Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genck Azonho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Genck Azonho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not verify this person's existence via Google. The Snowager-is awake 02:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also, all Google mentions are either a) derived from Wikipedia or b) completely trivial. The fact that there is virtually no mention for the supposedly "best known for" work on Google makes me think we are dealing with someone not notable or a hoax. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete a quick search turned up nothing. Neither did a search on WP Espanol.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Absolutely no indication that this writer existed - nothing found for him or his supposed work. Since such references would be plentiful for any actual writer (even many not meeting WP:N), the article appears to be a hoax. Calamondin12 (talk) 01:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete by all means as my searches found absolutely nothing. If the nominator hadn't taken it, I would've. SwisterTwister talk 21:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.