User talk:TheDoctorWho/archive7
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheDoctorWho/archive7. |
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TheDoctorWho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day!
List of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes (2010–present)
Hey buddy! Since BB: All-Stars 2 will start soon just wanted to drop a line that we may need to keep an eye on List of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes (2010–present) because I have a feeling it may max out on templates as the new season progresses and may need another split. If that does happen we may want to look at how List of The Simpsons episodes work. That is FL and has the most recent seasons listed at the main page. Currently Lists of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes is service as a disambiguation page. What do you think? Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Alucard 16: I've always disliked the way that the naming was handled for The Simpsons LoE pages mainly because the main page with the current episodes doesn't provide any disambiguation from the previous years. At the time I created I believe I had used Lists of Doctor Who episodes (List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989) and List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)) as an example when setting it up. Ideally my original plan was hoping that the current setup was able to hold through the end of the current season, then IF a 23rd season happened when we're able to create an episode table for it we'd split the 22nd to a new article that would also have the 23rd episode table and just continue with the current naming scheme by naming the new article List of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes (2020–present) and renaming the other page to List of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes (2010–2019). I know there is a link to the other list that explains the list has been split due to template limits but it could easily be missed by a reader. If you don't think it's a problem I'd be open to considering The Simpsons method.
- As a side thought, something that wasn't on Lists of Doctor Who episodes when I originally created the BB lists is the Series Overview table. Thoughts on either transcluding it to Lists of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes or housing the table there and then transcluding it to the other two articles? TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Appears an IP added the overview to the disambig page for Doctor Who. I don't think disambig pages should have an overview tbh. I like your method too! I say we just keep with the current method but keep a close eye on that page just in the event we may need to move S22. Hopefully it can fit but since the episode tables are using the parts template to identify weeks it could push it over the limit especially if CBS runs this season for a full 99 days to fill in programming gaps in the fall. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
- Ajpolino • LuK3
- Jackmcbarn
- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
- There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Series Overview: Roll Call
I would have gladly responded to a talk page note about this, as I don't believe edit summaries should be that long. In any case, the series overview box you composed is fine, and in fact, I think it's better to have it than not have it. Andrew Englehart (talk) 19:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message, I'm truly glad that we've finally reached a compromise. Thanks for removing the links from the series overview table, I missed that when I just copied it from the version history. If you get around to editing the tables and need any help, let me know, I work with episode tables quite a bit so I'll help if/when I can! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Andrew Englehart: to above response, forgot to ping. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
List of Superstore episodes
It's air dates that are used, not pre-release dates. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- I've left a response on your talk page. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- You are wrong, Hulu is not the show's provider, NBC is. Both neXt and Filthy Rich released episodes before their airdates on FOX, but the airdate on FOX is the one used, that's the point of the note. Their are dozens of other examples of this as well. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 02:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- An original network is any network that airs the first run of an episode. Even if it is only one episode. Hulu now meets those requirements and October 23 is the official release date as it was the first time the episode "aired." It is that plain and simple. Again it is also supported by WP:TV, feel free to open a discussion there if you must. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- The show's network is NBC. Hulu isn't even a network and is a on-demand provider of the show after it's aired. Also the table states airdate, not release date, Also your note has no citation of the Hulu date. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 03:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hulu airs original shows so it is considered a network. Air date, release date, same thing in this instance. Give me two minutes I'll grab a source. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not even on Hulu yet. superstore 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 03:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It was removed prior to the episodes airing on NBC and will be readded after, it's all in the reliable source I added. I've also attempted a compromise if you haven't seen that yet. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- That futon source doesn't not state they removed it and that source should have been invalidated with the other one when NBC put out the rescheduled press release. Stop making things up. Since it's not up on Hulu they may done it by mistake but you have no proof of that. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 06:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It was not a mistake, the source clearly states
Streaming October 19 - October 26
meaning the only mistake was 19 as opposed to 23 since that is the release date. It is not invalidated because it happened, your primary source, Hulu, is not reliable in this case. TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It was not a mistake, the source clearly states
- That futon source doesn't not state they removed it and that source should have been invalidated with the other one when NBC put out the rescheduled press release. Stop making things up. Since it's not up on Hulu they may done it by mistake but you have no proof of that. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 06:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It was removed prior to the episodes airing on NBC and will be readded after, it's all in the reliable source I added. I've also attempted a compromise if you haven't seen that yet. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not even on Hulu yet. superstore 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 03:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hulu airs original shows so it is considered a network. Air date, release date, same thing in this instance. Give me two minutes I'll grab a source. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- The show's network is NBC. Hulu isn't even a network and is a on-demand provider of the show after it's aired. Also the table states airdate, not release date, Also your note has no citation of the Hulu date. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 03:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- An original network is any network that airs the first run of an episode. Even if it is only one episode. Hulu now meets those requirements and October 23 is the official release date as it was the first time the episode "aired." It is that plain and simple. Again it is also supported by WP:TV, feel free to open a discussion there if you must. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- You are wrong, Hulu is not the show's provider, NBC is. Both neXt and Filthy Rich released episodes before their airdates on FOX, but the airdate on FOX is the one used, that's the point of the note. Their are dozens of other examples of this as well. 2001:470:1F2D:C:78EF:4AF3:28D2:17F7 (talk) 02:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Your GA nomination of Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1)
The article Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 1), has passed the Good Article criteria, becoming a good article on November 16, 2020. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this image of a cute cat. Enjoy! |
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Thank you so much for reviewing the article, I appreciate your hard work! TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:One Chicago Cast Photo 2019.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:One Chicago Cast Photo 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Your GA nomination of Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello TheDoctorWho,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2)
Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2), has passed the good article criteria, becoming a good article on December 10, 2020. Great job on the improvements! For you're hard work, I award you this image of a bird. Enjoy! |
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks for your review, it was nice working with you again! TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2)
The article Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi TheDoctorWho,
You are adding WP:SYNTH though because The Futon Critic never explicitly stated that is the date they posted it. You are clearly just assuming. It is not on the listing page itself. For example, this [1] is actually shows the published date at the top of the press release. — YoungForever(talk) 05:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TheDoctorWho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |