æ¯æ²¢æ± æå¾ã®é©å½ ä¸å·»
- ä½è : ãããªãã¯ã»ãã¯ãã¡ã¼ã«ã¼,ãã¤ã±ã«ã»ã·ã§ã¼ã³ãã«ã¹,æååå
- åºç社/ã¡ã¼ã«ã¼: éç¯ç¤¾
- çºå£²æ¥: 2010/11/26
- ã¡ãã£ã¢: åè¡æ¬ï¼ã½ããã«ãã¼ï¼
- ã¯ãªãã¯: 1å
- ãã®ååãå«ãããã° (4件) ãè¦ã
æ¯æ²¢æ± æå¾ã®é©å½ ä¸å·»
- ä½è : ãããªãã¯ã»ãã¯ãã¡ã¼ã«ã¼,ãã¤ã±ã«ã»ã·ã§ã¼ã³ãã«ã¹,æååå
- åºç社/ã¡ã¼ã«ã¼: éç¯ç¤¾
- çºå£²æ¥: 2010/12/27
- ã¡ãã£ã¢: åè¡æ¬ï¼ã½ããã«ãã¼ï¼
- ã¯ãªãã¯: 1å
- ãã®ååãå«ãããã° (3件) ãè¦ã
ãã¢ã¡ãªã«ã«ãããæé©ç 究ã®ç¬¬ä¸äººè ã«ãããææ°ï¼ã¨ãã£ã¦ãåèãåºãã®ã¯2006å¹´ï¼ã®ç 究ææãæé©ã«ã¤ãã¦ã®åºæ¬çãªç¥èï¼ãã£ãªããã»ã·ã§ã¼ãã®æ¬ã§è§¦ãããã¦ããç¨åº¦ã®ï¼ããªãã¨ã¨ã£ã¤ãã«ããã¨æãããåºç社ããã¤ãã¼ãªã¨ããã§å¤æ®µãããªãé«ãã®ã§ã©ã®ããã売ããããªããå¦è¡çãªæ°´æºã¯ééããªãé«ãã¨æããã ããæ¬æ¸ã®è©ä¾¡ã«ã¤ãã¦ã¯ãアンドリュー・ネイサンの書評ãåèã«ãªãã
Certainly Mao was extraordinarily cruel. But neither MacFarquhar and Schoenhals nor any other scholar has yet presented a plausible diagnosis that would help us to understand how Mao's pathology directed his actions. Confronting such riddles, one misses a certainty, a fullness of reconstruction, that simply cannot be had when it comes to Mao and his court, because so much remains off-limits even in the recent document collections, biographies, and memoirs. Li Zhisui, who was perhaps the only person really close to Mao who was able to write uncensored, was too limited in his access to the leader -- and, indeed, too frightened of him -- to provide an answer to the inner mysteries of this supremely mysterious man. Jung Chang and Jon Halliday solved this problem in their best-seller Mao: The Unknown Story with their own imaginations -- by making up motives and states of mind that they ascribed to Mao and other actors without authority from their sources. MacFarquhar and Schoenhals have respected the limits of their data, and have more scrupulously left Mao an enigma.