how "incredibly hard" it is to create great software
Quote: Having opened his post by musing about how "incredibly hard" it is to create great software
In fact Wordpress is definitely not great software. Not at all.
364 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Sep 2009
I have tried Duckduckgo because I also dislike Google, but its search results were mostly under performing.
I usually search for technical information as I'm a linux sysadmin. I was baffled I could not find anything relevant on some topic (I don't remember what) so I tried Google again with the same query: first hit was the right one.
I sadly went back to Google, because it gets the job done better than DDG, at least for tech questions. Probably DDG is better in other scenarios.
It's the fact that you cannot say that you base line is shit, so you have to say that your base line is fine for the same job as the middle line.
Also, there is a difference between the PC given to the lower slave worker and the PC given to the middle manager.
Dell = slaves
Dell Pro = middle managers
Dell Pro Max Premium = C-levels
Apple something for the CEO
Every "difficult" wifi setup I have worked on has issues with client density and a full spectrum. Hotels and big halls and lounges usually have to manage a lot of clients in a small space, and on top of it, they usually are located in places where there are a lot of other users crowding up the available spectrum.
We don't need more speed, we really need a much more efficient way of using the spectrum and we really need a way to avoid the collapse of the whole system when it's over a certain load (the same issue that plagues almost every system that time shares the same medium since thin ethernet).
So maybe wifi8 is a step in the right direction, even if we will have to wait for the wifi7 cow to have been utterly squeezed and milked to death before the new cow (I mean, new standard) becomes available on the market.
And this is why PIRACY is our only hope. For every kind of "content" be it an ebook, a movie, music, or a game.
Copy and crack the software (if you can, that is "if it can be made to run locally") and you'll have it forever (or at least as long as you have a compatible hardware or emulator).
Is this morally wrong? Yes, it is, but only if there is a morally right way to have your software run as long as you like, like my old, pre-internet era games do (Quake, Doom, Diablo 1, Diablo 2), or having your content available FOREVER (like for example if you can pay for an ebook and download a LOCAL and without DRM version of it)
Otherwise it's morally right. Very right.
And if some software is completely cloud based, think about this fact before deciding if it's good for you or not. Maybe it can be good anyway, but just think of the implications of cloud-based software before making a decision.
No need for another init, really. No need becuase:
1- sysvinit works (workED because it's dead)
2- systemd has won the init wars, has become a global cancer, and no newcomer will succeed (*)
(*) at least until someone will manage to make a WORSE newcomer than systemd, then it wiil become the new standard. Maybe Oracle could try to outshit systemd?
I was a Devuan user, I have reverted back to Debian because nowadays anything that's not part of the standard Devuan repo NEEDS systemd, so no way to install third party software made for Debian/ubuntu on Devuan.
The lock-in is still present today, up to a point. But I think it's MS that rules the market and gives peanuts to its vassals (intel and amd) with the windows 11 forced PC replacement. Probably it was not so 30 years ago, but it's been like this since at least 20 years. Businesses need to run Windows, and Windows needs (well, needed) X86 or AMD64 cpus to run. Today windows can run on ARM, but it's a very marginal market anyway.
Mobile is a very different story but that ship has sailed for MS and Intel (and AMD) 20 years ago.
ipv6 is a mess. it has been made overly complicated, IMHO. And if you don't use NAT (NAT in V6, I mean) you'll end up having to renumber your entire LAN if you change provider (unless you own your own v6 netblock and have it routed through your current provider).
And anyway if you want your internet to work, you still NEED v4 until everyone else (100% of them) is on v6 too. And this statement says it all. Since everyone still needs v4, why bother configuring a dual stack solution?
Since I need v4 anyway, I just stick with it.
Now think of this and consider that "I" is everyone (service providers, content providers, users, etc) and you'll see why v4 will never go away and v6 will never reach 100% coverage.
Well, putting aside the actual risks related to a FSD that does not do what it promises, I'd like to point out that investors should be smarter and less gullible.
Here the issue is that when they see an occasion for big profit they just go for it without stopping to think "is it too good to be true? is it too risky?" Then they sue when they lose money on it.
Come on, it's like idiots who sue because coffee is hot.
Like... a BIOS? We had it, when IT was not such a shitshow.
We all know that UEFI is a pile of useless trash and that Secure Boot was invented to make sure that only windows would be able to boot (and then failed at that).
I'd really like to have old BIOS back.
You are right, of course. But at least check some decent software, not the worst AV software in the world. Have a look at NOD32 or F-secure.
Also, as a general rule, consider that every software that comes with a new computer is crap. Avoid it and find a different solution.
Yes, I hoped I coul manage to get my customers to use Chromium, but I see that the shit is deeply radicated into Chromium, not just Chrome.
And since every fucking web app nowadays requires Chrome (or Chromium-based browsers, maybe) then yes, Google has won and we are fucked.
I still use FF and linux and will continue as long as I can, but the ads war is lost, and to be honest it's been lost since years, not just today.
Nice but really overcomplicated and non practical. There are a lot of other simpler attacks, but it you are a hitman from some TLA maybe it's a really new way to make someone have an accident without anyone noticing, if you can drop your projecting machine and remove it without being seen or recorded by any person or surveillance camera along the road.
Microsoft is not so bad, it has a procedure for requesting delisting that works. If my domain or ip is listed (and it seems that they blacklist more or less everything) you get an error message that states what's wrong and how to solve the issue. You fill a short web form and you are delisted. Never had an issue with that. (Of course if you send spam you'll probably fool them once and then be blacklisted forever)
I have been managing mail servers for 20 years, and the only provider that makes me go crazy is Gmail. Everyone else is more or less fine or at least it answers your emails if there are issues.
PS: I don't like MS365 for a lot of other reasons, but their antispam service is not as bad as Gmail's.
Gmail is not email. Gmail is something similar to email, but different. Its "labels" system is non standard and IMAP clients do "more or less" work.
Also, their antispam rules are obscure and if you are "bad" in their eyes, like my domain is, there is NO WAY you can actually ask them what's wrong. You are just fucked.
My domain is a business one, used by one person (me). My mail server has never sent spam or even legit bulk mail. I have DMARC DKIM SPF and all of that is needed. I have no issues with every other email service IN THE WORLD. But gmail (the free version) files my emails in spam. At least the business version does not.
I hate Gmail.
"We do not use user data," Kardwell stressed to us. "We never have, and we never will. We take privacy and security very seriously. It's at the core of what we do globally."
Yes, of course. Your terms and conditions say the exact opposite of this, but we believe that you are indeed concerned about privacy and security and not about selling everything to everyone for AI training.
I know they are not "virtual" but actually "remote" desktops. I also know that they work for a 10 users org and not a 200 or 2000 users org. But they are really cheap, they work well, and for a small office they are just fine. And of course they have to be maintaned and updated and so on, but it's not such a big deal once windows update works and also the auto update on the other software (browsers and the accounting program they use) works.