Jump to content

User:Xymmax

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 17
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 40
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 3
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 51
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 2
    Candidates for speedy deletion 15
    Open sockpuppet investigations 97
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs

    [edit]

    Administrative backlog

    [edit]

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports

    [edit]

    User-reported

    [edit]


    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 7
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 1
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 7

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    Deletion backlog

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    User-reported

    [edit]
    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    [edit]
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: someone try to change the name of Ddnar 49.237.23.126 (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Full protection. Reason: High level of IP vandalism regarding his resignation.GardenCosmos (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @GardenCosmos: The article is already ECP which disallows editing from IP addresses and new accounts. Full protection is not used for IP vandalism. Please read WP:PP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial figure, article has seen a lot of vandalism and BLP violations. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    19:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Beginnings of high level of inaccurate edits by anonymous editors, either rumour or vandalism, having to do with Trudeau's resignation; it will get worse G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: An IP keeps posting stalking and inappropriate messages on talk page directed towards the subject. Wil540 art (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: 2601:18d:4900:d40::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Quinlan. IP range is partially blocked from editing Nora Vasconcellos and Talk:Nora Vasconcellos for 6 months for disruptive editing. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced content being added TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Persistent disruptive edits made by various IPs over estimated record sales. TheOnlyOne12 (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MHD1234567890 (talk) 20:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @MHD1234567890: The article has never been edited by an IP address. Please stop making unnecessary protection requests. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Donald Trump will take office as President of the United States. I fear that this article will be distorted in a manner that favors him and his followers. Americans and people around the world should never forget this event in history. This article should also be protected out of respect for the Capitol Police officers that died during that time and their families. Correditor56 (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    21:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: IP user(s) continuously vandalize page on a daily basis; Unsourced material, such as season 2 or 3 renewal, or crossover with Lyla in the Loop, Work It Out Wombats!, and Bluey, despite none of which being announced. Kiff Chatterly (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    [edit]
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Unprotection: sandbox was mistakenly used by main module. Please unprotect. — hike395 (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    @Hike395  Done --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE
    )
    21:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    [edit]
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Handled requests

    [edit]
    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    3 protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2024-12-16 14:26 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
    Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-12-24 11:47 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
    Module:Unicode data (request) 2025-01-02 01:37 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Picture of the day/On the main pages (log) Protected by Anomie on 2019-07-11: "Cascade-protecting to mirror Main page cascade protection to cover all options of multiple-picture POTDs, per discussion at WT:POTD#Use of Module:Random may be problematic"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    10 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Template for discussion/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2016-10-30: ""
    Template:Tfm/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tfm/dated: Protected by Ged UK on 2013-11-12: "Highly visible template"
    Module:Video game reviews/data (request) 2024-12-27 13:23 Template-protected (log) Protected by ST11 on 2014-07-18: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-12-29 20:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Ice hockey stats (request) 2025-01-01 18:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Djsasso on 2017-11-07: "Highly visible template: On enough at this point that we should probably totally restrict it."
    Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence (request) 2025-01-02 08:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Baseballstats (request) 2025-01-05 00:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Infobox language (request) 2025-01-05 05:41 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
    Template:WikiProject Military history (request) 2025-01-05 22:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Woody on 2020-10-27: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-01-06 03:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)


    RFA= Requests for adminship

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]

    Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

    Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

    (Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Wikipedia is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
    It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
    Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia(talk) 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

    Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


    Confirmed

    [edit]

    I'm requesting that RickRolled7676 be made confirmed. They are attempting to make productive edits, but they are running into an abuse filter, and being added to this group would help. See also Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports#RickRolled7676. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

     Not done filter 1062 was updated instead. — xaosflux Talk 12:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

    Hello, dear adminstrators! I did not contribute Wikipedia that much yet. But I can promise something. I'm turkmen and turkmen Wikipedia is not that much rich yet. And I want to add more articles and improve the ones that has been already created already as much as I can. Thanks for reading this. Hudaýberenow (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

     Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. MusikBot talk 17:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

    File mover

    [edit]

    Hello, I primarily work with files on Wikimedia Commons, where I have file mover and autopatrol rights. The process of file moving on English Wikipedia is almost the same as the practices on Commons. I also have experience working on files on English Wikipedia, including submitting several rename requests. Moreover, I have file mover rights on Bengali Wikipedia, further demonstrating my familiarity with file management across Wikimedia projects. I am familiar with Wikipedia:File names and request this right to enhance my work. Thanks.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 05:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

     Done Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

    I’m returning and previously held this role as part of my work to move images to Commons. Could I have this restored, please? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

     Already done (automated response): This user already has the "filemover" user right. MusikBot talk 18:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Page mover

    [edit]

    Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

    I previously completed many XFD discussions as a non-admin which resulted in the use of this user right for round robin deletions, and have shown good use of it before. I understand it’s been a while since I’ve been back, so wondering if this can be restored as I intend to complete this work again. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

     Done; welcome back! Let me know if you also want autopatrolled or NPR back. charlotte 👸♥ 20:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    Yes, that would be great if you could. Time to dust off the shovel and get cleaning again! Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 21:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Hi, I find myself not infrequently asking at RM/TR to move drafts over existing redirects with bits of history; I'd appreciate being able to do that myself. I also like taking in part in RMs and would like to be able to help with more than just the easiest closes. Thanks. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)


    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]

    I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

    Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

    (Non-administrator comment) Even if you're not pending changes reviewer, you can reject pending changes by reverting them. Pending changes reviewer, on the other hand, gives you the ability to accept changes. Rusty 🐈 14:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
    I already know that, and the reason why im really requesting this is to accept pending changes and to reject them at the same time. (forgot to put the acceptance part) 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 03:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
     Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

    Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

     Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 08:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

     Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 68 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 16:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
     Not done You have had account for quite a while, but you don't actually use it all that much and I'm not seeing the kind of relevant experience we normally expect before granting this. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I am aware the Reviewing process for Pending Changes. I might help to reduce load. Good Faith. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

     Not done This request is barely coherent and does not give me confidence that you fully understand what this permission does or how to use it. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    As someone who frequently edits and creates U.S. state legislature pages and living biographies, I strongly believe that receiving this permission will allow me to help combat vandalism, especially as the wikis of living people are often vandalized. I am 100% aware of being able to revert vandalized edits -- however, some edits are genuine, and I would love to help out in that domain of expertise. WormEater13 (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 37 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
     Not done We generally don't consider granting this for users with less than two hundred article edits, and your request makes me question if you actually understand what pending changes is and how it works. Feel free to re-apply when you have more relevant experience. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I had "pending change" privileges, but for some reason they are gone. I think I had to request to renew them but I did not realize. I apologize. I have been focused on doing other things on Wikipedia, such as cleaning up article categorization, but I would like to start using the "pending review" privilege if possible. I make daily edits to all types of Wikipedia pages and am familiar with the style guide. My ideas for things aren't always popular but I respect when conversations happen that challenge my edits because that's how Wikipedia becomes a better place. I always assume good faith, but I also understand that not everyone possesses that. Thank you. BittersweetParadox (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

     Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I am requesting this to assist with reviewing edits. I am fairly active on this platform and occasionally handle edit requests. I have made significant contributions to articles, including List of things named after Julius Caesar, which I have nominated for FL. I have also participated in some AFDs and believe that I am eligible for this. The AP (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    As a relatively new Wikipedia editor, I quickly grasped the core principles and ideology of the encyclopedia. With over 500 edits and several articles created, I have made steady progress, and at my current editing rate, I project to reach 30,000+ edits by the end of 2025. The Pending Changes Reviewer privilege would provide me an opportunity to my broaden efforts against page vandalism and ensure accurate, stable, and reliable content. I sincerely appreciate rejections or acceptance given my understanding, however, please endeavor to leave any explanation if you deem it fit to reject. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 15:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)


    Rollback

    [edit]

    I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

    Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
    Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page[1] and article talk page.[2] Thanks. Nxcrypto Message 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
     Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Wikipedia more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Wikipedia's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Wikipedia before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

    Patrick Welsh, thank you very much for requesting this permission, and for the calm, thoughtful request. For a permission that allows you to undo a series of edits with one click that is granted only on request because its overuse is so tempting, there's not a better application one could file. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
     Done happily ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier.

    Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

    Hello Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, is there something in the Simple Wikipedia you may like to reconsider? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Hi there. I was an admin for years but lot my bit through inactivity. I do a fair bit of anti-vandalism work and regaining this right would save me a few clicks. John (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Of course! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
     Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Previously I held rollback before my departure as part of my anti-vandalism work, so hoping for this to be restored. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

     Already done (automated response): This user already has the "rollbacker" user right. MusikBot talk 18:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
     Already done by Acalamari (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Template editor

    [edit]

    Hi there, I had the user right previously (see my user rights log. I’m back to Wikipedia so hoping to have this right restored, my return was prompted by a TFD and I’d like to make sure it’s not in use and modify the source template if required (if some of my other user rights could be restored at the same time that’d be appreciated). Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 17:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC) \

     Done and welcome back. Didn't expect to see your name appear in my watchlist! Acalamari 18:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    I know, it’s been absolutely forever, but alas I got an email and it prompted me to decide to return again! I’ll pop a request over for the other bits and pieces if that’s OK too. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
    Of course it's okay - I already switched back on some of them for you :) Acalamari 18:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

    Footer

    [edit]

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.