Jump to content

User talk:RoySmith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

[edit]
You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

How adverse is DYK...

[edit]

CU followup

[edit]

You had previously blocked:

as CU/LTA. I'm not sure which LTA that was and I know you can't match names to IPs or give out other CU-level details to me. But the block-log says it's a block of "specificed non-editing actions", and I can't figure out what those actions are. I'm seeing several different patterns of abuse from that range lately. Do you know what behavior you were blocking, and are you able to reveal if whatever LTA you had seen is again active in that range? DMacks (talk) 03:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a long time ago and I don't remember any of the details, but I think I understand the log message. I was trying to disallow account creation on this very wide range without actually blocking editing, so I used a WP:PBLOCK with no pages or namespaces listed; that's what auto-generated the strange log message. @Novem Linguae @Pppery @MusicAnimal is this the kind of message that an Interface Admin could improve to make less mysterious? RoySmith (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Interface admins have no special rights here that ordinary admins don't. The message is MediaWiki:logentry-non-editing-block-block, but I don't see how it is mysterious - the log says exactly what happened. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fix ping: @MusikAnimalNovem Linguae (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that that block log message is super vague. I'll bet we could file a Phab ticket to make it clearer. What are the exact steps to reproduce please? I tried visiting Special:Block for a user account, and ticking Uploading files (including overwriting files), Moving pages and files, Creating new pages and uploading new files, and Sending thanks, but it didn't recreate the block message "specificed non-editing actions".
https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:NovemBotNovem Linguae (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just went to Special:Block/RoySmith-testing, selected "Partial", ticked "Block account creation", set Expiration to "5 minutes", and unticked "Autoblock any IP addresses used". This resulted in [1]. RoySmith (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I filed phab:T392126. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all for the various details! DMacks (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter!

[edit]

Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season. Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving.

Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April music

[edit]
story · music · places

My music features Bach Bach Bach today ;) - thank you for reviewing! - I picked a recording by today's birthday child. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review, but don't forget that you owe me a fix for broken chord :-) RoySmith (talk) 13:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I remember - but today is the day to take care of an actress article, and next will be to write more background because of many questions --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Amen break notation (local copy).svg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Amen break notation (local copy).svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]