|
photo by Jim Richardson, National Geographic |
One recent garden trend that is spreading with inexorable speed is the “no-dig” or “no-till” method of planting. The basic idea is that plants are installed directly into the ground without tilling or turning over the soil. While this method is centuries old, it challenges conventional gardening practices of tilling and breaking in the soil before one plants.
I’ve been aware of this method for a while, but have been surprised by how quickly it has become dogma, particularly within sustainable landscape circles. When teaching a class on soil preparation, I mentioned tilling and watched as many of the students recoiled in protest. “Isn’t tilling bad?” one student immediately asked. I was taken aback. ‘No-dig’ is not just an idea, but a doctrine, a creed, a badge of one’s eco-credentials. Proponents spread the message with revolutionary fervor.
So is it time to put your tiller on Craigslist? Let me weigh in on this complex issue and hopefully provide some clarity. The gardening world has more than its fair share of old wives tales and superstitions. This is particularly true with anything regarding soil. We understand so little about what goes on in the soil, yet we dig, till, fertilize, and amend it with reckless zeal. When it comes to soil cultivation, what’s true?
Here’s the bottom line: ‘no-dig’ is great, but not when the soil is severely compacted.
After going through quite a bit of research, the evidence certainly favors the ‘no-dig’ approach. Part of me really wanted to find flaws with this method; after all, breaking the soil before planting just feels so natural, so downright human. Egyptian paintings 1200 years bc show people plowing fields. But the evidence generally supports the wisdom of not digging. Why?