"That all depends on whether the torpid privatized water firms in England and Wales view detecting leaks as a priority."
Any that don't should be automatically receiving a "cease-and-desist" from the government and the controlling board disbanded.
456 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Aug 2010
“For the first time New York City business and aspiring entrepreneurs will be able to direct their questions to an AI-powered chatbot rather than having to scan through webpage after webpage going into the blackhole of uncertainty about how to open a business, how to run a business, how to answer some of the basic questions,” he said during the announcement. “That is behind us. AI-generated answering is in front of us.”
Maybe I'm naive - but wouldn't it be simpler, and far more efficient to just provide simple rules (and therefore answers) for these questions, in plain language?
More likely the scammers who stuck up the phoney QR codes that link to fraudulent copies of the parking app website are the ones who sabotage the pay machines.
Doesn't need saying here - but worth pointing out as a reminder... ANY QR code that's physically accessible to the public is a target for a scammer to make use of by sticking up a replacement QR code over the original. If you have to find a new parking app, do it by searching the company name and making damned sure you're on the correct website, or downloading the correct app, before entering any information whatsoever.
I've never understood the mentality of removing (as opposed to just disabling it) something just because you don't use it.
As above - by all means disable it, so those of us who do use it can re-enable and use it, but why "remove" it? I can't see the code for this being a massive bloaty chunk of binary that would make any difference to the file size of the OS download, so why strip it? There's far bigger chunks of code that could be optimised, I'm sure.
This definitely smacks of "I've got the power, I'm going to use it", which I suppose it all the rage these days.... <sigh>
It also shows up that there's some serious lack of knowledge about real-world riding.
Without a proper front mudguard (ie one that covers the wheel for at least 15 degrees forward of the wheel hub) the bike and rider will get very wet and very dirty, very quickly as soon as it rains.
I've ridden a C1, it actually worked (rather top heavy admittedly), and if I'd had a non-motorway commute at the time, I would seriously have considered one. It just needed a couple of "curtains" across the sides to make it properly weatherproof as well.
I also had fancies of shoe-horning a BMW F650 engine (or similar) into one.....
If it's going to "spring" open like that.... isn't that going to impart some unwanted thrust impetus into the whole assembly while it's in freefall? I suppose it does depend on when in the launch process the maw opens, but it seems odd to have it move in a semi-uncontrolled manner.
Also - that canard's movement seemed a bit... rough?
I'd liken it more to the FLASH "bubble" (or 'fad'). It's a software that (possibly) has a use-case somewhere, but eventually everyone will realise those use-cases are few and far between, but not before everyone tries to use it for everything and eventually realises it just doesn't perform as expected.
The digital rendering (for such it is), seems to have 2 hinges that fold in the same way. IE, each fold will put the two outer "leaves" being folded into a "face-face" arrangement with the central "leaf".
So ... if BOTH hinges work like that... which part of the time-space continuum is the left (or right) "leaf" pushed into when it tries to move into the same spatial coordinates as the right (or left) "leaf" which has been folded over the central "leaf".
I assume that this HAS been thought about.... but the rendering would suggest otherwise.
"... The only reason humans needed to be in the loop before AI was natural language understanding, and that's one thing that AI *is* actually pretty good at - certainly better than the frustrating IVR voicetrees that have you shouting "representative!" in no time. ... "
I'd debate that LLM/AI/Trenchcoated Autocompletes "understand" natural language, as opposed to "recognising" it. Subtle, but important difference. They can identify the language being used, and pattern match it as reference in order to parse their store of information, pick out segments of that knowledge that appear to be related to the pattern, then use pre-defined patterns (and guardrails) to generate a response that simulates a visibly similar pattern to the input language..... but never actually "comprehend" the actual meanings of either the input or the output.
"... As far as I can discern, postcodes are based on a number of dwellings ..."
(this is from memory, I've not used the PO db for a few years)...
it's ... "something like that".
In towns & cities a post-code is often (but not always), a "street", ie a vaguely sensible collection of address that have some sort of connection - obviously real-life is not neat and tidy so this is only really a "guideline" in practise.
Out in the countryside the post-code defined areas (yes, they're geo-spatial areas with boundaries) are a bit more random, so some might contain 20+ dwellings, some more, some much less (our one has 4 dwellings, but 6 addresses (iirc) - because one of them is a farm with multiple out-buildings and businesses onsite). The centroid of the area is located about 100metres from my dwelling, luckily in site of my gate, but if you're at the post-code centreoid you can't see my house! (the gate itself is mostly hidden in hedging).
Also - again, if memory serves, the PO used to licence the geo-information at different granularity levels for different prices, so it was very possible for cheapskate companies to buy lower-granularity information depending on their use case, or parsimoniousness.
The problem there is not the drivers', it's the company itself using the Post-Office database for deliveries, which (if memory serves) does indeed not go down any closer geo-spatially than post-code centreoid lat/longs. Or perhaps they're just still using an old version of the db they pinched 10 years ago.... There are other, better, (more expensive to access) data sources for postal address geo-locations.
Of course it does help when your address is actually contained within those databases.... Mine doesn't seem to be in a rather large number of them (next door is though!)
Writing PHP daily here and you very definitely can distinguish between integers, numbers (decimals), and strings when needed. IIRC strict typing was introduced in PHP v7.
For Gene's reference - in PHP the operator ' + ' is always "add these vars", whereas the operator ' . ' (full-stop) is "concatenate these vars". Works well.
"... Huntsville has enjoyed the unofficial title of "Rocket City" for many years. Many US military rockets and missiles were developed and tested at the US Army Redstone Arsenal site, and NASA Marshall Space Flight Center was established there. It was also the site where the Saturn rockets were developed ..."
Is it ... er.... "sensible" to put all the eggs in one basket (as it were)? I seem to recall understanding that there was a good, militarily sound, reason for having your organisations "spread out"....
Like others I'm in the "over my dead body" camp.
Firstly, I've been keeping an eye on the "market-place" before wondering if it's worth a try, and everything, yes EVERYTHING I've seen or read has always pointed in the "nope!" direction.
Secondly: I dislike "black-boxen" as a matter of course:. I want to be responsible for the data that my code handles: feeding it into black boxes that do [diety]-knows-what with it is not top of my wishlist.
Thirdly: I have enough difficulty understanding the code I wrote last week (mainly due to poor memory, despite copious commenting), so updating things is always a voyage of discovery (often it's even pleasant! :D) : I have no wish to be debugging random mixes of plagiarised code that is highly likely to contain oddities and bugs that are not readily apparent even at the 3rd close look.
1: yep - would love that, will never happen
2: oo - nice, but the implementation, as you say, is pants.
3: maybe I'm not enough of a keyboard warrior, but I daresay a lot of people would appreciate it - however where do you stop..... MOD... MOD-2.... MOD-3... MOD 4 (the Revenge!)
4: I can barely remember the "standards"....
5: F-ME YES!! PLEASE [DEITY] YES!
6: meh
7: PLAESE [DEITY] YES!! And while we're at it - STICK APPS TO THE WORKSPACES I PUT THEM ON!!
8: Yeah - that would be nice.
9: Be even better if they kept the audo controls in just one place... sodding fed up tinkering with audio in the OS AND audio in Teams every sodding day.
10: well, dur.
Extra things I'd like:
A: KEYBOARD CONTROL OF WORKSPACES!! Yes I can flit back and forth across the varios workspaces setup to my hearts content... SO WHY CAN'T I MOVE APPS WITHOUT THE MOUSE?!?!
B: Notifications I can re-find after they've been "acknowledged" in the OS popup which disappears the instant my eyes flick to it, so I a) can't read the notification or b) I click it and then it's NOT in the manually dragged out "Notifications" modal.