Historical Rhode Island pension information

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.


The historical Rhode Island pension information below applies to prior calendar years. The tabs below may contain information from several different fiscal years; for example, the tab labeled "As published 2015" contains information from fiscal years 2013 and 2012 (the most recent data available at the time of initial publication). For more current information regarding Rhode Island's pension system, click here.

As published 2016


Pension Policy Logo on Ballotpedia.png
Rhode Island information (2015)
Total contributions:
$694,479,000
Employee contributions:
$104,433,000
Government contributions:
$590,047,000
Total payments:
$1,040,474,000
Total cash and investment holdings:
$9,212,875,000
Number of state and local pension systems:
39
Active membership:
32,757
Inactive membership:
9,468

Public Policy Logo-one line.png

Key terms
Actuarial value of assets (AVA)Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL)Annual required contribution (ARC)Discount rateFunded ratioRate of returnActive memberInactive memberOPEB
Hover over the above
terms for definitions.
Note: This page utilizes information from a variety of sources. The information presented on this page reflects the most recent data available as of August 2016.

Rhode Island public pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in Rhode Island receive retirement benefits.

According to the United States Census Bureau, there were 39 public pension systems in Rhode Island as of 2015. Of these, five were state-level programs, while the remaining 34 were administered at the local level. As of fiscal year 2015, membership in Rhode Island's various pension systems totaled 42,225. Of these, 32,757 were active members.[1]

HIGHLIGHTS
  • In fiscal year 2015, the most recent year for which information is available, total contributions of $694.5 million were made to Rhode Island's state and local pension systems. Of this amount, $104.4 million came from employees.
  • In fiscal year 2015, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $1.0 billion.
  • As of fiscal year 2015, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems held $9.2 billion in total cash and investment holdings.
  • According to a 2013 report by Morningstar, an independent financial research group, most states' pension plans continued to be funded below the 80 percent level considered necessary for a healthy fund. Decreased funding and increasing liabilities since the 2008 recession continued to put pressure on local and state budgets, in some cases leading to bankruptcy. Higher pension costs can have the following consequences:[2]

    • higher taxes
    • less intergovernmental aid for services
    • lower credit ratings
    • higher interest rates on state borrowing

    State pension systems can vary in their organization, management, and accounting principles, making them difficult to compare. The basic information on this page comes from the U.S. Census Bureau, as reported by the states and pension funds themselves for fiscal year 2015.

    General information

    See also: Pension data, U.S. Census

    According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Rhode Island had five state pension plans as of 2015:[3]

    1. Rhode Island Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
    2. Rhode Island Employees Retirement System
    3. Rhode Island Municipal Employees' Retirement System
    4. Rhode Island State Police Retirement Benefits Trust
    5. Rhode Island Judicial Retirement Benefits Trust

    In addition to the aforementioned state-level pension systems, there were 34 locally administered pension systems in Rhode Island.[1]

    The table below provides general pension system information for Rhode Island and surrounding states.

    General pension system information, 2015
    State Systems Total members Active members Inactive members
    State Local Members Percent of total Members Percent of total
    Rhode Island 5 34 42,225 32,757 77.58% 9,468 22.42%
    Connecticut N/A 206 196,761 175,650 89.27% 21,111 10.73%
    Massachusetts 14 N/A 419,717 314,756 74.99% 104,961 25.01%
    New Hampshire 2 3 60,028 49,240 82.03% 10,788 17.97%
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2015"

    Contributions

    See also: Pension contribution and payment data, U.S. Census

    Pension contributions are the funds paid into pension systems. These contributions come from the employer (in the case of public pensions, the government) and employees. Investment earnings are the main source of increases in the fund and are listed separately in the rightmost column in the below table.

    In fiscal year 2015, the most recent year for which information is available, total contributions of $694.5 million were made to Rhode Island's state and local pension systems. Of this amount, $104.4 million came from employees. The remainder came from state and local governments. The table below provides information about pension contributions in Rhode Island and surrounding states in fiscal year 2015.[1]

    Pension contributions, fiscal year 2015 (dollars in thousands)
    State Total contributions from employees and employers Employee contributions Government contributions Earnings on investments
    Contributions Percentage of total Contributions Percentage of total
    Rhode Island $694,479 $104,433 15.04% $590,047 84.96% $317,178
    Connecticut $3,292,112 $742,085 22.54% $2,550,027 77.46% $2,750,689
    Massachusetts $5,129,721 $1,968,873 38.38% $3,160,848 61.62% $5,606,935
    New Hampshire $558,282 $208,701 37.38% $349,581 62.62% $288,260
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2015"

    Payments

    See also: Pension contribution and payment data, U.S. Census

    Payments are the amounts paid to pension recipients by their pension plans. Pension payments include benefits and withdrawals. Benefits are the regular payments made by a pension plan to the plan's recipients. Pension beneficiaries may also withdraw funds before they are due to receive regular benefits.

    In fiscal year 2015, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $1.0 billion. The table below provides pension payment information for Rhode Island and surrounding states in fiscal year 2015. The columns labeled "Benefits," "Withdrawals," and "Other" are subsets of total payments. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000 ($240,000 is equal to $240,000,000).[1]

    Pension payments, fiscal year 2015 (dollars in thousands)
    State Total payments Benefits Withdrawals Other
    Rhode Island $1,040,474 $1,000,407 $12,155 $27,915
    Connecticut $4,416,643 $4,334,387 $27,010 $55,245
    Massachusetts $7,217,066 $6,555,354 $210,913 $450,795
    New Hampshire $717,311 $657,762 $26,501 $33,048
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2015"

    Other post-employment benefits

    See also: Other post-employment benefits, data

    In addition to standard pension payments, some plans may offer pensioners additional benefits. These benefits, sometimes referred to as "other post-employment benefits," or "OPEBs," consist of health insurance, life insurance or other benefits that the pensioner may have received while employed. The cost of these benefits can prove complicated for actuaries to calculate because of the changes in fields like medicine. This, coupled with the normal challenges in calculating and meeting pension requirements, can result in funding shortages for pension plans.

    Unfunded liabilities totaled nearly $500 billion throughout the country for OPEBs. Rhode Island was reported to have about $858 million in unfunded liabilities for OPEBs. This was equal to about 0.17 percent of the country's total unfunded liabilities for these other services.

    The chart below displays the unfunded liabilities for Rhode Island and its surrounding states. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000,000. For instance, $300 translates to $300,000,000.

    Unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities for other post-employment benefits, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in millions)
    State Unfunded liabilities Percent of total
    Rhode Island $858 0.17%
    Connecticut $22,581 4.54%
    Massachusetts $15,377 3.09%
    New Hampshire $1,857 0.37%
    U.S. total $497,693 100%
    Source: National Association of State Retirement Administrators, "Retiree Health Care Benefits for State and Local Employees in 2014," accessed April 30, 2015. Note: Although this article was dated for 2014, all figures were reported to have come from fiscal year 2013 reports.

    Cash and investment holdings

    See also: Pension data, U.S. Census

    Investments are a crucial part of the pension process. The goal is that, by investing pension contributions, the pensioner will receive more money when he or she retires than he or she and the employer were able to contribute. These investments can come in the form of cash investments, short-term investments, securities, or other investments. Cash investments are usually low-risk, short-term investments that have a lower rate of return than other types of investments. Other short-term investments are riskier than cash investments, but have the potential for greater returns. Securities can refer to stocks, bonds, or other types of financial certificates that hold some sort of financial value. As the values of these securities change, they can be traded to make a profit. While there are other applications of securities investments, this represents one of the most common practices.[4][5][6]

    As of fiscal year 2015, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems held $9.2 billion in total cash and investment holdings. The table below summarizes pension system cash and investment holdings for Rhode Island and surrounding states. The columns labeled "Total cash and short-term investments," "Total securities," and "Total other investments" are subsets of the grand total. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000 ($240,000 is equal to $240,000,000).[1]

    Total cash and investment holdings, fiscal year 2015 (dollars in thousands)
    State Grand total Total cash and short-term investments Total securities Total other investments
    Rhode Island $9,212,875 $284,440 $8,204,392 $724,043
    Connecticut $38,425,038 $2,003,751 $31,608,540 $4,812,747
    Massachusetts $74,458,401 $1,603,736 $57,806,783 $15,047,882
    New Hampshire $7,758,843 $110,898 $6,903,966 $743,979
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2015"

    Pension fund management fees

    See also: Public pension fund management fees

    In July 2013, the Maryland Public Policy Institute (MPPI) and the Maryland Tax Education Foundation released a report detailing the fees paid for the management of state pension systems. According to MPPI, the 10 state pension funds that paid the most in management fees relative to net assets experienced lower returns over a five-year period than the 10 state pension funds that paid the least in management fees. For example, in fiscal year 2012 South Carolina's pension system paid approximately $296.1 million in total management fees (1.31 percent of total net assets at the beginning of the fiscal year), and its five-year rate of return was 1.46 percent. By contrast, Alabama's pension system paid roughly $13.3 million in management fees (0.05 percent of total net assets), and its five-year rate of return was 7.53 percent.[7]

    The table below presents the information collected by MPPI for states around Rhode Island. Unfortunately, the relevant information for Rhode Island was not available at the time of the study. For each state's pension system, total net assets are listed (both for the beginning and end of the fiscal year in question), as well as the total amount paid in management fees. In addition, the rates of return for the pension systems are presented.

    Public pension fund management fees, 2011-2012
    State Fiscal year Total net assets at the beginning of the year Total net assets at the end of the year Total management fees Management fees as % of total net assets Five-year rate of return
    Rhode Island1 N/A
    Connecticut 2012 $25,086,280,000 $23,873,812,000 $87,099,000 0.35% 1.27%
    Massachusetts 2012 $50,245,766,000 $48,867,807,000 $252,070,837 0.50% 0.11%
    New Hampshire 2012 $5,891,179,000 $5,774,343,000 $22,908,000 0.39% 1.80%
    1"Three states— Hawaii, Nevada and Rhode Island—were excluded because they hadn’t published CAFRs for fiscal years ending December 31, 2011 or later. West Virginia was excluded because its June 30, 2012 CAFR lacked sufficient disclosure."
    Source: Maryland Public Policy Institute, "Wall Street Fees, Investment Returns, Maryland 49 Other State Pension Funds," July 1, 2013

    As published 2015

    Public pensions in
    Rhode Island
    Pension Policy Logo on Ballotpedia.png
    General information (2013)
    Total contributions:
    $687,450,000
    Employee contributions:
    $192,072,000
    Government contributions:
    $495,378,000
    Total payments:
    $1,102,278,000
    Total cash and investment holdings:
    $8,511,634,000
    Number of state and local pension systems:
    13 (1 state system, 12 local systems)
    Active membership:
    37,122
    Inactive membership:
    8,572
    Pension health (2012)
    Assets:
    $6,295,214,000
    Actuarial accrued liability (AAL):
    $10,816,459,000
    Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL):
    $4,521,245,000
    Funded ratio:
    58.2%
    UAAL per capita:
    $4,280
    Public pensions
    in the states
    AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming

    Public Policy Logo-one line.png
    Public pensionsState public pension plansRhode Island state budget and finances
    Note: This page utilizes information from a variety of sources. As such, the currency of the information varies somewhat. The information presented on this page reflects the most recent data available as of March 2015.


    Rhode Island public pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in Rhode Island receive retirement benefits.

    According to the United States Census Bureau, there were 13 public pension systems in Rhode Island as of 2013. One of these was a state-level program, while the remaining 12 were administered at the local level. As of 2013, membership in Rhode Island's various pension systems totaled 45,694. Of these, 37,122 were active members.[1]

    According to a 2013 report by Morningstar, an independent financial research group, most states' pension plans continued to be funded below the 80 percent level considered necessary for a healthy fund. Decreased funding and increasing liabilities since the 2008 recession continued to put pressure on local and state budgets, in some cases leading to bankruptcy. Higher pension costs can have the following consequences:[2]

    • higher taxes
    • less intergovernmental aid for services
    • lower credit ratings
    • higher interest rates on state borrowing
    HIGHLIGHTS
  • Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, the funded ratio of Rhode Island's state-administered pension plans decreased from 61.7 percent to 58.2 percent. The state paid 100 percent of its annual required contribution, and for fiscal year 2012 the pension system's unfunded accrued liability totaled $4.5 billion. This amounted to $4,280 in unfunded liabilities per capita.[2][8]
  • Background

    The basic information on this page comes from the U.S. Census Bureau, as reported by the states and pension funds themselves for fiscal year 2013. Also included are comparative data from three different reports, which looked at the states' Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs).

    General information

    See also: Pension data, U.S. Census

    According to the U.S. Census, Rhode Island had only one state pension plan as of 2013:

    1. Rhode Island Employees Retirement System[9]

    In addition to the aforementioned state-level pension systems, there were 12 locally administered pension systems in Rhode Island.[1]

    The table below provides general pension system information for Rhode Island and surrounding states.

    General pension system information, 2013
    State Systems Total members Active members Inactive members
    State Local Members Percent of total Members Percent of total
    Rhode Island 1 12 45,694 37,122 81.24% 8,572 18.76%
    Connecticut 6 55 155,014 138,093 89.08% 16,921 10.92%
    Massachusetts 14 86 370,577 308,704 83.3% 61,873 16.7%
    New Hampshire 2 2 58,761 50,135 85.32% 8,626 14.68%
    Vermont 3 2 33,095 25,696 77.64% 7,399 22.36%
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2013"

    Contributions

    See also: Pension contribution and payment data, U.S. Census

    Pension contributions are the funds paid into pension systems. These contributions come from the employer (in the case of public pensions, the government) and employees. Investment earnings are the main source of increases in the fund and are listed separately in the rightmost column in the below table.

    In fiscal year 2013, total contributions of $687 million were made to Rhode Island's state and local pension systems. Of this amount, $192 million came from employees. The remainder came from state and local governments. The table below provides information about pension contributions in Rhode Island and surrounding states in fiscal year 2013.[1]

    Pension contributions, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in thousands)
    State Total contributions from employees and employers Employee contributions Government contributions Earnings on investments
    Contributions Percentage of total Contributions Percentage of total
    Rhode Island $687,450 $192,072 27.94% $495,378 72.06% $894,165
    Connecticut $2,797,253 $645,440 23.07% $2,151,813 76.93% $5,041,830
    Massachusetts $4,798,875 $1,898,451 39.56% $2,900,424 60.44% $7,078,906
    New Hampshire $467,624 $203,611 43.54% $264,013 56.46% $853,492
    Vermont $195,022 $79,442 40.73% $115,580 59.27% $291,549
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2013"

    Payments

    See also: Pension contribution and payment data, U.S. Census

    Payments are the amounts paid to pension recipients by their pension plans. Pension payments include benefits and withdrawals. Benefits are the regular payments made by a pension plan to the plan's recipients. Pension beneficiaries may also withdraw funds before they are due to receive regular benefits.

    In fiscal year 2013, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems made payments totaling $1.1 billion. The table below provides pension payment information for Rhode Island and surrounding states in fiscal year 2013. The columns labeled "Benefits," "Withdrawals," and "Other" are subsets of total payments. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000 ($240,000 is equal to $240,000,000).

    Pension payments, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in thousands)
    State Total payments Benefits Withdrawals Other
    Rhode Island $1,102,278 $1,065,014 $12,290 $24,974
    Connecticut $3,971,602 $3,821,090 $36,789 $113,723
    Massachusetts $6,500,305 $5,994,304 $246,687 $259,315
    New Hampshire $646,872 $592,325 $23,401 $31,146
    Vermont $278,634 $254,237 $6,099 $18,298
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2013"

    Cash and investment holdings

    See also: Pension data, U.S. Census

    As of fiscal year 2013, Rhode Island's state and local pension systems held $8.5 billion in total cash and investment holdings. The table below summarizes pension system cash and investment holdings for Rhode Island and surrounding states. The columns labeled "Total cash and short-term investments," "Total securities," and "Total other investments" are subsets of the grand total. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000 ($240,000 is equal to $240,000,000).[1]

    Total cash and investment holdings, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in thousands)
    State Grand total Total cash and short-term investments Total securities Total other investments
    Rhode Island $8,511,634 $416,599 $7,822,470 $272,565
    Connecticut $32,522,521 $1,052,104 $31,056,635 $413,782
    Massachusetts $64,984,732 $894,635 $58,868,672 $5,221,426
    New Hampshire $6,450,662 $14,695 $5,617,328 $818,639
    Vermont $3,613,701 $118,799 $2,924,189 $570,713
    Source: United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2013"

    Pension health

    Pension health is a term used to describe the overall state of pension systems. It can be difficult to gauge pension health in each state, but many studies use calculations to determine the average liabilities, unfunded liabilities, funded ratio and other data. Most experts believe that pension systems need to be funded at least 80 percent to be considered healthy. This information is then used to provide a snapshot of the state's overall pension health. This section provides information from three studies regarding the health of pensions in Rhode Island and neighboring states. They found the following:

    • According to the Pew Charitable Trusts, Rhode Island paid 100 percent of its required contribution and its funded ratio was only 58 percent in fiscal year 2012.
    • According to Morningstar, the state had a per capita pension debt of $4,280 and a funded ratio of 58.2 percent in fiscal year 2012.
    • According to State Budget Solutions, which assumed a lower rate of return, Rhode Island had a per capita pension debt of $16,050 and a funded ratio of 31 percent in fiscal year 2013.

    Pew research

    See also: Pew Charitable Trusts pensions study, 2014

    According to a 2014 report by the Pew Charitable Trusts, “Many states are seeing their pension debt continue to increase, despite reform efforts, because of missed contributions and the continued impact of investment losses.” The funding gap between what state pension systems have promised in benefits (liabilities) and current funding (assets) increased by $158 billion from 2010 to 2012 (14 percent), leaving state-run retirement systems with $915 billion in unfunded liabilities. Only 15 states made at least 95 percent of the annual required contributions (ARCs) for their pensions between 2010 and 2012; the aggregate shortfall in funding for all state plans was $21 billion. Data on these state pensions come from the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) that each state’s pension plan prepared for fiscal year 2012; these reports include actuarial valuations based on “the expected rate of return on investments and estimates of employee life spans, retirement ages, salary growth, retention rates, and other demographic characteristics.”[10]

    All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000,000 (e.g., $240,000 is equal to $240,000,000,000).

    Pension health metrics from the Pew Charitable Trusts report, 2010-2012 (dollars in millions)
    State 2012 Funded ratio Percent of ARC paid
    Liability Unfunded ARC 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
    Rhode Island $10,816 $4,521 $367 49% 59% 58% 100% 100% 100%
    Connecticut $48,200 $24,546 $1,699 53% 55% 49% 87% 91% 100%
    Massachusetts $71,622 $28,104 $1,669 71% 65% 61% 65% 103% 87%
    New Hampshire $10,433 $4,573 $257 59% 58% 56% 100% 100% 100%
    Vermont $4,754 $1,418 $92 75% 73% 70% 94% 95% 118%
    Totals in the U.S. $3,298,643 $914,653 $87,213 75% 74% 72% 78% 77% 77%
    Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts, "The Fiscal Health of State Pension Plans: Funding Gap Continues to Grow"

    Morningstar report

    See also: Pension data, 2013 Morningstar report

    In 2013, independent investment research firm Morningstar released "The State of State Pension Plans 2013," a report detailing various metrics of pension system health in all 50 states. Morningstar found a $1.2 trillion gap in 2012 for the largest 100 U.S. public pension plans (according to the actuarial firm Milliman). Based on two key drivers in Morningstar’s analysis—the funded ratio and the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) per capita—the fiscal solvency and management of these plans varied greatly. Overall, the firm found that "more than half of all states fall below Morningstar’s fiscally sound threshold of a 70 percent funded ratio" and all state plans combined were "72.6 percent funded with a UAAL per capita of roughly $2,600.”[2]

    According to Morningstar's research, Rhode Island's state pension system was funded at a rate of 58.2 percent in fiscal year 2012. The table below provides state pension system health metrics for Rhode Island and surrounding states in fiscal year 2012. Figures in the columns labeled "Assets," "AAL," and "UAAL" are rendered in thousands of dollars (for example, $2,400,000 translates to $2,400,000,000). Figures in the remaining columns have not been abbreviated. To view the full report, click here.

    Pension health metrics from the Morningstar report, fiscal year 2012
    State Assets Liabilities (AAL) Unfunded liabilities (UAAL) Funded ratio Unfunded liabilities
    per capita
    Rhode Island $6,295,214 $10,816,459 $4,521,245 58.2% $4,280
    Connecticut $23,654,500 $48,200,500 $24,546,000 49.1% $6,922
    Massachusetts $42,649,119 $64,267,758 $21,618,639 66.4% $3,338
    New Hampshire $5,861,896 $10,421,426 $4,559,531 56.2% $3,470
    Vermont $2,918,189 $4,265,516 $1,347,327 68.41% $2,158
    Totals in the U.S. $2,157,578,916 $2,979,267,860 $821,688,945 72.40% N/A
    Source: Morningstar, "The State of State Pension Plans 2013: A Deep Dive Into Shortfalls and Surpluses," accessed September 16, 2013

    State Budget Solutions report

    See also: Pension data, State Budget Solutions report

    State Budget Solutions is "a nonpartisan, nonprofit, national public policy organization with the mission to change the way state and local governments do business."[11] It should be noted that although the organization is technically nonpartisan, its ideology and mission have conservative leanings. In November 2014, the organization released a research report that used a fair market valuation based on a discount rate of 2.743 percent to determine the unfunded liabilities of public pension plans. The group concluded that "state public pension plans were underfunded by $4.7 trillion in 2014, up from $4.1 trillion in 2013. Overall, the combined plans' funded status ... dipped 3 percentage points to 36 percent. Split among all Americans, the unfunded liability [was] over $15,000 per person."[12]

    According to the State Budget Solutions report, Rhode Island's pension plans were funded at a rate of 31 percent. To read the full report, click here.

    Note that all dollar amounts displayed (excluding those under the "Unfunded liability per capita" column) should be multiplied by 1,000 (e.g., $240,000 is equal to $240,000,000).

    Pension health metrics from the State Budget Solutions report, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in thousands)
    State Assets Market liability* Funding ratio Unfunded liability Unfunded liability per capita Unfunded liability as % of 2013 gross state product
    Rhode Island $7,524,961 $24,409,768 31% $16,884,807 $16,050 32%
    Connecticut $25,765,325 $112,357,458 23% $86,592,133 $24,080 35%
    Massachusetts $42,974,758 $147,019,968 29% $104,045,210 $15,545 23%
    New Hampshire $6,112,228 $22,023,284 28% $15,911,056 $12,026 23%
    Vermont $3,468,330 $10,600,652 33% $7,132,322 $11,375 24%
    Totals in the U.S. $2,679,831,466 $7,416,319,293 36% $4,736,487,827 $15,052 29%
    Source: State Budget Solutions, "Promises Made, Promises Broken 2014: Unfunded Liabilities Hit $4.7 Trillion"

    Other factors

    Rate of return

    According to a 2012 analysis by the Pew Center for the States, most state pension plans assumed an 8 percent rate of return on investments at that time. Proponents argued that an 8 percent rate of return would bear out over the long-term (15-30 years). Critics asserted that this assumption was unrealistic, citing changing market conditions and lower investment returns across the board in preceding years.[13][14]

    Assuming a lower rate of return to predict investment earnings increases current plan liabilities, thereby lowering the percent funded ratio and requiring increased employer contributions (ARCs). This is because future plan liabilities are discounted based on the rate of return, so smaller expected investment returns result in larger actuarially accrued liabilities.[15] For example, on September 21, 2012, the Illinois Teachers Retirement System voted to lower its rate of return from 8.5 percent to 8.0 percent. This change increased the state's fiscal year 2014 ARC from $3.07 billion to $3.36 billion.[16] Similarly, when California's CalPERS reduced its projected annual rate of return from 7.75 percent to 7.5 percent in March 2012, it cost the state an additional $303 million for fiscal year 2013.[17]

    Financial crisis

    In the wake of the 2008 recession, proponents of a lower assumed rate of return argued that the standard 8 percent assumptions could cause pension fund managers to engage in more risky investments and imprudent stewardship of public funds. Jeffrey Friedman, a senior market strategist at MF Global, said, "To target 8 percent means some aggressive trading. Ten-year Treasury [bonds] are yielding around 2 percent, economists say we are headed for a double-dip, and house prices aren't getting back to 2007 levels for the next decade, maybe.".[18][19][20][21][22]

    Advocates of the 8 percent return rate argued that the dip following the 2008 financial crisis did not prove that there was a long-term downward trend in investment returns. According to Chris Hoene, executive director of the California Budget Project, "The problem with [the market rate] argument is there isn’t significant evidence other than the short term blip during the economic crisis that there’s been that shift. It’s a speculative argument coming out of a very deep recession."[23]

    The National Association of State Retirement Administrators researched the median annualized rate of return for public pensions for the 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-, 20- and 25-year periods ending in 2013 and found it was 7.9 percent over the 20-year period, and exceeded 8 percent for the 1-, 3- and 25-year periods. It is important to note that the NASRA data reported the median returns, which means that median annualized returns of investment portfolios for half of the examined public pension funds failed to meet an 8 percent assumed rate of return.[24]

    Studies and reports

    Pension fund management fees

    See also: Public pension fund management fees

    In July 2013, the Maryland Public Policy Institute (MPPI) and the Maryland Tax Education Foundation released a report detailing the fees paid for the management of state pension systems. According to MPPI, the 10 state pension funds that paid the most in management fees relative to net assets experienced lower returns over a five-year period than the 10 state pension funds that paid the least in management fees. For example, in fiscal year 2012 South Carolina's pension system paid approximately $296.1 million in total management fees (1.31 percent of total net assets at the beginning of the fiscal year), and its five-year rate of return was 1.46 percent. By contrast, Alabama's pension system paid roughly $13.3 million in management fees (0.05 percent of total net assets), and its five-year rate of return was 7.53 percent.[25]

    The table below presents the information collected by MPPI for states around Rhode Island. Unfortunately, the relevant information for Rhode Island was not available at the time of the study. For each state's pension system, total net assets are listed (both for the beginning and end of the fiscal year in question), as well as the total amount paid in management fees. In addition, the rates of return for the pension systems are presented.

    Public pension fund management fees, 2011-2012
    State Fiscal year Total net assets at the beginning of the year Total net assets at the end of the year Total management fees Management fees as a percentage of total net assets Five-year rate of return
    Rhode Island1 N/A
    Connecticut 2012 $25,086,280,000 $23,873,812,000 $87,099,000 0.35% 1.27%
    Massachusetts 2012 $50,245,766,000 $48,867,807,000 $252,070,837 0.50% 0.11%
    New Hampshire 2012 $5,891,179,000 $5,774,343,000 $22,908,000 0.39% 1.80%
    Vermont 2012 $3,470,318,417 $3,450,571,044 $14,304,023 0.41% 2.30%
    1"Three states— Hawaii, Nevada and Rhode Island—were excluded because they hadn’t published CAFRs for fiscal years ending December 31, 2011 or later. West Virginia was excluded because its June 30, 2012 CAFR lacked sufficient disclosure."[25]
    Source: Maryland Public Policy Institute, "Wall Street Fees, Investment Returns, Maryland 49 Other State Pension Funds," accessed July 1, 2013

    Other post-employment benefits

    See also: Other post-employment benefits, data

    In addition to standard pension payments, some plans may offer pensioners additional benefits. These benefits, sometimes referred to as "other post-employment benefits," or "OPEBs," consist of health insurance, life insurance or other benefits that the pensioner may have received while employed. The cost of these benefits can prove complicated for actuaries to calculate because of the changes in fields like medicine. This, coupled with the normal challenges in calculating and meeting pension requirements, can result in funding shortages for pension plans.

    Unfunded liabilities totaled nearly $500 billion throughout the country for OPEBs. Rhode Island was reported to have about $858 million in unfunded liabilities for OPEBs. This was equal to about 0.17 percent of the country's total unfunded liabilities for these other services.

    The chart below displays the unfunded liabilities for Rhode Island and its surrounding states. All dollar amounts displayed should be multiplied by 1,000,000. For instance, $300 translates to $300,000,000.

    Unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities for other post-employment benefits, fiscal year 2013 (dollars in millions)
    State Unfunded liabilities Percent of total
    Rhode Island $858 0.17%
    Connecticut $22,581 4.54%
    Massachusetts $15,377 3.09%
    New Hampshire $1,857 0.37%
    Vermont $1,644 0.33%
    U.S. total $497,693 100%
    Source: National Association of State Retirement Administrators, "Retiree Health Care Benefits for State and Local Employees in 2014," accessed April 30, 2015. Note: Although this article was dated for 2014, all figures were reported to have come from fiscal year 2013 reports.

    Public pensions in 2012

    The funding ratio for Rhode Island's pension system increased from 59.65 percent in fiscal year 2007 to 61.16 percent in fiscal year 2012, an increase of 1.51 percentage points, or 2.5 percent. Likewise, unfunded liabilities decreased from nearly $5 billion in fiscal year 2007 to approximately $4.8 billion in fiscal year 2012.[26][27][28][29]

    A 2012 report from the Pew Center on the States noted that Rhode Island's pension system was funded at 49 percent at the close of fiscal year 2010, well below the 80 percent funding level experts recommend. Consequently, Pew designated the state's pension system as cause for "serious concern."[30]

    In fiscal year 2012, according to the plans' Actuarial Valuation Reports, Rhode Island had a total of 32,084 active members in its retirement plans.[26][27][28][29] Membership figures divide plan participants into two broad categories: active and other. Active members are current employees contributing to the pension system. Other members include retirees, beneficiaries and other inactive plan participants (usually terminated employees entitled to benefits but not yet receiving them).[31]

    The following information was collected from the plans' Actuarial Valuation Reports. The "percentage funded" was calculated by taking the current value of the fund and dividing by the estimated amount of total liabilities. The assumed rate of return used to calculate fund value was 7.5 percent in fiscal year 2012.[26][27][28]Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Pew Research Centers cited a percent funded ratio of 80 percent as the minimum threshold for a healthy fund, though the American Academy of Actuaries suggested that all pension systems "have a strategy in place to attain or maintain a funded status of 100 percent or greater."[32][33] The column labeled "SBS figure" refers to a market liability calculation of the fund by the nonprofit organization State Budget Solutions. This analysis used a rate of return of 3.225 percent, which was based upon the 15-year Treasury bond yield. The organization called this a "risk-free" rate of return that would make it easier for states to achieve their pension funding requirements in the future. Beginning in 2006, all private sector corporate pension plans incorporated market costs into their funding schemes.[34]

    Basic pension plan information -- Rhode Island
    Plans Current value Percentage funded Unfunded liabilities Membership
    State figure SBS figure[35] State figure SBS figure[35]
    Employees' Retirement System - State Employees[26] $2,421,191,542 56.3% N/A[36] $1,876,069,769 N/A[36] 11,166 active members
    Employees' Retirement System - Teachers[26] $3,746,299,871 58.8% $2,626,781,473 13,212 active members
    Municipal Employees' Retirement System[27] $1,238,175,548 82.5% $262,298,831 7,422 active members
    State Police Retirement Benefits Trust[28] $84,293,968 89.6% $9,737,719 231 active members
    Judicial Retirement Benefits Trust[29] $43,428,646 83.4% $8,656,508 53 active members
    TOTALS $7,533,389,575 61.16% 33% $4,783,544,300 $15,007,090,000 32,084 active members

    Annual Required Contribution

    Annual Required Contributions (ARC) are calculated annually and are a sum of two different costs. The first component is the "normal cost," or what the employer owes to the system in order to support the liabilities gained in the previous year of service. The second component is an additional payment in order to make up for previous liabilities that have not yet been paid for. According to a report by the Pew Center on the States, in 2010 Rhode Island paid 100 percent of its annual required contribution.[30][37]

    On June 25, 2012, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) approved a plan to reform the accounting rules for state and local pension funds. These revised standards were set to take effect in fiscal years 2013 and 2014.[38] As a result, ARCs were removed as a reporting requirement. Instead, plan administrators and accountants were instructed to use an actuarially determined contribution or a statutory contribution for reporting purposes.[39]

    ARC historical data[40]
    Fiscal year ERS - state employees ERS - teachers MERS SPRBT JRBT
    Annual Required Contribution (ARC) Percentage contributed Annual Required Contribution (ARC) Percentage contributed Annual Required Contribution (ARC) Percentage contributed Annual Required Contribution (ARC) Percentage contributed Annual Required Contribution (ARC) Percentage contributed
    2011 $126,560,644 100% $70,286,262 100% $29,469,064 100% $3,786,553 100% $1,298,278 100%
    2010 $123,547,738 100% $68,542,956 100% $31,269,020 100% $3,590,615 100% $1,180,817 100%
    2009 $126,297,706 100% $73,600,069 100% $33,514,681 100% $3,340,746 100% $1,700,174 100%
    2008 $131,560,248 100% $82,455,777 100% $33,415,530 100% $3,720,281 100% $2,127,643 100%
    2007 $118,300,522 100% $70,531,472 100% $26,697,326 100% $4,038,828 100% $2,362,671 100%

    Public pensions in 2011

    On June 27, 2013, Moody's Investor Service released its report on adjusted pension liabilities in the states. The Moody's report ranked states "based on ratios measuring the size of their adjusted net pension liabilities (ANPL) relative to several measures of economic capacity." In its calculations of net pension liabilities, Moody's employed market-determined discount rates (5.47 percent for Rhode Island) instead of the state-reported assumed rates of return (7.50 percent for Rhode Island as of June 30, 2011).[41]

    The report's authors found that adjusted net pension liabilities varied dramatically from state to state, from 6.8 percent (Nebraska) to 241 percent (Illinois) of governmental revenues in fiscal year 2011.[41]

    The adjusted net pension liability for Rhode Island in fiscal year 2011 was ranked the 34th highest in the nation.[41] The following table presents key state-specific findings from the Moody's report, as well as the state's national rank with respect to each indicator.

    Adjusted net pension liabilities (ANPL) relative to key economic indicators - Rhode Island
    Governmental revenue* Personal income State GDP Per capita
    State findings 91.3% 11.4% 10.5% $5,019
    National ranking 12th 11th 12th 9th
    *Moody's uses governmental revenues as reported in each state's consolidated annual financial reports; this includes not only state-generated revenue, but federal funds, as well.[41]

    Historical data

    Historical pension plan data - all systems
    Year Value of assets Accrued liability Unfunded liability Funded ratio
    2007 $7,371,653,419 $12,358,030,816 $4,986,377,397 59.65%
    2008 $8,009,487,935 $12,336,953,168 $4,327,465,233 64.92%
    2009 $7,948,450,618 $12,856,078,134 $4,907,627,517 61.83%
    2010 $7,705,428,773 $12,247,121,865 $4,541,693,092 62.92%
    2011 $7,538,171,142 $12,130,963,827 $4,592,792,685 62.14%
    Change from 2007-2011 $166,517,723 -$227,066,989 -$393,584,712 2.49%

    Reforms

    2011

    In November 2011, Rhode Island lawmakers passed the Retirement Security Act, which Fitch Ratings cited as "the most comprehensive pension reform package implemented by any state to date." Reforms included:[23][30][47]

    • Ending the defined benefit plan and replacing it with a hybrid plan for both current and future employees
    • Suspending cost of living adjustments until the system's funding ratio increases to at least 80 percent
    • Raising the retirement age from 62 to 67

    Proponents contend that the reforms will, over the course of two decades, save state taxpayers over $4 billion. While a June 2011 actuarial valuation pointed to an immediate downsizing of the state's unfunded pension liability by $2.7 billion, the law has been met with numerous court challenges and significant criticism.[23] Forbes contributor Tom Siedle has argued that the reforms put both taxpayers and retirees at risk.[48]

    See also

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 United States Census Bureau, "State- and Locally-Administered Defined Benefit Pension Systems - All Data by State and Level of Government: 2015," accessed August 26, 2016 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "census" defined multiple times with different content
    2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Morningstar, "The State of State Pension Plans 2013: A Deep Dive Into Shortfalls and Surpluses," accessed September 16, 2013
    3. Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, "Annual Financial Report," accessed August 30, 2016
    4. Investopedia, "Cash investment definition," accessed April 6, 2015
    5. Investopedia, "Short-term investments definition," accessed April 6, 2015
    6. Investopedia, "Securities," accessed April 6, 2015
    7. Maryland Public Policy Institute, "Wall Street Fees, Investment Returns, Maryland 49 Other State Pension Funds," accessed July 1, 2013
    8. The Pew Charitable Trusts, “The Fiscal Health of State Pension Plans: Funding Gap Continues to Grow,” accessed April 16, 2015
    9. U.S. Census, "2013 Survey of Public Pensions: State Data," accessed April 16, 2015. Note: To access this data, navigate to the bottom of the page and click "Unit ID file."
    10. The Pew Charitable Trusts, “The Fiscal Health of State Pension Plans: Funding Gap Continues to Grow,” accessed April 16, 2015
    11. State Budget Solutions, "About SBS," archived January 20, 2016
    12. American Legislative Exchange Council, "Promises Made, Promises Broken 2014: Unfunded Liabilities Hit $4.7 Trillion," accessed November 12, 2014
    13. The Widening Gap Update, "Pew Center on the States," accessed October 17, 2013
    14. The New York Times, "Public Pensions Faulted for Bets on Rosy Returns," accessed May 27, 2012
    15. Benefits Magazine, "Public Pension Funding 101: Key Terms and Concepts," accessed October 23, 2013
    16. Crain's Chicago Business, "State teachers pension board lowers expected rate of return," accessed September 21, 2013
    17. Huffington Post, "California Pension Funds Expect Lower Investment Return," accessed March 14, 2012
    18. The Washington Post, "Kansas’s pension funding gap just grew by $1 billion," accessed September 6, 2013
    19. Topeka Capital-Journal, "KPERS' unfunded liability rises to $10.2B," accessed September 4, 2013
    20. Wall Street Journal, "Pensions Wrestle With Return Rates," accessed October 10, 2011
    21. The Courant, "Promising Too Much On Public Pensions," accessed August 10, 2012
    22. Business Wire, "NCPERS 2013 Survey: Public Pension Plans Report Increasing Confidence, Lower Costs, Growing Returns," accessed October 22, 2013
    23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 Governing, "Expert: Governments Are Masking Their Pension Liabilities," accessed October 25, 2013 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "governing" defined multiple times with different content
    24. National Association of State Retirement Administrators, "Issue Brief: Public Pension Plan Investment Return Assumptions," accessed October 23, 2013
    25. 25.0 25.1 Maryland Public Policy Institute, "Wall Street Fees, Investment Returns, Maryland 49 Other State Pension Funds," accessed July 1, 2013 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "report" defined multiple times with different content
    26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.6 Employees' Retirement System of Rhode island, "Actuarial Valuation - June 30, 2012," accessed November 19, 2013
    27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "Actuarial Valuation - June 30, 2012," accessed November 19, 2013
    28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 State Police Retirement Benefits Trust, "Actuarial Valuation - June 30, 2012," accessed November 19, 2013
    29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 Judicial Retirement Benefits Trust, "Actuarial Valuation - June 30, 2012," accessed November 19, 2013
    30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 Pew Center on the States, "Widening Gap Update: Rhode Island," accessed June 18, 2012
    31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Pensions Glossary," accessed November 27, 2013
    32. United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate, "State and Local Government Retiree Benefits: Current Status of Benefit Structures, Protections, and Fiscal Outlook for Funding Future Costs," September 2007, accessed October 23, 2013
    33. American Academy of Actuaries, "Issue Brief: The 80% Pension Funding Standard Myth," July 2012, accessed October 23, 2013
    34. Governing Magazine, " Is There a Plot Against Pensions?" accessed October 14, 2013
    35. 35.0 35.1 State Budget Solutions, "Promises Made, Promises Broken - The Betrayal of Pensioners and Taxpayers," accessed September 20, 2013
    36. 36.0 36.1 Analysis only available for system totals and not individual funds.
    37. Government Accounting Standards Board, "Annual Required Contribution (ARC)," accessed October 17, 2013
    38. Reuters, "Little-known U.S. board stokes hot pension debate," accessed July 10, 2012
    39. State Budget Solutions, "GASB's ineffective public pension reporting standards set to take effect," accessed June 5, 2013
    40. The Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, "Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011," accessed November 19, 2013
    41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 41.3 Moody's Investor Service, "Adjusted Pension Liability Medians for US States," accessed June 27, 2013
    42. Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "2011 Actuarial Valuation Report," accessed November 20, 2013
    43. Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "2010 Actuarial Valuation Report," accessed November 20, 2013
    44. Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "2009 Actuarial Valuation Report," accessed November 20, 2013
    45. Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "2008 Actuarial Valuation Report," accessed November 20, 2013
    46. Municipal Employees' Retirement System, "2007 Actuarial Valuation Report," accessed November 20, 2013
    47. State of Rhode Island - Office of the General Treasurer, "The Rhode Island Retirement Security Act of 2011," accessed November 20, 2013
    48. Forbes, "Rhode Island Public Pension 'Reform' Looks More Like Wall Street Feeding Frenzy," accessed April 4, 2013