* Posts by LucreLout

3193 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jun 2014

AI still doesn't work very well, businesses are faking it, and a reckoning is coming

LucreLout Silver badge

Sure, but we've always had legions of people that thought they were coding ninjas that regularly shat the bed. AI, no AI, same thing in that regard.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: re: AI still doesn't work very well

In financial markets there's a moment of capitulation where everyone fighting against the start of the direction change just accepts it. It's a necessary precursor for the direction change.

I've gradually given up on rational arguments against AI. It's just not stopping no matter how much I think it should. Will the bubble burst? Eventually yes. Will it go away after? No, not now, but it would change.

I want you to be right, I really do, but I've finally capitulated and accepted you won't be. The sooner you join me the sooner this shit show can change direction.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: The next year 2000?

That would be the absolute sweet spot for me. Recently retired by then, come back for a last blast couple of years on a contracting gig at insanely high day rates to finish teaching millennials and gen z proper architectures and coding in a post AI world.

I'm not holding my breath mind. What we want in life is so rarely what we get. At least once you're 40+.

Brits fear AI will strip the human touch from public services

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: worried that AI will dehumanize public services

Literally none of the best & brightest people I've ever met would consider a job in the public sector. Its not the pay. Its not even the public. Its your colleagues and union barons - as above, demotivated, jaded, lazy, and committed to provision of truly awful levels of service, if any.

Intelligent people that expect to head a department don't want to do so with a malingering union steward trying to undercut every change, every efficiency, every attempt to deliver something better. They just don't.

I lasted less than a year in the public sector and swore I'd never go back. The whole thing needs a root & branch clear out at all levels, and of all the antiquated ways of working. That way 30 years ago and its only gotten worse since.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: worried that AI will dehumanize public services

Personally I'd much rather deal with an AI than many of the public servants I meet who are bored, jaded, burned out, and inefficient. That's before we get to stroppy, surely, and moody.

There's a reason most of us keep our interactions with the state to a bare minimum.

LexisNexis confirms data breach at Legal & Professional arm, some customer records affected

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: LexisNexis fails cybersecurity risk assessment services

In fairness, the company employed tens of thousands of people. You're always going to get a few clowns sneaking through at that scale.

That said, holy shit. The claims made are essentially that every rookie error in the book has been made and then gone undetected in any internal review, every internal audit, and the damage caused will be many years in the fixing. Holy shit.

Transport for London says 2024 breach affected 7M customers, not 5,000

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Make 'em pay

That's precisely the problem though, isn't it? Lessons won't be learned until heads have rolled.

For this level of data breach it would be impossible for all the senior folks to stay in harness in the real world, and its time public bodies like TFL were made to take accountability. Lose millions of records in a hack, your CISO gets sacked and your CEO gets warned. Second hack the CISO number 2 gets sacked and the CEO with them. Rinse and repeat until secure.

UK watchdog eyes Meta's smart glasses after workers say they 'see everything'

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: What a surprise

Africans. & Indians. AI keeping it real.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Key takeaway

The problem is when you're having a piss in the pub toilet and one of these wankers walls in.

The people filmed aren't always the terminally online.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Who would wear AI glasses during "extremely private moments" ...

Hi Clarence, I noticed you're trying to smash Chlamydia. Would you like a little help?

LucreLout Silver badge

What would be infinitely better would be ensuring those in the content, owners or not, can delete content featuring themselves. Better yet, give folks an automatic right not to be filmed and enforce mandatory blurring of all who select it.

Or is facial rec not good enough for police use yet?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: describing the allegations as "concerning."

That's the problem I think. Like a lot of people I simply don't look closely enough at everyone in a room to know there's a pair of these there.

Maybe we could legislate to make them saleable only in hot pink, a shade reserved so no other glasses come in the colour. Knowing there's a pair about is half the battle.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: describing the allegations as "concerning."

I can see a use for augmented reality that takes a nice camera feed, but it's really time the privacy laws in the UK were updated.

Recording, either as pictured or video should require consent, and it's beyond certain that permission must be required to upload someone else to social media.

The alternative is clout thirsty brainouts treating every interaction with anyone else as content. The works had changed since our laws were written, when being photographed in public mostly meant the background of someone's holiday snaps, not being targeted for monetized humiliation.

Iran all but vanishes from the global internet amid US-Israel strikes

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

the difference between anti-semitism and anti-

I've already explained, in practice there isn't any difference. Same people, same hate. You know this already though, don't you?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Its you who choose to slant it that way to mark anyone as antisemitist.

If it walks like a duck....

The real question for folks of your ilk, is why you despise being called out for your antisemitism, instead of just learning not to be antisemitic in the first place. It might help, no?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Or the same people with the same hate for non-Jews use anti-semitism as a dog whistle to prevent any criticism of Israel

Quack quack oops. I'm neither Israeli nor am I Jewish.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

So Israel is just incompetent then?

Careful, careful to not kill civilians.

You really are defending bombing civilians for more than a year?

They've been bombing Hamas. Can you have a guess at why? Or do Jewish kids not count?

You really are a sorry example of a human

Right back at ya champ. I don't know how you people sleep at night.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

The problem with posts like yours, is that under the disgusting mask of antizionism always, always, lies the disgusting face of antisemitism. It's the same people with the same hate. Always.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Yeah, sadly it's totally true.

You again have no basis in fact for your post. It's just school playground rhetoric.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

"Provoked", seriously?

You'd have to be dangerously antisemitic to not consider October 7th as provocation.

Palestine was a very brief British invention that ended more decades back than ever it existed for. Your obsession with it is illogical. I mean, are you campaigning this hard for Yugoslavia? Czechoslovakia maybe? If not, why not?

The land was never "Palestinian" except when Britain made it so.

The Jews are a very distinctive ethnic group, tribe if you like. If their land is not Jerusalem the where is it you think they come from?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

70,000+ dead in Gaza

Yeah, no. All we know about the numbers is that hamas lie and massively inflate them. Also apparently no terrorists have died, if you believe hamas.

Remember the hospital bombing where they claimed 500 died until it was shown to be their rocket, where miraculously, the number dropped to 50. That's a big miscalculation somewhere.

It's done nothing to minimise civilian casualties

Lol. Aside from leaflet drops, supplying aid, safety zones, evacuation corridors, and withholding their biggest weapons from use. Aside from more than any other military in history you mean? Facts after man, start using some.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Genocide? In Gaza? Lol, no.

If Israel wanted to kill Gazans there would be millions dead. They're actively trying to avoid it more than any military in history.

You've clearly absolutely no idea what genocide actually means. Again, I ask not to insult you but to understand, but are you still somewhere in the school system? Only, I'm wondering if you're just too young to know what a real genocide is.

The NHS death toll isn't all that far behind the IDF, so they can't be trying all that hard.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: "the good sense to leave the US & Israel to slog it out"

Lol. That's just factually incorrect. They're the only democracy in the middle east and our only strategic ally in the region.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: There are elections later this year

So you don't care about Iranian citizens? Or you do but this was just too much of an opportunity to dump on your favourite hate objects? I'm genuinely unclear which message you want us to understand.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

You're not going to come here and try to pretend Iran wasn't developing nuclear weapons, are you? That would be really quite incredible given its satellite tracked activity at its nuclear mountain base.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Why on Earth would you be worried about Israel having nukes?

Everyone knows they have nukes. They have been provoked to the extreme by Gaza, and still did not nuke them, in fact they went extensively out of their way to reduce and minimise civilian casualties in Gaza. Two big bombs would have wiped out about 80 to 90% of Gaza's population at one stage, quite without using nukes. Israel isn't the problem.

The problem is the last 8 years of ambitious advancement of Iran's nuclear capability. As we've seen the last few days, they're completely unsuited to nuclear weapons, or half he middle east would be gone this week.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Just Weird

That would have to be the weirdest and probably the most innocuous conspiracy theory I have encountered in a very long time

Its not a conspiracy theory, its a fact.

You have google, you can literally google this and see for yourself. It's been widely reported for a while now.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: "the good sense to leave the US & Israel to slog it out"

Keith already managed to get the UK involved

As much as Starmer is an absolute cretin who has been a disaster in every job he's ever had, and does always chicken out (SACO), it's hard to blame him for this one.

There's no way any war this close to us doesn't end up using our bases at some stage, and Iran have mindlessly lashed out at everything in reach, including us and our allies (Israel and the USA). There's nothing else he could do but allow our bases to be used.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Another war for oil

Given the widespread distribution of attacks over the weekend by Iran, which can only reasonably be described as mindlessly lashing out at everything in reach, is that really a regime you'd be happy to see achieve nuclear capability? Really?

Negotiation totally failed. They've had decades to come tot he table, and were not many months or years from a nuke. This had to be done, and done now. Its genuinely astounding that you don't seem to see that.

HR may have to cajole and soothe reluctant employees to get them to use AI

LucreLout Silver badge

Misaligned incentives

The problem here is the incentives aren't aligned. Embracing AI as an employee comes with risks of cost reductions on one side and a lot more work in the more optimistic view.

What it doesn't come with is less work across the same people or a pay rise for the same work over fewer people. So what's the grunt level logically going to do? Slow walk AI.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Clarification needed

In English, get HR to help managers automate webinar workloads.

US struck Iran with copies of its own drones

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Proof this was long planned

America isn't a regime.lol. Hilarious.

America is our most important global ally. It just is. And all the bile from the usual suspects in these parts isn't going to change that. Even in the earliest days where we all ended up on a labour watch list because of the extreme leftist reactionaries that made up the commentariat back then.

AIs are happy to launch nukes in simulated combat scenarios

LucreLout Silver badge
Terminator

Re: > AI's seem to come to the same conclusion.

AI can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear! And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead!

AI isn't a Terminator. Needs just a little tweak at the end there:

AI can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear! And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your career is dead!

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: > AI's seem to come to the same conclusion.

Just switch the damn things off

I'd love for that to happen, but I've reluctantly come to the conclusion that it's never going to happen.

AI will only play a larger role in our future than it does in our current day, with what is likely to be large scale job losses through increased automation. I've got about a decade left in my career, and I'm switching all my future upskilling to working with AI because, sadly, its that or get crushed by it.

Think about all those 20 deep hierarchies in the public sector - most of you are in one - once you remove those at the coalface in public facing roles, and you remove the top tier interacting with ministers etc, its probably most of the organisation. All of those roles are massively at risk, because their main function is writing reports which get incorporated into the next level of reporting above. That can all be readily automated now. Its not just the number of jobs in the public sector at risk though, its all those career paths folks assumed they'd have that won't exist in what has to now become a much flatter hierarchy.

Out in the private sector, the job losses, at least in tech, are well in train already. Linked in is full of folks that haven't worked in 12+ months due to not being able to find the next job thanks to greatly reduced hiring. The tax base is very likely to be meaningfully smaller over the next decade and so that will further force the state to cut its cloth according to its means, because we can't default on the massive public sector debt we're carrying already.

There's gonna be hard times to come, so yeah, I'd love to just switch the damn things off for a few years, but its not going to happen.

Denizens of DEF CON are 'fed up with government'

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Benjamin Franklin and human rights

Nobody has excused it, its simply that its of far lesser importance than his later actions in life. In terms of scale you're comparing the temporary small scale impact against the permanent everywhere in America impact.

Again, the UK did financially well out of trading slaves, but the union jack is and forever will be the ultimate symbol of abolition of slavery. Its just not at all about excusing or apologising for the fact the country did it. Its just that it has comparatively absolutely zero relevance compared to the impact of our then abolishing it world wide.

We did it. It happened. It wasn't good. What we did after, by abolishing it globally forever matters so much more, and it always will. Same goes for Benny F. Which bit you struggling with? Try to use facts rather than emotion to express your response.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Benjamin Franklin and human rights

Lol. People disagreeing with you aren't apologising for anything or anyone. They just think your take is laughably wrong.

I don't mean this in a bad way, but are you still in school? I ask because all you've done is show up, hyperfixate on one very badly made point, stamp your feet and abuse anyone that doesn't agree with you. Which on the face of it appears to be pretty much everyone. It's the sort of mentality you find in school common rooms.

At one point Britain was balls deep in slavery before we pulled out and abolished it everywhere. The fact we chose to end slavery in the world is of far greater importance to the modern world than the fact we used to make money off it.

Not all historic facts carry equal weight, and Franklin's later life carries more importance than his youth. It just does.

LucreLout Silver badge

By hoarded do you mean saved and invested?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Blaming the wrong people

Hilary I don't know what my husband is doing in that jacuzzi with the teenage girl Clinton?

I find it hilarious that in the UK the democrats are the lefts favourite party yet they're so far right leaning they make Reform look like Marxists.

The empty moralising of the left is tiring and pointless, given that almost all the horrors of modern history begin with one flavour of Marxist or other going too far.

Human rights, freedom of speech and science are not leftwing values. Not only not exclusively left wing values, but barely left wing values at all.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Blaming the wrong people

Let me guess, the right party is labour, right?

So ID cards, war, surveillance society. All the good stuff, yeah?

I realise SACO, but is there really anything you can think of to point at that this right sort of government of yours are doing that is going well?

Trump orders purge of 'woke' Anthropic from government

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Kathy Burke said it best...

While I can see what you're saying, this bit is highly unlikely to be reasonable:

if the BBC (and presumably others) had used their broadcast delay properly to edit the outburst out

The tic is the result of a disability, not a choice, not an opinion. Would you pixelate a wheelchair? Blur out a facial disfigurement? Voice over someone with a stutter?

The only correct response to his verbal tic is to accept it for what it is and choose to be understanding instead of choosing to be offended.

Removing it is totally out of order. He's there representing a film about literally this problem.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Kathy Burke said it best...

Liberals are centrist or slightly left of centre and believe that people should be left to get on with their lives but that the state should be there as a backstop.

That's accurate only in so far as it's what the center right believe. The center left believe in the state as a partner in their lives, not a backstop.

All socialism is about control because you cannot have socialism without first establishing control of the people. Nobody will accept equality of outcome without it, a core belief of the left. Note the difference between equality of outcome and equality of opportunity, which is a right wing belief.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Kathy Burke said it best...

Also history, that their entire concept was created by the literal stasi.

AWS would rather blame its own engineers than its AI

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Strive to be the Earth's Best Employer?

only sounds normal if you’re insulated

Level of preparation doesn't influence the normality of redundancy. It happens to basically everyone, usually several times, public sector excepted of course. You can never really insulate yourself from it. When you're young and don't earn as much, saving & investing enough to get ahead is hard, bloody hard. When you're older and have investments accrued over a working lifetime, your salary is often larger, and due to the ageism of the young, periods of employment of a length its often impossible to really prepare for. Too often, its retirement - most folks don't make it to their retirement party.

At that level the brain does not register redundancy as professional transition. It registers loss of shelter, loss of security, potential collapse of everything person worked for.

Sounds terrible. Are you sure you want me to experience that alone, at a time when there's nobody to constrain, monitor, or control my rashest of actions? When I'm more likely to damage the business and the business is least likely to notice it quickly.

That’s when higher reasoning is muted and the stress system fires first. Add a text that ensures the message hits immediately, in the dark, alone. Not during working hours. Not with HR present. Not with colleagues. In isolation.

If redundancy were all you suggested earlier, this sounds like a situation every employer would actively avoid, had they actually thought it through. It maximises operational risk to the business, rather than minimising it.

I've both been made redundant and had to make others redundant, and both sides of the desk have been the worst times of my career. The best way to minimise risks to the business just also happens to be the least shit way for the affected employees - face to face in a meeting room, with HR support, their manager, etc. Where they can process the immediate shock, vent their immediate anger to your face, and seek support of friends and colleagues.

Messaging folks at home is the way of the coward. Its disrespectful. It makes a bad situation worse. It dehumanises the person and their awful experience.

For all that, redundancy happens. It is normal. For as long as there are economic cycles, it will happen with regularity. Only the public sector remains immune, a fact upon which their staff place puzzlingly little value.

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Strive to be the Earth's Best Employer?

At 4:30am you are not in problem solving mode. You are not rehearsing arguments. You are not reaching for policy documents or drafting responses.

Genuinely interested in what you think that achieves? At best you're trying to stay where you're not wanted.

By the time you're being consulted about redundancy decisions, in my experience the outcome has almost always been determined. What is it an employee is going to propose that the management structure hasn't already considered? There's almost never anything to be done about it other than address practicalities - notice, enhanced redundancy payments, last day etc.

There's no good way to be told about it, though there are certainly much darker shades of bad.

This is why, no matter what anyone may tell you, you never confuse an employer for "family". Jobs come, jobs go, its entirely normal, and just part of everyone's career arc.

NASA safety watchdog says it's time to rethink Moon landing

LucreLout Silver badge

I wonder how much stuff is in a spacecraft now...

Think back to Apollo 13, and the mass of components and stuff there was in the craft to repurpose into other tasks to solve problems they weren't expecting to have. Now its 3 touch screens and what? I realise the screens just replace switches, buttons and their wiring, but think about all the other components they control that also have less in them due to increased reliance on microchips. They're comparatively very hard to repurpose. I could, for example, probably cobble together more uses for the parts in a 60s Ford Mustang than a Tesla Model 3.

I'm actually hoping to be proven wrong here, as it'll be interesting to see what commentards think they could more easily repurpose, and why?

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: "too many firsts in Artemis III mission"

I'll go. It'd be worth the risks.

And that right there, becomes the problem. No matter how big those risks become, there's very definitely someone out there willing to have a very large firework jammed up their ass and go for launch. NASA, at least after Challenger, embraced the idea of extreme risk reduction, which as we can see in the essence of the do more on each of fewer launches approach, has once again gone out the window.

But fuck it, gimme a seat and I'll still go. My life has been lived and that long painful death at the end is getting closer, much closer, and I'll take my chances on the best ride in the solar system.

Top cloud providers to outspend Ireland's GDP on AI in 2026

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: The Wreck of the good ship Cloud

One does have to wonder how they plan to recover these "Investments". They do have a plan, right?

That, sadly, is the easiest part of all of this. I'll explain, but please keep in mind what I think will happen and what I think should happen are not the same thing. I'm not advocating for this as much as warning about it.

Run the models as loss leaders while businesses everywhere shed staff into the next downturn, which they will. That'll make the next downturn a jobs recession, a proper 90s style recession, not like the soft recessions of the '08 or Covid. Then, crank up the billing on the tokens.

In essence, it leaves companies paying what could be thought of as labour taxes to Microsoft, Amazon, Google etc instead of to their traditional tax man. Once they're on that treadmill, and they're literally queuing up to give it a try, companies won't care if the token costs are half the cost of an employee because its still a huge saving.

Don't believe the hyperscalers! AI can't cure the climate crisis

LucreLout Silver badge

Ooops, didn't notice this.

But which "some" and "many" were those? Not reputable climate scientists

Sure they were. There's been reputable climate scientists saying exactly that for decades.

regarding birth rates: the problem here is, that you can't just kill people off

I didn't suggest killing folks off. Nobody did. Strange argument to propose.

With the best will in the world (clearly lacking), to realistically bring the global population size down to a point where it will make even a jot of difference to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions is likely to be on the order of 5-10 decades,

That's obviously wrong.

Population begins falling immediately the same year the birth rate does, because people at the other end of their lifespan continue to die. Fixing the birth rate is net positive every year from the first tot he last year you do it.

FWIW, the best proven way to reduce birth rates is to educate people

Yes, but that will take another hundred years or more. Its not a this year thing, where job automation and birth rate reduction could be.

A more realistically achievable goal is to address the extreme skew in resource consumption.

No, that's a more idealistically achievable idea, but its certainly not now nor ever will be realistic. It just isn't. Nobody is voting for a reduction in living standards. How is it people haven't grasped that after all these decades banging the environmental drum?

Rapid AI-driven development makes security unattainable, warns Veracode

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Security is HARD

So so many security issues are caused by piss poor devs not understanding even rudimentary defensive coding. Unauthorized access on API's, IDORs etc, all low hanging fruit really. I'm pretty sure that an AI could be effectively trained to spot these, as there's already several tools that can that don't even need AI.

The real answer, however, would have been to have software engineering be a regulated profession. The doctor that fits your pacemaker has to be qualified and certified and is regulated. So is the anaesthetist, the squad of nurses keeping the show on the road, and the hardware manufacturer. The only part of the whole process that is unregulated is the software engineer, who can be literally any self taught clown or a "specialist" from cheapistan. It's totally illogical, given that if the software stops working, so does the hardware, and it then doesn't mater how well fitted it was.

Infosec community panics as Anthropic rolls out Claude code security checker

LucreLout Silver badge

Re: Timely reminder ... to do with *ANYTHING* 'AI' !!!

do you really trust them

I tried to explain that to the snr folks at my last gig. Yes, they have sold you a walled garden. Yes, they have guaranteed that your data will never leave - its just like the Bates motel. So, what precisely is your plan when they violate that agreement and steal the data?

We may be a huge global business, but every single one of the cloud / AI vendors is vastly bigger and can tie us up in lawsuits while our revenue dwindles away because they have what we're selling and are flooding the market with it.