Re: Scene
What's next, OpenClippy in the spirit of OpenClaw?
41 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Apr 2024
I've been doing this for years. It is also amusing to discover links between company brands when they share the email address internally.
To finesse the scheme I also use a prefix to determine which mailbox should receive it, so a.<company>@<domain> and b.<company>@<domain> are different mailboxes.
I see that too. "Try looking in the settings for <whatever> and change it there". It's a good place to look, I've looked there already myself, and if the software had implemented it that's where it would logically be. It seems its memory of settings pages is as bad as mine. If you ask an ai with an agent like comet to then show you the page, it gets all confused and accuses me of having heard a rumour.
I find it quite good for asking about a subject where I don't know the right words to express the problem. The ability to refine the query with follow-on questions is invaluable when you['re not quite sure what you should be searching for. The other way I use it is to tidy up a messy piece of text I've written, where it is checking for accuracy, consistency and redundancy, not providing original input.
I am waiting for LLMs that can look at their own output, judge it against the original criteria, and iterate until it can give you a not-obviously-incorrect answer. I asked perplexity when this might happen and it said "they're working on it". To me it seems like an obvious next step; it's what I do all the time after all.
Apply this to coding and you get an agent that can write much better code - either by running it on a real environment or by performing (the lost art of) a dry run, then fixing any errors found. Hopefully it can then learn from the corrections it had to make, and become a better "works first time" coder, the ultimate stage of englightenment for a programmer.
We tried to use it - the shining star hope was that we could reverse engineer the existing code and modify it in graphical form, then regenerate working, modified, code. Trouble is, it never quite managed to get all the subtleties of the existing codebase to successfully round-trip it. Doing it graphical-ui-first was similarly cumbersome. And then the language evolved, and the UI was forever a few years behind the curve, forcing a load of manual overrides into the model. Eventually the struggle of trying to keep up became just too much and we abandoned it. I tried the uml modelling in visio too, and it was interesting for gnerating diagrams from the code but eventually got canned by MS anyway.
I think that was the fate of all these "diagram first" or "diagram round trip" efforts; they could never keep up with the language itself or accurately express the subtleties of the language and environment, which is why the only offerings that survived are the "I'll parse your source and draw a diagram". Useful, certainly, but code-first appears now to be king. Templates, code generators and LLMs can feed into the start of this chain, but the days of graphical tools that generate code seem to be over.
yes, but do you remember how much car theft was reduced when decent loocks and immobilisers became standard? Making it harder cools the whole ecosystem, even if it isn't a magic bullet that stops it entirely.
According to perplexity, "The standardisation of electronic immobilisers and improved locking systems has led to a dramatic reduction in car theft—by about 40–50% in the years following their widespread adoption, and by over 80% in the UK over two decades."
I still can't shake the feeling that requiring the TPM is a trojan horse tactic. Once every PC is running windows with a TPM, the screws will be turned, signed drivers will be a non-negotiable requirement, and anything not approved by Microsoft can be hard blocked. It feels like a move to be more like Apple where you don't really control your own device any more.
If only there was some way the formatting style could be saved along with the files themselves, then every editor would be able to convert whatever keystrokes you use into the preferred representation for saving. Some sort of platform-independent editor config file perhaps?
Every (decent) code editor in existence can support .editorconfig and it makes the code look consistent whoever edits it. I find myself writing custom editorconfig files for all sorts of imported projects, just to preserve their historical, sometimes arcane, tab/space conventions.
According to BBC scam interceptors program, establishing a remote connection to the phone with e.g. anydesk is a fairly standard part of the script. OTP authenticators on a phone can be set to require a fingerprint before they generate the code; this is much harder to obtain without the local user's interaction and unlikely to be enforceable on a pc. The scammers then presumably use social engineering to bully the user into providing it anyway, but it gives the bank a plausible excuse to claim the user is culpable.
According to grammarly, retch is a verb that means “to vomit,” and wretch is a noun that means “an unhappy or unlucky person." Even Merriam Webster agrees with this UK speaker that they are separate words with different meanings. The sense here is definitely retching.
I use comskip on recordings, which detects adverts and generates a cut list so the player automatically jumps them. It's getting a bit long in the tooth though, and some broadcasters have learnt how to game the clues it uses to decide. Sounds like a perfect problem for deep learning; has anyone done one that can be used?