This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
This template was considered for deletion on 2018 January 12. The result of the discussion was "keep".
This template was considered for deletion on 2009 September 2. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
Looks much better, same should be done with the comune template. I think though the guy adding the frazione has been using the standard template anyway.Himalayan16:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I gave up and added <center> tags to {{infobox settlement}}. I am still waiting for a CSS solution, but until then this works. 04:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Notwithstanding that I have listed the closure at WP:DRV, the new version is much better; and of course benefits our readers, by being laid out like (and stylistically in keeping with) other instances of {{Infobox settlement}}. Please go ahead and implement it. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits13:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I propose the following edit (which is partly analogous to that made to Template:Infobox Italian comune). This proposed change is contained in this template's sandbox:
1) Creating a new parameter called metropolitan_cityand making it a binary option with province, so that an editor can use one or the other (this is to accommodate the creation of metropolitan cities in 2015).
2) Creating a tracking category called "Category:Pages using Infobox frazione with administrative division issues" that would contain articles that use this infobox with either:
A) No region parameter.
B) No provinceormetropolitan_city parameter.
C) Both province and metropolitan_city parameters.
D) No comune parameter.
3) Creating distinct preview warnings for each of the four scenarios above.
4) Creating an unknown parameter tracking category and preview warning.
5) Creating an exception to the above tracking category and preview warning for frazioni in the region of Aosta Valley, which contains no provinces or metropolitan cities. When "Aosta" is entered in the region parameter (including when {{RegioneIT|sigla=VAO}} is entered via {{RegioneIT}}), the article will not be placed in the tracking category and the preview warning will not appear if province or metropolitan_city are not used. Ergo Sum18:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done After notifying the relevant wikiprojects and allowing an adequate amount of time for comments, I have gone forth with the proposal on the live template. Ergo Sum16:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Preview warning and hatnotes moving to templatestyles