User talk:Lord Cornwallis

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 15 sections are present.

Proposed deletion of The Golden Salamander

The article The Golden Salamander has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has had no evidence of meeting Wikipedia:Notability in its 5.6 years, and has naught but a single source—not about this novel, but the film into which it was adapted. Further, all other claims are unsupported by citations to reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siege of Lleida (1644)

The article Siege of Lleida (1644) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, not obviously notable after a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delectopierre (talk) 23:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Death of Jane McCrea

Hello - I don't think I have ever interacted with you, so I hope you are well? I wanted to reach out to discuss the above named topic (The Death of Jane McCrea), as the second paragraph contains this sentence: Vanderlyn moved to Paris and became the first American every to exhibit at the Paris Salon when he displayed two portraits at the Salon of 1800 in the Louvre. It's the use of the word every in the sentence that makes no sense to me; is it misplaced, or is every an art term? I know nothing about art (sorry), but then so will others, so if every is an art term, should it not be wikilinked?

I mean no offence by this enquiry, just trying to understand. Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Yes it was a typo, should have read "ever" instead of "every". I've corrected it now. Thanks for spotting it. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Between Night and Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Between Night and Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Between Night and Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 06:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of paintings by J. M. W. Turner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private Collection.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Algiers in fiction

A tag has been placed on Category:Algiers in fiction indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Once in a Blue Moon (1935 film)

The article Once in a Blue Moon (1935 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV: IMDB and passing mentions in three books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Shipwreck (Turner), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weymouth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Voice in the Mirror.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Voice in the Mirror.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shiraz (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shiraz (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cecil Bevan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cecil Bevan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecil Bevan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Landseer

Hi, It is not necessary to add a copy of every single one of Landseer's works to the page, that is what Commons is for. It is enough to just have a representative sample of his work. There is a commons link for those who want to see more. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Help to Publish Draft Article on Iranian Theater Artist Mehran Ranjbar

Hi dear Lord Cornwallis

I'm a researcher in cinema and theater, and most of my work focuses on these fields. As you may know, many theater artists in Iran remain largely unknown, even though their work offers valuable insights and perspectives. I’ve been trying to introduce them to a wider audience in English, as I believe this could be useful and enriching for many readers.

I started with a draft article on Draft:Mehran Ranjbar , and I’d like to share it here. Would it be possible for someone to help me improve it and guide me on how to move it to the main space?

Thanks so much! Darvish.76 (talk) 10:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stale draft

Hello, Lord Cornwallis, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Lord Cornwallis/Hanoverian Succession (1714). Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Woman of No Importance (1945 film)

The article A Woman of No Importance (1945 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]