Now THAT is a low bar.
Posts by UCAP
723 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Jul 2020
Age verification isn't sage verification when it's inside operating systems
Quicksort inventor Tony Hoare reaches the base case at 92
BOFH: What physics defines as impossible, sales calls a challenge
Whitehall can't cost digital ID until it decides how to build it
Microsoft Azure CTO set Claude on his 1986 Apple II code, says it found vulns
Burger King turns to AI to flame broil employees who aren't friendly enough
Orbital datacenters are a pie-in-the-sky idea: Gartner
DARPA's autonomous missile-firing missile advances toward flight tests
Contain your Windows apps inside Linux Windows
Stash or splash? Lawmakers ask NASA to find alternatives for International Space Station
Re: Low energy to high orbit?
The ISS is deep in the Earth's magnetic field - the solar wind cannot reach it. You could boost the orbit using photon energy (which is what a light sail does), but I suspect your total thrust is not likely to exceed 1 newton (at best). It would probably take a couple of hundred years to boot the ISS's orbit by any meaningful amount.
You'll also need astronauts in situ to dismantle all the bits poking out that stop the modules from fitting into a Starship's cargo bay. A dangerous job, one that a risk-adverse organisation like NASA will want to steer clear of.
Note that all of the bits of ISS will need to be retrieved otherwise you are going to end up leaving debris in orbit that risks in other satellites in the future.
Re: Cheaper source
There is a fairly basic question that, when asked, provides the answer: how much energy is required to lift the ISS to a high enough orbit to avoid re-entry within the political lifetime of the current crop of Congress-critters?
I'm sure NASA have already done this calculation and the answer came out as: more than Congress will be willing to approve. All NASA will have to do now is get some intern to dress it up in a fancy report full of long and complicated sentences before getting on with figuring how to dispose of the ISS without getting a metric tonne of lawsuits afterwards.
Marketing 'genius' destroyed a printer by trying to fix a paper jam
OpenAI is still figuring out how to make money, but wants you to believe in it
ATM maintenance tech broke the bank by forgetting to return a key
Windows App forgets how to log in with first security update of the year
AI's $3T infrastructure binge continues despite lack of clear profits
Techie turned the tables on office bullies with remote access rumble
Claude is his copilot: Rust veteran designs new Rue programming language with help from AI bot
European Space Agency hit again as cybercrims claim 200 GB data up for sale
BOFH: The Christmas spirit has run dry – time to show some chiller instinct
Sydney Uni data goes walkabout after criminals raid code repo
US freezes $42B trade pact with UK over digital tax row
he's ended no better off than he would have been had he invested daddy's money in a tracker fund and simply sat on it
Actually, he would have been even richer if he had kept his money in a tracker fund while sitting on his hands twiddling his thumbs. The added bonus is that he would have far fewer skeletons i the closet that he's terrified are about to come out.
Alternatively Trump's supporters may surprise us all, and not fall into vicious infighting after he's left the scene, and give us some kind of viable successor.
Trump does not allow viable successors to survive since they are all seen as threats to his continued control of GOP. Look at Vance as an example.