- published: 16 Sep 2011
- views: 3402
-
remove the playlistEusebius (typeface)
- remove the playlistEusebius (typeface)
Ernst F. Detterer
Ernst Frederic Detterer (1888, Lake Mills, Wisconsin – 1947, Chicago) was an American calligrapher, teacher, and typographer. He studied at Moravian College and the Pennsylvania Museum and School of Industrial Art where he took classes in lettering taught by Edward Johnston. From 1912–21 he taught wood-cut art, calligraphy and typography at Chicago Normal School. From 1921–31 he taught the history of printing at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. The design department of the Ludlow Typograph Company commissioned him to design a Venetian type-face (i.e. one based on the designs of Venetian type-founder Nicolas Jenson), and his Nicolas Jenson was the result. Detterer's former student, R. Hunter Middleton, later expanded Nicolas Jenson into a complete type family. First cast in 1923, Nicolas Jenson was reintroduced in 1941 as Eusebius. At the time of his death, Detterer was employed as the custodian of the John M. Wing Collection on the History of Printing at the Newberry Library in Chicago.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Ernst_F._Detterer
Eusebius
Eusebius of Caesarea (/juːˈsiːbiəs/; Greek: Εὐσέβιος, Eusébios; AD 260/265 – 339/340), also known as Eusebius Pamphili, was a Roman historian, exegete, and Christian polemicist of Greek descent. He became the bishop of Caesarea Maritima about 314. Together with Pamphilus, he was a scholar of the Biblical canon and is regarded as an extremely well learned Christian of his time. He wrote Demonstrations of the Gospel, Preparations for the Gospel, and On Discrepancies between the Gospels, studies of the Biblical text. As "Father of Church History" he produced the Ecclesiastical History, On the Life of Pamphilus, the Chronicle and On the Martyrs.
Sources
Little is known about the life of Eusebius. His successor at the see of Caesarea, Acacius, wrote a Life of Eusebius, a work that has since been lost. Eusebius' own surviving works probably only represent a small portion of his total output. Beyond notices in his extant writings, the major sources are the 5th-century ecclesiastical historians Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret, and the 4th-century Christian author Jerome. There are assorted notices of his activities in the writings of his contemporaries Athanasius, Arius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, and Alexander of Alexandria. Eusebius' pupil, Eusebius of Emesa, provides some incidental information.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Eusebius
Eusebius (praepositus sacri cubiculi)
Eusebius (died 361) was a high-ranking officer of the Roman Empire, holding the position of praepositus sacri cubiculi for all the rule of Emperor Constantius II (337-361).
Biography
Eusebius held the position of praepositus sacri cubiculi in 337, when Constantine I died; he concealed the will of the Emperor. Eusebius became a supporter of Arianism, influencing the empress and many other eunuchs. He entered then at the service of one of Constantine's sons and successors, Constantius II, with whom he shared the support for Arianism and on whom he exerted a great influence.
In 354 Eusebius was sent by Constantius II to talk to Pope Liberius and then attended at the meeting between the Emperor and the Pope. He sent money to the orator Libanius in exile and, in 355, helped those Arian bishops who plotted against Athanasius of Alexandria.
Eusebius followed Constantius into Gaul (353-354) and then to Milan (354). Here he plotted against Constantius' cousin, brother-in-law and Caesar, Constantius Gallus; Constantius ordered him to go to Pula, where Gallus was imprisoned, to question him about his rule in the East.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Eusebius_(praepositus_sacri_cubiculi)
Eusebius (consul 359)
Flavius Eusebius (died after AD 371) was a Roman Senator, who was the brother-in-law of the Roman emperor Constantius II.
Biography
Born into a family originating from the city of Thessalonica, and of Macedonian descent, Eusebius was the son of Flavius Eusebius, the Roman consul of AD 347. Probably through the influence of his sister Eusebia, the wife of the emperor Constantius II, Eusebius was appointed the governor of the province of Hellespontus in AD 355. While here, he was noted as an efficient governor, and an improvement on his predecessors.
After his term had completed, he went to Antioch where he was notified of his appointment as governor of Bithynia et Pontus, which he held in AD 356. He was then made consul prior alongside his brother Flavius Hypatius in AD 359.
Eventually moving back to Antioch, it was here in AD 371 that Eusebius was accused of treason and put on trial during the reign of the emperor Valens. Although he was found guilty, fined and exiled, he was soon recalled from his exile by the emperor, and his wealth and position were restored.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Eusebius_(consul_359)
Podcasts:
-
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebius)
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/NathanH83 This video explains the discrepancy which is supposed to exist in the gospels respecting the genealogy of Christ. I've heard many times that the genealogy in Matthew is of Joseph, and the one in Luke is of Mary. However, according to these historical documents, that is not the case. The information in this video can be found in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book 1, Chapter 7: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250101.htm Eusebius is considered by many bible scholars to be the greatest of church historians. Eusebius references a letter that Julius Africanus wrote to Aristides: http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/17/13798/The-...
published: 16 Sep 2011 -
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann. Dans cette vidéo, nous allons analyser la première phrase de la pièce, et observer ainsi un nouvel arrivant : l'accord de dominante à quinte augmentée. Pour écouter la pièce : -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58 -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU http://thibault.muller.free.fr
published: 21 Aug 2012 -
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann. Après le relevé d'accords, nous allons analyser et chiffrer les différents accords de la phrase "b". Ce sera l'occasion d'ajouter de nouveaux animaux musicaux à notre bestiaire. Pour écouter la pièce : -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58 -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU http://thibault.muller.free.fr
published: 17 Sep 2012 -
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23 HI, I HAVE GOT THE FULL BOOK OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BY EUSEBIUS:- http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.v.html PLEASE STUDY THIS AND IF YOU FIND SOME THING INTERESTING THAT I HAVE NOT DEALT WITH, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. EUSEBIUS SEEMS TO BE HONEST BUT AROUND 325A.D., PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY BLINDED AS YOU WILL FIND IN HIS NARRATION. BY THAT TIME THEY HAVE DECLARED CHRIST AND NOT JESUS DIED ON THE CROSS THAT IS NON-SENSE AS CHRIST STAND FOR HIS WORD THAT TOOK THE FLESH IN THE NAME OF JESUS. JESUS DIED AND NOT CHRIST. EUSEBIUS WAS PRESENT WHEN THEY FORMULATED THE NICENE CREED THAT MAKES NO SENSE. I WILL MAKE CORRECTIONS AND PUT HIS TEXT MARKING IT IS CORRUPTED. 5. He was holy...
published: 22 Jan 2010 -
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d'Eusæbius
published: 10 Sep 2022 -
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius
published: 05 Aug 2022 -
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to the First Council of Nicaea
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032 $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we are grateful and really need you. My main Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN_1wmxeXl5PA6fgb_cB5FQ/ Subscribe to my other non-fiction history channel - John Washington’s Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbWLFtuRC81ZUmWKdfn_wQ Playlist of Previous Podcasts -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMZXAYQL8tXlx0aOt4uOzQTvW2G03uR0B “Found a Secret Hidden in the Bible” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRR5_z4MhHI “CRAZY MUST SEE NOW! Entire Bible Explained Like a Boss. Truth of Nephilim, Anunnaki, Bloodlines - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpgSxuMputc 2 Creation Stories in Genesis are Different? What does it mean for the Bible? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xx9_B6XOvQ&t...
published: 26 May 2017 -
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josephus
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josephus and Tacitus wrote about Jesus. The implication is that these references serve as some kind of proof not only for Jesus' existence but for his resurrection, miracles, and godhood. But what do they actually say? What if anything to they prove? In this video, I take a look at an article that typifies how Christians approach ancient non-Biblical references to Jesus - along with looking at what these sources state, when they were written, and if they add up go good evidence for Jesus. SPOILER ALERT: They don't. My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/prophetofzod My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Prophet-of-Zod-786256038184855/ My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Prophet_of_Zod My Email: poz@propheto...
published: 07 Mar 2019 -
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius
published: 25 Aug 2022 -
The Real Jesus (DVD) Myth #5 (7 of 10)
Order the DVD at: http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html Myth #5: The Gospels contradict one another and contain fiction Jennings: "Scholars don't take everything that they read in the New Testament literally because there are four different and sometimes contradictory versions of Jesus' life." [08:30] Yes, there are differences in the Gospel accounts. Let's begin with the first obvious difference that seems to concern Jennings so much -- the story of Jesus birth. First, there are different genealogies of Jesus. The Jews knew that the Messiah was to come from the house of Judah and specifically must be a descendant of David. Up to this point, Matthew and Luke agree with one another. There could be several reasons why Matthew and Luke contain different genealogical accoun...
published: 20 Sep 2008
developed with YouTube
7:22
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebius)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:22
- Uploaded Date: 16 Sep 2011
- views: 3402
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/NathanH83
This video explains t...
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/NathanH83
This video explains the discrepancy which is supposed to exist in the gospels respecting the genealogy of Christ.
I've heard many times that the genealogy in Matthew is of Joseph, and the one in Luke is of Mary. However, according to these historical documents, that is not the case.
The information in this video can be found in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book 1, Chapter 7:
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250101.htm
Eusebius is considered by many bible scholars to be the greatest of church historians.
Eusebius references a letter that Julius Africanus wrote to Aristides:
http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/17/13798/The-Epistle-to-Arist...
The explanation that I give in this video concerning the genealogies of Christ:
A. Fits in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is backed up by the law found in Deuteronomy 25:5,
C. Is backed up by an example in Genesis 38 ***, and
D. Is also backed up by two extra-biblical historians from the 3rd and 4th centuries, Eusebius of Caesarea and Julius Africanus who claim that this history was handed down to them by the Desposyni, a group of people who were descendants of Jesus' blood relatives.
However, the explanation given by most modern-day apologists:
A. Does not fit in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is not backed up by the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 like they claim **,
C. Is not backed up by any examples in the Old Testament ****, and
D. Is not backed up by any extra-biblical historians from any century whatsoever.
* The obvious interpretation of Luke 3 is that Joseph is the son of Heli. There is nothing written in Luke chapter 3 that would ever cause a 5th or 6th grade child to formulate the idea that Joseph was the son-in-law of Heli. The scriptures are not so elusive to where a child cannot understand its obvious interpretation.
** Modern-day apologists claim that the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 caused Joseph to trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, Heli. However, all Numbers 27 says is that if a man dies and has no son, then his daughters will take the inheritance. It never says that his daughter's husbands will succeed to the name of their dead father-in-law.
*** The example of Genesis 38 gives the story of Onan, whose older brother, Er, had died. Onan was told by his father, Judah, to marry his dead brother's widow, Tamar, and raise up an heir to him. But Onan refused to have a child with her, because he knew the child would not be recognized as his son, but rather as his brother's. This story unveils one of the customs that the Hebrews had, which later became the law of Deuteronomy 25:5.
**** There is no example in the Old Testament implying that a man would ever trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, except in the case of Abraham who married his sister (his father WAS his father-in-law).
To sum it up:
1. Matthan, of Solomon's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Jacob. [Matthew]
2. Matthan dies. Matthat, of Nathan's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Heli. [Luke]
3. Jacob and Heli are uterine brothers (same mother but different fathers).
4. Heli marries a wife but dies childless.
5. Keeping Jewish Law in view, Jacob (Heli's brother) marries his brother's wife to raise up seed for him.
6. Joseph is born.
7. Joseph is naturally Jacob's son. [Matthew]
8. But, is, according to Law, Heli's son. [Luke]
I used Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended, After Effects, Premiere, and Soundbooth.
************ disclaimer *************
Just to let you know, Eusebius actually says that Melchi is the father of Heli, not Matthat. When I made this video I thought that I had read that Melchi is the latin translation of Matthat. So I just replaced Melchi for Matthat. However, I found out later on that this is not true. Melchi is NOT the latin translation for Matthat.
Eusebius omits Matthat and Levi from the genealogy making it seem like Melchi is the father of Heli. So Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History has a mistake in it.
Although it is still possible that the discrepancy could be explained the way Eusebius describes, it is important to understand that he made a minor mistake, like many historians do (Josephus makes mistakes also). So just chew the meat and spit out the bones.
**************
https://wn.com/The_Genealogy_Of_Jesus_Christ_(According_To_Eusebius)
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/NathanH83
This video explains the discrepancy which is supposed to exist in the gospels respecting the genealogy of Christ.
I've heard many times that the genealogy in Matthew is of Joseph, and the one in Luke is of Mary. However, according to these historical documents, that is not the case.
The information in this video can be found in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book 1, Chapter 7:
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250101.htm
Eusebius is considered by many bible scholars to be the greatest of church historians.
Eusebius references a letter that Julius Africanus wrote to Aristides:
http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/17/13798/The-Epistle-to-Arist...
The explanation that I give in this video concerning the genealogies of Christ:
A. Fits in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is backed up by the law found in Deuteronomy 25:5,
C. Is backed up by an example in Genesis 38 ***, and
D. Is also backed up by two extra-biblical historians from the 3rd and 4th centuries, Eusebius of Caesarea and Julius Africanus who claim that this history was handed down to them by the Desposyni, a group of people who were descendants of Jesus' blood relatives.
However, the explanation given by most modern-day apologists:
A. Does not fit in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is not backed up by the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 like they claim **,
C. Is not backed up by any examples in the Old Testament ****, and
D. Is not backed up by any extra-biblical historians from any century whatsoever.
* The obvious interpretation of Luke 3 is that Joseph is the son of Heli. There is nothing written in Luke chapter 3 that would ever cause a 5th or 6th grade child to formulate the idea that Joseph was the son-in-law of Heli. The scriptures are not so elusive to where a child cannot understand its obvious interpretation.
** Modern-day apologists claim that the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 caused Joseph to trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, Heli. However, all Numbers 27 says is that if a man dies and has no son, then his daughters will take the inheritance. It never says that his daughter's husbands will succeed to the name of their dead father-in-law.
*** The example of Genesis 38 gives the story of Onan, whose older brother, Er, had died. Onan was told by his father, Judah, to marry his dead brother's widow, Tamar, and raise up an heir to him. But Onan refused to have a child with her, because he knew the child would not be recognized as his son, but rather as his brother's. This story unveils one of the customs that the Hebrews had, which later became the law of Deuteronomy 25:5.
**** There is no example in the Old Testament implying that a man would ever trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, except in the case of Abraham who married his sister (his father WAS his father-in-law).
To sum it up:
1. Matthan, of Solomon's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Jacob. [Matthew]
2. Matthan dies. Matthat, of Nathan's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Heli. [Luke]
3. Jacob and Heli are uterine brothers (same mother but different fathers).
4. Heli marries a wife but dies childless.
5. Keeping Jewish Law in view, Jacob (Heli's brother) marries his brother's wife to raise up seed for him.
6. Joseph is born.
7. Joseph is naturally Jacob's son. [Matthew]
8. But, is, according to Law, Heli's son. [Luke]
I used Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended, After Effects, Premiere, and Soundbooth.
************ disclaimer *************
Just to let you know, Eusebius actually says that Melchi is the father of Heli, not Matthat. When I made this video I thought that I had read that Melchi is the latin translation of Matthat. So I just replaced Melchi for Matthat. However, I found out later on that this is not true. Melchi is NOT the latin translation for Matthat.
Eusebius omits Matthat and Levi from the genealogy making it seem like Melchi is the father of Heli. So Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History has a mistake in it.
Although it is still possible that the discrepancy could be explained the way Eusebius describes, it is important to understand that he made a minor mistake, like many historians do (Josephus makes mistakes also). So just chew the meat and spit out the bones.
**************
37:53
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 37:53
- Uploaded Date: 21 Aug 2012
- views: 1621
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Dans cette vidéo, nous allons an...
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Dans cette vidéo, nous allons analyser la première phrase de la pièce, et observer ainsi un nouvel arrivant : l'accord de dominante à quinte augmentée.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
https://wn.com/Analyse_4B_Eusebius_De_Robert_Schumann
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Dans cette vidéo, nous allons analyser la première phrase de la pièce, et observer ainsi un nouvel arrivant : l'accord de dominante à quinte augmentée.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
- published: 21 Aug 2012
- views: 1621
35:27
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 35:27
- Uploaded Date: 17 Sep 2012
- views: 1998
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Après le relevé d'accords, nou...
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Après le relevé d'accords, nous allons analyser et chiffrer les différents accords de la phrase "b". Ce sera l'occasion d'ajouter de nouveaux animaux musicaux à notre bestiaire.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
https://wn.com/Analyse_4D_Eusebius_De_Robert_Schumann
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Après le relevé d'accords, nous allons analyser et chiffrer les différents accords de la phrase "b". Ce sera l'occasion d'ajouter de nouveaux animaux musicaux à notre bestiaire.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
- published: 17 Sep 2012
- views: 1998
10:14
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 10:14
- Uploaded Date: 22 Jan 2010
- views: 0
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23 HI,
I HAVE GOT THE FULL BOOK OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BY E...
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23 HI,
I HAVE GOT THE FULL BOOK OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BY EUSEBIUS:- http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.v.html PLEASE STUDY THIS AND IF YOU FIND SOME THING INTERESTING THAT I HAVE NOT DEALT WITH, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. EUSEBIUS SEEMS TO BE HONEST BUT AROUND 325A.D., PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY BLINDED AS YOU WILL FIND IN HIS NARRATION. BY THAT TIME THEY HAVE DECLARED CHRIST AND NOT JESUS DIED ON THE CROSS THAT IS NON-SENSE AS CHRIST STAND FOR HIS WORD THAT TOOK THE FLESH IN THE NAME OF JESUS. JESUS DIED AND NOT CHRIST. EUSEBIUS WAS PRESENT WHEN THEY FORMULATED THE NICENE CREED THAT MAKES NO SENSE. I WILL MAKE CORRECTIONS AND PUT HIS TEXT MARKING IT IS CORRUPTED.
5. He was holy from his mothers womb; and he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor did he eat flesh. No razor came upon his head; he did not anoint himself with oil, and he did not use the bath.
6. He alone was permitted to enter into the holy place; for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God, and asking forgiveness for the people. Because of his exceeding great justice he was called the Just, and Oblias, which signifies in Greek, Bulwark of the people and Justice, in accordance with what the prophets declare concerning him. 8. Now some of the seven sects, which existed among the people and which have been mentioned by me in the Memoirs, asked him, What is the gate of Jesus? and he replied that he was the Saviour.
9. On account of these words some believed that Jesus is the Christ. But the sects mentioned above did not believe either in a resurrection or in ones coming to give to every man according to his works. But as many as believed did so on account of James.
10. Therefore when many even of the rulers believed, there was a commotion among the Jews and Scribes and Pharisees, who said that there was danger that the whole people would be looking for Jesus as the Christ. Coming therefore in a body to James they said, We entreat thee, restrain the people; for they are gone astray in regard to Jesus, as if he were the Christ. We entreat thee to persuade all that have come to the feast of the Passover concerning Jesus; for we all have confidence in thee. For we bear thee witness, as do all the people, that thou art just, and dost not respect persons.
11. Do thou therefore persuade the multitude not to be led astray concerning Jesus. For the whole people, and all of us also, have confidence in thee. Stand therefore upon the pinnacle of the temple, that from that high position thou mayest be clearly seen, and that thy words may be readily heard by all the people. For all the tribes, with the Gentiles also, are come together on account of the Passover.
12. The aforesaid Scribes and Pharisees therefore placed James upon the pinnacle of the temple, and cried out to him and said: Thou just one, in whom we ought all to have confidence, forasmuch as the people are led astray after Jesus, the crucified one, declare to us, what is the gate of Jesus.
https://wn.com/Eusebius_Clever_Hypocrite_Jews_Wanted_James_To_Declare_Publicly_That_Jews_And_Gentile_Equal_23
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23 HI,
I HAVE GOT THE FULL BOOK OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BY EUSEBIUS:- http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.v.html PLEASE STUDY THIS AND IF YOU FIND SOME THING INTERESTING THAT I HAVE NOT DEALT WITH, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. EUSEBIUS SEEMS TO BE HONEST BUT AROUND 325A.D., PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY BLINDED AS YOU WILL FIND IN HIS NARRATION. BY THAT TIME THEY HAVE DECLARED CHRIST AND NOT JESUS DIED ON THE CROSS THAT IS NON-SENSE AS CHRIST STAND FOR HIS WORD THAT TOOK THE FLESH IN THE NAME OF JESUS. JESUS DIED AND NOT CHRIST. EUSEBIUS WAS PRESENT WHEN THEY FORMULATED THE NICENE CREED THAT MAKES NO SENSE. I WILL MAKE CORRECTIONS AND PUT HIS TEXT MARKING IT IS CORRUPTED.
5. He was holy from his mothers womb; and he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor did he eat flesh. No razor came upon his head; he did not anoint himself with oil, and he did not use the bath.
6. He alone was permitted to enter into the holy place; for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God, and asking forgiveness for the people. Because of his exceeding great justice he was called the Just, and Oblias, which signifies in Greek, Bulwark of the people and Justice, in accordance with what the prophets declare concerning him. 8. Now some of the seven sects, which existed among the people and which have been mentioned by me in the Memoirs, asked him, What is the gate of Jesus? and he replied that he was the Saviour.
9. On account of these words some believed that Jesus is the Christ. But the sects mentioned above did not believe either in a resurrection or in ones coming to give to every man according to his works. But as many as believed did so on account of James.
10. Therefore when many even of the rulers believed, there was a commotion among the Jews and Scribes and Pharisees, who said that there was danger that the whole people would be looking for Jesus as the Christ. Coming therefore in a body to James they said, We entreat thee, restrain the people; for they are gone astray in regard to Jesus, as if he were the Christ. We entreat thee to persuade all that have come to the feast of the Passover concerning Jesus; for we all have confidence in thee. For we bear thee witness, as do all the people, that thou art just, and dost not respect persons.
11. Do thou therefore persuade the multitude not to be led astray concerning Jesus. For the whole people, and all of us also, have confidence in thee. Stand therefore upon the pinnacle of the temple, that from that high position thou mayest be clearly seen, and that thy words may be readily heard by all the people. For all the tribes, with the Gentiles also, are come together on account of the Passover.
12. The aforesaid Scribes and Pharisees therefore placed James upon the pinnacle of the temple, and cried out to him and said: Thou just one, in whom we ought all to have confidence, forasmuch as the people are led astray after Jesus, the crucified one, declare to us, what is the gate of Jesus.
- published: 22 Jan 2010
- views: 0
1:23
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d'Eusæbius
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:23
- Uploaded Date: 10 Sep 2022
- views: 23879
- published: 10 Sep 2022
- views: 23879
1:48
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:48
- Uploaded Date: 05 Aug 2022
- views: 11604
- published: 05 Aug 2022
- views: 11604
18:14
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to the First Council of Nicaea
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 18:14
- Uploaded Date: 26 May 2017
- views: 3046
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032
$1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we are grateful and really need you.
My main Channel – https://www.youtu...
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032
$1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we are grateful and really need you.
My main Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN_1wmxeXl5PA6fgb_cB5FQ/
Subscribe to my other non-fiction history channel - John Washington’s Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbWLFtuRC81ZUmWKdfn_wQ
Playlist of Previous Podcasts -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMZXAYQL8tXlx0aOt4uOzQTvW2G03uR0B
“Found a Secret Hidden in the Bible” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRR5_z4MhHI
“CRAZY MUST SEE NOW! Entire Bible Explained Like a Boss. Truth of Nephilim, Anunnaki, Bloodlines - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpgSxuMputc
2 Creation Stories in Genesis are Different? What does it mean for the Bible? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xx9_B6XOvQ&t=311s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.twitter.com/EvangelistNickG
www.facebook.com/EvangelistNickG
Purchase my books here -
www.amazon.com/author/nicholasgarrett
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Future of Christianity – Ebook $3.99 - Paperback only 7.99 -
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Crusades – 3.99 for Ebook - 7.99 Paperback
Just Tell Me the Truth About the Early Church Councils 2.99 Ebook $5.99 Paperback,
for collaboration or cross promotional opportunities please reach me at [email protected]
Footnotes
“History of Christianity’s First 1,000 Years” Documentary by Tim Evans, Roberta Grossman, and Kathryn Christi, appears on Channel “Mateo Zilli” various professors of Roman History.
Nero was a Roman emperor from A.D. 54 to 68. Nero (A.D. 37-68)
Domitian, Latin in full Caesar Domitianus Augustus, original name (until ad 81) Titus Flavius Domitianus (born Oct. 24, ad 51—died Sept. 18, 96 AD Rome Italy, Roman emperor (ad 81–96)
Titus was born in Rome in the year 39 A.D.
Peter answered: "The Christ of God". Christology (from Greek Χριστός Khristós and -λογία, -logia) is the field of study within Christian theology, which is primarily concerned with the nature and person of Jesus as recorded in the canonical Gospels and the epistles of the New Testament.
In the Old Testament Bene Ha Elohim is defined as Sons of God. It appears in the 6th chapter of Genesis where Angels “kept not their first estate” (quoted in Jude) and came to earth to mate with human women. The only other Old Testament references to Sons of God refer to the fallen angels or Satan himself in the book of Job.
The Ancient Scripture, the Book of Enoch name many of the watcher class of fallen angels that were cast down to earth to Mt. Hermon in the days of Jared. Genesis 6:1-10
Heteroousios means “of a different substance” http://www.theopedia.com/heteroousios
The Protoevangelium is the introduction of the salvation plan of man and the announcing of an eventual messiah to course correct the sin of man by the temptation of the serpent in the garden. It comprises verses 14-16 in the 3rd chapter book of Genesis.
Galerius, in full Gaius Galerius Valerius Maximianus was born near Serdica, Thrace [now Sofia, Bulg. He died in 311. He served as Roman emperor from 305 to 311.
Constantine was the son of Flavius Valerius Constantius, a Roman army officer, and his consort Helena. His father became Caesar, the deputy emperor in the west in 293 AD. Constantine was sent east, where he rose through the ranks to become a military tribune under the emperors Diocletian and Galerius
Maxentius (Latin: Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus; c. 278 – 28 October 312) was Roman Emperor from 306 to 312. He was the son of former Emperor Maximian and the son-in-law of Emperor Galerius.
Licinius I (Latin: Gaius Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus; c. 263–325) was a Roman emperor from 308 to 324. For most of his reign he was the colleague and rival of Constantine I, with whom he co-authored the Edict of Milan that granted official toleration to Christians in the Roman Empire.
The Edict of Milan was a proclamation that permanently established religious toleration for Christianity within the Roman Empire. It was the outcome of a political agreement concluded in Milan between the Roman emperors Constantine I and Licinius in February 313.
History of the Christian Church” Phillip Schaff , vol 3 sec 75, par 5, note 1.
There were two Eusebius’ in the narrative about Nicaea. One from Nicomedia that worked in the court of Constantine and who was friends with Arius, and one from Caesarea.
http://www.sententias..org, “Was Constantine a Christian or a Pagan” by: Max Andrews
“Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe” translated in Peters’ p. 41 Theodoret: Arius' Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia
https://wn.com/The_Trinity_Controversy_Arius_And_The_Road_To_The_First_Council_Of_Nicaea
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032
$1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we are grateful and really need you.
My main Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN_1wmxeXl5PA6fgb_cB5FQ/
Subscribe to my other non-fiction history channel - John Washington’s Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbWLFtuRC81ZUmWKdfn_wQ
Playlist of Previous Podcasts -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMZXAYQL8tXlx0aOt4uOzQTvW2G03uR0B
“Found a Secret Hidden in the Bible” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRR5_z4MhHI
“CRAZY MUST SEE NOW! Entire Bible Explained Like a Boss. Truth of Nephilim, Anunnaki, Bloodlines - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpgSxuMputc
2 Creation Stories in Genesis are Different? What does it mean for the Bible? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xx9_B6XOvQ&t=311s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.twitter.com/EvangelistNickG
www.facebook.com/EvangelistNickG
Purchase my books here -
www.amazon.com/author/nicholasgarrett
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Future of Christianity – Ebook $3.99 - Paperback only 7.99 -
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Crusades – 3.99 for Ebook - 7.99 Paperback
Just Tell Me the Truth About the Early Church Councils 2.99 Ebook $5.99 Paperback,
for collaboration or cross promotional opportunities please reach me at [email protected]
Footnotes
“History of Christianity’s First 1,000 Years” Documentary by Tim Evans, Roberta Grossman, and Kathryn Christi, appears on Channel “Mateo Zilli” various professors of Roman History.
Nero was a Roman emperor from A.D. 54 to 68. Nero (A.D. 37-68)
Domitian, Latin in full Caesar Domitianus Augustus, original name (until ad 81) Titus Flavius Domitianus (born Oct. 24, ad 51—died Sept. 18, 96 AD Rome Italy, Roman emperor (ad 81–96)
Titus was born in Rome in the year 39 A.D.
Peter answered: "The Christ of God". Christology (from Greek Χριστός Khristós and -λογία, -logia) is the field of study within Christian theology, which is primarily concerned with the nature and person of Jesus as recorded in the canonical Gospels and the epistles of the New Testament.
In the Old Testament Bene Ha Elohim is defined as Sons of God. It appears in the 6th chapter of Genesis where Angels “kept not their first estate” (quoted in Jude) and came to earth to mate with human women. The only other Old Testament references to Sons of God refer to the fallen angels or Satan himself in the book of Job.
The Ancient Scripture, the Book of Enoch name many of the watcher class of fallen angels that were cast down to earth to Mt. Hermon in the days of Jared. Genesis 6:1-10
Heteroousios means “of a different substance” http://www.theopedia.com/heteroousios
The Protoevangelium is the introduction of the salvation plan of man and the announcing of an eventual messiah to course correct the sin of man by the temptation of the serpent in the garden. It comprises verses 14-16 in the 3rd chapter book of Genesis.
Galerius, in full Gaius Galerius Valerius Maximianus was born near Serdica, Thrace [now Sofia, Bulg. He died in 311. He served as Roman emperor from 305 to 311.
Constantine was the son of Flavius Valerius Constantius, a Roman army officer, and his consort Helena. His father became Caesar, the deputy emperor in the west in 293 AD. Constantine was sent east, where he rose through the ranks to become a military tribune under the emperors Diocletian and Galerius
Maxentius (Latin: Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus; c. 278 – 28 October 312) was Roman Emperor from 306 to 312. He was the son of former Emperor Maximian and the son-in-law of Emperor Galerius.
Licinius I (Latin: Gaius Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus; c. 263–325) was a Roman emperor from 308 to 324. For most of his reign he was the colleague and rival of Constantine I, with whom he co-authored the Edict of Milan that granted official toleration to Christians in the Roman Empire.
The Edict of Milan was a proclamation that permanently established religious toleration for Christianity within the Roman Empire. It was the outcome of a political agreement concluded in Milan between the Roman emperors Constantine I and Licinius in February 313.
History of the Christian Church” Phillip Schaff , vol 3 sec 75, par 5, note 1.
There were two Eusebius’ in the narrative about Nicaea. One from Nicomedia that worked in the court of Constantine and who was friends with Arius, and one from Caesarea.
http://www.sententias..org, “Was Constantine a Christian or a Pagan” by: Max Andrews
“Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe” translated in Peters’ p. 41 Theodoret: Arius' Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia
- published: 26 May 2017
- views: 3046
9:21
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josephus
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:21
- Uploaded Date: 07 Mar 2019
- views: 38047
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josephus and Tacitus wrote about Jesus. The implication is that these refer...
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josephus and Tacitus wrote about Jesus. The implication is that these references serve as some kind of proof not only for Jesus' existence but for his resurrection, miracles, and godhood. But what do they actually say? What if anything to they prove? In this video, I take a look at an article that typifies how Christians approach ancient non-Biblical references to Jesus - along with looking at what these sources state, when they were written, and if they add up go good evidence for Jesus.
SPOILER ALERT: They don't.
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/prophetofzod
My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Prophet-of-Zod-786256038184855/
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Prophet_of_Zod
My Email: [email protected]
Theme song is from the royalty-free song "The Game is On" by Ross Bugden: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dasaVm7L-Y
The article I review gives a brief and neat example of how Christians interact with these "extra-Biblical" references to Jesus. I don't wish to promote the author due to his or HER pattern of insulting atheists and repeating easily debunked arguments, apparently for the sake of getting our attention. However, for the sake of reference, here's a link: https://christian-apologist.com/2019/01/08/the-best-explanation-for-8-well-supported-claims-about-jesus-resurrection-is-jesus-is-lord/?fbclid=IwAR1qSv0EYcIDG5ylgME9VOn4QmpZDq8zmzvOgj9-iBsNMmFP9qv8AQwYFao
https://wn.com/The_Weird_Love_Affair_Between_Christians_And_Josephus
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josephus and Tacitus wrote about Jesus. The implication is that these references serve as some kind of proof not only for Jesus' existence but for his resurrection, miracles, and godhood. But what do they actually say? What if anything to they prove? In this video, I take a look at an article that typifies how Christians approach ancient non-Biblical references to Jesus - along with looking at what these sources state, when they were written, and if they add up go good evidence for Jesus.
SPOILER ALERT: They don't.
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/prophetofzod
My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Prophet-of-Zod-786256038184855/
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Prophet_of_Zod
My Email: [email protected]
Theme song is from the royalty-free song "The Game is On" by Ross Bugden: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dasaVm7L-Y
The article I review gives a brief and neat example of how Christians interact with these "extra-Biblical" references to Jesus. I don't wish to promote the author due to his or HER pattern of insulting atheists and repeating easily debunked arguments, apparently for the sake of getting our attention. However, for the sake of reference, here's a link: https://christian-apologist.com/2019/01/08/the-best-explanation-for-8-well-supported-claims-about-jesus-resurrection-is-jesus-is-lord/?fbclid=IwAR1qSv0EYcIDG5ylgME9VOn4QmpZDq8zmzvOgj9-iBsNMmFP9qv8AQwYFao
- published: 07 Mar 2019
- views: 38047
3:47
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:47
- Uploaded Date: 25 Aug 2022
- views: 51595
- published: 25 Aug 2022
- views: 51595
11:42
The Real Jesus (DVD) Myth #5 (7 of 10)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:42
- Uploaded Date: 20 Sep 2008
- views: 8439
Order the DVD at:
http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html
Myth #5: The Gospels contradict one another and contain fiction
Jennings: "Scholars don't ...
Order the DVD at:
http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html
Myth #5: The Gospels contradict one another and contain fiction
Jennings: "Scholars don't take everything that they read in the New Testament literally because there are four different and sometimes contradictory versions of Jesus' life." [08:30]
Yes, there are differences in the Gospel accounts. Let's begin with the first obvious difference that seems to concern Jennings so much -- the story of Jesus birth. First, there are different genealogies of Jesus. The Jews knew that the Messiah was to come from the house of Judah and specifically must be a descendant of David. Up to this point, Matthew and Luke agree with one another.
There could be several reasons why Matthew and Luke contain different genealogical accounts. The church historian Eusebius, writing in the early fourth century, records that separate genealogies appear for the following reason. Jesus had both a biological mother, Mary, and a legal (but not biological) father, Joseph. Matthew records Jesus' genealogy by "law" through his adoptive father, Joseph, and Luke records the genealogy of "nature" through his biological mother, Mary. According to Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Julius Africanus, a third century church father, explained this alleged contradiction in his Letter to Aristides (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book I, chapter 7).
[CONTRAST JENNINGS' FOLLOWING CLAIMS WITH COMMENTS BY APOLOGIST J.P. HOLDING]
Jennings: "The Gospels give different versions of what happened on the day that Jesus was baptized ... " [48:40]
Jennings: "Historians differ about what happened a the Last Supper. Some people think His whole speech about the Body and Blood was added by the Gospel writers." [1:37:10]
Jennings: "The Jewish leaders take Jesus to Pilate and pressure him before he will pass the sentence. Many historians don't believe it." [1:44:40]
Jennings: "Jesus is not an heroic figure at all until He gets into the hands of all the people who are going to write and embellish him." [1:46:50]
https://wn.com/The_Real_Jesus_(Dvd)_Myth_5_(7_Of_10)
Order the DVD at:
http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html
Myth #5: The Gospels contradict one another and contain fiction
Jennings: "Scholars don't take everything that they read in the New Testament literally because there are four different and sometimes contradictory versions of Jesus' life." [08:30]
Yes, there are differences in the Gospel accounts. Let's begin with the first obvious difference that seems to concern Jennings so much -- the story of Jesus birth. First, there are different genealogies of Jesus. The Jews knew that the Messiah was to come from the house of Judah and specifically must be a descendant of David. Up to this point, Matthew and Luke agree with one another.
There could be several reasons why Matthew and Luke contain different genealogical accounts. The church historian Eusebius, writing in the early fourth century, records that separate genealogies appear for the following reason. Jesus had both a biological mother, Mary, and a legal (but not biological) father, Joseph. Matthew records Jesus' genealogy by "law" through his adoptive father, Joseph, and Luke records the genealogy of "nature" through his biological mother, Mary. According to Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Julius Africanus, a third century church father, explained this alleged contradiction in his Letter to Aristides (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book I, chapter 7).
[CONTRAST JENNINGS' FOLLOWING CLAIMS WITH COMMENTS BY APOLOGIST J.P. HOLDING]
Jennings: "The Gospels give different versions of what happened on the day that Jesus was baptized ... " [48:40]
Jennings: "Historians differ about what happened a the Last Supper. Some people think His whole speech about the Body and Blood was added by the Gospel writers." [1:37:10]
Jennings: "The Jewish leaders take Jesus to Pilate and pressure him before he will pass the sentence. Many historians don't believe it." [1:44:40]
Jennings: "Jesus is not an heroic figure at all until He gets into the hands of all the people who are going to write and embellish him." [1:46:50]
- published: 20 Sep 2008
- views: 8439
7:22
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebius)
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting ...
published: 16 Sep 2011
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebius)
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebius)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Sep 2011
- views: 3402
Uploaded via permission from youtube user NathanH83. Visit his site for more interesting videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/NathanH83
This video explains the discrepancy which is supposed to exist in the gospels respecting the genealogy of Christ.
I've heard many times that the genealogy in Matthew is of Joseph, and the one in Luke is of Mary. However, according to these historical documents, that is not the case.
The information in this video can be found in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Book 1, Chapter 7:
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250101.htm
Eusebius is considered by many bible scholars to be the greatest of church historians.
Eusebius references a letter that Julius Africanus wrote to Aristides:
http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/17/13798/The-Epistle-to-Arist...
The explanation that I give in this video concerning the genealogies of Christ:
A. Fits in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is backed up by the law found in Deuteronomy 25:5,
C. Is backed up by an example in Genesis 38 ***, and
D. Is also backed up by two extra-biblical historians from the 3rd and 4th centuries, Eusebius of Caesarea and Julius Africanus who claim that this history was handed down to them by the Desposyni, a group of people who were descendants of Jesus' blood relatives.
However, the explanation given by most modern-day apologists:
A. Does not fit in well with the obvious interpretation of Luke chapter 3 *,
B. Is not backed up by the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 like they claim **,
C. Is not backed up by any examples in the Old Testament ****, and
D. Is not backed up by any extra-biblical historians from any century whatsoever.
* The obvious interpretation of Luke 3 is that Joseph is the son of Heli. There is nothing written in Luke chapter 3 that would ever cause a 5th or 6th grade child to formulate the idea that Joseph was the son-in-law of Heli. The scriptures are not so elusive to where a child cannot understand its obvious interpretation.
** Modern-day apologists claim that the Inheritance Law of Numbers 27 caused Joseph to trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, Heli. However, all Numbers 27 says is that if a man dies and has no son, then his daughters will take the inheritance. It never says that his daughter's husbands will succeed to the name of their dead father-in-law.
*** The example of Genesis 38 gives the story of Onan, whose older brother, Er, had died. Onan was told by his father, Judah, to marry his dead brother's widow, Tamar, and raise up an heir to him. But Onan refused to have a child with her, because he knew the child would not be recognized as his son, but rather as his brother's. This story unveils one of the customs that the Hebrews had, which later became the law of Deuteronomy 25:5.
**** There is no example in the Old Testament implying that a man would ever trace his genealogy through his father-in-law, except in the case of Abraham who married his sister (his father WAS his father-in-law).
To sum it up:
1. Matthan, of Solomon's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Jacob. [Matthew]
2. Matthan dies. Matthat, of Nathan's descent, marries Estha and gives birth to Heli. [Luke]
3. Jacob and Heli are uterine brothers (same mother but different fathers).
4. Heli marries a wife but dies childless.
5. Keeping Jewish Law in view, Jacob (Heli's brother) marries his brother's wife to raise up seed for him.
6. Joseph is born.
7. Joseph is naturally Jacob's son. [Matthew]
8. But, is, according to Law, Heli's son. [Luke]
I used Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended, After Effects, Premiere, and Soundbooth.
************ disclaimer *************
Just to let you know, Eusebius actually says that Melchi is the father of Heli, not Matthat. When I made this video I thought that I had read that Melchi is the latin translation of Matthat. So I just replaced Melchi for Matthat. However, I found out later on that this is not true. Melchi is NOT the latin translation for Matthat.
Eusebius omits Matthat and Levi from the genealogy making it seem like Melchi is the father of Heli. So Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History has a mistake in it.
Although it is still possible that the discrepancy could be explained the way Eusebius describes, it is important to understand that he made a minor mistake, like many historians do (Josephus makes mistakes also). So just chew the meat and spit out the bones.
**************
37:53
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du...
published: 21 Aug 2012
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Aug 2012
- views: 1621
Seconde vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Dans cette vidéo, nous allons analyser la première phrase de la pièce, et observer ainsi un nouvel arrivant : l'accord de dominante à quinte augmentée.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
35:27
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau ...
published: 17 Sep 2012
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann
- Report rights infringement
- published: 17 Sep 2012
- views: 1998
Quatrième vidéo consacrée à l'analyse de la pièce intitulée "Eusebius", cinquième tableau du Carnaval opus 9 de Robert Schumann.
Après le relevé d'accords, nous allons analyser et chiffrer les différents accords de la phrase "b". Ce sera l'occasion d'ajouter de nouveaux animaux musicaux à notre bestiaire.
Pour écouter la pièce :
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkxwutQXxs0#t=4m58
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqosdTbfGqg
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcavQDB8xlU
http://thibault.muller.free.fr
10:14
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile eq...
published: 22 Jan 2010
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jan 2010
- views: 0
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to declare publicly that Jews and Gentile equal - 23 HI,
I HAVE GOT THE FULL BOOK OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY BY EUSEBIUS:- http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.v.html PLEASE STUDY THIS AND IF YOU FIND SOME THING INTERESTING THAT I HAVE NOT DEALT WITH, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. EUSEBIUS SEEMS TO BE HONEST BUT AROUND 325A.D., PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY BLINDED AS YOU WILL FIND IN HIS NARRATION. BY THAT TIME THEY HAVE DECLARED CHRIST AND NOT JESUS DIED ON THE CROSS THAT IS NON-SENSE AS CHRIST STAND FOR HIS WORD THAT TOOK THE FLESH IN THE NAME OF JESUS. JESUS DIED AND NOT CHRIST. EUSEBIUS WAS PRESENT WHEN THEY FORMULATED THE NICENE CREED THAT MAKES NO SENSE. I WILL MAKE CORRECTIONS AND PUT HIS TEXT MARKING IT IS CORRUPTED.
5. He was holy from his mothers womb; and he drank no wine nor strong drink, nor did he eat flesh. No razor came upon his head; he did not anoint himself with oil, and he did not use the bath.
6. He alone was permitted to enter into the holy place; for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God, and asking forgiveness for the people. Because of his exceeding great justice he was called the Just, and Oblias, which signifies in Greek, Bulwark of the people and Justice, in accordance with what the prophets declare concerning him. 8. Now some of the seven sects, which existed among the people and which have been mentioned by me in the Memoirs, asked him, What is the gate of Jesus? and he replied that he was the Saviour.
9. On account of these words some believed that Jesus is the Christ. But the sects mentioned above did not believe either in a resurrection or in ones coming to give to every man according to his works. But as many as believed did so on account of James.
10. Therefore when many even of the rulers believed, there was a commotion among the Jews and Scribes and Pharisees, who said that there was danger that the whole people would be looking for Jesus as the Christ. Coming therefore in a body to James they said, We entreat thee, restrain the people; for they are gone astray in regard to Jesus, as if he were the Christ. We entreat thee to persuade all that have come to the feast of the Passover concerning Jesus; for we all have confidence in thee. For we bear thee witness, as do all the people, that thou art just, and dost not respect persons.
11. Do thou therefore persuade the multitude not to be led astray concerning Jesus. For the whole people, and all of us also, have confidence in thee. Stand therefore upon the pinnacle of the temple, that from that high position thou mayest be clearly seen, and that thy words may be readily heard by all the people. For all the tribes, with the Gentiles also, are come together on account of the Passover.
12. The aforesaid Scribes and Pharisees therefore placed James upon the pinnacle of the temple, and cried out to him and said: Thou just one, in whom we ought all to have confidence, forasmuch as the people are led astray after Jesus, the crucified one, declare to us, what is the gate of Jesus.
1:23
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d'Eusæbius
published: 10 Sep 2022
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d'Eusæbius
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d'Eusæbius
- Report rights infringement
- published: 10 Sep 2022
- views: 23879
1:48
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius
published: 05 Aug 2022
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius
- Report rights infringement
- published: 05 Aug 2022
- views: 11604
18:14
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to the First Council of Nicaea
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032
$1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we ...
published: 26 May 2017
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to the First Council of Nicaea
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to the First Council of Nicaea
- Report rights infringement
- published: 26 May 2017
- views: 3046
Please support easily on PayPal - http://paypal.me/NGarrett032
$1, $2, $5, $10, $20, we are grateful and really need you.
My main Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN_1wmxeXl5PA6fgb_cB5FQ/
Subscribe to my other non-fiction history channel - John Washington’s Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPbWLFtuRC81ZUmWKdfn_wQ
Playlist of Previous Podcasts -https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMZXAYQL8tXlx0aOt4uOzQTvW2G03uR0B
“Found a Secret Hidden in the Bible” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRR5_z4MhHI
“CRAZY MUST SEE NOW! Entire Bible Explained Like a Boss. Truth of Nephilim, Anunnaki, Bloodlines - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpgSxuMputc
2 Creation Stories in Genesis are Different? What does it mean for the Bible? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xx9_B6XOvQ&t=311s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.twitter.com/EvangelistNickG
www.facebook.com/EvangelistNickG
Purchase my books here -
www.amazon.com/author/nicholasgarrett
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Future of Christianity – Ebook $3.99 - Paperback only 7.99 -
Just Tell Me the TRUTH About the Crusades – 3.99 for Ebook - 7.99 Paperback
Just Tell Me the Truth About the Early Church Councils 2.99 Ebook $5.99 Paperback,
for collaboration or cross promotional opportunities please reach me at [email protected]
Footnotes
“History of Christianity’s First 1,000 Years” Documentary by Tim Evans, Roberta Grossman, and Kathryn Christi, appears on Channel “Mateo Zilli” various professors of Roman History.
Nero was a Roman emperor from A.D. 54 to 68. Nero (A.D. 37-68)
Domitian, Latin in full Caesar Domitianus Augustus, original name (until ad 81) Titus Flavius Domitianus (born Oct. 24, ad 51—died Sept. 18, 96 AD Rome Italy, Roman emperor (ad 81–96)
Titus was born in Rome in the year 39 A.D.
Peter answered: "The Christ of God". Christology (from Greek Χριστός Khristós and -λογία, -logia) is the field of study within Christian theology, which is primarily concerned with the nature and person of Jesus as recorded in the canonical Gospels and the epistles of the New Testament.
In the Old Testament Bene Ha Elohim is defined as Sons of God. It appears in the 6th chapter of Genesis where Angels “kept not their first estate” (quoted in Jude) and came to earth to mate with human women. The only other Old Testament references to Sons of God refer to the fallen angels or Satan himself in the book of Job.
The Ancient Scripture, the Book of Enoch name many of the watcher class of fallen angels that were cast down to earth to Mt. Hermon in the days of Jared. Genesis 6:1-10
Heteroousios means “of a different substance” http://www.theopedia.com/heteroousios
The Protoevangelium is the introduction of the salvation plan of man and the announcing of an eventual messiah to course correct the sin of man by the temptation of the serpent in the garden. It comprises verses 14-16 in the 3rd chapter book of Genesis.
Galerius, in full Gaius Galerius Valerius Maximianus was born near Serdica, Thrace [now Sofia, Bulg. He died in 311. He served as Roman emperor from 305 to 311.
Constantine was the son of Flavius Valerius Constantius, a Roman army officer, and his consort Helena. His father became Caesar, the deputy emperor in the west in 293 AD. Constantine was sent east, where he rose through the ranks to become a military tribune under the emperors Diocletian and Galerius
Maxentius (Latin: Marcus Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus; c. 278 – 28 October 312) was Roman Emperor from 306 to 312. He was the son of former Emperor Maximian and the son-in-law of Emperor Galerius.
Licinius I (Latin: Gaius Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus; c. 263–325) was a Roman emperor from 308 to 324. For most of his reign he was the colleague and rival of Constantine I, with whom he co-authored the Edict of Milan that granted official toleration to Christians in the Roman Empire.
The Edict of Milan was a proclamation that permanently established religious toleration for Christianity within the Roman Empire. It was the outcome of a political agreement concluded in Milan between the Roman emperors Constantine I and Licinius in February 313.
History of the Christian Church” Phillip Schaff , vol 3 sec 75, par 5, note 1.
There were two Eusebius’ in the narrative about Nicaea. One from Nicomedia that worked in the court of Constantine and who was friends with Arius, and one from Caesarea.
http://www.sententias..org, “Was Constantine a Christian or a Pagan” by: Max Andrews
“Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe” translated in Peters’ p. 41 Theodoret: Arius' Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia
9:21
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josephus
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josep...
published: 07 Mar 2019
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josephus
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josephus
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Mar 2019
- views: 38047
Christians love telling each other about how really reliable secular historians like Josephus and Tacitus wrote about Jesus. The implication is that these references serve as some kind of proof not only for Jesus' existence but for his resurrection, miracles, and godhood. But what do they actually say? What if anything to they prove? In this video, I take a look at an article that typifies how Christians approach ancient non-Biblical references to Jesus - along with looking at what these sources state, when they were written, and if they add up go good evidence for Jesus.
SPOILER ALERT: They don't.
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/prophetofzod
My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Prophet-of-Zod-786256038184855/
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Prophet_of_Zod
My Email: [email protected]
Theme song is from the royalty-free song "The Game is On" by Ross Bugden: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dasaVm7L-Y
The article I review gives a brief and neat example of how Christians interact with these "extra-Biblical" references to Jesus. I don't wish to promote the author due to his or HER pattern of insulting atheists and repeating easily debunked arguments, apparently for the sake of getting our attention. However, for the sake of reference, here's a link: https://christian-apologist.com/2019/01/08/the-best-explanation-for-8-well-supported-claims-about-jesus-resurrection-is-jesus-is-lord/?fbclid=IwAR1qSv0EYcIDG5ylgME9VOn4QmpZDq8zmzvOgj9-iBsNMmFP9qv8AQwYFao
3:47
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius
published: 25 Aug 2022
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Aug 2022
- views: 51595
11:42
The Real Jesus (DVD) Myth #5 (7 of 10)
Order the DVD at:
http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html
Myth #5: The Gospels co...
published: 20 Sep 2008
The Real Jesus (DVD) Myth #5 (7 of 10)
The Real Jesus (DVD) Myth #5 (7 of 10)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 20 Sep 2008
- views: 8439
Order the DVD at:
http://forerunner.com/realjesus/part1.html
Myth #5: The Gospels contradict one another and contain fiction
Jennings: "Scholars don't take everything that they read in the New Testament literally because there are four different and sometimes contradictory versions of Jesus' life." [08:30]
Yes, there are differences in the Gospel accounts. Let's begin with the first obvious difference that seems to concern Jennings so much -- the story of Jesus birth. First, there are different genealogies of Jesus. The Jews knew that the Messiah was to come from the house of Judah and specifically must be a descendant of David. Up to this point, Matthew and Luke agree with one another.
There could be several reasons why Matthew and Luke contain different genealogical accounts. The church historian Eusebius, writing in the early fourth century, records that separate genealogies appear for the following reason. Jesus had both a biological mother, Mary, and a legal (but not biological) father, Joseph. Matthew records Jesus' genealogy by "law" through his adoptive father, Joseph, and Luke records the genealogy of "nature" through his biological mother, Mary. According to Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, Julius Africanus, a third century church father, explained this alleged contradiction in his Letter to Aristides (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, book I, chapter 7).
[CONTRAST JENNINGS' FOLLOWING CLAIMS WITH COMMENTS BY APOLOGIST J.P. HOLDING]
Jennings: "The Gospels give different versions of what happened on the day that Jesus was baptized ... " [48:40]
Jennings: "Historians differ about what happened a the Last Supper. Some people think His whole speech about the Body and Blood was added by the Gospel writers." [1:37:10]
Jennings: "The Jewish leaders take Jesus to Pilate and pressure him before he will pass the sentence. Many historians don't believe it." [1:44:40]
Jennings: "Jesus is not an heroic figure at all until He gets into the hands of all the people who are going to write and embellish him." [1:46:50]
Ernst F. Detterer
Ernst Frederic Detterer (1888, Lake Mills, Wisconsin – 1947, Chicago) was an American calligrapher, teacher, and typographer. He studied at Moravian College and the Pennsylvania Museum and School of Industrial Art where he took classes in lettering taught by Edward Johnston. From 1912–21 he taught wood-cut art, calligraphy and typography at Chicago Normal School. From 1921–31 he taught the history of printing at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. The design department of the Ludlow Typograph Company commissioned him to design a Venetian type-face (i.e. one based on the designs of Venetian type-founder Nicolas Jenson), and his Nicolas Jenson was the result. Detterer's former student, R. Hunter Middleton, later expanded Nicolas Jenson into a complete type family. First cast in 1923, Nicolas Jenson was reintroduced in 1941 as Eusebius. At the time of his death, Detterer was employed as the custodian of the John M. Wing Collection on the History of Printing at the Newberry Library in Chicago.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Ernst_F._Detterer
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ (According to Eusebi...
Analyse 4b - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann...
Analyse 4d - "Eusebius" de Robert Schumann...
Eusebius - Clever hypocrite Jews wanted James to d...
Les Visiteurs - Godefroy rencontre le Descendant d...
Les Visiteurs 2 - Le Descendant d'Eusæbius...
The Trinity Controversy - Arius and the Road to th...
The Weird Love Affair Between Christians And Josep...
Les Visiteurs - L'Enchanteur Eusæbius...