After the apocalypse
We will be combing the waste tips for used Stanley knife blades to sharpen, until we work out how to make carbide steel again.
2286 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Nov 2013
If all that happens is that it gets crushed by bots, and no humans visit, why make a web site at all?
And once new sources of stuff disappear, won't the AI results be less and less useful?
Since AI scraping is tied to search engine ranking, successfully blocking bots (even if possible) would make your site invisible.
Init needed sorting out. Something like systemd v1 might have been a candidate for the representation of the init requirement. It was seen as an improvement. But now it's in, the requirements of a small set of users is driving the development, so that the rest of us keep finding stuff is surprising.
"it is your job that got made redundant - not you"
Rubbish. Unless you are one of a small number of people doing "X", and now there is less "X" to do, this is not the case. You are being made "redundant" as your job still needs doing, but other people are cheaper/less awkward/less inclined to complain about lousy conditions (or. hey, AI might even be able to do your job, but that is only true if manglement don't care about the job being done). Unless the actual business is significantly shrinking, the work is still there - you were just the most fire-able. Too old, too professional, too expensive.
I did rent a chainsaw once to cut down a tree. Bonus marks for the hire shop that lifted a holdall of safety gear onto the table and said "you are also hiring this".
Not being a complete numpty, i carefully examined all of the kit (gauntlets, chaps etc) and looked like a complete prune wearing it all whilst I did the job. The tree was felled onto the road, well away from our house!
I never understood why BoJo rushed it through pre-Covid. I don't think he stood to get some massive directorship or something. You do wonder *who* stood to benefit, who could put the screws on the government of the time.
I never forget the comment he made leading up to the debate. "When you're in a hole, keep digging". There was a "tell" that he knew it was bollocks.
Branson would have loved to buy the Concordes, but BA refused to release the service records for them. Without those, it was impossible to certify airworthiness. BA were absolutely determined that their precious Concordes would never fly with a Virgin logo on the tail, even if Branson lost a king's ransom on each flight.
It's a NoteMachine, what do you expect.
They bought up a load of second-hand obsolete machines, took over a few other machine networks, and are sweating the assets until they die. Never use one - they are way more likely to swallow your card due to poor maintenance. And the customer service is zilch, so best of luck getting a refund when it flubs dispensing notes.
Isn't the issue with who has a contract with whom?
Tesco have a contract with Computacenter. Does Computercenter have a contract with Dell/VMware/Broadcom that obliges them to provide services that Computacenter have contracted to provide?
If Tesco bought vans from a Ford dealer with a 10-year service plan, and Ford stop making the parts, the Ford dealer can only sue Ford if they have a contract that obliges them to supply.If not, the Ford dealer is S O L and goes bust.
I suspect that Computacenter will cease to exist as Tesco can oblige them to purchase enough VMWare subscriptions to be able to provide Tesco with the services they have a contract for.
Aside from the less than 100% reliability record, they had two important attributes:
Have you noticed how hard it is to get data from one machine to another nowadays if you aren't a nerd? 2 Choices - 1) an online service that needs signups or 2) USB keys.
1) Fails the too-much faff test, and
2) Fails as you need to have one handy and you need it back as it cost you several pounds, and you have only one on you, instead of a box of 10 or a drawerful of floppies.
Plus books 3 onwards really needed editing. Book 1, for all it's faults, rollicked along and carried you with it. It had benefited from years of rejections, and had been honed and polished.
Subsequent books were allowed to spread to airport-novel dimensions. And the titles were a swizz! "Goblet Of Fire" was just a name-choosing machine.
What's needed is to begin proceedings now and adjourn them. And have an interview now and again.
The idea to apply the same process-is-the-punishment that has been applied to some non-Establishment figures, so they will live out their lives always waiting for the knock, and never really enjoying their unearned wealth.
Please just stop. Every IPV6 article you come out with this trope about NAT not preventing inbound unsolicited connections. Wake up. The real world's PCs behind NAT routers have been isolated from net nasties for nearly 30 years. It's over. Pick another hill to die on.
Indeed. NAT was seen as a smell, and needing removing. Plus, since IOT was all-the-rage, they wanted every single node to be globally routable. This is, of course a privacy and security nightmare.
Some fiddling was done with router address translation to hide the identity of devices behind firewalls, but this is really window dressing.
If IPV6 was simply IPV4 with some sensible enhancements and wider addresses, we'd be steadily migrating. But oh, no! We had to have purity!