Re: SvarDOS is not "open source"
The Stallman virus is strong with this one....
278 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Aug 2011
Sorry, but "Outlook Rules" and "easy of creation" seem rather mutually exclusive.
I wish Outlook rules could be created as quick as I can create all my necessary rules in T-Bird. And it seems to be getting more and more convoluted with each version of Outlook (currently at work dealing with Outllook 2010, 2019 and 2021)...
One of the arguments often deployed for not switching to Linux is that it doesn't have an application comparable to .... and one of those things it doesn't have an application comparable to is Outlook. Remarkably this is seen as a disadvantage on Linux' part.
Well, that is only one. And there is some functionality of Outlook (in connection with Exchange) that just isn't available in any free alternative. Like sharing contacts, calendars, across groups in company.
Or Autodesk AutoCAD/Revit. Or Quickbooks. Or the many, many specialized vertical applications...
Sure, T-bird and LibreOffice can cover a lot of ground for a vast amount of home users, but unless it is a more lucrative and better supported alternative for business users, you just won't see a larger acceptance overall....
> Though I'd say the Betterbird fork lives up to its name. YMMV
Well, my mileage varies but quite a few nautical miles....
I tried it for maybe half an hour, then uninstalled it. It wasn't able to properly handle IMAP and changes across multiple devices. This was a year or so ago, so might try to take another look...
Thunderbird isn't perfect, but I had few of those problems that other reported. And I use it as my main email client, across 3 different OS (Windows, Linux, macOS) on more than half a dozen different hosts...
Rewrite: "Microsoft, fuck off."
I see you are using profanity here. Which of the following options do you want to use instead:
1) "Microsoft, buzz off"
2) "Microsoft, pop off"
3) "Microsoft, sod off"
Those kiosks are utterly useless, at least that are in the local MickeyD's here in LA. And thus one more reason to boycott them (and any other chain that tries to force them on their customers).
It takes several times longer for a simple order, more mistakes made in the "kitchen" and thus more aggravation when you try to actually get hold of your "food"...
Why is anyone surprised that there is a huge difference between what the Muskrat says and what he (or his companies) is actually doing?
Business as usual, big promises.with arm thick ropes (rather than strings) attached...
It's not only the case with StarLink, but also applies to Tesla and X. Only SpaceX seems to kind of on track, but then that is primarily run by others anyway and Elon is just providing the mouthpiece...
The Med certainly is NOT a tranquil body of water. And this was kind of a freak storm, a very localized hurricane/tornado that struck right where that ship was and with it's huge mast, those hurricane force winds apparently just pushed the boat over to capsize and sink rather quickly.
There was nothing that any forecasting could have done...
Boeing 707, 747, never liked the 727) and the earlier 737 models were quite OK. Problem is that they assumed that they cash in on those 2 models (707 and 727 are out of action/production for a really long time) as long as they could, and when they had to stop producing the 747 due to waning demands, the 737 alone just couldn't provide for shareholder satisfaction. 757 was kind of a bust, 767 and 777 were mediocre at best, and the 787 another bust. And then they tried to mess with the 737(max) in order to try and keep the same type certificate rather than develop a competitive model in a market dominated by Airbus and they even would be hard pressed to compete with Bombardier and Embraer. That's when the proverbial soft brown matter hit that fast rotating appliance.
If it's Boeing, I ain't going! (even recent astronauts are chiming in on that one now) >:)
I don't think that the availability of the CPU was an issue here.68000 were available in production numbers since late '79. By 1980, I used 68k based systems from Sage and Cromemco and even a pre-series model of the HP-9816 desktop computer...
What made a (cost) difference was that with the 8088, it was possible to use a large number of existing (and thus cheap) 8 bit peripheral chips, while offering up to 10x the amount of RAM than the then prevailing 8 bit CP/M systems and micros like the Apple II, Tandy TRS-80 and Commodore CBM 3000/4000/8000 were capable of. For more of a side show project at IBM, that seemed good enough and with the subsequent evolution of 80286/80386/486 CPUs by Intel, any initial advantage that using an 68k chip quickly vanished, even considering that Motorola very quickly dropped the price of the 68k chips and IBM could have easily gotten a similar sweetheart deal as Apple got for using the CPU in the Lisa and then Macintosh series...
And at the same time as IBM in Boca Raton developed the IBM PC, another IBM department was developing the IBM 9000 lab/instrumentation/process control system, based on the Motorola 68000, trying to compete with IBM and DEC in that market.
What a clown statement! Sorry, but this is on a military vessel, a place where very strict rules apply. That is something you are aware of from the very first day you join the military, something you quite obviously never did.
Installing such an unauthorized technology on a warship can endanger the whole crew and the mission of the ship in more ways that you can possibly imagine. In addition to the possibility to enable spying and other ways of allowing unauthorized access to shipboard functions...
Somehow your post doesn't make much sense. Beside that on a 17" Framework laptop, you could upgrade an existing one, if GPU and the display itself would become available as modules by them.
But in general, you claim you need a large monitor due to age, but then you still can see the pixels on a 1920x1080 display?
Well, it sounds as if you have never create a single, non-trivial program in BASIC.
Yes, there are a lot of BASIC spaghetti code programs out there, but in my experience, they are, specially in recent years, outnumbered by the badly designed Java, C++ or Python programs out in the wild...
Still use Firefox as my primary browser everywhere, everyday. Works for me better than Chrome, though at times I wonder where they focus in terms of development is.
Browsers like Brave or Vivaldi, they didn't last past 5 minutes when I was taking a look at them, and I also dumped Opera as my second choice years ago.
Had the same problem with a customer who wasn't very good with his fine motoric sills.
He kept pushing the mouse a foot and a half in each direction, complaining that he had already cleaned out 60% of his desk to have enough space for that. And then looked at me like a deer in the headlights when I showed him how to move it with rather short, but faster movements in a space the equivalent of an A5 sheet of paper. He had already wondered why that mouse pad he got with the system was so small... ;-)
How much are they supposed to lower the prices? A lot of run-of-the-mill apps are just a couple of bucks anyway, do you have any idea how many you need to get paid for to just break even with your very own development costs. And if Apple if just taking another 30% of those couple of bucks, that means you need to sell a lot more of your app to even start to make any money. And don't forget that you have to pay another Apple tax as you need to have a Mac with the latest version of XCode to even get the code signing to get the app in the store in the first place...
Sorry, but what Apple does is just highway robbery. And yes, Google needs to made to change their commission scheme as well, Likewise Microsoft for their 12%/15% they are charging for games/apps in their store.
It's not that they shouldn't take a free for providing the service of that store, but IMHO, anything above 5% is absolutely excessive....
"In California the threat model is a little different. A wood framed house will survive most earthquakes as long as it's bolted to the foundation and properly built; a masonry house will collapse and kill you."
But then that wood framed house will provide no to little protection from mud/water coming down the hillside and in case of a wildfire (or unkempt palm trees catching fire, as it just happened a few days ago), the wood framed houses provide plenty of additional fuel in case of a (wild)fire. Same with those nasty juniper trees. Roman candle galore, with most houses that are not directly in a high severity fire zone are not properly prepared to deal with the embers...
Today's "programmers" aren't that anymore. They just throw canned libraries or "frameworks" at a problem, without actually knowing why and if there would be a better option to solve a problem, with less unknown "hubris".
To sort a small array or list, a quick hand rolled bubble sort might do just fine, without the fluff of pulling in a whole qsort library. Or throwing simple data into extensive SQL tables with vulnerable SQL statements/queries, where a simple, small random access data file would suffice.
Reusing code is fine, but one needs to know what to reuse, why and how.
But for far too many folks these days, that only know how to use a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail...
"but that's 0.52595812836mm, if you want to go that route"
Well, that would be rather retarded, as nobody, in almost all use cases, would require and use such a precision. Again, one of the points that you and most of your fellow US Americans are completely missing.
"Hyperbole much? I'm fairly certain that in the whole of human history, the only sociopath who has suggested that 0.0207070129276 inches would be a useful measurement is yourself."
Not really, as you are totally missing that nobody would/should be using inches anymore. Or feet, ounces and other Fred Flintstones units...
Sorry but your rant doesn't make much sense.
No, you do not lose your data if you change ISPs. Or if you do not "manually copy your email". For the very reason that you claim that there is no problem with POP3: backup.
You can back up your IMAP email folders of your mail client (PST in case of Outlook) just the same way you back up your POP3 email folders. Not one bit of difference.
And if you are using email for work, it is more than likely that you have more than one device where you are receiving email. And I prefer to have access to all my relevant email, on any of my devices (desktop, laptop, tablet, phone), at any given time. I keep track of email with clients, both incoming and outgoing, and can always get back to any of the email exchanges, on any device, at any time.
Yes, there is a danger that you accidentally delete an email that you find out you need later, and this has been synced with the IMAP server and from there to the other devices. Tough nuts, but that is where making proper backups comes into play.
And most ISPs there days usually don't offer to keep email on the server for more than two weeks, so if you go on vacation, or are sick/in the hospital for 15 days, you will lose email that you can not download from the server anymore. WIth any decent IMAP server setup, this simply isn't a problem. Even if your devices didn't retrieve any of the email, it is still on the server. And can be retrieved from any device...
How can some software, in the year 2024, not properly account for the additional day in a leap year. The rules for when there is a February 29th added (or not) exist for several hundreds of years, well before there was even a remote inkling of computers around.
It just comes to show that there are far too many "programmers" around these days that might know about all the latest paradigms and other fluff in programming, but have lost all connection to real world problems...