Archive for the ‘art’ Category

The Brooklyn Bridge casts a mesmerizing magic spell over the city in this early 1900s painting

November 25, 2024

Since opening in 1883, the Brooklyn Bridge has been captured in paintings, photographs, and illustrations by scores of artists, each rendering the Bridge’s beauty and power in their own way.

But it’s the poetic, enchanting Brooklyn Bridge depicted by Johann Berthelsen, which he titled “New York Skyline From the Brooklyn Navy Yard,” that I find most mesmerizing.

Born in Denmark the same year as the Bridge was completed, Berthelsen moved to the Midwest in 1890. He studied voice and became an opera singer, but after relocating to New York in the 1920s he decided to pursue painting. By the 1930s, he’d sold several works and was building a reputation as a powerful Impressionist painter.

I’m not sure when Berthelsen painted this nocturne of the Brooklyn Bridge. Considering the heights of the Manhattan-side buildings and the electric lights almost twinkling from their many windows, I would guess the 1920s.

It’s a transfixing collage of color and light, just like New York at street level. I can’t take my eyes off the graceful, flowing bridge span that bisects the painting, separating the towering buildings, piers, and ship traffic from the heavens above.

What John Sloan saw one Saturday night outside a butcher shop on Bleecker Street

November 11, 2024

Maybe it’s a holiday evening, or perhaps the bright corner street lamp makes late-day shopping easier for these mostly faceless residents of Greenwich Village.

Whatever the reason, there’s a line outside this corner meat market, with customers eyeing the goods while others gather outside a dry goods shop, its entrance also illuminated in the night.

“Bleecker Street, Saturday Night” is a 1918 painting by John Sloan. Born in Pennsylvania, Sloan by this time was a Village denizen who famously depicted the ordinary street life of his new neighborhood—from the flower vendors on Sixth Avenue to the rush of the elevated train and crowds of commuters scurrying under the track.

There’s a lot going on in this highly detailed image. Sloan introduces us to a cross-section of people, from young children to older adults, all going about their lives amid the Belgian block pavement and wood and brick buildings of a corner I wish I could identify. The rooftops get higher from right to left, shifting the perspective. The open basement doors add more drama.

“Bleecker Street, Saturday Night” is part of the collection at the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, which has this to say about it:

“When Sloan painted this scene, the city was undergoing rapid change. Residents navigated the streets and shops late into the evening hours thanks to the recent introduction of electric lighting. New construction projects led to buildings, such as the white one pictured here, getting partially or fully demolished. The painting represents both what once was and the inevitable change that comes with industrial development.”

A rich display of humanity on the grass and benches of Depression-era Tompkins Square Park

September 23, 2024

Gossipers, nappers, confidantes, playmates—Morris Shulman’s 1938 painting “Tompkins Square Park” is a stylized portrait of dozens of neighborhood characters congregating at this East Village park on a lush night in Depression-era Manhattan.

The vibrant palette and expressive faces are captivating. Mothers chat while tending to an unseen baby in a bassinet. A little girl in a yellow dress holds an ice cream pop. A fellow in forgotten-man garb sits with his chin tucked into his chest, seemingly asleep.

Born in 1912, Shulman came to New York in the 1930s to study at the National Academy of Design, the Art Students League, and Hans Hofmann School of Art, according to incollect.com. Perhaps best known for his postwar works of Abstract Expressionism, he taught at many schools around the city, including the Brooklyn Museum School and the School of Visual Art.

Much about Shulman’s life and work is unknown to me. But at some point, this visual storyteller made his way to Tompkins Square Park and created an almost folk art–like tapestry of humanity sharing the grass and benches of one of New York’s oldest green spaces.

It’s part of the collection at the Jewish Museum.

The beautiful widowed heiress who may have been the model for the Statue of Liberty

September 23, 2024

When the Statue of Liberty was unveiled in New York Harbor on the rain-soaked afternoon of October 28, 1886, enormous crowds of New Yorkers attending the ceremony on Bedloe’s (now Liberty) Island or watching from the Battery cheered with delight.

But soon after the French flag covering Lady Liberty’s face was removed and her features revealed to the world, New Yorkers began wondering: who was the inspiration behind the statue’s face?

The general consensus is that French sculptor Frederic-Auguste Bartholdi—who had spent two decades creating and completing the statue he described as “the dream of my life”—modeled the sturdy jawline and determined expression after that of his mother (above).

Bartholdi (above, in 1886) apparently revealed this in 1876 to a colleague in France, according to The Statue of Liberty Encyclopedia, by Barry Moreno.

But other ideas abound: the face is that of the Roman goddess Libertas, an Egyptian peasant, even an unnamed man.

But one intriguing theory has it that Bartholdi based the statue’s face on that of a French-English widowed heiress, Isabella Boyer, who was considered one of the most beautiful women in the world in the late 19th century.

Boyer, born in 1841 in Paris, relocated to New York in 1863 when she was 22 to marry Isaac Merritt Singer, the founder of the Singer Sewing Machine Company. Singer, 52 years old at the time, gained fortune and fame after he improved the functionality and accessibility of home sewing machines.

For 12 years, Boyer lived in New York as Singer’s wife and the mother of six of his children. (Singer had 24 children by five women during his lifetime, so he was quite a player.) In 1875, Singer died. Her share of his estate made her rich in her own right.

Boyer (below) moved to England with her children after Singer’s death. But apparently she returned to Paris at some point, as this is where she met Bartholdi, according to Christopher Winn, author of I Never Knew That About New York.

What was their romance like, and how long did it last? The details are a mystery. And based on the only authentic photo of Boyer I could find, it’s not exactly obvious that she really was the inspiration for the statue’s strong, almost stern facial features.

But it’s a romantic idea—and the possibility that Lady Liberty’s face was based on that of a woman the sculptor loved broadens the backstory of this icon of freedom.

[Top and second photos: Musee Bartholdi; third photo: Edward Moran via Wikipedia; fourth image: unknown; fifth photo: Wikipedia]

An 1870s painter from Queens captures the stark reality of “the way the city is built”

September 16, 2024

Charles Henry Miller didn’t intend to devote his life to painting. Born in 1842 in Gotham, he studied art but graduated from New York Homeopathic Medical College and found work as a ship’s surgeon.

Two failed mutinies during his first voyage on a Liverpool-bound ship made him reconsider his professional direction. While in England he visited European art museums, prompting him to abandon medicine for a career as an artist.

Miller became known for his lush, dreamy pastoral landscapes of a then-rural Queens, where he lived much of his adult life—earning the title “the artistic developer of the little continent of Long Island” from American poet and travel writer Bayard Taylor.

But in 1877 he apparently took a trip across the East River to the district of Harlem, which was beginning its transformation from rural country to urban city. Miller (below right) captured in stark detail a scene hardly uncommon in the burgeoning New York of the era: workers getting ready to tear down a cottage on top of a hill, ostensibly to construct multi-family tenements.

“Charles Miller had a preservationist’s interest in the historic buildings and landmarks that were rapidly disappearing throughout New York and Long Island,” states the Brooklyn Museum, which has this painting, plainly titled “The Way the City Is Built,” in its collection.

“This Harlem scene represents the modern urban landscape in transition: a hill on which stands an old cottage is being razed for the construction of more multistory tenements like the ones at right.”

New York has always been a “pull down and build over again” town, as Walt Whitman put it when describing the 1840s. But there’s more to Miller’s painting than the disappearance of spacious countryside in favor of tightly packed cityscape.

The painting highlights the contrast between the two worlds that co-existed in the late 19th century: the men in the ravine with their primitive tools and horse carts working together as beasts of burden—and then modern civilization towering before them. The future of New York belonged to the tenement builders.

[Top image: Brooklyn Museum; second image: New York Medical College]

The construction workers embossed in bronze on a 1929 Art Deco skyscraper’s elevators

September 2, 2024

There’s a lot to admire about the Fuller Building, the Art Deco masterpiece completed in 1929 on Madison Avenue and 57th Street.

Sleek, streamlined, and stylish, this bold new design heralded the skyscraper age of the 20th century.

It also transformed 57th Street into an east-west business and cultural artery, with the Fuller building as one of its premier towers.

But what I want to call out is the humanity of the Fuller Building—namely the respect the tower gives to the men who built it.

Each elevator door in the gleaming lobby features bas reliefs of overall-clad construction workers hoisting the blocks of granite that form the building’s base, hammering beams, securing steel, and plastering walls.

Few faces are shown. It’s more of a way to honor the tradesmen who put the plans of dreams of developers and architects into the cityscape, transforming the look of the skyline and the vantage point through which people saw the city.

The Fuller Building memorialized the workers who built it in another way: Elie Nadelman’s sculpture of two men in front of what looks like a skyline, flanking a clock (above).

I don’t know if Nadelman had a hand in the bronze reliefs on the elevators. But honoring these workers by putting them front and center in the lobby makes sense when you realize that the Fuller company was a construction company founded in Chicago by an architect, George Fuller.

Fuller and his company were behind some of New York’s first skyscrapers, including the Flatiron Building—originally called the Fuller Building when it opened in 1902.

It feels appropriate for Labor Day to post their images—the anonymous army of people who built and continue to build the city we live in.

[Fifth image: structurae.net]

A boarded-up Gothic church hangs on in what was once Manhattan’s Hungarian immigrant enclave

August 19, 2024

On a quiet Upper East Side block stands a lovely Gothic Revival church, its blond brick facade and copper steeples fitting in with beauty and symmetry amid its low-rise neighbors.

Former church, I should clarify. Though small crosses still grace the roof, the arched front entrance at 211 East 83rd Street between Second and Third Avenues is now boarded up; stained glass no longer fills the windows.

A resident across the street told me the church bell was recently removed. Religious artifacts and liturgical items were apparently taken away at night earlier this summer, per the New York Post.

This historic sanctuary—sold to a developer in April for $11.8 million, per East Side Feed, and now under threat of demolition—deserves better.

Its story begins in 1892, when the church was built for a German Lutheran congregation. A quarter of a century later, it became the home of the Church of St. Elizabeth of Hungary—just as many of New York’s Hungarian and Slovak immigrants were relocating from the Lower East Side and East Village to the less crowded tenements and storefronts of Yorkville.

St. Elizabeth’s Catholic church moved from Lower Manhattan to Yorkville (above, in 1940) with its congregants, leaving the original small church at 345 East Fourth Street for this four-story house of worship, which includes a rectory on the left.

The church was one of the foundations of the Hungarian community here. Since the early 20th century, thousands of Hungarian immigrants—who colonized “Little Hungary” around East 79th Street—shared Yorkville with Czech immigrants closer to East 72nd Street and German newcomers on and around East 86th Street.

As the number of church members began to dwindle toward the end of the 20th century, St. Elizabeth’s took on a new role. In 1980, it was designated by Cardinal Cooke as a congregation for deaf parishioners, with services conducted in sign language.

St. Elizabeth’s fortunes turned in 2014, when the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York announced it would close and merge with a neighboring parish, St. Monica’s on East 79th Street. (Another Hungarian congregation, St. Stephen’s on East 82nd Street, also merged with St. Monica’s.)

With the church sold and being emptied out, this pillar of a formerly vibrant immigrant community needs an angel. Neighborhood preservation group Friends of the Upper East Side Historic Districts is spearheading a campaign to have St. Elizabeth’s obtain landmark status, which could stop its destruction.

Click on the campaign link above or email [email protected] to find out more about keeping this sanctuary of loveliness and peace in the cityscape.

[Third image: NYC Department of Records & Information Services]

The blueish skies and orange glow of 1910 New York City at night

August 12, 2024

George Luks never shied away from the gritty side of Gotham, depicting honest, sometimes bleak moments in time amid the markets, tenements, docks, parks, and sidewalks of the city’s downtown slum and working-class districts.

I’d always thought of this early 20th century Ashcan School painter as one who focused primarily on people—using plays of light and dark to bring out the humanity of the shoppers, workers, beggars, onlookers, children, and others who go about their day along the streets.

So what to make of this 1910 image, New York City Nightscape? There’s no humans that I an see. The old and new buildings seem out of proportion, and blotchy blue-gray nighttime skies contrast with the almost flame-like yellow-orange glow from windows. The buildings in the forefront look like they’re on fire.

What is Luks telling us about the New York of 1910? I’m not sure, but the orange colors ablaze in the darkness are magnetic.

[Image: Greg Thompson Fine Art]

The changing social rules John Sloan captured in a Greenwich Village restaurant in 1912

July 15, 2024

Artist John Sloan enjoyed depicting the outside world of the Greenwich Village neighborhoods where he made his home and studio—painting women on rooftops, a flower vendor selling his wares, and a cat streaking across pristine snow in his apartment backyard, among others.

In 1912 he lent his talents to an indoor scene. Sloan lived on Perry Street at the time, and he was a frequent visitor of Renganeschi’s, an Italian restaurant inside an 1830s brick dwelling at 139 West Tenth Street.

Unlike many of the other Italian restaurants opening in the Village at the time, Renganeschi’s was described as “classier” but still “modestly priced,” according to Gerald W. McFarland’s Inside Greenwich Village.

“Renganeschi’s Saturday Night” came out of these visits. On the surface, it gives us three stylish women at a prime table, having drinks and seemingly enjoying one another’s company.

It’s an unremarkable scene, right? Not in the early 1900s. In the painting, Sloan is signaling something about the three friends and the changing social rules for women of the era.

“By showing the women celebrating a night out on the town, the artist emphasized their newfound freedom to socialize in public spaces without the need for male escorts,” states the website for Art Institute Chicago, which has the painting in their collection.

“Although he indicated their working-class status through their ‘unladylike’ gestures—legs wrapped around their chairs and pinkies flared in the air—Sloan did not cast judgment on the women’s relaxed behavior. His informal style and loose brushwork enliven this scene of urban leisure with a sense of immediacy and action.”

[Art Institute of Chicago]

Searching for the Lower East Side corner saloon as seen in a 1930s street life painting

July 8, 2024

Reginald Marsh was a true street artist—painting colorful, exaggerated images of New York City’s commuters, lovers, barflies, sailors, bargain shoppers, Coney Island thrill seekers, and Bowery bums, mostly through the 1920s and 1940s.

His depictions of the urban masses—inspired by his study of the Great Masters of the Renaissance during a trip to Europe in 1925—conveyed the energy and excitement (and sometimes despair) of early 20th century life in Gotham.

Marsh tended to focus on crowds and not individuals, which is why one notable painting in particular seems out of step. “H. Dummeyer Bar & Grill” is the title of this undated work, likely from the 1930s or 1940s. It features a lone man leaning against a fire alarm box outside a corner saloon.

There’s a John Sloan kind of solitude to the painting, which isn’t all that surprising considering that Sloan was Marsh’s instructor when Marsh took classes at the Art Students League on West 57th Street. (Below photo, Marsh sketching on 14th Street in 1941)

The saloon in the painting seems dreary, festooned with fraying American flags. The drab figure holding his overcoat could be a neighborhood local or a friend of Marsh’s—or perhaps one of the forgotten men dwelling in forgotten sections of the Depression-era city.

Uncovering the identity of the man seems like a fruitless endeavor. But what about the saloon? Discovering where H. Dummeyer Bar & Grill once served growlers of beer to thirsty workingmen extends a firmer sense of place to the painting.

Luckily Dummeyer is an uncommon name. A 1904 Sun article featured a saloon keeper named Henry Dummeyer whose establishment was located at 281 Cherry Street, between Rutgers and Jefferson Streets.

(The article explained that Dummeyer, along with other local bar owners, complained to police that three crooks posing as detectives demanded protection money from them—an interesting slice of life kind of story of its own.)

Other articles reference an H. Dummeyer who in 1893 lost a large black dog on Cherry and Jefferson Streets, and an H. Dummeyer whose liquor store at 281 Cherry Street was burglarized a year later.

When these articles appeared, this block on Cherry Street would have been part of a densely packed tenement neighborhood, close to the “lung block” between Cherry, Catherine, Market, and Monroe Streets—so named for its high concentration of residents living with tuberculosis, according to the Tenement House Commission in 1903.

A saloon like the one in Marsh’s painting would not be out of place on Cherry Street near the East River waterfront in the early decades of the 20th century.

What I’d really like is a photo of Dummeyer’s, an image that offers a clearer sense of the real-life saloon and street corner in Marsh’s painting. The third photo in this post shows the intersection of Cherry Street looking east to Rutgers Street , and there’s a corner store that looks like a possible contender.

Unfortunately, the storefront in the photo, from 1937, has an obvious difference—there’s no fire escape on the upper floors of the building, as Marsh’s painting shows.

Could this corner storefront from 1933, seen in the fourth photo in this post, be Dummeyer’s? The American flag bunting lines up with Marsh’s depiction, as does the facade of the building and the fire escape.

Unfortunately, though the fire hydrant on the sidewalk matches up, there’s no fire alarm call box. The photo, from the New York Public Library, also has the location as Cherry and Catherine Streets.

So I turned to the circa-1940 tax photo collection, part of the archives from the NYC Department of Records & Information Services. After looking for a photo to correspond to 281 Cherry Street, this image, seen in the fifth photo in this post, appears—an abandoned storefront that doesn’t exactly line up with Marsh’s.

Finally, by searching for Jefferson Street, a faded image of a matching corner saloon appeared (above). The fire escape, fire hydrant, fire call box—they all line up as Marsh’s painting depicts them. The photo itself is cloudy, making it hard to read the name on the window. (Click the image for a closer view.)

But I’m pretty certain it’s Dummeyer’s. True, he may have thrown in the towel and sold his building in 1911, the year one newspaper ran a small announcement of the sale of 277-281 Cherry Street.

But since Marsh put the saloon name in the title of his painting, it appears that Dummeyer made it through Prohibition (perhaps by transforming into a restaurant, hence the “grill” in the name) and soldiered on into the 1930s or 1940s. By that time, many of Cherry Street’s rundown tenements and commercial spaces were targeted for demolition under the city’s slum clearance initiative.

Today, this corner is home to two residential towers and a parking lot overlooking South Street. The neighborhood has been rechristened “Two Bridges.” The gritty saloon corner of Marsh’s Lower East Side exists only in faded photos, art museums, and the imagination.

[Top image: MOMA; second photo: Everett/Shutterstock.com via britannica.com; third photo: NYPL Digital Collections; fourth photo: NYPL Digital Collections; fifth photo: NYC Department of Records & Information Services; sixth photo: NYC Department of Records & Information Services]