
Sounds ghastly, doesn’t it?
Computers now with Genuine People Personalities.
Icon, because I need to drink several of these, the world’s clearly ending.
4418 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2010
@Ian J
Hmm. That’s puzzling. In my experience Firefox, when I give in and close it to finish its update, automatically saves the state of however many tabs I have open, and invariably restores them when the new version launches.
So I only lose a few seconds of time (which is why I said “irrational” in my original comment :) …) but fortunately no work.
I wonder if I’m just missing something? Or if you had some extension(s) installed that were interfering with the auto-tab-save mechanism?
Running Firefox here on Mint. Does anyone else get irrationally annoyed when FF has been updated via Update Manager, and then refuses to open new tabs until it's been closed & restarted to finish its update - or is it just me?
Yes, yes, logically I know why it refuses to spawn new tab processes mid-way through its update, but it still irks me cos it interrupts my workflow.
Liam: It's about making stuff easier, for maintainers and for users, at the cost of some disk space.
That, on the face of it, is not a bad thing.
In a world where storage space is way cheaper per byte, and more capacious - and security is far more of a headache - than in *nix's formative decades, this does seem to be a reasonable trade-off, I'll semi-grudgingly agree.
Similar and from 80 years ago…
https://magazine.punch.co.uk/image/I0000oS38YV8ZmfY
(Sadly, Punch have taken to putting an obnoxious watermark over their archived cartoons now - I have the unmarked version saved locally, but this is the only online one I could find with a cursory search from my phone)
Well, I seem to recall reading an interview with Andy Green a few years ago, and him saying that there's a fair bit more to it than that. Less of it is computer-automated than you might think. The driver has to be closely monitoring the throttle and the airflow surfaces, lest the vehicle go airborne, at which point he's (briefly) not a driver but a pilot.
Oh and even the "flat" surfaces they're planning to use aren't really "flat" to a metal-wheeled vehicle travelling at 1000mph. Even a small pebble could unsettle the car.
Just set up a PiHole on your LAN and configure your router to point to it as the local DNS server when handing out DHCP leases. Job done, your wife will see fewer ads and you won’t have to touch her machine - well, unless her browser has DNS-over-HTTPS enabled (AKA Cloudflare’s end-run around PiHole) :)
One of my favourite things about hanging out on these forums, is learning about new software that's escaped my notice.
Thanks for the pointer to OpenMediaVault - I have to build a NAS for a friend soon and that might just be the ticket. Was going to use Linux Mint, but OMV looks like it'll require him to do less tinkering with the oily bits.
Have a pint.
The companies named in the article will promptly pay up and move into more virtuous business models.
They absolutely won’t just declare bankruptcy and sell all their assets & customer lists for a nominal sum to newly-registered, almost-identically named companies that coincidentally share the same principal directors. No way.
...I'm shocked, shocked! by this... and knowing the robust precedents set by previous antitrust cases, I look forward to my compensation of a $0.50 money-off voucher for XYWHUYR-brand Chinese melamine-enhanced parakeet feed when the case grinds to its eventual conclusion.
Cylinder? From space, you say? Can’t believe I’m the only one to think of this…
“Suddenly the top of the cylinder began moving, rotating, unscrewing. Ogilvy feared there was a man inside trying to escape. He rushed to the cylinder but the intense heat stopped him before he could burn himself on the metal…”
>a washing machine processor sounds pretty adequate.
The first space vessel ever that orbits the Earth thirty times in one direction, then stops abruptly and orbits three times in the other direction, then sits motionless in LEO for ten minutes whirring, and then finally plays a jaunty little tune and unlocks the capsule door.
No, really.
Given that social media in general - and Twitter in particular - is a plague on society, good manners, reasonable debate and civility… his selfless efforts to turn it into an x social-network (see what I did there?) must be applauded.
Can we persuade him, and his investor backers who clearly hate having so much money, to buy Facebook next and burn that to the ground, too?
As 2 people at time of writing this have downvoted you but no-one's bothered to explain... no, this isn't HTTPS, which is entirely different.
HTTPS is encryption of the traffic between your endpoint and the website you're viewing.
DoH, by contrast, is sending all your DNS requests over HTTPS to a "trusted" DNS provider, instead of in plaintext to your ISP's own DNS servers.
The touted advantage is that a) your ISP doesn't get to see which site addresses you're looking up, and b) your DNS queries can't be MITM'ed.
The entirely accidental advantage - albeit not for you, the end-user - is that whoever you've chosen as your "trusted" DNS provider now gets all your DNS lookup traffic instead. Cloudflare (and Google, I believe but I might be wrong - see disclaimer below) have, out of the goodness of their hearts, been early movers for providing DoH services.
In many markets, Firefox auto-enables DoH out of the box and routes everything to Cloudflare - a choice I don't agree with, but YMMV.
(If there are gaps in the above explanation, full disclosure - I have never enabled DoH or indeed checked out alternative providers, and my preferred browser is Firefox.)