>...none of you can prove that you exist in the first place...
I hallucinate, therefore I am.
Not sure whether I was ever in the first place, though.
2111 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Nov 2011
Well, I'm a generous soul and I choose to believe that Wayland was based on good intentions. Or one good intention, anyway.
They have assiduously followed that path, and are well on the way (inevitably, as predicted by a well-known saying) to hell. Or a kind of hell, anyway.
> ... this would just yet another opportunity for politicians and lobbies to get the boot in.
All too true. Every UK political party believes the BBC to have long-term bias against them.
Possibly because news media based of factual reporting will tend to be biased against almost all political opinions.
Allow me to venture the view that the world would keep on turning, and probably be better off, without corrupt governments exercising ever-increasing surveillance and control over the people they are supposed to serve.
Just because you (vehemently) detest (some) social media does not make this a good law, nor does it make the goverment that passed it (or other goverments that will inevitably try something similar) any better.
> Some councils have housing, some don't.
Surely you mean "Some councils have one or more items on their haousing roster, some have zero." Any numerate person can cope with the use of zero to mean none. So, do councils have established rules against employing numrate staff?
> They're too close to the product, don't understand the often silly mistakes customers make, and get very upset when the professional writers want to change their highly technical content into better and more readable English.
Unfortunately, unlike the developers, they're too far from the product. End of, in my bitter experience. You just go round a useless loop of the documentation team removing crucial information and replacing it with well-written, clear, easy to understand, errors.
> “If they can join meeting and send emails/messages to people – what happens if they go rogue?
> It could be sending sensitive data to the wrong people, providing incorrect information,
> or it could be sending strange or offensive messages…how is that to be prevented,
> monitored, and acted upon?”
Same as you do with the PHBs, and for the same reason.