ã¯ã¦ãªãƒ–ãƒã‚° | 無料ブãƒã‚°ã‚’作æˆã—よã†
è²·ã£ã¦ã‚ˆã‹ã£ãŸã‚‚ã®2024ã¨ã‚†ã‚‹ã‚ã®æŠ±è² 2025 2025å¹´ã‚‚ãã‚ãã‚1/4（ã¯ã‚„ã™ãŽã‚‹ï¼‰ãŒéŽãŽã¤ã¤ã‚ã‚Šã¾ã™ãŒã€ã›ã£ã‹ããªã®ã§ã‚„ã£ã¦ã„ãã¾ã™ã€‚ 毎年身内å‘ã‘ã®SNSアカウントã§ç´°ã€…ã‚„ã£ã¦ã„ã‚‹ä¼ç”»ã‚’ã¡ã‚ƒã‚“ã¨ã¾ã¨ã‚ãŸã‚‚ã®ã«ãªã‚Šã¾ã™ãŒã€ä¸€å¿œä»¥ä¸‹ã®ãƒ«ãƒ¼ãƒ«ã‚’è¨ã‘ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ 自分ルール ・物å“ã€ä½“験（ãŸã ã—食事以外）食ã«èª²â€¦
High performance single-threaded access to SimpleDB
Last month, Amazon published a code sample which demonstrated the use of SimpleDB as a repository for S3 object metadata. This code sample would probably have gone almost completely unnoticed if it were not for one detail: Using a pool of 34 threads in Java, the code sample sustained 300 SimpleDB operations per second when running on a small EC2 instance. Only 300? We can do better than that... Fi
1
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
処ç†ã‚’実行ä¸ã§ã™
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
SimpleDB versus RDBMS
Ryan Park
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}