Add bulk endpoint #59
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stefanbuck
force-pushed
the
bulk
branch
3 times, most recently
from
4f59d6a to
5f0b565
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Towards our mission to use real links (see OctoLinker/OctoLinker#277), this PR adds a new bulk endpoint to our service. This is needed to reduce response times and server load when prefetching links for the OctoLinker browser extension.
The order of the response is equal to the order in request body. If a query fails or can't be resolved the api will return
null.Request body
[ { "type": "registry", "registry": "npm", "target": "request" }, { "type": "ping", "target": "https://nodejs.org/api/path.html" }, { "type": "registry", "registry": "npm", "target": "package_which_does_not_exist" } ]Response