Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapes Consortium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anone wants to merge the content, let me know. Tone 13:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hapes Consortium

Article about a non-notable fictional government from the Star Wars universe. The article's content appears to be a simple cut-and-paste from Wookieepedia. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smerge/redirect to Star Wars galaxy#Political areas. This is a poorly executed copy-and-paste from Hapes Consortium, whose style conflicts with our fiction guidelines, on a topic which doesn't really meet Wikipedia notability standards for a stand-alone article in any case. Its list entry could use a bit of expansion and cleanup though, hence the "smerge". BryanG (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no real-world significance whatsoever. There might be a list of political groups or somesuch in the Wikiproject -- but this topic certainly does not warrant inclusion here. --EEMIV (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, just to check -- what with the license change and all, what's the rule-of-thumb about e.g. this article, which is a copy-and-paste I'm sure from Wookieepedia (another CCASAL site)? --EEMIV (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-notable" is not a compelling reason for deletion. Best, --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Notable — delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.