I cannot upvote your comment as much as I would like to.
Unfortunately, I've encountered some individuals who are just as dysfunctional as these WD guys.
2982 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jan 2009
I wanted to put a nail in a wooden beam. What I found was a screwdriver. And then I've wasted four months trying to screw the nail into the beam.
To solve this problem, I've developed a meta screwdriver. It's still shite for hammering a nail in a beam but at least it's heavy enough that I actually make some progress.
Sorry, didn't read the article - what was it about?
MbO, because it makes sense, you know. Trying to find objectives for Sergeant X...
- Deliver high quality reports - it's too hard to measure.
- Adequately fulfill tasks x, y, z - nah, I'd need to actually understand what Sergeant X is doing.
- Improve process P and Q - what does improve even mean?
- Rate of key stroke - a machine can measure this. It's brilliant! This is it!!
"If you pay me for being present and awake, I will appear present and awake." Seriously, there are no other performance metrics, like, I don't know, maybe work done?!
Head of the PSD said, "It is extremely disappointing an officer has behaved in a way which could not only discredit the police force, but also undermine the public confidence in respect of our duties and responsibilities."
Maybe it is just me but their reasoning for dismissal I find considerably more extremely disappointing and undermining the police force's credibility than what Sergeant X did.
"No. You shall unconditionally love the USA.
If you don't and live in the USA: feck off! this place isn't for you. How dare you criticise this great nation, built by proper colonialist using slavery and stealing the land from natives.
If you don't and live abroad, the USA might bomb you. They may also do this even if you love them."
This is not a unique issue for the USA; I've heard similar shit around here, continental Europe, specifically when a descendant from recent immigrants dares to criticise the country they grew up and live in. But it seems a rather unique trait from so-called patriots, that more often than not seem to lean towards fascism.
I can't be bothered to dig out the studies now but I seem to remember that some research showed that from the set of suitable candidates*, a random choice to hire wasn't less successful than all the interview and assessment BS. That way you don't reject the unlucky ones, you choose The Lucky One.
* that is, after weeding out the rotten ones like fake applications or the MBA applying for an engineers' job.
I don't know what is...
Meat bags who understand the job, which is hired for. But it depends...
It's quite simple. Anything you consider key to your business, anything which distinguishes, differentiates your business from others, anything that gives your business a competitive edge: you do yourself. And "do yourself" means doing it inhouse with competent employees.
So, if you consider your staff a commodity, do not hesitate to delegate the candidate selection - heck, the whole hiring! - to some AI. On the other hand, if your staff is crucial for the business' prosperity, invest in a hiring process that selects the best matches for the job and do not try to cut corners with a mediocre procedure that is likely to dismiss good candidates.
I find that well known and oft cited soundbite to be utterly meaningless and redundant
I don't think it is meaningless nor redundant. But it's more difficult to clearly define "consequences" than what is already covered within criminal law for hate speech, instigating violence etc. For example, if I spread racist shit, which may still be within legal limits and not punishable, I might face consequences of losing my job, my reasonable friends, being rejected from doing business... and at least in my jurisdiction it will be difficult for the racist shit spreader to win an anti-discrimination law suit under this circumstances.
Fully agree.
Anyway, report to management and make it gets reported to authorities.
And yet, there might be a problem of evidence for such a threat (and other misconduct, too)... but if it hasn't been reported with authorities in the first place, there is no track record if something happens again and it will be more difficult for authorities to take appropriate action.
I might have told this story here before. Young me was trusted with walking a bunch of interns through the process of exposure, development and etching of PCBs. The setting: a lab containing some stinky chemicals and shielded from UV radiation to prevent accidental exposure of the PCBs. One of the interns asked whether we could open a window to let in some breathable air. Of course, we couldn't as this would not only let in fresh air but also UV radiation. Silly young me's response though was, no, for reasons of environmental protection we cannot let that air out into the open.
None of those poor interns was willing to join us.
And some time later, via an acquaintance, I was told that, apparently, my very company lets people work in hazardous environments without any protection. I knew that was rubbish because safety had truly been a core value of the company. But it took me quite a while to make the connection...
I get your point. But the difference is that the entity producing and selling the car (not necessarily selling directly to the customer) does indeed fully understand" how the car works. Whether the salesperson understands it, is irrelevant.
*Given the issues my car has with its entertainment system, I do wonder whether the manufacturer fully understands it. Well, it's a piece of software...
Instead of commenting to a random article, you've got more of a chance of being heard when you write them: contact El Reg
I'd be happy if only accountants were the problem. My struggle is, when I'm forced to futilely explain to a colleague that they cannot simply trust what comes out of a GenAI.
In Idiocracy, at least, if I remember correctly, they did recognise that there was a problem and tried to find someone who could help. We're not there.
That reminded me of the innocent fun I used to have with loosely (lousily?) protected Linux boxen at university. Remote logon to a fellow students machine and initiate shutdown with a ten second delay (or was it five, or three?) and watch and hear their reactions... No real damage done as all that was going on was students torturing C++ or vice versa. And it took an astonishing long time before someone figured to check the log...
I'm a thorough atheist but Jesus Freaking Christ! Some people here need to take their medication. Or get off the interwebs. Guys, it's not healthy to consume that amount of misinformation. It's enough that in real life I already have to deal with some "conspirationalised" people and some I like to call Putin's Suppositories.
And before one or both of you misinterprets my comment as a call for censorship, it is not. Feel free to continue posting whatever you want. As I feel free to comment on that the way I see fit.