpenter is an Institute Scientist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Carpenter completed her bachelor’s degree in biological sciences, and a doctoral degree in cell biology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She continued her scientific training as a postdoctoral fellow at the MIT/Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in the laboratory of Dr. David Sabatini and was co-mentored by Dr. Polina Golland of MIT’s Computer Science/Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. In 2017, Carpenter started her laboratory at the Broad Institute where she combines her background in cell biology, microscopy, and computational biology to develop methods extracting quantitative information from biological images.
Dr. Kevin Eliceiri is an Associate Professor of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering and director of the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation (LOCI) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Eliceiri completed his bachelor’s and doctoral degree in Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. In 2008, he founded LOCI and started his research group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His current research focuses on the development of novel optical imaging methods for investigating the role of the cellular microenvironment in disease, and the development of software for multidimensional image analysis.
- published: 20 Aug 2019
- views: 5364
4:26
How the Scientific Community Can Improve Research Methods and Reporting - Shai Silberberg, PhD
Shai Silberberg explains reasons why some research can’t be replicated and how the scientific community can improve research methods and reporting. Silberberg s...
Shai Silberberg explains reasons why some research can’t be replicated and how the scientific community can improve research methods and reporting. Silberberg spoke at an Experimental Biology 2015 symposium sponsored by the American Physiological Society’s Science Policy Committee. The session explored challenges to scientific rigor and identified issues that affect the reliability of research results. For more information and to view all the slides and hear all the presentations from the symposium in their entirety, visit the Science Policy pages of the APS website at www.the-aps.org/reproducibility.
https://wn.com/How_The_Scientific_Community_Can_Improve_Research_Methods_And_Reporting_Shai_Silberberg,_Phd
Shai Silberberg explains reasons why some research can’t be replicated and how the scientific community can improve research methods and reporting. Silberberg spoke at an Experimental Biology 2015 symposium sponsored by the American Physiological Society’s Science Policy Committee. The session explored challenges to scientific rigor and identified issues that affect the reliability of research results. For more information and to view all the slides and hear all the presentations from the symposium in their entirety, visit the Science Policy pages of the APS website at www.the-aps.org/reproducibility.
- published: 10 Sep 2015
- views: 678
1:56
Broad Institute: A Collaborative Scientific Community
The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard was launched in 2004 to empower this generation of creative scientists to transform medicine. The Broad...
The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard was launched in 2004 to empower this generation of creative scientists to transform medicine. The Broad Institute seeks to describe all the molecular components of life and their connections; discover the molecular basis of major human diseases; develop effective new approaches to diagnostics and therapeutics; and disseminate discoveries, tools, methods and data openly to the entire scientific community.Copyright Broad Institute, 2015. All rights reserved.
https://wn.com/Broad_Institute_A_Collaborative_Scientific_Community
The Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard was launched in 2004 to empower this generation of creative scientists to transform medicine. The Broad Institute seeks to describe all the molecular components of life and their connections; discover the molecular basis of major human diseases; develop effective new approaches to diagnostics and therapeutics; and disseminate discoveries, tools, methods and data openly to the entire scientific community.Copyright Broad Institute, 2015. All rights reserved.
- published: 04 Dec 2015
- views: 1913
5:11
How the coronavirus is changing scientific research
When the coronavirus crisis became a worldwide pandemic, thousands of scientists pivoted their research efforts to help stop the spread of the virus. Ed Yong, a...
When the coronavirus crisis became a worldwide pandemic, thousands of scientists pivoted their research efforts to help stop the spread of the virus. Ed Yong, a staff writer covering science for The Atlantic, joins CBSN to discuss how the pandemic has changed the scientific community and what mRNA technology means for future disease outbreaks.
https://wn.com/How_The_Coronavirus_Is_Changing_Scientific_Research
When the coronavirus crisis became a worldwide pandemic, thousands of scientists pivoted their research efforts to help stop the spread of the virus. Ed Yong, a staff writer covering science for The Atlantic, joins CBSN to discuss how the pandemic has changed the scientific community and what mRNA technology means for future disease outbreaks.
- published: 21 Dec 2020
- views: 2786
3:19
How do we lead the way for the scientific community?
How do we lead the way for the scientific community? Well, that’s where The Royal Society of Chemistry editorial board members come in. They offer their experti...
How do we lead the way for the scientific community? Well, that’s where The Royal Society of Chemistry editorial board members come in. They offer their expertise to ensure high-quality science across both our journals and our books, working as ambassadors, researchers, and key opinion leaders.
To learn more about their valuable contributions to the chemical sciences, visit https://rsc.li/OurEditors.
https://wn.com/How_Do_We_Lead_The_Way_For_The_Scientific_Community
How do we lead the way for the scientific community? Well, that’s where The Royal Society of Chemistry editorial board members come in. They offer their expertise to ensure high-quality science across both our journals and our books, working as ambassadors, researchers, and key opinion leaders.
To learn more about their valuable contributions to the chemical sciences, visit https://rsc.li/OurEditors.
- published: 14 Mar 2022
- views: 1734
8:18
Scientific community influenced by ‘political wokeness’ on COVID
Most of the mainstream media and parts of the scientific community compromised their principles in order to dismiss any discussion that COVID-19 could have orig...
Most of the mainstream media and parts of the scientific community compromised their principles in order to dismiss any discussion that COVID-19 could have originated from a lab, according to former China advisor to the US State Department, Miles Yu.
In February 2020, eminent medical journal The Lancet published a letter signed by 27 leading scientists which said COVID-19 originated from animals and argued that anyone claiming it was from a lab was guilty of spreading “misinformation”.
Subsequently, more and more scientists, including some from the World Health Organisation, have said it is possible that the disease originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaking with Sky News host Sharri Markson as part of her exclusive documentary, ‘What Really Happened in Wuhan’, Mr Yu said many researchers were unduly influenced by “wokeness.”
“It is a sad story of unprincipled compromise in the face of an authoritarian regime,” he said.
“It’s also a sad story of political wokeness because the reason many scientists sign on to that kind of rhetoric, to accuse anybody who is seriously interested in the possibility, not the certainty, but the possibility, is simply racist.”
Sharri Markson's book 'What Really Happened in Wuhan' is available for pre-order from Booktopia at https://bit.ly/3kNQ3q7 and from Amazon at https://amzn.to/2XAg1om.
https://wn.com/Scientific_Community_Influenced_By_‘Political_Wokeness’_On_Covid
Most of the mainstream media and parts of the scientific community compromised their principles in order to dismiss any discussion that COVID-19 could have originated from a lab, according to former China advisor to the US State Department, Miles Yu.
In February 2020, eminent medical journal The Lancet published a letter signed by 27 leading scientists which said COVID-19 originated from animals and argued that anyone claiming it was from a lab was guilty of spreading “misinformation”.
Subsequently, more and more scientists, including some from the World Health Organisation, have said it is possible that the disease originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaking with Sky News host Sharri Markson as part of her exclusive documentary, ‘What Really Happened in Wuhan’, Mr Yu said many researchers were unduly influenced by “wokeness.”
“It is a sad story of unprincipled compromise in the face of an authoritarian regime,” he said.
“It’s also a sad story of political wokeness because the reason many scientists sign on to that kind of rhetoric, to accuse anybody who is seriously interested in the possibility, not the certainty, but the possibility, is simply racist.”
Sharri Markson's book 'What Really Happened in Wuhan' is available for pre-order from Booktopia at https://bit.ly/3kNQ3q7 and from Amazon at https://amzn.to/2XAg1om.
- published: 29 Sep 2021
- views: 74841