The Register

Topics

Security

Security

All Security Cyber-crime Patches Research CSO

Off-Prem

Off-Prem

All Off-Prem Edge + IoT Channel PaaS + IaaS SaaS

On-Prem

On-Prem

All On-Prem Systems Storage Networks HPC Personal Tech CxO Public Sector

Software

Software

All Software AI + ML Applications Databases DevOps OSes Virtualization

Offbeat

Offbeat

All Offbeat Debates Columnists Science Geek's Guide BOFH Legal Bootnotes Site News About Us

Special Features

Special Features

All Special Features Nvidia GTC Agentic AI The Future of the Datacenter AWS Re:invent SC25 Supercomputing Month

Vendor Voice

Vendor Voice

Vendor Voice

All Vendor Voice AWS Capgemini Money Movement Hub ZTE Nutanix: Scale Kubernetes. Not Chaos. Amazon Web Services (AWS) New Horizon in Cloud Computing

Resources

Resources

Whitepapers Webinars & Events Newsletters

User topics

Article topics

Reply to post: Re: Alexa, please explain...

Hardware barn denies that .004 seconds of facial recognition violated privacy

Tuesday 19th November 2024 17:24 GMT JoeCool

Re: Alexa, please explain...

"No Harm No Foul" is not an actual legal concept, at least where it comes to privacy and the breaking of those laws.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

Email

Your email address is never published

Password

Forgotten password ?

Remember me on this computer? Post anonymously?

Enter your comment
Add an icon

Title

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

None

The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT

About Us

Contact us
Advertise with us
Who we are

Our Websites

The Next Platform
DevClass
Blocks and Files

Your Privacy

Cookies Policy
Privacy Policy
Ts & Cs
Do not sell my personal information

Situation Publishing

Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025