Always a disaster soapbox
We know now that the massive outage was due to a "program" that needed 21 parameters and 20 were supplied, leading to a general protection fault. It wasn't tested as thoroughly as it should have been.
That doesn't mean the entire industry is completely coming apart and soapboxing the whole thing to point a quivering finger at "Agile" practice is due.
This happens because there are thousands of bored IT journalists and talking heads, not because there are some "fundamental" problems with how IT works
Not that we can't all do better, but this existential hand-wringing helps nobody.