So, is this the same EU
That decided it would be better for the consumer if more broadcasters competed for various football competitions (including the Premier League)? Funny, that.
1190 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2009
I judge it entirely on its utility. Can I get the Code Companion plugin for Vim to do a bit of grunt work using a small local model? Yes I can, and it's a small productivity gain. Can I get Nano Banana to produce an accurate infographic for a presentation? Absolutely. Some things work. Some things don't.
What is clear is that unlike the ghosts of AI past, AI present is here to stay in one form or another. Unlike the past, adoption in the present is pretty pervasive.
By 2030, TMSC's Gigafab Cluster in Arizona should be producing 2nm chips. Currently, yields are similar to those in Taiwan. Now imagine a world where not only are fewer chips being made, but those chips are made only in an increasingly protectionist US.
Plenty of other countries implemented ID without becoming totalitarian. Plenty of things were never required here. Until they were required. In fact, across the broad arc of human history, lots of things were considered tradition until they weren't. Drowning people accused of witchcraft, for example. I understand it is known as progress.
"As it stands, an AI PC is a solution looking for a problem. It will remain that way until a genuinely useful program/feature comes along that can actually utilise the NPU."
If I run asitop on my Mac, I see the NPUs fire into action if I do subject or sky selection in Lightroom or Photoshop, so they will be used for various things in the background.
"If there's no killer feature that can utilise the NPU and provide real-world benefit? What's the point in shelling out for an AI PC? At the moment, the only thing they've got is "future proofing"..."
Caveat: I have no idea if the same can be said for a PC. For example, running Ollama locally makes zero use of the NPU on the beefy corporate Lenovo that was recently handed to me. Co-Pilot doesn't seem to do anything locally.
This is very on point, so I'm surprised at the downvotes. Some of the responses fail to distinguish between the model doing the work (i.e. vibe coding, often with very lazy prompting) and answering simple, well-composed questions, which is what the best models actually do pretty well. People who use the technology well have already broken the problem down and are well on their way to a solution.
As for vibe-coding, we should be careful not to dismiss it, as the long-term danger it poses is real.
"The big concern, as Lewis states, is that other mobile providers will feel emboldened"
I wouldn't mind if EE did this. When I left BT Broadband earlier this year, I ported my number from the BT Mobile MVNO to EE without reading some of the small print*. It was the path of least resistance, but now it feels rather silly of me. As such, I wouldn't mind the opportunity to port out.
* 5G speeds capped unless you pay for an absurdly priced plan (and that's with SIM only), plus the daily charge they levy for roaming in Europe.
Back in caveman days, I had a dial-up and later broadband with AOL UK. I signed up for a service called iTunes because I bought an iPod, which gave me many years of happy bus commutes. I use that ID to sign into my iPad and MacBook. I don't think Apple allows changing the email address associated with an account.
"It's the only response any sensible person can have to Starmercards. Whether or not they're a world class arsehole.
Starmercards are going to be a form of internal passport that will underpin every aspect of our existence: buying fags, going to the pub, visiting a doctor, using the Internet, voting, getting on a train or a bus, going to a concert, visiting a supermarket, using a car park, buying a lotto ticket, borrowing a library book, etc, etc. You seem to think that dystopian Orwellian nightmare will be a Good Thing.
"Now there *might* be a case for a unified state-provided ID scheme along the lines of the one used in Ireland. But that's not the snake-oil arsehole Starmer and his pond life are selling. They want cradle to grave, all-pervasive unavoidable monitoring of everyone, everywhere. Without getting any sort of public consensus or democratic approval for that. And lie about all of it. Fuck 'em.
We didn't vote for any of this shit. Which means there's no democratic mandate for Starmercards and the mother of all databases behind them."
Starmercards? FFS sake grow up.
You've just argued for a robust, government issued photo ID system. Your passport can be removed if the authorities deem you a flight risk. Your driving licence can be taken away if you are caught being an arsehole behind the wheel. Your gun licence can be revoked if you are diagnosed a bloody maniac. Try identifying yourself without any of those.
We live in a country where you have no fundamental right to robustly identify yourself. Yet whenever a government tries to introduce ID, Britain's world class arseholes scream Nazi.
That headline has literally turned me into a gullible idiot who will believe anything.
I left an item on a plane this week and getting it back has proved fraught/unlikely. My calls are met with AI answers - the modern equivalent of "compu-ah sais no".
BTW, a colleague did use Co-Pilot to write his resignation email. It's quite good at those.
That gets an up-vote from me, and I'm probably one of the bigger users of AI on the team I work on (mainly as an alternative to Google search). Asking students to get AI to write the code for them shows a frightening lack of self awareness on the part of management*.
* But then again, we are talking the kind of blithering idiots who think AI is a great way to not need junior engineers anymore.
I did recently see what seemed to a reasonably well researched vid on YouTube about Amazon's working culture. It essentially boiled down to not encouraging employees to work for them long enough for the stock options to mature. It's on a pretty long list of employers I would avoid (in no small part thanks to El Reg's journalism over the years).
In the US, they're the FAANG of last resort for engineering talent (and that's saying something, bearing in mind Meta is on the list).
Icon? Let's just say the water don't taste like what it ought-a here. Cheers.
I think that was more about Apple Intelligence than the Mac's ability to run local LLMs (which they do very well within their memory limitations - the latest models all max out at 32Gb - the M5 Pro and Max have not yet been announced).
"As The Reg has mentioned previously, to pass the legislation, EU leaders need support from nations representing the majority of the member-state bloc's population – which is why Germany's is a key player."
I thought it needed to be unanimous. Anyway, if I'm wrong, I hope Germany succeeds. Otherwise, there will be no WhatsApp, Signal or Telegram in the EU (though a useful idiot in an Oval Office might have something to say about that).
The vast majority of people who use LLMs to do the work for them haven't been trained in using them. They have no idea what the strengths and weaknesses of the technology are. Most don't know how to prompt effectively. In some cases, they won't have enough enough of a foundation in the subject matter at hand to critically evaluate the outputs. Some will be feeding business data and proprietary information into public LLMs with no thought as to how it might benefit the AI businesses and harm their own.
We risk shirking on a scale that leads to disaster.
“we've completed our own internal review of this incident and are confident that there wasn't an issue with the drones or the technology that supports them”
I'd love to see Boing get away with that line. Then again, this is one of the so-called FAANGs that seem to dance to their own laws.
That seems reasonable. IF they have a valid claim to be seeking asylum here. I don't think it should fully apply to people coming over on Farage Boats, who should be subject to some form of detention in the first instance*. They broke the law to be here after illegally crossing multiple borders, including ours.
* Mahmood's plan to use former military property sounds pretty reasonable, but they'll still need to sort out healthcare, education and so on, which will upset the Reform types out there.
Anyone lucky enough to look under the age of twenty-five is routinely asked for ID if they want to have a drink on a night out or buy any age-restricted item at a supermarket. That means a passport, driving license, or third-party digital ID, which may or may not be accepted at any given establishment. This is somewhat bigger than your occasional job hopping.
As for what the government says it's for, vs. what people use it for, I'll wait for the relevant legislation (either that or wait for the government to employ a director of communications who doesn't have the communications skills of an albatross). If, like the voter ID card, this turns out to be a form of ID that can be used for one thing only, I'll be the first to call the government out on it.
It's not really convenient to carry a passport. I'm surprised so many people keep their driving licences in their wallets, bearing in mind there is no legal requirement to do so. Passports and driving licences get lost or stolen, and it can take days or weeks to replace them. Phones are stolen and can be replaced (along with digital wallets, banking apps and so on) within hours. A stolen British passport sells on the black market for between £500 and £750. A stolen phone is sent to China for parts because encrypted/locked devices are unusable to anyone but the legitimate owner.
As long as your mother is happy with the bank account opened many moons ago, she should not need ID (which is going to be mandatory BTW). Anyone who needs to open a bank account right now will find it easier with a photo ID. It's not impossible (unless it's an online-only bank like Revolut), but it won't get any easier.
Ahh, yes, the Tory voter suppression scheme. They did at least make a free form of photo ID available for people without a Passport, Driving Licence or Gun Licence. One that could only be used for exactly one purpose. Funny, that.
I get the sense the opposition is opposing Digital ID for the sake of opposing Digital ID. If it is rolled out by the next election and people are already using it to help open bank accounts and gain entry to nightclubs (if lucky enough to appear under 25), I don't think the next government will scrap it. If it is not rolled out before the next election, it will be made a major electoral issue about Labour turning us into the Stasi, the Nazis or both (or some bastard lovechild of the two).
I find it amusing that other countries roll out ID schemes, including digital, and manage not to turn into China. What makes Britain so special?
Anyone who doesn't drive, for example, has access to two forms of government photo ID (one of which is vanishingly rare):
- A passport.
- A gun licence.
Against that background, many will regard an extra form of ID as desirable/practical, and polling backs that up. Digital ID has the advantage that it should be faster to recover than a stolen driving licence or passport, but I think a backup should be made available to those who don't want to use their smartphones for this purpose (or don't own a smartphone).