Re: All of it in foreign hands
Did somebody mention Birmingham Council?
41175 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I'm curious as to exactly how these mini-organs are integrated. For one thing the liver receives a blood supply direct from the gut via the hepatic portal vein allowing it to process the sugars absorbed in digestion without their entering the genral circulation.
Secondly it produces bile which flows direct into the blood via the bile duct. Letting that ooze into the abdominal cavity doesn't sound like a good thing. 18 days in mice might not be enough to show the consequences, 18 months in a human patient waiting for a transplant would be a different matter.
They probably did have a clue. One of the problems in law enforcement is the publicity-hungry officer. It was much the same when they'd got criminals not only using back-doored phones but also paying for them - somebody had to blab about taking down a gang and how they did it.
I suppose I'm looking at it from the user's point of view. There is a local version that doesn't need a web server - it's called LibreOffice, no Electron style bloat. If I need a local version that's what I use. If I needed online collaborative office collaboration I'd use the online version. But then I'm not looking to sell something for local use and trying to persuade customers to not look at things that way.
What would really be cool, if not COOL, would be to get together with Tbird and make a combined app. That might even be worth buying.
"I can only assume that by pushing the UI into a web/browser technology that the LO UI development can be offloaded on to external browser development projects."
The original Netscape Communicator and its current incarnation, SeaMonkey sort of used this approach for the UI of the mail/news client but that wasn't altogether surprising as the application was (and is) a combined browser and mail client.
What's slightly more surprising is that Thunderbird continues with this, using an internal browser. Perhaps Collabora could look at some sort of merge because there really is a need to combine the office suite functionality with mail/calendar/etc functionality. I believe that early versions of Open Office included Seamonkey code for a mail-merge function. It's a pity it was never surfaced as part of the overall application.
"There's also the market flaw that once you've sold one 10,000-year storage solution, it'll be a while before anyone needs another."
In fact you do need another. You need one to replace the first that died of old age. You need one to interface to USB-D or whatever comes along in the next generation of computers to replace the interface you're currently using. And if that doesn't happen your borosilicate plate with all the world's knowledge on it, being only 2mm thick, isn't even useable as a dinner plate.
The great new BBC Domesday book of 40 years ago became unreadable in very short order without some scrambling about to find a surviving reader. The original from 940 years ago is still readable as in needs nothing more than the Mk 1 eyeball (backed up by a knowledge of palaeography and medieval Latin usages).
I'd add
3. The faster requests come in from any IP address or block of IP addresses the slower they get served. In the event of really fast requests when somebody starts pounding return is they think they're not being served quick enough the connection is dropped and reconnections refused for the next 10 minutes. This is made quite clear to users as is the suggestion that if they want to make frequent pulls they set up their own cache. Alternatively they can have a private cache set up on the server provided they pay for it, solving the problem of who pays for the infrastructure.
Common land in England was never in some sort of public domain. The land itself had an owner, usually the manorial lord. Certain people (e.g. householders or manorial tenants) had certain rights (e.g. pasturage, pannage, turbary, collecting dead-wood). Grazing would be limited by some form of rationing (stinting, agistment).
There were also complications of visenage or inter-commoning where two communities would have common rights on the lnd between them. If lordship demanded boundaries there might be differences between the neighbours' definitions of those boundaries leading to disputes, violence and even death. The commoners taking part were, I think, often pawns and victims in disputes between their manorial lords.
Enclosure goes back a long way, e.g. the peak of the English population in late Edward II/early Edward III. If the population grew beyond what existing cultivation could support extra land would be granted (asserts). When the population collapsed, e.g. in the famine of the late 1310s or the Black Death a generation later, come of these assarts were abandoned. When it rose again more common was enclosed well before the Parliamentary enclosures. I'm currently trying to work out how one common came to have been largely enclosed, apparently by a neighbouring estate, mostly by at least half a century before its Act. I've also seen an instance where the post-Enclosure field layout as seen on the 1st ed OS 6" map differed from that in the Commissioners' map; I suspect it was following previous encroachments which had already enclosed a substantial part of it, again from a neighbouring estate although this time they didn't get to keep it.
Odido's business deserves to suffer on account of holding passport and driving licence numbers in the first place. These are surely not necessary for providing a telecoms service. However as customers have provided this data they must be OK with it unless Odido made them a requirement in which case they would appear to be in breach of GDPR.
Productivity is a measurement of output per head. In order to measure it you need a good metric of output. Devising that requires thought. Capturing the metric also requires thought.
Keystrokes are not a good metric of output. They're not a metric of output at all. They're a metric of input. Someone using them as a metric of output in place of doing the work of finding something that really does the job (in this case, something related to monitoring of calls as far as can be told from TFA) is the one who is actually "making it appear they were working when they were not." Perhaps they should be fired.
What's more it would appear from TFA that this pseudo-activity was a device for keeping the computer from going into sleep mode, thus blocking an activity which appears not to have required key inputs. She appears to have been given a device which was not intrinsically fit for purpose and been fired for fixing that.
"Do you really believe VC's would supply this kind or money and having no say in the company's direction?"
Of course they have a say. The say will likely be not to put that money at risk (and more than it already is!) with the legal consequences of unrestrained use by the likes of Hegseth, especially if that use is against US citizens. Just think of all the class actions.