Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Patch instead of Update for ensuring ingress resources; #12874

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2021

Conversation

ycliuhw
Copy link
Member

@ycliuhw ycliuhw commented Apr 15, 2021

Use Patch instead of Update for ensuring ingress resources;

Checklist

  • Requires a pylibjuju change
  • Added integration tests for the PR
  • Added or updated doc.go related to packages changed
  • Comments answer the question of why design decisions were made

QA steps

$ charm build ./  && juju deploy /tmp/charm-builds/mariadb-k8s/ --debug  --resource mysql_image=mariadb

$ mkubectl -nt1 get ing test-ingress
NAME           CLASS    HOSTS   ADDRESS     PORTS   AGE
test-ingress   public   *       127.0.0.1   80      3m51s

$ mkubectl -nt1 get ing test-ingress -o json  | jq '.metadata.name,.spec.ingressClassName,.spec.rules[].http.paths[].path'
"test-ingress"
"public"
"/test1"

# change ingress spec path from /test1 to /test2 then upgrade charm
$ charm build ./  && juju upgrade-charm mariadb-k8s --path /tmp/charm-builds/mariadb-k8s/ --debug --resource mysql_image=mariadb

$ mkubectl -nt1 get ing test-ingress
NAME           CLASS    HOSTS   ADDRESS     PORTS   AGE
test-ingress   public   *       127.0.0.1   80      6m44s

$ mkubectl -nt1 get ing test-ingress -o json  | jq '.metadata.name,.spec.ingressClassName,.spec.rules[].http.paths[].path'
"test-ingress"
"public"
"/test2"

Documentation changes

No

Bug reference

https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1916621

@ycliuhw
Copy link
Member Author

ycliuhw commented Apr 15, 2021

@hpidcock hpidcock added the 2.9 label Apr 15, 2021
@ycliuhw
Copy link
Member Author

ycliuhw commented Apr 15, 2021

$$merge$$

@jujubot jujubot merged commit 85805a4 into juju:2.9 Apr 15, 2021
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2021
#12876

Use Patch instead of Update for ensuring ingress resources;

bring #12874 backward
@ycliuhw ycliuhw deleted the fix/lp-1916621 branch April 15, 2021 03:45
@wallyworld wallyworld mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2021
jujubot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2021
#12909

Merge 2.9

#12827 Unsubscribe from hub when closing state pool
#12829 Correct default bootstrap-timeout value displayed in help.
#12840 Constraint tags can be used for pod affinity
#12842 Fix upgrade series agent version handling
#12794 Add disk provisioning customization
#12845 Restore space support for manual machines
#12839 Support merging of netplan configs
#12853 Add display type for network-get results
#12854 Fix for LP1921557 sni in Juju login.
#12850 Use Base in Charmhub packge and its response structures.
#12858 Ensure assess-upgrade-series does not report started prematuremly
#12860 Removed logging from core annotations.
#12861 Fixes bug where empty error can happen in storage
#12865 Update Pebble version to include new files API
#12866 Workaround for k8s dashboard URL with k8s client proxy
#12862 Fix/lp 1923051
#12867 Fix/lp 1923561
#12870 Use channel logic in charm library
#12873 Add support for setting pod affinity topology key
#12874 Use Patch instead of Update for ensuring ingress resources
#12831 Integration fixes
#12879 Ensure refresh uses version
#12864 bug: fix for bootstrap fail on vsphere 7 + multi network
#12883 Initial work to allow juju trust for sidecar charms
#12884 Fix ssh with sidecar charms and containers.
#12886 Charmhub bases
#12881 Use charm pkg updates
#12889 Ignore projected volume mounts when looking up juju storage
#12890 Fix passing empty string container name to unit params
#12893 Add CLA checker GH action and remove codecov push action
#12897 Use production charmhub endpoint
#12887 Resource validation error
#12888 Ensure we validate the model target
#12898 Remove usage of systems package from CAAS application provisioner
#12899 CAAS bundle deployments
#12900 Bump up Pebble version to include user/group in list-files
#12901 charm Format helper
#12902 charm Iskubernetes helper
#12903 Display ... for really long k8s app versions in status
#12904 Filter out more full registry paths for app version in status
#12905 Fix k8s bundle deploys with v2 charms
#12906 Register resource-get for containeragent binary

Conflicts mostly due to charm v8 vs v9 imports.
The other one was due to changes to dashboard CLI.
```
# Conflicts:
# api/common/charms/common.go
# api/common/charms/common_test.go
# apiserver/facades/client/application/application.go
# apiserver/facades/client/application/charmstore.go
# apiserver/facades/client/application/update_series_mocks_test.go
# apiserver/facades/client/charms/client.go
# apiserver/facades/client/charms/convertions.go
# apiserver/facades/client/machinemanager/types_mock_test.go
# apiserver/facades/controller/caasoperatorprovisioner/provisioner.go
# cmd/juju/application/deployer/bundlehandler_test.go
# cmd/juju/application/refresh_test.go
# cmd/juju/application/refresher/refresher_mock_test.go
# cmd/juju/dashboard/dashboard.go
# core/charm/strategies_mock_test.go
# core/model/model.go
# core/model/model_test.go
# go.mod
# go.sum
# resource/resourceadapters/charmhub.go
# scripts/win-installer/setup.iss
# service/agentconf_test.go
# snap/snapcraft.yaml
# state/charm.go
# state/migration_export.go
# state/state.go
# version/version.go
# worker/caasfirewallerembedded/applicationworker.go
# worker/caasfirewallerembedded/applicationworker_test.go
```

## QA steps

See PRs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants