User talk:TarnishedPath

Unified login: TarnishedPath is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.

Pending changes backlog (review log) Level 5 Very low backlog [view • purge • update] 3 pages according to DatBot 05:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

AfC Backlog Level 9 2-month backlog at AFC. There are currently 2,337 pending submissions. [view • purge • update]

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for responding to the StoneToss GA review while I wasn't there and for help along the way.—Alalch E. 21:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)

The article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for StoneToss

On 23 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article StoneToss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that X's rules were changed when StoneToss sought help from Elon Musk after an anti-fascist group published materials claiming to have revealed their identity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/StoneToss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, StoneToss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Symonds St Public Conveniences and Former Tram Shelter

On 29 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Symonds St Public Conveniences and Former Tram Shelter, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the first standalone street toilets to cater to both men and women in Auckland were converted into a male-only facility during the Second World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Symonds St Public Conveniences and Former Tram Shelter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Symonds St Public Conveniences and Former Tram Shelter), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)

On 9 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Sewell attempted to recruit Brenton Tarrant, the perpetrator of the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings, into the Lads Society? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Smit has been accepted

Monica Smit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 12:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Monica Smit

On 6 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monica Smit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Monica Smit was ordered to pay Victoria Police's legal bill of about A$250,000, despite winning a lawsuit against them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monica Smit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Monica Smit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarrad Searby (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jarrad Searby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Idoghor Melody (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, TarnishedPath! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Idoghor Melody (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

@Idoghor Melody, there's three reliable sources, which have WP:SIGCOV of the subject. That is a WP:GNG pass. TarnishedPath^talk 11:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarrad Searby has been accepted

Jarrad Searby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Idoghor Melody (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Zalman Teitelbaum

please consider closing the move discussion at Talk:Zalman Teitelbaum Esotericmadman (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@Esotericmadman I've closed the discussion. I've submitted it for a technical move. TarnishedPath^talk 08:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanx Esotericmadman (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Elliot Rodger peer review

I have set up a peer review for the article if you're still interested. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

@Shoot for the Stars, I've put the review page on my watchlist. TarnishedPath^talk 04:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

your bulk revert of 19 recent edits by me and two other editors

Hi, I see that you reverted 19 recent edits on the Zionism page - eight of which were "failed verification" templates that I added over the last couple of days after thoroughly examining the references, another 8 - my edits not related to failed verification, and 3 more - completely unrelated edits made by other editors.

The explanation you provided for the revert was It is not clear that all of these claims of failed verification are correct, that is, you don't seem to have any specific evidence that any of those claims were in fact incorrect and you have just made a wholesale revert of those 8 well-researched edits, along with 11 totally unrelated ones, based on nothing but a hypothetical possibility that some of them may be incorrect.

I find this absolutely unreasonable and would appreciate it if you could self-revert this, and if you have any specific source-based objections to any of my failed verification claims, please revert just those specific edits and I'll be happy to discuss those edits in Talk. DancingOwl (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@DancingOwl, I reviewed one of the instances in which you placed failed verification and I disagreed that the source did in fact fail verification. On that basis I determined I couldn't trust the rest of your placements of failed verification. Please discuss it in the article talk. TarnishedPath^talk 23:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)