Wayne County employee salaries, 2002-2011

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article may not adhere to Ballotpedia's current article guidelines. Please email us at [email protected] to suggest an improvement.


Wayne County employee salaries in Wayne County, Michigan are available online through The Lansing State Journal. Wayne County employees number almost 7,000, according to the county Human Resources department.[1]

Salaries

According to a 2007 salary database created by The Lansing State Journal, Wayne County had 6,838 public employees.[2]

  • The highest-paid employee was Psychiatrist Director Shobhana Joshi in the Department of Community Health with a salary of $161,757.36.
  • There were 20 employees that earned over $150,000 a year.

The following were the top 10 salaries for Wayne County in 2007:[3]

Name Department Title Salary
Joshi, Shobhana S Community Health Psychiatrist Director-3 $161,757.36
Shukla, Yogesh J Community Health Psychiatrist Director-2 $160,922.16
Lingam, Venkataramana S Community Health Psychiatrist Director-2 $160,922.16
Mellos, George E Community Health Psychiatrist Director-1 $160,066.08
Bandla, Hanumaiah Community Health Psychiatrist Director-31 $160,066.08
Roc, Ruby C Community Health Physician Manager-2 $159,251.76
Patel, Navnitlal P Community Health Psychiatrist-A $156,871.44
Lamsen, Edward A Community Health Psychiatrist-A $156,871.44
Kulkarni, Arun Community Health Psychiatrist-A $156,871.44
Koneru, Sunil K Community Health Psychiatrist-A $156,871.44

Benefits

According to the Wayne County website, the following are benefits provided for general employment:[4]

  • Medical insurance
  • Dental insurance
  • Life insurance
  • Leave: personal business, military, holiday with pay, bereavement, sick, and vacation.
  • Disability
  • Retirement
  • Tuition reimbursement

Double dipping

According to The Metro Times, about 40 employees retired and collected and received up to 24 weeks of salaried pay along with unused benefit payments in 2011. Roughly 20 of those employees returned to work for the county under separate contracts and received a county salary along with a pension.[5]

The following table outlines eight employees who retired and returned to work for the county, according to data obtained by The Metro Times:[6]

Retiree Monthly pension Retirement date Contract effective date Equivalent annual rate of contract
Gamber-Mclenon, Christine F. $5,006 1-May 1-May $102,045
Hawkins, Leah $3,726 Apr. 1 4-Apr $66,310
Hendrix, Deborah $3,940 Apr. 1 1-Apr $79,601
Johnson, Barbara $4,305 Apr. 1 April 4 and May 9 $75,857 and $111,000
Marsh, Renee $5,432 Apr. 1 18-Apr $77,272
Saab, Lahouaria $3,385 Apr. 1 4-Apr $62,326
Taylor, Timothy $8,838 Apr. 1 2-May $117,062
Tolbert, Dinah $7,121 Apr. 1 1-Apr $126,422

Phone use

According to the Wayne County Cell Phone Policy, employees have two choices concerning cell phones:

  • Receive a monthly allowance for a cell phone that can be used for business and personal use
  • Use a county-owned cell phone that may only be used for business purposes


Detroit News sues Wayne County for employee data

In 2002, the State of Michigan Court of Appeals held that the defendant, County of Wayne, was required to disclose records pertaining to Wayne County employees as requested by plaintiff, Detroit News, pursuant to Michigan's Freedom of Information Act. The plaintiff requested the following information: 1) the name, job title, and salary/hourly pay rate for all Wayne County officials and employees for calendar years 2000 and 2001, 2) the names of employees who received longevity pay and the amount in 1999 and 2000, 3) the names of all employees who received pay for annual leave, accumulative leave, and the amount of leave pay in 1999 and 2000, 4) the names of all employees who received pay for accumulated sick leave and the amount of sick leave received 1999 and 2000, 5) the names of all employees who received flat rate mileage reimbursements and the monthly amount as of April 2, 2001, and 6) the names of employees who had a county vehicle assigned to them as of April 2, 2001, and the year, make, and model of each assigned vehicle.

The Court determined that the Civil Service Act does not exempt the requested information from FOIA disclosure and that the Legislature, by amending the FOIA, did not intend to bar the FOIA disclosure of public salaries. The Court ordered the defendant to produce the requested records to the plaintiff.[7]

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia said the city of Philadelphia faced challenges owing to the cost of public employee pensions.[8] The report claimed the amount that Philadelphia paid to pension recipients limited the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report said there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[8] The authors recommended three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions: improved data collection, expanded transparency initiatives, and reductions to the city's overall budget.[8]

Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific compensation figures, and may leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

See also

External links

Footnotes