if there's open source code in there..
..there's a non-zero chance there may be some closed source code as well. Quick, someone contact SCO.
339 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Apr 2010
1 - Doom wasn't truly 3D. There was a Z axis, but it wasn't utilized as an input, nor was it able to allow overlapping floors on a map.
2 - A mouse was not used for game input, so the brain not knowing of the device wouldn't matter.
3 - Unrelated to the article, but given it can play Doom can it also map a non-soundblaster16 card in a way that the game can output to it?
Reminds me of an old pickup truck I owned in my youth. Rusty rotor cut right through the pad, the backing plate and into the piston surface. I'd grown so used to the noise that I didn't bother to check until it went from squawking to crunching. Many hours of dirt-backlot repairs later a lesson was learned.
Interesting. I've no MS account on my win10 machines and only use limited accounts. I did notice one of those rigs tried to turn copilot back on despite my previous efforts to eliminate it completely. However neither has exhibited any other ill effects. Might have dodged a bullet there.
2008? Panasonic 42" ips screen. Dumb as dirt and still going strong. The thing has lasted longer than my refrigerator.
I've zero need for a smart TV, and while a resolution better than 1080 would be nice, it's not required, and ips still looks good enough for my eyesight so buying any new kit is not something I have on the budget.
People tend to forget that last bit. Same way they forget that a female nipple is just a food dispenser for infants. We're a very odd species to abstract away our own biology to this extreme.
(Also, blending fabrics is a crime under biblical law. We're already born in sin, no need to compound it.)
Obsolescence is the end goal. They've learned from cellphones that if you glue the battery in well enough nobody will bother replacing it, this is the natural evolution of that line of thought.
Next stop will be container based housing, where you can enjoy the dubious benefit of being able to quickly swap out your entire home when the faucet leaks.
You make the most valid point about 'AI' right there. It cannot learn therefore it cannot be intelligent in any way. A Xerox copier is just as capable of producing imitations of the things fed to it, it could even modify the content in pseudo-random ways if the toner was on it's way out, but you'd be hard pressed to label the thing as 'intelligent'.
Before any glimmer of intellect can be attributed to these things, there needs to first be a 'living' model that constantly adjusts it's data and weights according to interactions. Training a new model every time there's new data is not only wasteful, it's pointless.
The core concept is not wrong there. There are billions of humans on Earth. There are very few actual people.
I personally am just one of the tiny, and infinitely replaceable, cogs that make up the background noise of humanity. It's quote comfortable once you know where you stand.
But of course it did that. Not even the image specific machines can actually tell you what an image is about, only what pre-defined tags it is able to recognise. They cannot see the whole image AS a whole image. Show it an apple and 90% of the time it'll tell you that's an apple, not that the apple is accidentally in the dairy section of the store.
That an automated guessing engine cannot fully grasp the idea of QR codes is not a surprise.