Probably not. This is simply screaming "I've never had a girlfriend ever".
He may as well wear a shirt sponsored by Richard Branson.
1460 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Dec 2008
You would hope most parents would. However there is only a window of two months to make secondary applications and four and a half for primaries. Those periods are spelled out in law and we can't change them. In year applications such as when moving into the area work differently since clearly they can happen at any point.
In practice you'll have three basic categories of parent - perhaps a quarter will be eager and looking into this as soon as they are out of the maternity ward, half will need a reminder that it is time to put an application in and the remaining quarter need prodding and poking all the way. As a county we still have hundreds of children not in school and even prosecution doesn't always help.
Don't you think they do that? As well as sending sending letters through the post? Getting schools (and health visitors etc) to communicate with their parents? But there's a very real problem first: where do you get the email addresses from?
We have contact details for parents of children that are already in school and can identify children who need a secondary application made, but there is no guarantee those details are up to date - the county council education department isn't someone who you might instantly think of if your address, email or phone number changes, and it's of zero help from primary applications. There are various fragmentary sources we can use to mop up large numbers of parents but none are comprehensive.
Remember that any time there is a proposal for a centralised national identity scheme it gets shouted down and with good reasons. But it also means there isn't a single source of authoritiative data. Various government departments will have large peices of the jigsaw - the NHS, Child Benefit etc but that doesn't mean we can start idly rooting through their records. Ultimately there comes a point where the parent needs to make initial contact with us for us to become aware of them. That's want the publicity drives are for.
You have to put these things into context. I'm in local government and one of our big publicity drives over the last few months has been around getting parents to apply before the secondary and primary school deadlines for this September.
Every year there are dozens of appeals triggered by parents missing the deadline and thus going to the back of the queue. Given how tight school capacity is in large parts of the county the general result is a less than desirable offer.
I'm not aware of us having spent money with X specifically but each admission appeal costs well over £100 to handle. If it costs a few pence to get the message in front of a parent in advance and so they meet the deadline that's a difficult expense to argue against.
"double the productivity and impact of US research and development within a decade."
Relatively easy to do. All you need is 7.2% inflation over that period and in dollar terms your objective is met.
A trade war against the world and undermining the Fed's independence are great ways of ensuring that.
The primary motivation for lower voltage was cooling rather than signal effects. The original Pentium-60 and -66 at 5V were well known for running particularly hot. The Pentium-90 was the first at 3.3V and was a lot cooler. ISTR many (if not all) DX4-100 and (AMD) DX4-120s were 3.3V for the same reason.
I picked up a Series 5 a couple of months back with some nice extras, good collectors example.
I'll probably move it on, display is terrible. Contrast is poor and the backlight so weak you often can't decide if the minor difference with it on is worse than with it on. I only saw a couple of them when current but remember the display being much better, presumably age-related degradation.
Had a Newton MP2000 at the time myself, great machine. Backlight again faded over time but an aftermarket white backlight made it better than new. Pity I can't remember where I put it, it's the only machine I've ever had that can replace pen and paper and improve on them.
I never saw one IRL, but was shocked learning the first Apple Macintosh had a 9inch monitor.
I have a couple here, an SE/30 and a Classic II. The SE/30 is the fastest of the compact Macs even though the Classic II is more recent. With enough RAM and an ethernet adapter it makes a nice enough machine especially on A/UX which was pretty nifty for its time.
The built in tube with a 1 bit 512x342 resolution was low even for the time but at least was pin sharp compared to anything using a TV, especially with an RF modulator. In some ways black and white was actually preferable, since there were no issues over questionable dot pitch between colour sub-pixels.
why can't I keep using my modern one, that works absolutely fine
You can, and probably will, carry on doing so. The media have done a good job of getting this back to front - the copper is staying for now and it'll probably be many decades before everything is fibre. What is changing is the equipment on either end, the same copper line will now carry a digital signal rather than an analogue POTS one.
They'll replace the copper at some point in the future as part of a local refresh but the equipment in the exchange is being updated over a much shorter timescale. Putting everyone on digital simplifies the equipment there and potentially allows greater speed over those same lines in the medium term, as backwards compatibility with POTS equipment and signalling does not need to be considered.
No, not craters.
Just a gas leak that caused an estimated 16,000 deaths. Yes, Union Carbide is part of Dow now.
Fortunately they were Indian and thus apparently don't matter.
Payments out? Still website only.
It's 2026 ffs.
That sounds ideal to me. I hate those words "you can use our app for this..."
Particularly when it is functionality that works fine on the desktop website but is mysteriously not possible on the mobile site. Yes I may be using a phone instead of a desktop today but that isn't an excuse: if you demand I install an app I am forced to conclude it is for nefarious purposes that my web browser would block for security reasons.
It's 2026? Yes, that's exactly why I maintain the above.
Yes those seem to be caught up too. If everyone was rational and shill bidding was taken seriously it wouldn't make any difference. However neither of those is true. People do get carried away and bid more than they originally intended and blatant shills and bid retractions do not get actioned even when reported.
Another use is for bid groups - I want an X, here's eight current listings - bid up to £a on that one, £b on that, £c on that one until you win one for me. Incredibly useful and avoids you getting carried away on individual auctions when there are plenty of options available.
I love this feature. It is the fastest way to copy paste with mouse selection.
Of course it is, because it pastes the text al opposed to the text+formatting which when taken from another source will almost certainly not match the document you are writing.
Presumably whoever decided that would be the default will end up in the same part of hell as the chap proposing this new misfeature.
They favor military spending because our constitution allows them to do that. Feeding, clothing or educating aren't really things that our constitution intended for them to do.
The US Founding Fathers were against the establishment of a standing army, indeed they observed that most coups against established civil power either originated in or are contingent on the military. This is why there is a constitutional bar on defence appropriations for more than two years at a time, but not for any other form of spending - the government can raise an army as needed, but it wasn't intended to be on an ongoing basis.
It is also where those second amendment rights to arms come from. In a country without a regular army the ability to raise a militia for the protection of the state becomes a sensible safeguard. It was not as frequently portrayed for protection from the state, which is the goal of all the other clauses in the constitution.
Arguably the split went ahead At the beginning of the 90s IBM were a one stop shop - You could have an IBM base unit coupled to an IBM monitor and IBM printer. Inside the base unit was an IBM processor and an IBM hard drive, and it was running an IBM OS. They don't do any of that now, bits have been split off as new entities (Lexmark) or sold off as unprofitable (HGST, Lenovo). IBM is now a services company with a sideline in big iron, they are a shadow of what they were.
That only really works for the joyriders.
A professional thief won't give a Ferrari, Bentley or whatever a second glance, they are far too niche and attract far too much attention.
Much better to grab something mass market and anonymous, much easier to pass off under a cloned identity, or break up and shift as parts.
Please, please, go away and read up about what you wish to pontificate about.
The Tivoization controversy has absolutely nothing to do with aggregation as even 30 seconds of research would have shown you. Rather it was about digital signing. An executable image for the device needs to be signed with a secret key. Without the key you can't correctly sign the image and the hardware will refuse to run it.
Thus, no you can't create your own valid executable and yes, GPL2 does nothing to prohibit that.
No it is something allowed, not when creating the executable but when allowing it to be installed or executed.
Since you are clearly keen on spouting the terms of the GPL try reading it, and also the surrounding controversy around "Tivoization" when GPL3 was being drafted. The text is there in black and white and does not change according to what you want it to say.
It is not well known that Linux has a hard dependency on GNU code via GNU bison etc.
I will freely admit I'm not overly well versed in modern Linux but I'm struggling to think of anywhere a Unix-style kernel could make use of a parser generator, whether that be Bison or a generic Yacc. The shell and various other interpreters and compilers forming part of the distribution, sure, but not the kernel itself which you specifically restricted this to.