Re: Driving home for Christmas
LOL. Just watched that one last night!
249 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Sep 2023
> Intel processors are just not very fast.
And that's a load of hooey. My ultrabook's Intel chip is faster (higher clock speed by half a GHz) than my friend's M3 Max. It has more cores, too. The only thing it doesn't compete on is power consumption, but oh well. Once Linux is fully ported to the ARM notebooks Apple makes, they might even be usable!
Sweeping generalizations generally don't add anything to the argument.
> ...it's difficult not to connect the company's breathtaking launch pace and acceleration with the emergence of some quality issues...
A 0.495% (99.505% success) chance of loss of cargo is phenomenal—Soyuz has launched 1800 times, and has a ~5% chance of failure. The recent incidents aren't quality issues. Space is hard. The fact that SpaceX's teams have achieved this reliability is a testament to their gold-standard quality control practices.
Mathematics and compsci students at my university (Texas, USA) have a requirement and an option, respectively, of writing an undergraduate thesis on some topic of mutual interest to them and the advisor. Undergraduate research is also a requirement for honors—seniors from all disciplines but nursing would do that in their last two semesters.
> No sane person could claim that currently shipping RISC-V is as fast as currently-shipping Arm. It's just not even close.
And why should it be? There's no reason to tape out multi-GHz 32-core RISC-V CPUs. Who would buy them? It'll take years for the adoption to happen.
The point is that some company *could* do it if they wanted—ARM isn't somehow inherently faster than RISC-V. That's like claiming one API definition is faster than another. Definitions don't have a speed. Implementations do.
Oldest continuously-functioning representative government on the planet, unless you actually count the UK since its last civil war and the Interregnum. You're pretty bad at history!
Some examples: the Fifth French Republic was established in 1958. Most other European countries' governments are in the same boat. Germany was reunified in 1990. The Netherlands changed hands like a hot potato, and Spain was effectively fascist until the 70s. Poland was communist, Eastern Europe was under the USSR's thumb, and Italy couldn't make up its mind on whether it was Maoist, Socialist, Neofascist, or sane.
Any long-lived national government I'm missing? No? Didn't think so.
It's the second-oldest continuously-sitting government on Earth (after GB's) and the oldest republic.
My favorite period in history is the Cinquecento, BTW. We also happen to have the finest technical and liberal-arts universities in the world, so you really can't make fun of the United States on that front. It's modern Europeans that are ignorant of history—that's why they keep repeating it.
This was a great article; I didn't realize El Reg was running a funnies section now. Particularly liked this. ^^^
Some more memorable jokes from the repo:
> "Fil-C uses a pointer representation that is a 16-byte atomic tuple..."
Yeah, because we can write operating systems using atomics everywhere. Totally no overhead involved.
> "All allocations are garbage collected using FUGC (Fil's Unbelievable Garbage Collector)."
What!? JavaOS hasn't died yet? Look, if you need a GC'ed memory-safe language, it's called Go. Way better concurrency and everything. Just don't try to use either in embedded systems or mission-critical stuff like flight control software.
> "There's no unsafe keyword."
No, because you've just recreated Java with C syntax. Try compiling the Linux kernel with this; LMK how far you get.
Hehe. I remember a video of some five-year-old giggling uncontrollably at Putin's name—he had a little electronic globe that announced facts about the country you selected, and one was the head of state.
I don't know about the commie states in the Union, but we're doing fine here in Texas. Eighth-largest economy in the world, and all. Wouldn't say the same for Houston, though. Those guys are commies, too.
Also, the White House is currently full of sh*t, and the election won't change that, no matter who wins.
We deliberately do not have a fast-moving government. If the government were to suddenly become efficient, with a fixed direction and policy, we'd be toast.
As it is, the government's response time is considerably longer than that of the press and public opinion. I pray it stays that way.