Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene Stringer-Cuevas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arlene Stringer-Cuevas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local councillor and candidate does not appear to meet WP:NPOL; notable family members but notability is not inherited Melcous (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Members of the New York City Council are consider notable-thank you-RFD (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article does need some improvement, like a bit more substance about her actual work on council, but New York City is literally at the very top of the list of global cities where we do accept city councillors as notable, on the grounds that serving in cities that large and important inherently makes them significantly more notable than most other city councillors. Bearcat (talk) 18:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - New York City Council member in her own right. In agreement with the points already made by users RFD and Bearcat above.Scanlan (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as she is a city councillor in New York City, which is explicitly counted. If it were some small town in Ohio obviously that would not cut it, but that is not the case here.IphisOfCrete (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: she was a New York City Councillor, which grants her notability. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 02:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She served as a New York city councillor. It is enough to grant her notability. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 09:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets GNG. b uidhe 18:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as elected politician. — JFG ^talk 09:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:POLOUTCOMES. She was a legislator for a Global city, and well-known civil servant in the same city. This is about as strong a consensus over many AfDs as I am aware. If we change consensus, it has to be extremely clear and would require the discussion of dozens of Wikipedians. We have kept legislators articles even if they never attended a meeting or serve only a few months; see Reggie Bagala for a recent, relevant example. WP:NOTINHERITED doesn't apply since she has independent notability. FWIW, I have met her son and supported his campaigns. Bearian (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.