Jump to content

Talk:Early history of American football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEarly history of American football was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 7, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
January 13, 2016Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 25, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (Consensus was made to split History of American football due to excessive size) --ParkH.Davis (talk) 21:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that so I removed the speedy deletion template on both pages. Don't forget to attribute with {{copied}} or a similar template. clpo13(talk) 21:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Early history of American football

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Early history of American football's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "sfmg":

  • From 1894 Stanford football team: Official results from "Stanford Football Media Guide" (PDF). p. 142. Retrieved May 6, 2014.
  • From 1891 Stanford football team: Results from "Stanford Football Media Guide" (PDF). p. 142. Retrieved February 22, 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

32 or 33?

[edit]

Granted Davis's book says 1933, but doesn't this article end with 32 and the modern one pick up at '33? Cake (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, it does make more sense for the first to end in 1932 and the second begin 1933. ParkH.Davis (talk) 22:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of entrants into the "Innovators and Motivators" section

[edit]

While I am most certainly in favor of adding as much as information as is both reasonable and necessary to do, I think that coaches discussed in the "Innovators and Motivators" section should have made some sort of notable contribution to the game itself, and not have had just success on the field. They should have made a lasting or otherwise important innovation, such as inventing an offense tactic or some sort of equipment which is now in wide use, etc. The information being added is great, I just think we need to form a consensus about which info should be included about these coaches and what about these coaches makes them worthy of inclusion. ParkH.Davis (talk) 02:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Some of the edits are with the hope some of you other guys know what it is which made them famous. E. g. I know with conviction Jones and Smith were the two biggest coaches on the Pacific Coast at the time, but I couldn't tell you what schemes they ran, etc. If really nothing else is known by anyone else, then one probably won't find an advocate in me if you carve it up. I tend not to know what to cut. To further the discussion, Percy Haughton is one whose success and early accolades probably deserve mention, if for only being Harvard's greatest coach. However I know nothing more about him and so did not add him. Charley Moran is an arguable case for inclusion, for it is shocking he is not in the hall of fame. We can start with Edwin Pope's Football's Greatest Coaches perhaps. I would also like to note it is difficult for a reader not to be confused by the disparate history of the huddle with Stagg, Zuppke, and Gallaudet. Cake (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ParkH.Davis: Would you know any more about Davis's claim to first having jersey numbers? I can also find Stagg and Warner having this title, and next to Stagg I find the date of 1913 which empirically holds up. I can respect if it was a committee of sorts like with the forward pass or the division into quarters. The latter was like that with Davis and Heisman, for example; but none of the sources I find mention that. Cake (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ParkH.Davis (talk • contribs) 06:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
By "that" I meant a committee for jersey numbers. Laundry lists for Warner and Stagg's innovations also mention jersey numbers. See here or here; and the former includes the year of 1913. I notice we have numbers for Bob McWhorter and the Vols. Cake (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See here for the various huddle stories. Cake (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://library.la84.org/SportsLibrary/CFHSN/CFHSNv21/CFHSNv21n1d.pdf

2 Old timers worthy of mention

[edit]

Unsure where to stick them, but Pa Corbin and Alex Moffat both deserve mention somewhere. They might be the oldest fellows in the Hall. Cake (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ball and Formations

[edit]

We may want to add some on the history of the ball and of formations (cf. Quarterback). Cake (talk) 02:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Warner

[edit]

We previously had a discussion on there being a need to expand articles on allot of the major figures. I can't find it. What I want to say is that I just started working on the Pop Warner article. Rybkovich (talk) 06:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you can find something to clear up whether he or Stagg invented reverse (I believe Warner invented the reverse, and Stagg the end-around), and whether Davis, Stagg, or Warner started numbering jerseys. Cake (talk) 01:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How it began

[edit]

Interesting info on page 14 here. Cake (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 16 external links on Early history of American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Early history of American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on Early history of American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Early history of American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Early history of American football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Early history of American football/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 07:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one. I hope to have my first comments ready soon. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is a quick fail: there are just too many unreferenced paragraphs, see WP:QF. I've recently added various "citation needed" tags to the article to highlight this problem. They should all be addressed before a renomination.

Some additional points that caught my eye:

  • The article is very long: by my count, about 105 kB of pure text. That's a strong indication that the article contains too many details, see WP:TOOBIG and WP:SUMMARY. It might be a good idea to summarize more and move the details to more specific articles.
  • The article contains various duplicate links ( e.g. Native Americans, Parke H. Davis, The Football Association, Columbia University, Rugby Football Union) that should be removed, see MOS:DUPLINK
  • WP:EARWIG shows one potential copyright violation (https://www.vintag.es/2018/03/american-football-players.html), though it's probably them who copied from us.
  • neighbouring: change to American spelling "neighboring"
  • Schaff himself was injured and unable to the play the game: remove "the" before "play"
  • Rutgers was first to extend the reach of the game.: add "the" before "first"

Phlsph7 (talk) 08:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Early_history_of_American_football&oldid=1265135141"