-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
feat(ingestion): add source to executionRequest #13614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
chriscollins3456
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this is a reasonable path to be going down here! I have a question about whether it's worth it to adjust loadableTypes here but i can see your path making more sense. interested to hear what you think
datahub-graphql-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/GmsGraphQLEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...l-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/types/ingestion/IngestionSourceMapper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
datahub-graphql-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/GmsGraphQLEngine.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
datahub-graphql-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/GmsGraphQLEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...l-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/types/ingestion/IngestionSourceMapper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...hql-core/src/main/java/com/linkedin/datahub/graphql/types/ingestion/IngestionSourceType.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6222e16 to
6f84867
Compare
|
🔴 Meticulous spotted visual differences in 78 of 1354 screens tested: view and approve differences detected. Meticulous evaluated ~8 hours of user flows against your PR. Last updated for commit 5ca672b. This comment will update as new commits are pushed. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ❌ Unsupported file format
❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (71.17%) is below the target coverage (75.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
6f84867 to
3ed448d
Compare
8e49aef to
b47a4e3
Compare
b47a4e3 to
393d552
Compare
|
first thing is let's try to add some more test coverage to get code coverage at the 75% goal here |
chriscollins3456
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is looking good! only one real comment and then adding tests to get to that 75% code coverage in CI and we can merge this
| public static final Set<String> ASPECTS_TO_FETCH = | ||
| ImmutableSet.of( | ||
| Constants.INGESTION_SOURCE_ENTITY_NAME, | ||
| Constants.INGESTION_INFO_ASPECT_NAME, | ||
| Constants.INGESTION_SOURCE_KEY_ASPECT_NAME); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we'll want to add owners to this once we support that fully
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also we want to remove INGESTION_SOURCE_ENTITY_NAME here - that's not an aspect we want to fetch
|
we have an issue with |
7ab7565 to
e09bd50
Compare
… ingestion source to class type
e09bd50 to
5ca672b
Compare
chriscollins3456
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice
This PR contains: