Hardware switches for WiFi, camera, and microphone on a laptop sound like a good thing to me.
A pain of course if your l-users cause problems with them.
442 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Oct 2021
$5 million for Microsoft COA labels between 2018 and 2023
If we assume a 100% markup, that would be ~ $333K each (3 people are named in the article) per annum, before taxes and business expenses. Not too bad.
I wonder who is losing out in this scheme - I'd guess the OEMs purchasing bulk licensing from MS from which some of fall off a back of a lorry.
It's amazing how many cashpoints and self-service supermarket tills are still English-only. There are exceptions that offer Welsh and usually at least one other language (Polish used to be common) but it's far from being the majority as far as I can see.
Is that lawful that cashpoints and tills are monolingual in Wales? Welsh Language Act?
I don't have to "admit" to anything, having absolutely nothing to do with Wayland (or Xorg for that matter).
I "realize" [sic] that there's a piece of software that has different features to it's alternative (at this point in time).
I'll make the observation that the most used GUI unixy devices are Android phones and tablets, which don't use X and don't do networked display out of the box. The most used desktop GUI unixey system is MacOS which uses Quartz and IINM also doesn't run over the network.
If you want network capability in Wayland, get busy with those pull requests. Or demand a refund.
Ever used a GUI application?
Yes, regularly. My desktop machine at home runs Mint with Cinnamon (previously FreeBSD).
However, I've personally never had the need to run a graphical program on a *remote* machine. Web interface on say the router might be the exception (and it's not that remote, couple of meters maybe), though that's not a full XServer obviously.
In the particular use-case above, that of checking the status of a Raspberry, a GUI isn't required at all. If the use-case was editing video, that'd be a different matter.
In my experience, generally machines than have a GUI aren't remotely accessed, and remotely accessed devices aren't running a graphics server. I've never used the remote x feature despite now decades of using unixey systems.
I'll gladly accept that some people do use it, but I'll propose that they're in a minority.
I do wonder why you Jellied Eel spend time around here.
I doubt you work in IT (except maybe as a PHB).
If you'd a modicum of social intelligence, you'd realise from the consistent downvotes (not just this thread) that you're probably in the wrong place and go hang out somewhere else (Dailymail maybe?) where your presence would be more welcome.
Canada's plan if invaded by the US (again?) appears to be to go for guerrilla tactics. (E.g. https://thedefensepost.com/2026/01/21/canada-military-us-invasion/ )
Given the reputation of Canadian fighters, the US would probably experience a snowy Vietnam and lose.
Keep your elbows up my Canadian friends!
While the UK's Trident WoMD can be fired without permission from the US, the USA could nuclearly disarm the UK over (a probably fairly short) time by simply no longer providing support or maintenance for the actual missiles. The warheads themselves being obviously not much use if you can't launch them.
Coming up with a new equivalent missile system and retro-fitting the subs would take a not insignificant amount of time and money.
Icon -> obvious
I'm already generating power from nuclear fusion.
I'm converting energy in the visible electromagnetic spectrum from a fusion reactor 8 light-minutes away to electricity. ;-)
Cheap, though without precautions the reactor may cause epidermal cancer. Due to run for ~5 billion years.
My gut-feeling for man-made fusion is that to be efficient (more energy out than in) will require a scale that would be impractical (small star say).
The problem is, running servers to provide a service costs money. How does one fund this (without the evils of advertising)?
Yes, you can probably host your own blog on a Raspberry Pi at home, for example.
However, the technical hurdles exclude a vast part of the population. While some might argue that's a feature (after decades of the endless September), it hinders the goal of a truly open web. "No is free until all are free".
Ideas like Dispora haven't taken off.
Still planning on running a Gemini client for my AgonLight (I've got a WiFi module somewhere) when I get around to it, but that's just me ;-)
Enjoyed the article though.
Lending the ethernet diagnostic tool out is however to be encouraged.
Icon -> BOFH
Big thumbs up.
Overlaps with my previous comments to this theme: https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2026/01/19/uk_social_media_children_ban_prime_minister/
Axioms:
- Social media as it stands is toxic, especially for young people.
- We can't rely on the companies to police themselves (X/Twitter moderation for example has gotten worse since you-know-who took over).
- The state intervenes for activities, substances, and media for U18 year olds, and has always done so. Nobody says "it's only up to parents to prevent children drinking alcohol" or "it's purely down to parents to check if toys are dangerous or not" - we live in a society (even you anonymous cowards do).
- Mass age verification isn't likely to be the solution as it causes just as many if not more problems than it would hypothetically solve.
No easy answers on this one.
Then they should dammed well learn!
How and when? In my part of the world there are indeed free courses provided for parents (at least in some areas) as a guide to children's media consummation and similar. These are relatively recent, generally non-technical, and as far as I know an outlier.
If you think it's simple a case of enabling filtering on the home router (itself something that's probably technically beyond a not insignificant percentage) you're very much mistaken.
Simple scenario: your child wants to install Roblox on their tablet. You look at it - seems fine, good even as it has an educational aspect. Except the games and chat functionality is insufficiently moderated, presenting a real risk.
I'll reiterate a point I've made elsewhere on a similar theme. For our parents it was easy - there was (and still ist technically IINM) a 9 PM watershed (state control of content) and the TV was in the front room which meant monitoring was easy. In the beginning of home internet access, pre smart-phone, there was usually 1 PC in the household, often also in an easily monitorable location.
Today, the task is a lot harder.
It's a typical knee-jerk Disgusted-of-Tumbridge-Wells reactionary response, including by some A. cowards here, that it's simply a case of irresponsable parenting. While the fact is, most parents (the middle lump of the Bell Curve) are trying to do the best they can with the resources they have, and balancing supervision with freedom (not unimportant for teenagers).
I don't entirely disagree with your point.
However, we already as a society restrict various items and behaviour to adults or shortly before - alcohol, tobacco, gambling, driving, age of consent etc. Some of these activities may require producing id.
The other extreme, the idea of "if it's online we can't do anything about it" is also unsatisfactory as an irresponsible cop-out.
I don't have the perfect solution either, just to be clear.
> Just so parents can put their feet up
There's not that many parents out there with their feet up. Most are both working full-time just to make ends meet (which leaves a limited amount of time and capacity for in-depth supervision).
There's also the lack of knowledge and skills for many parents to effectively supervise online use.
How could the devs be responsible?
It depends. We all (at least adults) have our own personal responsability. Have they implemented something knowing it's ethically or functionally dubious? The "lack of explainability" of a machine-learning-model doesn't excuse for example biases in input data, or training, or risk analysis.
"I was only following orders" hasn't been a valid defense for 80-odd years. There's also the wonderful German word "Schreibtischtäter".
The value of the bonds held will have decreased in market value due to the no longer so attractive yield.
Which means on paper the value of assets held by the initial bond buyers has decreased.
It also reduces the practical liquidy - "we could sell these, but we'd lose money doing so".
AI can absolutely generate 100% functional code
As any programmer worth their salt knows, functional (i.e. "it works") is only half the job. With allegedly over 40 years experience you _should_ know this.
- is it robust?
- is it maintainable?
- is it secure?
- does it handle error conditions as elegantly as possible?
- is it well documented?
It seems it was previously made legal to rip CDs and movies in the UK, but then it was made illegal again; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-33566933.
Ah, after my time. Thanks for the info.
Though we're still in the realm of lawful/unlawful rather than illegal/illegal no?